George IV (George Augustus Frederick; 12 August 1762 –
26 June 1830) was king of the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
Hanover from 29 January 1820 until his death. He had earlier served as The Prince Regent when
his father, George III, suffered from a relapse into insanity from an
illness that is now suspected to have been porphyria.[1] The Regency, George's nine-year tenure
as Prince Regent, which commenced in 1811 and ended with George III's death in 1820, was marked by victory in the
Napoleonic Wars in Europe.
George was a stubborn monarch, often interfering in politics, especially in the matter of Catholic emancipation, though not as much as his father. For most of George's regency and reign,
Lord Liverpool controlled the government as Prime Minister.
George is remembered largely for the extravagant lifestyle that he maintained as prince and monarch. By 1797 his weight had
reached 17 stone 7 pounds (111 kg or 245 lbs),[2] and by 1824 his corset was made for a waist of 50 inches (127 cm).[3] He had a poor relationship with both his father and his wife,
Caroline of Brunswick, whom he even forbade to attend his coronation. He was a
patron of new forms of leisure, style and taste. He commissioned architect John
Nash to build the Royal Pavilion in Brighton,
and the re-building of Windsor Castle. He was largely instrumental in the foundation of
the National Gallery, London and King's
College London.
Early life
Upon his birth at St James's Palace, London on 12 August 1762, he
automatically became Duke of Cornwall and Duke of
Rothesay; he was created Prince of Wales and Earl of Chester a few days afterwards.[4] On 18 September of the same year, he was baptised by
Thomas Secker, Archbishop of
Canterbury.[5] His godparents were the
Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (his uncle), the
Duke of Cumberland (his great-uncle) and the Dowager Princess of Wales (his grandmother).[6] George was a talented student, quickly learning to speak French, German and Italian in addition to his native English.[7]
The Prince of Wales turned 21 in 1783, and obtained a grant of £60,000 from Parliament and an annual income of £50,000 from
his father. He then established his residence in Carlton House, where he lived a
profligate life.[8] Animosity developed between the prince
and his father, a monarch who desired more frugal behaviour on the part of the heir-apparent. The King, a political conservative, was also alienated by the Prince of Wales's adherence
to Charles James Fox and other radically-inclined politicians.[9]
Soon after he reached the age of 21, the Prince of Wales fell in love with a Roman
Catholic, Maria Anne Fitzherbert, who was a widow twice over; her first
husband, Edward Weld, died in 1775, and her second husband, Thomas Fitzherbert, in 1781.[10] A marriage between the two was prohibited by the Act of
Settlement 1701, which declared those who married Roman Catholics ineligible to succeed to the Throne.[11] In addition, under the Royal
Marriages Act 1772 the Prince of Wales could not marry without the consent of the King, which would have never been
granted.[12] Nevertheless, the couple contracted a
marriage on 15 December 1785 at her house in Park Lane, Mayfair. Legally the union was void as the King's assent
was never requested.[13] However, Mrs Fitzherbert
believed that she was the Prince of Wales's canonical and true wife, holding the law of the
Church to be superior to the law of the State. For political reasons, the union remained secret and Mrs Fitzherbert promised not
to publish any evidence relating to it.[14]
The Prince of Wales was plunged into debt by his exorbitant lifestyle. His father refused to assist him, forcing him to quit
Carlton House and live at Mrs Fitzherbert's residence. In 1787, the Prince of Wales's allies in the House of Commons introduced a proposal to relieve his debts with a parliamentary grant. The
prince's personal relationship with Mrs Fitzherbert was suspected, but revelation of the illegal marriage would have scandalized
the nation and doomed any parliamentary proposal to aid him. Acting on the prince's authority, the Whig leader Charles James Fox declared that the story was a calumny.[15] Mrs Fitzherbert was not pleased with the public denial of the marriage in
such vehement terms and contemplated severing her ties to the prince. He appeased her by asking another Whig, Richard Brinsley Sheridan, to restate Fox's forceful declaration in more careful words.
