Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Ex parte Garland

 
US History Encyclopedia: Ex Parte Garland

Ex Parte Garland, 4 Wallace 333 (1867). In December 1860, Augustus Hill Garland, who later served as an Arkansas senator in the Confederate congress, was admitted to the federal bar. Following the Civil War, Congress enacted a new Ironclad Oath requiring attorneys to swear that they had neither voluntarily borne arms against the United States nor held office under a hostile government. President Andrew Johnson pardoned Garland, who then petitioned the Supreme Court to readmit him to the federal bar without taking the new oath. In Ex Parte Garland, a 5 to 4 Court majority held that the oath constituted both a bill of Attainder and an ex post facto law, violating the U.S. Constitution in either instance.

Bibliography

Fairman, Charles. Reconstruction and Reunion, 1864–88. Vol. 1. New York: Macmillan, 1987.

—R. Volney Riser

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia: Ex parte Garland
Top
Ex parte Garland

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued December 15, 22, 1865
Reargued March 13–15, 1866
Decided January 14, 1867
Full case name Ex parte Garland
Citations 71 U.S. 333 (more)
Holding
Congress cannot punish a person for a crime for which the person has been pardoned.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Field, joined by Wayne, Nelson, Grier, Clifford
Dissent Miller, joined by Chase, Swayne, Davis

Ex parte Garland, 71 U.S. 333 (1866), was an important United States Supreme Court case involving the disbarment of former Confederate officials.

Case

In January of 1865 the Congress of the United States passed a law that effectively debarred former members of the Confederate government by requiring a loyalty oath be recited by any Federal court officer affirming that the officer had never served in the Confederate government.

Augustus Hill Garland, an attorney and former Confederate Senator from Arkansas, had previously received a pardon from President Andrew Johnson. Garland came before the court and pleaded that the act of Congress was a bill of attainder and an ex post facto law which unfairly punished him for the crime he had been pardoned for and was therefore unconstitutional.

Decision

In a 5-4 vote the Supreme Court ruled that the law was indeed a bill of attainder and an ex post facto law. The court ruled that Garland was beyond the reach of punishment of any kind due to his prior presidential pardon. The court also stated that counselors are officers of the court and not officers of the United States, and that their removal was an exercise of judicial power and not legislative power. The law was struck down, opening the way for former Confederate government officials to return to positions within the federal judiciary.

External links


 
 

 

Copyrights:

US History Encyclopedia. © 2006 through a partnership of Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Ex parte Garland" Read more