
in faith
[Middle English, from Anglo-Norman fed, from Latin fidēs.]
noun
Definition: belief in a higher being
Antonyms: agnosticism, denial, doubt, rejection, skepticism, unbelief
n
Definition: trust in something
Antonyms: disbelief, distrust, doubt, misgiving, skepticism, suspicion
Faith in God as "trust" is important in biblical religion since so much of man's encounter with God has to do with promises which are to be fulfilled in the distant future. Thus landless and unprolific Patriarchs are asked to envision their eventual development into a numerous people, with a land of their own. With each of the biblical generations, the word of God is mainly directed toward the future. Therefore, in the formative period, the vital "faith" element is not so much concerned with whether God appeared at some point in the past or even with whether He exists somewhere at the present time, but rather, "can we rely upon His promises for the future?" and this requires "trust," an abiding confidence in the essential goodness, steadfastness, and consistency of the Promisor.
Nowhere does the Bible speak unequivocally of the importance of "faith" in the cognitive sense of "belief that" something is the case, namely, that God exists. This is not because these cognitive beliefs played no role in Judaism. On the contrary, "belief in ..." presupposes "belief that ..." God cannot be trusted in if His existence is denied. "Belief that ..." is not stressed in the Bible in connection with God because it was taken for granted. The sense of the presence of God as a living, palpable reality was strongly self-evident.
The prophets inveighed against those who, while acknowledging the existence of God, denied that He is aware of human affairs (Ps. 94:7) or that He governs justly (Ezek. 18:23; Mal. 2:17, 3:14). Most important for them is the question of the kind of God believed in and its implications. Belief that the Lord your God "took you out of the land of Egypt" (Ex. 20:2) means that He intervenes in human affairs. "The Lord our God is One" (Deut. 6:4) implies that Idolatry and polytheism are lies without power. Here, in the view of the rabbis, "He who denies idolatry is as if he acknowledged the entire Torah" (Sif., Deut. 28). Rather than emphasize the importance of "belief" as such or the saving power of dogma, the rabbis stressed the disastrous consequences of denying the basic beliefs. They spoke of the kofer ba-ikkar ("he who denies the roots," i.e., belief in the one God) and ruled in the Mishnah (San. 11:1): "These are the ones who are excluded from the World to Come: He who denies the Resurrection, that there is no Torah from Heaven [denies Divine revelation], and the Epikoros ..." who denies Providence and reward and punishment (see Heresy). Furthermore, the rabbis frequently traced specific transgressions to a lack of faith on the part of the sinner (e.g., San. 38b).
The entire structure of beliefs and practices called Judaism rests upon certain cognitive presuppositions, in the absence of which the entire structure collapses. However, absent from Judaism is the concept of catechism, that there is some special spiritual efficacy in the act of affirming belief itself.
In the Middle Ages, Jews encountered atheism, and in expounding theism used the term emunah to affirm the belief in the existence of God. Now a differentiation was made between emunah and bittaḥon, as proof of the existence of God took precedence over the concept of trust. Jewish philosophers now debated the question as to what are the basic principles of Judaism. Moses Maimonides (1135-1204) was the first to formulate the creed of Judaism in 13 Principles of Faith. These were intended as criteria for membership in the community of Israel, thereby granting a share in the World to Come.
The controversies precipitated by this formulation over the next three centuries affected the philosophical development of Judaism. They resulted in a clarification of the content of these fundamental beliefs themselves and helped to refine the concepts of rational analysis and to remove folk accretions. They also helped to define the position of Judaism vis-à-vis Christianity and Islam.
Few of those who disagreed with Maimonides actually denied that any of the Thirteen Principles were in some sense part of Judaism. The issues were rather: can any group of doctrines in Judaism be said to be more important than any other (Abravanel); can it be said that denial of any one of the Thirteen Principles bars one from a share in the World to Come? (Ibn Daud); are all the Thirteen equally fundamental in the sense that denial of any one renders the entire structure of Judaism untenable? (Albo); and why were certain important principles, such as freedom of will, omitted?