Parliament, meanwhile, was sufficiently pleased to grant the Prince of Wales £161,000 for the payment of his debts, in addition
to £60,000 for improvements to Carlton House.[7][16]
Regency crisis of 1788
It is hypothesized George III suffered the hereditary disease porphyria.[17] In the summer of 1788, the
King's mental health deteriorated, but he was nonetheless able to discharge some of his duties. Thus, he was able to declare
Parliament prorogued from 25 September to
20 November. During the prorogation, however, George III became deranged, posing a threat to
his own life, and when Parliament reconvened in November the King could not deliver the customary Speech from the Throne during the State Opening of
Parliament. Parliament found itself in an untenable position; according to long-established law, it could not proceed to
any business until the delivery of the King's Speech at a State Opening.[15][18]
Although theoretically barred from doing so, Parliament began debating a Regency. In the House of Commons, Charles James Fox
declared his opinion that the Prince of Wales was automatically entitled to exercise sovereignty during the King's incapacity. A
contrasting opinion was held by the Prime Minister, William Pitt the Younger,
who argued that, in the absence of a statute to the contrary, the right to choose a Regent belonged to Parliament alone.[19] He even stated that, without parliamentary authority "the
Prince of Wales had no more right...to assume the government, than any other individual subject of the country."[20] Though disagreeing on the principle underlying a Regency,
Pitt agreed with Fox that the Prince of Wales would be the most convenient choice for a Regent.[15][18]
The Prince of Wales — though offended by Pitt's boldness — did not lend his full support to Fox's philosophy. The prince's
brother, Prince Frederick, Duke of York, declared that the
prince would not attempt to exercise any power without previously obtaining the consent of Parliament.[21] Following the passage of preliminary resolutions, Pitt outlined a formal plan
for the Regency, suggesting that the powers of the Prince of Wales be greatly limited. Among other things, the Prince of Wales
would not be able either to sell the King's property or to grant a peerage to anyone other than
a child of the King. The Prince of Wales denounced Pitt's scheme, declaring it a "project for producing weakness, disorder, and
insecurity in every branch of the administration of affairs."[22] In the interests of the nation, both factions agreed to compromise.[18]
A significant technical impediment to any Regency Bill involved the lack of a Speech from the Throne, which was necessary
before Parliament could proceed to any debates or votes. The Speech was normally delivered by the King, but could also be
delivered by royal representatives known as Lords Commissioners, but no document
could empower the Lords Commissioners to act unless the Great Seal of the Realm
was affixed to it. The Seal could not be legally affixed without the prior authorisation of the Sovereign. Pitt and his fellow
ministers ignored the last requirement and instructed the Lord Chancellor to affix the
Great Seal without the King's consent, as the act of affixing the Great Seal gave, in itself, legal force to the Bill. This
legal fiction was denounced by Edmund Burke as a
"glaring falsehood",[23] as a "palpable
absurdity",[23] and even as a "forgery,
fraud".[24] The Prince of Wales's brother, the Duke of
York, described the plan as "unconstitutional and illegal."[22] Nevertheless, others in Parliament felt that such a scheme was necessary to preserve an effective
government. Consequently, on 3 February 1789, more than two
months after it had convened, Parliament was formally opened by an "illegal" group of Lords Commissioners. The Regency Bill was
introduced, but, before it could be passed, the King recovered. Retroactively, the King declared that the instrument authorising
the Lords Commissioners to act was valid.[15][18]
Marriage
The Prince of Wales's debts continued to climb; his father refused to aid him unless he married his cousin, Caroline of Brunswick.[25]
In 1795, the Prince of Wales acquiesced, and they were married on April 8, 1795 at the Chapel Royal, St James's
Palace. The marriage, however, was disastrous; each party was unsuited to the other. The two were formally separated after
the birth of their only child, Princess Charlotte, in 1796, and
remained separated for the rest of their lives. The Prince of Wales remained attached to Mrs Fitzherbert for the rest of his
life, despite several periods of estrangement.[26]
Before meeting Mrs Fitzherbert, the Prince of Wales may have fathered several illegitimate children. His mistresses included
