fatalism

This article is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. WikiProject Philosophy or the Philosophy Portal may be able to help recruit one. (November 2008)

Look up fatalism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

Fatalism is a philosophical doctrine emphasizing the subjugation of all events or actions to fate or inevitable predetermination.

Fatalism generally refers to several of the following ideas:

1. A flawed perception of the consequences of exercised free will, ignorance, and forgetfulness.
2. That free will does not exist, meaning therefore that history has progressed in the only manner possible. ^[1] This belief is very similar to determinism.
3. That actions are free, but nevertheless work toward an inevitable end. ^[2] This belief is very similar to compatibilist predestination.
4. That acceptance is appropriate, rather than resistance against inevitability. This belief is very similar to defeatism.

Determinism, fatalism and predestination

While the terms are often used interchangeably, fatalism, determinism, and predestination are discrete in emphasizing different aspects of the futility of human will or the foreordination of destiny. However, all these doctrines share common ground.

Determinists generally agree that human actions affect the future but, because the future is predetermined, human action is just part of the overall cause. Their view does not accentuate a "submission" to fate, whereas fatalists stress an acceptance of all events as inevitable. In other words, determinists believe the future is fixed because of absolute causality, whereas fatalists and many predestinarians think the future is ineluctable despite causality.

Therefore, in determinism, if the past were different, the present and future would also differ. For fatalists, such a question is negligible, since no past could have happened other than the one that has happened.

Fatalism is a broader term than determinism. The presence of history indeterminisms/chances, i.e. events that could not be predicted by sole knowledge of other events, does not exclude fatalism. Necessity (such as a law of nature) will happen just as inevitably as a chance—both can be imagined as sovereign.

The idle argument

One ancient argument for fatalism, called the idle argument,^[3] went like this:

• If it is fated for you to recover from your illness, then you will recover whether you call a doctor or not.
• Likewise, if you are fated not to recover, you will not do so even if you call a doctor.
• It is either fated that you will recover from your illness, or that you will not recover from your illness.

While the idle argument applies fatalism on the effect side (i.e., the recovery from illness), it does not apply fatalism to the cause side. Literalist fatalists apply it to both sides of the cause and effect. While the fact that you will recover or not is left to fate, fatalists believe it is also pre-determined whether or not you will call the doctor.

The logical argument

The logical argument for fatalism is one that depends not on causation or physical circumstances but rather argues based on logical necessity. There are numerous versions of this argument, but the most famous are by Aristotle^[4] and Richard Taylor^[5]. These have been objected to and elaborated on^[6] but very few people accept them.

The key idea of logical fatalism is that there is a body of true propositions (statements) about what is going to happen, and these are true regardless of when they are made. So, for example, if it is true today that tomorrow there will be a sea battle, then there cannot fail to be a sea battle tomorrow, since otherwise it would be not be true today that such a battle will take place.

The argument relies heavily on the principle of bivalence, the idea that any proposition is either true or false. As a result of this principle, if it is not false that there will be a sea battle, then it is true; there is no in-between. However, rejecting the principle of bivalence—perhaps by saying that the truth of a proposition about the future is indeterminate—is a controversial view, since the principle is an accepted part of classical logic.

Another problem with logical fatalism is that first you must accept that there is a timeless set of all propositions which exist without being proposed by anyone in particular. Constructivists (a school of thought in logic and maths) would argue that this is not the case, and that propositions only exist when they are constructed, or expressed.

Fatalism in popular culture

• Kurt Vonnegut Jr. satirized fatalism in several novels including Slaughterhouse-Five.
• The character of John Locke on ABC's television show "Lost" is portrayed as a fatalist, with much of his decision-making being done based on what he feels is his "destiny".
• The story of Markandeya.
• Dead End, a Decepticon Stunticon in the Transformers franchise, is a fatalist, portrayed as being unwilling to fight, under the belief that everyone will eventually be dead, preferring to polish himself and look good when he dies.
• The final chapter of Mikhail Lermontov's novel A Hero of Our Time is titled "The Fatalist" and involves concepts of predestination and free will.
• The characters Neji Hyuga and Shion from the Naruto series are fatalists. They are both shown to change their philosophy however.
• The character Basil Hawkins of the One Piece series is a fatalist.
• The character Morpheus of The Matrix series is a fatalist.
• The film Donnie Darko is about fatalism, with its main character being a fatalist.
• The character Paul Atreides from Frank Herbert's Dune undergoes a complete state of fatalism when he goes blind
• The character Doc Boone from the 1938 movie Stagecoach is a self proclaimed fatalist
• The characters Mickey and Mallory were fatalists in the Oliver Stone film "Natural Born Killers".
• In the Japanese film "Summer Time Machine Blues," college students play with a time machine. Fatalism is used as the device to explain their antics.
• Suikoden Tierkreis features a cult called "The Order of the One True Way" that incorporates fatalist beliefs.
• Anton Chigurh from the book and film "No Country for Old Men" is a fatalist (with, arguably, elements of moral nihilism). The coin toss creates an illusion of hope to his victims. Chigurh, on the other hand, believes the result of the coin toss is just an element of fate, just as he believes fate is what led he and the coin and the victim to intersect at that moment.
• The Gravemind from the Halo series is a fatalist.

Notes

1. ^ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
2. ^ Catholic Encyclopedia
3. ^ The Idle Argument at the S.E.P
4. ^ Aristotle, De Interpretatione, 9
5. ^ http://www.jstor.org/stable/2183681
6. ^ Fatalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

See also

Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Fate

• Problem of future contingents
• Theological fatalism
• Determinism
• Theological determinism
• Accidental Necessity
• Predestination
• Calvinism
• Amor fati
• Defeatism

• Predestination in Islam
• Shikata ga nai (Japanese expression)
• Jansenism

External links

• Fatalism, from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
• Fatalism vs. Free Will from Project Worldview

v • d • e Philosophy of time Concepts in time Time · Duration · A priori and a posteriori Eternity · Event  · Action · Deterministic system · Free will · Eternal return · A-series and B-series · Temporal parts · Growing block universe Time Portal Theories of time Determinism · Temporal finitism · Fatalism · Indeterminism · Compatibilism and incompatibilism · Presentism · Eternalism · Four dimensionalism · Endurantism · Perdurantism  · B-Theory of time Related articles Metaphysics · Etiology · Teleology · Post hoc ergo propter hoc · The Unreality of Time