The rabbis had already detected in the Shema (Deut. 6:4) and in the first statement of the Decalogue (Ex. 20:2) a call to accept "the yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven" (Ber. 2:1), which implied a total subjection of the individual to the authority of God. Maimonides saw in this a command to believe in the existence of God. On purely logical grounds, Ḥasdai Crescas argued that one could hardly speak of a "commandment" before one had accepted the notion of a "commander." Others raised the objection that since faith was a condition of the mind which came about in respect to evidence, how could one speak of a "command to believe"? Either there is adequate evidence, in which case a command is not necessary, or there is not adequate evidence, in which case a command to believe is futile. Abravanel suggests that while the intellect cannot be commanded to assent to propositions, one could be ordered to do certain things that might possibly bring about belief, such as investigate certain questions, weigh possibilities, gather evidence, seek out the counsel of believers.
Grounds for Belief
Maimonides went further. In his view, not only is religious faith justified by an appeal to rational deductive proofs for the existence of God but it is possible to elaborate an intellectual concept of faith in which religious certitude and proximity to God become identical with depth in philosophical knowledge.
Others thought differently. While acknowledging that the basis of Jewish religious belief is a form of historical knowledge, Judah Halevi maintained that the religious relationship itself, which is communion with God, is higher than knowledge, not attainable by philosophy, and prompted by love of God.
By the end of the Middle Ages, the issue was joined as to the nature of the ultimate religious experience of Judaism. It could be seen as centering about the meaning of emunah in the verse, "The righteous shall live by his faith" (emunato). The intellectualist school of Saadiah, Baḥya, and Maimonides interpreted "faith" in the cognitive mode of "faith that ...," a form of intellectual knowledge. The voluntarist school of Judah Halevi and Crescas interpreted emunah as "faith in ...," a "trust" which is a total emotional commitment characterized by love and joy.
The conviction of the truth of some doctrine which is the result of a voluntary act of will. According to fideists who happen to be believers in the same doctrine, this act may be meritorious (and refusal to make it may be a fault or even a sin); according to others, it may in fact be just as sinful to ride roughshod over the deliverance of reason (itself a divine gift), when that commands us to suspend judgement.
(Skt,; Pāli, saddhā). An attitude of faith, trust, or confidence, especially in the Buddha and his teachings. Faith is a prerequisite for embarking on the Eightfold Path, but it must be tempered by critical reflection and tested against one's own experience. In general, there is no doctrine of ‘salvation by faith’ in Buddhism, and blind faith is not regarded as a virtue: instead each person must cultivate insight and understanding (prajñā) into the Four Noble Truths. Some forms of Pure Land Buddhism, however, do teach that rebirth in a Pure Land (or heaven) can be obtained through faith alone.
Old and Middle Irish word for seer or prophet, describing both male and female examples; the powerful Scáthach who taught Cúchulainn is conventionally described as a ban-fháith [woman fáith]. Probably the Irish cognate of what classical commentators represented in the word vates. See also W GWELEDYDD; GWAWD; Modern Irish fáidh.
n.
Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.
A man of courage is also full of faith.
— Cicero, (106-43 BC), Roman orator, statesman, philosopher and writer.
LearnThatWord.com is a free vocabulary and spelling program where you only pay for results!
Quotes:
"Faith builds the bridge from this old world to the new."
- Young
"There are many things that are essential to arriving at true peace of mind, and one of the most important is faith, which cannot be acquired without prayer."
- John Wooden
"The amplest knowledge has the largest faith. Ignorance is always incredulous."
- Robert Eldridge Willmott
"I can believe anything provided it is incredible."
- Oscar Wilde
"When faith is lost, when honor dies, the man is dead."
- John Greenleaf Whittier
"Talk unbelief, and you will have unbelief; but talk faith, and you will have faith. According to the seed sown will be the harvest."