Mary Robinson, an actress who was bought off with a generous pension when she
threatened to sell his letters to the newspapers;[27]
Grace Elliott, the divorced wife of a physician;[28] and Frances Villiers,
Countess of Jersey, who dominated his life for some years.[26] In later life, his mistresses were Isabella Seymour-Conway, Marchioness of Hertford, and finally, for the
last ten years of his life, Elizabeth Conyngham, Marchioness
Conyngham.[29]
Meanwhile, the problem of the Prince of Wales's debts, which amounted to the extraordinary sum of £630,000 in 1795,[30] was solved (at least temporarily) by Parliament. Being
unwilling to make an outright grant to relieve these debts, it provided him an additional sum of £65,000 per annum.[31] In 1803, a further £60,000 was added, and the Prince of
Wales's debts of 1795 were finally cleared in 1806, although the debts he had incurred since 1795 remained.[32]
In 1804 a dispute arose over the custody of Princess Charlotte, which led to her being placed in the care of the King, George
III. It also led to a Parliamentary Commission of Enquiry into Princess Caroline's conduct after the Prince of Wales accused her
having an illegitimate son. The investigation cleared Caroline of the charge but still revealed her behaviour to be
extraordinarily indiscreet.[33]
Regency
-
In late 1810, George III was once again overcome by his malady following the death of his youngest daughter, Princess Amelia. Parliament agreed to follow the precedent of 1788; without the
King's consent, the Lord Chancellor affixed the Great Seal of the Realm to letters patent
naming Lords Commissioners. The Lords Commissioners, in the name of the King, signified the granting of the Royal Assent to a bill that became the Regency Act 1811. Parliament
restricted some of the powers of the Prince Regent (as the Prince of Wales became known). The constraints expired one year after
the passage of the Act.[34]
As the Prince of Wales became Prince Regent on 5 January,[35], one of the most important political conflicts facing the country concerned
Catholic emancipation, the movement to relieve Roman Catholics of various political disabilities. The Tories, led by the Prime Minister,
Spencer Perceval, were opposed to Catholic emancipation, while the Whigs supported it.
At the beginning of the Regency, the Prince of Wales was expected to support the Whig leader, William Wyndham Grenville, 1st Baron Grenville. He did not, however, immediately
put Lord Grenville and the Whigs in office. Influenced by his mother, he claimed that a sudden dismissal of the Tory government
would exact too great a toll on the health of the King (a steadfast supporter of the Tories), thereby eliminating any chance of a
recovery.[36] In 1812, when it appeared highly unlikely
that the King would recover, the Prince of Wales again failed to appoint a new Whig administration. Instead, he asked the Whigs
to join the existing ministry under Spencer Perceval. The Whigs, however, refused to co-operate because of disagreements over
Catholic emancipation. Grudgingly, the Prince of Wales allowed Perceval to continue as Prime Minister.[37]
When, on May 10 1812, John
Bellingham assassinated Spencer Perceval, the Prince Regent was prepared to reappoint all the members of the Perceval
ministry under a new leader. The House of Commons formally declared its desire for a "strong and efficient
administration",[38] so the Prince Regent then offered
leadership of the government to Richard Wellesley, 1st Marquess
Wellesley, and afterwards to Francis Rawdon-Hastings,
2nd Earl of Moira. He doomed the attempts of both to failure, however, by forcing each to construct a bipartisan ministry
at a time when neither party wished to share power with the other. Possibly using the failure of the two peers as a pretext, the
Prince Regent immediately reappointed the Perceval administration, with Robert Banks Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool, as Prime Minister.[39]
The Tories, unlike Whigs such as Charles Grey, 2nd Earl Grey, sought to
continue the vigorous prosecution of the war in Continental Europe against the powerful and aggressive Emperor of the French,
Napoleon I.[40] Russia, Prussia,
Austria, the United Kingdom and several smaller countries defeated Napoleon in 1814. In the
subsequent Congress of Vienna, it was decided that the Electorate of Hanover, a state that had shared a monarch with Britain since 1714, would be raised to a
Kingdom. Napoleon made a return in 1815, but was defeated at the Battle of Waterloo
by Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington, the brother of the
Marquess Wellesley. Also in 1815, the British-American War of 1812 was brought to an end,
with neither side victorious.
