The evidence used in evidential apologetics is supposed to be evidence both the believer and nonbeliever share, and does not presuppose God's existence. It seems that the nonbeliever is still expected to believe in the truth of the Bible and that because the Bible is 'true', the 'evidence' in the Bible is valid. As opposed to classical apologetics, there is less reliance on extra-biblical reasoning.

There are different schools of thought regarding apologetics. The major types of Christian apologetics include:

historical and legal evidential, presuppositional, philosophical, prophetic, doctrinal, biblical, moral, and, scientific apologetics.

The general information and arguments contained in the aforementioned are by no means exhaustive.

I am only a layperson who continuously studies the Bible. In politics, I do not engage in philosophical opinions. Likewise, with Christianity. However, I believe it is very important to be ready and equipped to proclaim the gospel and defend our faith As such, I refer you to the following link to assist you in formulating your own conclusion:

Liquidus

Evidential data refers to information or facts that provide evidence to support a particular claim, conclusion, or argument. It is data that can be used to verify, validate, or justify an assertion or hypothesis. Evidential data is crucial in decision-making processes, scientific research, and legal proceedings.

Ezekiel Bornig Kephart has written:

'Apologetics' -- subject(s): Apologetics