There are a lot of different ways of thinking about and looking at personality types. The goal of defining personality types is to be able to efficiently describe patterns that every person falls into that make that person similar to some people but different from most people. Personality classifications are based on measuring different variables that the authors believe are important ways in which different people are different from each other.
Katharine Cook Briggs and her daughter, Isabel Briggs Myers, first published their "Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)" in 1962. They based it on four different variables that they felt help distinguish different kinds of people, and that can vary independently from each other. These were based on ideas originally presented by the psychiatrist Carl Jung. Each variable is described as a choice between two opposite traits (also known as a dichotomy):
Attitude: Extrovert or Introvert? [Is the person more outgoing or more reserved?]
Function: Sensing or Intuitive? [Does the person make judgments more based on experience of the world or more based on intuition?]
Function: Thinking or Feeling? [Does the person use rational thinking or emotional feelings most to make decisions?]
Lifestyle: Judgment or Perception? [Does the person tend to make decisions about whether things are good or bad, or does the person have more of a "live-and-let-live" attitude?]
Each one of these variables on the MBTI yields an answer on one side or the other. Because there are four variables each with two possible values, the total number of possible personality types on the MBTI is 2x2x2x2, or 16.
The MBTI, which is self-administered, asks several questions of individual, each of which is designed to shed light on one of these four dichotomies. At the end, the responses determine whether you fall on one side or the other of each of the four dichotomies. The result is that every person who takes the MBTI is given one of the 16 personality types, usually represented by letters from the variables, e.g. ENTP, ISFJ, ESTJ, ISTJ.
The theory is that these four domains combine to create different types of people, and that each of the 16 categories is different from the others. Someone who is "ENTP" would be described as a person who is outgoing, relies on intuition and uses rational thought, but is not quick to judgment. The theory goes on to make conjectures about what this kind of person is likely to be good at, what that person's vulnerabilities are more likely to be, and what other personality types the person is more or less likely to get along with.
Because of these interpretations, many like to use this quick assessment to make people to think about themselves and how they relate to the world, frequently when a group of people is about to work closely together or spend time together, like in a company or on a committee. Some psychotherapists also use the MBTI to help clients understand themselves better and think more objectively about why and how things are difficult or what might be a pitfall in the future.
There are many common criticisms of this assessment. Common ones include:
1. It forces people's description into categories, and doesn't allow for people to be, for example, halfway between any of the dichotomies. Therefore, people who score weakly toward one side or the other of one of the personality variables are given the same personality interpretation as people who strongly manifest that trait.
2. There is not much scientific evidence that these four traits vary independently of each other; it may be that being strongly on one side of any one of these affects how you score on the others.
3. The assessment asks people about how they think about themselves, which may or may not accurately reflect how they actually are.