During this period George took an active interest in matters of style and taste, and his associates such as the dandy
Beau Brummell and the architect John Nash
created the Regency style. In London
Nash designed the Regency terraces of Regent's Park and Regent Street. George took up the new idea of the seaside spa and had the Brighton Pavilion developed as a fantastical seaside palace, adapted by Nash in the "Indian Gothic" style
inspired loosely by the Taj Mahal, with extravagant "Indian" and "Chinese" interiors.[41]
Reign
![Half-Crown of George IV, 1821. The inscription reads GEORGIUS IIII D[ei] G[ratia] BRITANNIAR[um] REX F[idei] D[efensor] (George IV, by the grace of God King of the Britains (British kingdoms), Defender of the Faith). George IV was the last British King to be shown on coins wearing a Roman-style laurel wreath.](http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/6/6d/180px-George4coin.jpg)
Half-Crown of George IV, 1821. The inscription reads
GEORGIUS IIII D[ei] G[ratia] BRITANNIAR[um] REX F[idei] D[efensor]
(George IV, by the grace of God King of the Britains (British kingdoms), Defender of the Faith). George IV was the last British
King to be shown on coins wearing a Roman-style laurel wreath.
When George III died in 1820, the Prince Regent ascended the throne as George IV, with no real change in his powers.[42] By the time of his accession, he was obese and possibly
addicted to laudanum.[7]
George IV's relationship with his wife Caroline had deteriorated by the time of his accession. They had lived separately since
1796, and both were having affairs. Caroline had later left the United Kingdom for Europe, but she chose to return for her
husband's coronation, and to publicly assert her rights. However, George IV refused to recognize Caroline as Queen, commanding
British ambassadors to ensure that monarchs in foreign courts did the same. By royal command, Caroline's name was omitted from
the liturgy of the Church of England. The King sought
a divorce, but his advisors suggested that any divorce proceedings might involve the publication of details relating to the
King's own adulterous relationships. Therefore, he requested and ensured the introduction of the Pains and Penalties Bill 1820, under which Parliament could have imposed legal penalties
without a trial in a court of law. The bill would have annulled the marriage and stripped Caroline of the title of Queen. The
bill proved extremely unpopular with the public, and was withdrawn from Parliament. George IV decided, nonetheless, to exclude
his wife from his coronation at Westminster Abbey, on 19
July 1821. Caroline fell ill that day and died soon afterwards, on 7 August of the same year; during her final illness she often stated that she thought she had been
poisoned.[43]
The coronation banquet for George IV was held at Westminster Hall on
19 July 1821
Gold Double-Pound Coin of George IV, dated 1823
George's coronation was a magnificent and expensive affair, costing about £243,000 (for comparison, his fathers coronation had
only cost about £10,000). Despite the enormous cost, it was a popular event.[7] In 1821 the King became the first monarch to pay a state visit to Ireland since Richard II of England.[44]
The following year he visited Edinburgh for "one and twenty daft days."[45] His visit to
Scotland, organised by Sir Walter Scott, was the first by a reigning British monarch
since Charles I went there in 1633.[46]
George IV spent most of his reign in seclusion at Windsor Castle,[47] but he continued to interfere in politics. At first, it was believed that
he would support Catholic emancipation, as, in 1797, he had proposed a Catholic Emancipation Bill for Ireland, but his
anti-Catholic views became clear in 1813 when he privately canvassed against the ultimately defeated Catholic Relief Bill of
1813. By 1824 he was denouncing Catholic emancipation in public.[48] Having taken the coronation oath on his accession, George now argued that he had sworn to uphold
the Protestant faith, and could not support any pro-Catholic measures.[49] The influence of the Crown was so great, and the will of the Tories under Prime Minister
Lord Liverpool so strong, that Catholic emancipation seemed
