| Dictionary: fudge factor |
| 5min Related Video: fudge factor |
| Hacker Slang: fudge factor |
[common] A value or parameter that is varied in an ad hoc way to produce the desired result. The terms tolerance and slop are also used, though these usually indicate a one-sided leeway, such as a buffer that is made larger than necessary because one isn't sure exactly how large it needs to be, and it is better to waste a little space than to lose completely for not having enough. A fudge factor, on the other hand, can often be tweaked in more than one direction. A good example is the fuzz typically allowed in floating-point calculations: two numbers being compared for equality must be allowed to differ by a small amount; if that amount is too small, a computation may never terminate, while if it is too large, results will be needlessly inaccurate. Fudge factors are frequently adjusted incorrectly by programmers who don't fully understand their import. See also coefficient of X.
| WordNet: fudge factor |
The noun has one meaning:
Meaning #1:
a quantity that is added or subtracted in order to increase the accuracy of a scientific measure
Synonym: correction
| Wikipedia: Fudge factor |
| Look up fudge factor in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
Fudge factors are invented variables whose purpose is to force a calculated result to give a better match to what happens in the real world.
Fudge factors are usually calculated retrospectively, and when a calculation has only managed to produce a good match to real data by the addition of a variable that seems artificially tailored to allow that result (to allow the calculations to be "fudged" to give the right answer), critics may sometimes refer to the variable in an uncomplimentary way as a "fudge factor".
The term fudge, meaning falsify, derives from this concept[1].
Contents |
Some variables in scientific theory are set arbitrarily according to measured results rather than by calculation (for example, Planck's constant). However, in the case of these fundamental constants, their arbitrariness is usually explicit. To suggest that other calculations may include a "fudge factor" may suggest that the calculation has been somehow tampered with to make results give a misleadingly good match to experimental data.
In theoretical physics, when Einstein originally tried to produce a general theory of relativity, he found that the theory seemed to predict the gravitational collapse of the universe: it seemed that the universe should either be expanding or collapsing, and to produce a model in which the universe was static and stable (which seemed to Einstein at the time to be the "proper" result), he introduced an expansionist variable (called the Cosmological Constant) whose sole purpose was to cancel out the cumulative effects of gravitation. He later called this, "the biggest blunder of my life." [1]
Currently there is some controversy over the disagreement between general relativity's predictions and the available astronomical data: In some situations, gravitational effects seem to be acting more powerfully than GR predicts. The current mainstream explanation is that the universe contains a certain amount of unseen dark matter of unknown composition. Due to the vagueness of this explanation, it is not yet clear whether the "dark matter" explanation represents a real discovery, or whether it is an arbitrary "fudge factor" invented to explain away the discrepancy between theory and experiment.
A common feature of "fudge factors" in science is their arbitrariness, and their retrospective nature.
However, in project management it's common to build a certain error margin into the predicted "resource cost" of a project to make predictions more realistic: there are many unforeseen factors that may delay a project or make it more costly, but very few factors that could result in it being delivered before time or under the calculated budget ... so to some degree, "unexpected" overruns are to be expected, even if their precise nature can't be predicted in advance. Experienced planners may know that a certain type of project will tend to overrun by a certain percentage of its calculated resource requirements, and may multiply the "ideal" calculations by a safety margin to produce a more realistic estimate, and this margin may sometimes be referred to as a fudge factor. However, when planning ahead for expected unpredictabilities, these "error margins" are usually assigned other, more specific names : for instance in warehouse stock control, where a certain amount of stock is expected to disappear naturally through damage, pilfering or other unexplained problems, the discrepancy is referred to as shrinkage.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| tweak (computer jargon) | |
| slop (computer jargon) | |
| coefficient of X (computer jargon) |
| Is fudge a noun? Read answer... | |
| What rhymes with fudge? Read answer... | |
| How do you store fudge? Read answer... |
| What to do with dry fudge? | |
| What is fudge made in? | |
| What the fudge door? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Hacker Slang. The Jargon File. Copyright © 2007. Read more | |
![]() | WordNet. WordNet 1.7.1 Copyright © 2001 by Princeton University. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Fudge factor". Read more |
Mentioned in