- Ellen Gould White
See more famous quotes about Faith

Faith is confidence or trust in a person or entity.[1][2] Depending on the religion, faith is belief in a single god or multiple gods or in the doctrines or teachings of the religion. Informal usage of faith can be quite broad, including trust or belief without proof,[2] and "faith" is often used as a substitute for "hope", "trust" or "belief".
Some critics of faith have argued that faith is opposed to reason. In contrast, some advocates of faith argue that the proper domain of faith concerns questions which cannot be settled by evidence. This is exemplified by attitudes about the future, which (by definition) has not yet occurred. Logical reasoning may proceed from any set of assumptions, positive or negative. In this view, faith is simply the selection of any assumption that may not be determinable by evidence.
|
Contents
|
The English word is thought to date from 1200–50, from the Middle English feith, via Anglo-French fed, Old French feid, feit from Latin fidem, accusative of fidēs (trust), akin to fīdere (to trust).[3]
There is a wide spectrum of opinion with respect to the epistemological validity of faith. On one extreme is logical positivism, which denies the validity of any beliefs held by faith; on the other extreme is fideism, which holds that true belief can only arise from faith, because reason and physical evidence cannot lead to truth. Some foundationalists, such as St. Augustine of Hippo and Alvin Plantinga, hold that all of our beliefs rest ultimately on beliefs accepted by faith. Others, such as C.S. Lewis, hold that faith is merely the virtue by which we hold to our reasoned ideas, despite moods to the contrary.[4]
William James believed that the varieties of religious experiences should be sought by psychologists, because they represent the closest thing to a microscope of the mind—that is, they show us in drastically enlarged form the normal processes of things. For a useful interpretation of human reality, to share faith experience he said that we must each make certain "over-beliefs" in things which, while they cannot be proven on the basis of experience, help us to live fuller and better lives.
Fideism is not a synonym for religious belief, but describes a particular philosophical proposition in regard to the relationship between faith's appropriate jurisdiction at arriving at truths, contrasted against reason. It states that faith is needed to determine some philosophical and religious truths, and it questions the ability of reason to arrive at all truth. The word and concept had its origin in the mid- to late-19th century by way of Catholic thought, in a movement called Traditionalism. The Roman Catholic Magisterium has, however, repeatedly condemned fideism.[5]
| Part of a series on |
| God |
|---|
| General conceptions |
| Agnosticism · Apatheism · Atheism Deism · Henotheism · Monolatrism Monotheism · Panentheism Pantheism · Polytheism · Theism · Transtheism |
| Specific conceptions |
|
Creator · Demiurge · Devil · Father Abrahamic (Bahá'í · Christianity Islam · Judaism) · Ayyavazhi Buddhism · Hinduism · Jainism Sikhism · Zoroastrianism |
| Attributes |
| Eternalness · Existence · Gender Names ("God") · Omnibenevolence Omnipotence · Omnipresence Omniscience |
| Experiences and practices |
| Belief · Esotericism · Faith Fideism · Gnosis · Hermeticism Metaphysics · Mysticism Prayer · Revelation · Worship |
| Related topics |
| Euthyphro dilemma · God complex Neurotheology · Ontology Philosophy · Problem of evil Religion · Religious texts Portrayals of God in popular media |
In the Bahá'í Faith, faith is ultimately the acceptance of the divine authority of the Manifestations of God. In the religion's view, faith and knowledge are both required for spiritual growth. Faith involves more than outward obedience to this authority, but also must be based on a deep personal understanding of religious teachings.[6]
By faith is meant, first, conscious knowledge, and second, the practice of good deeds.[7]
Faith (Pali: Saddhā, Sanskrit: Śraddhā) is an important constituent element of the teachings of Gautama Buddha— in both the Theravada and the Mahayana traditions. The teachings of Buddha were originally recorded in the language Pali and the word saddhā is generally translated as "faith". In the teachings, saddhā is often described as:
While faith in Buddhism does not imply "blind faith", Buddhist faith nevertheless requires a degree of faith and belief, primarily in the spiritual attainment of Gautama Buddha. Faith in Buddhism centers on the understanding that the Buddha is an Awakened being, on his superior role as teacher, in the truth of his Dharma (spiritual teachings), and in his Sangha (community of spiritually developed followers). Faith in Buddhism can be summarised as faith in the Three Jewels: the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha. It is intended to lead to the goal of enlightenment, or bodhi, and Nirvana. Volitionally, faith implies a resolute and courageous act of will. It combines the steadfast resolution that one will do a thing with the self-confidence that one can do it.[8]
As a counter to any form of "blind faith", the Buddha's teachings included those included in the Kalama Sutra, exhorting his disciples to investigate any teaching and to live by what is learnt and accepted, rather than believing in something simply because it is taught.
Faith in Christianity is based in and on the work and teachings of Jesus Christ.[9] In this way Christianity declares not to be distinguished by its faith, but by the object of its faith. Faith is an act of trust or reliance. Rather than being passive, faith leads to an active life aligned with the ideals and the example of the one being trusted. It sees the mystery of God and his grace and seeks to know and become obedient to God. To a Christian; faith is not static but causes one to learn more of God and grow; it has its origin in God.[10]
In Christianity faith causes change as it seeks a greater understanding of God. Faith is not fideism or simple obedience to a set of rules or statements.[11] Before the Christian has faith, they must understand in whom and in what they have faith. Without understanding, there cannot be true faith and that understanding is built on the foundation of the community of believers, the scriptures and traditions and on the personal experiences of the believer.[12] In English translations of the New Testament, the word faith generally corresponds to the Greek noun πίστις (pistis) or the Greek verb πιστεύω (pisteuo), meaning "to trust, to have confidence, faithfulness, to be reliable, to assure".[13]
The Bible (Hebrews 11) says that faith is "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."
Ethical Culture is a humanist religion that centers on living an ethical life. With its emphasis on human worth and dignity, it asks that all actions elicit the best in others in order to bring out the best in the self. The faith is in the interrelatedness of all people and in an improvable future in this world.
Śrāddha (ITRANS: shraddhA) is translated as faith in Sanskrit. All schools of Hindu philosophy posit that consciousness (ātman) is distinct and independent from mind and matter (prakṛti). Therefore, Hindu faith is based on the premise that logic and reason are not conclusive methods of epistemic knowing. Spiritual practice (sadhana) is performed with the faith that knowledge beyond the mind and sense perception will be revealed to the practitioner.
The schools of Hindu philosophy differ in their recommended methods to cultivate faith, including selfless action (karma-yoga), renunciation (jnana-yoga) and devotion (bhakti-yoga).
In chapter 17 of the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna describes how faith, influenced by the three modes (guṇas) lead to different approaches in worship, diet, sacrifice, austerity and charity.
Swami Tripurari states:
Faith for good reason arises out of the mystery that underlies the very structure and nature of reality, a mystery that in its entirety will never be entirely demystified despite what those who have placed reason on their altar might like us to believe. The mystery of life that gives rise to faith as a supra-rational means of unlocking life's mystery—one that reason does not hold the key to—suggests that faith is fundamentally rational in that it is a logical response to the mysterious.[14]
In Islam, faith (iman) is complete submission to the will of God, which includes belief, profession and the body's performance of deeds, consistent with the commission as vicegerent on Earth, all according to God's will.
Iman has two aspects:
In the Qur'an, it is stated that (2:62): "Surely, those who believe, those who are Muslims, Jewish, the Christians, and the Sabians; anyone who (1) believes in GOD, and (2) believes in the Last Day, and (3) leads a righteous life, will receive their recompense from their Lord. They have nothing to fear, nor will they grieve."[17]
Faith itself is not a religious concept in Judaism. Although Judaism does recognize the positive value of Emunah[18] (generally translated as faith, trust in God) and the negative status of the Apikorus (heretic), faith is not as stressed or as central as it is in other religions, especially as it is in the faith-possessed Christendom. It could be a necessary means for being a practicing religious Jew, but the emphasis is placed on practice rather than on faith itself. Very rarely does it relate to any teaching that must be believed.[19] Classical Judaism does not require one to explicitly identify God (a key tenet of faith in Christianity), but rather to honour the idea of God.
In the Jewish scriptures trust in God - Emunah - refers to how God acts toward his people and how they are to respond to him; it is rooted in the everlasting covenant established in the Torah, notably[19] Deuteronomy 7:9 (The Torah - A Modern Commentary; Union of American Hebrew Congregations, NY 1981 by W. G. Plaut)
"Know, therefore, that only the LORD your God is God, the steadfast God who keeps His gracious covenant to the thousandth generation of those who love Him and keep His commandments"
The specific tenets that compose required belief and their application to the times have been disputed throughout Jewish history. Today many, but not all, Orthodox Jews have accepted Maimonides' Thirteen Principles of Belief.[20] For a wide history of this dispute see: Shapiro, Marc: The Limits of Orthodox Theology: Maimonides' Thirteen Principles Reappraised (Littman Library of Jewish Civilization (Series).)
A traditional example of Emunah as seen in the Jewish annals is found in the person of Abraham. On a number of occasions, Abraham both accepts statements from God that seem impossible and offers obedient actions in response to direction from God to do things that seem implausible (see Genesis 12-15).
"The Talmud describes how a thief also believes in G‑d: On the brink of his forced entry, as he is about to risk his life—and the life of his victim—he cries out with all sincerity, 'G‑d help me!' The thief has faith that there is a G‑d who hears his cries, yet it escapes him that this G‑d may be able to provide for him without requiring that he abrogate G‑d’s will by stealing from others. For emunah to affect him in this way he needs study and contemplation."[18]
Sikhism, the fifth-largest organized religion in the world,[21] was founded in 15th-century Punjab on the teachings of Guru Nanak Dev and ten successive Sikh gurus, the last one being the sacred text Guru Granth Sahib. The core philosophy of the Sikh religion is described in the beginning hymn of the Guru Granth Sahib,
There is one supreme eternal reality; the truth; imminent in all things; creator of all things; immanent in creation. Without fear and without hatred; not subject to time; beyond birth and death; self-revealing. Known by the Guru's grace.[22]
Guru Nanak, the founder of the faith, summed up the basis of Sikh lifestyle in three requirements: Nām Japō (meditate on the holy name (Waheguru), Kirat karō (work diligently and honestly) and Vaṇḍ chakkō (share one's fruits).[23]
Meher Baba described three types of faith, emphasizing the importance of faith in a spiritual master:
"One of the most important qualifications for the aspirant is faith. There are three kinds of faith: (i) faith in oneself, (ii) faith in the Master and (iii) faith in life. Faith is so indispensable to life that unless it is present in some degree, life itself would be impossible. It is because of faith that cooperative and social life becomes possible. It is faith in each other that facilitates a free give and take of love, a free sharing of work and its results. When life is burdened with unjustified fear of one another it becomes cramped and restricted....Faith in the Master becomes all-important because it nourishes and sustains faith in oneself and faith in life in the very teeth of set-backs and failures, handicaps and difficulties, limitations and failings. Life, as man knows it in himself, or in most of his fellow-men, may be narrow, twisted and perverse, but life as he sees it in the Master is unlimited, pure and untainted. In the Master, man sees his own ideal realised; the Master is what his own deeper self would rather be. He sees in the Master the reflection of the best in himself which is yet to be, but which he will surely one day attain. Faith in the Master therefore becomes the chief motive-power for realising the divinity which is latent in man."[24]
Nisargadatta Maharaj makes a number of comments on faith in the book I Am That, for instance:- " There are teachers who deny faith and trust reason only. Actually it is not faith they deny, but blind beliefs. Faith is not blind. It is the willingness to try"
Religious epistemologists have formulated and defended reasons for the rationality of accepting belief in God without the support of an argument.[25] Some religious epistemologists hold that belief in God is more analogous to belief in a person than belief in a scientific hypothesis. Human relations demand trust and commitment. If belief in God is more like belief in other persons, then the trust that is appropriate to persons will be appropriate to God. American psychologist and philosopher William James offers a similar argument in his lecture The Will to Believe.[25][26] Foundationalism is a view about the structure of justification or knowledge.[27][27] Foundationalism holds that all knowledge and justified belief are ultimately based upon what are called properly basic beliefs. This position is intended to resolve the infinite regress problem in epistemology. According to foundationalism, a belief is epistemically justified only if it is justified by properly basic beliefs. One of the significant developments in foundationalism is the rise of reformed epistemology.[27]
Reformed epistemology is a view about the epistemology of religious belief, which holds that belief in God can be properly basic. Analytic philosophers Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff develop this view.[28] Plantinga holds that an individual may rationally believe in God even though the individual does not possess sufficient evidence to convince an agnostic. One difference between reformed epistemology and fideism is that the former requires defence against known objections, whereas the latter might dismiss such objections as irrelevant.[29] Plantinga has developed reformed epistemology in Warranted Christian Belief as a form of externalism that holds that the justification conferring factors for a belief may include external factors.[30] Some theistic philosophers have defended theism by granting evidentialism but supporting theism through deductive arguments whose premises are considered justifiable. Some of these arguments are probabilistic, either in the sense of having weight but being inconclusive, or in the sense of having a mathematical probability assigned to them.[25] Notable in this regard are the cumulative arguments presented by British philosopher Basil Mitchell and analytic philosopher Richard Swinburne, whose arguments are based on Bayesian probability.[31][32] In a notable exposition of his arguments, Swinburne appeals to an inference for the best explanation.[33][34]
Some critics argue that religious faith is irrational and see faith as ignorance of reality: a strong belief in something with no evidence and sometimes a strong belief in something even with evidence against it. Bertrand Russell noted, "Where there is evidence, no one speaks of 'faith'. We do not speak of faith that two and two are four or that the earth is round. We only speak of faith when we wish to substitute emotion for evidence."[35] In the rationalist view, belief should be restricted to direct observation in the past and present.
Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins criticizes all faith by generalizing from specific faith in propositions that conflict directly with scientific evidence. He describes faith as mere belief without evidence; a process of active non-thinking. He states that it is a practice that only degrades our understanding of the natural world by allowing anyone to make a claim about nature that is based solely on their personal thoughts, and possibly distorted perceptions, that does not require testing against nature, has no ability to make reliable and consistent predictions, and is not subject to peer review.[36]
| Look up faith in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
| Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Faith |
| Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Faith |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
Dansk (Danish)
n. - tro, tillid, tiltro, troskab
idioms:
Nederlands (Dutch)
geloof, vertrouwen, trouw
Français (French)
n. - foi, confiance, religion
idioms:
Deutsch (German)
n. - Glaube, Vertrauen, Treue
idioms:
Ελληνική (Greek)
n. - πίστη, λόγος (τιμής), εμπιστοσύνη, θρησκευτική πίστη, θρήσκευμα
int. - μα την πίστη μου!
idioms:
Italiano (Italian)
fede, fiducia
idioms:
Português (Portuguese)
n. - fé (f)
idioms:
Русский (Russian)
вера, доверие, религия, кредо, лояльность
idioms:
Español (Spanish)
n. - confianza, fe, creencia, sistema de creencias religiosas
idioms:
Svenska (Swedish)
n. - tro, förtröstan, religion, löfte, trohet
int. - sannerligen!, minsann!
中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
信心, 忠实, 信任
idioms:
中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
n. - 信心, 忠實, 信任
idioms:
한국어 (Korean)
n. - 신용, 신뢰, 신념신조, 확신, 신앙, 의무
idioms:
日本語 (Japanese)
n. - 信頼, 信念, 信仰, 教義, 信義, 約束, 誓約
idioms:
العربيه (Arabic)
(الاسم) إخلاص , ولاء (نداء) حقا , فعلا
עברית (Hebrew)
n. - אמונה, אמון, דת, הבנה רוחנית של אמת אלוהית ללא קשר להוכחה
If you are unable to view some languages clearly, click here.