hopeless. In 1827, however, Lord Liverpool retired, to be replaced by the pro-emancipation Tory George Canning. When Canning entered office, the King, who was hitherto content with privately
instructing his ministers on the Catholic Question, thought it fit to make a public declaration to the effect that his sentiments
on the question were those his revered father, George III.[50]
Canning's views on the Catholic Question were not well received by the most conservative Tories, including the Duke of
Wellington. As a result, the ministry was forced to include Whigs.[51] Canning died later in that year, leaving Frederick John Robinson, 1st Viscount Goderich to lead the tenuous
Tory-Whig coalition. Lord Goderich left office in 1828, to be succeeded by the Duke of Wellington, who had by that time accepted
that the denial of some measure of relief to Roman Catholics was politically untenable.[52][53]
With great difficulty, Wellington obtained the King's consent to the introduction of a Catholic Relief Bill on 29 January 1829. Under pressure from his fanatically anti-Catholic brother,
the Duke of Cumberland, the King withdrew his approval and in protest the
Cabinet resigned en masse on 4 March. The next day the King, now under intense political
pressure, reluctantly agreed to the Bill and the ministry remained in power.[7] Royal Assent was finally granted to the Catholic Relief
Act on 13 April.[54]
George IV's heavy drinking and indulgent lifestyle took its toll on his health by the late 1820s. His taste for huge banquets
and copious amounts of alcohol meant that he put on weight and eventually he became obese. This made him the target of ridicule
on the rare occasions that he did appear in public.[55]
Furthermore, he suffered from gout, arteriosclerosis,
cataracts and possible porphyria; he would spend whole days
in bed and suffered spasms of breathlessness that would leave him half-asphyxiated. He died at about half-past three in the
morning of 26 June 1830 at Windsor Castle; he called out "Good
God, what is this?" clasped his page's hand and said, "my boy, this is death."[56] He was buried in St George's Chapel,
Windsor on 15 July.[57]
His daughter, Princess Charlotte Augusta of Wales, had died from
post-partum complications in 1817, after delivering
a still-born son; and his eldest younger brother, Frederick, the Duke of York, had died in 1827. He
was therefore succeeded by another of his brothers, Prince William, Duke of
Clarence, who reigned as William IV.[58]
Legacy
"A Voluptuary Under The Horrors of Digestion," a caricature by
James Gillray
On George's death The Times commented:
| “ |
There never was an individual less regretted by his fellow-creatures than this
deceased king. What eye has wept for him? What heart has heaved one throb of unmercenary sorrow? ... If he ever had a friend — a
devoted friend in any rank of life — we protest that the name of him or her never reached us.[59] |
” |
During the political crisis caused by Catholic emancipation, the Duke of Wellington said that George was "the worst man he
ever fell in with his whole life, the most selfish, the most false, the most ill-natured, the most entirely without one redeeming
quality",[60] but his eulogy delivered in the
House of Lords called George "the most accomplished man of his age" and praised his
knowledge and talent.[61] Wellington's true
views probably lie somewhere between these two extremes; as he said later, George was "a magnificent patron of the arts...the
most extraordinary compound of talent, wit, buffoonery, obstinacy, and good feeling — in short a medley of the most opposite
qualities, with a great preponderence of good — that I ever saw in any character in my life."[61]
George IV was described as the "First Gentleman of England" on account of his style and manners.[62] Certainly, he possessed many good qualities; he was bright, clever and
knowledgeable, but his laziness and gluttony led him to squander much of his talent. As The Times once wrote, he would
always prefer "a girl and a bottle to politics and a sermon."[63]
There are many statues of George IV, a large number of which were erected during his reign. Some in the United Kingdom include
a bronze statue of him on horseback by Sir Francis Chantry in
Trafalgar Square, another of him on horseback at the end of the Long Walk in
Windsor Great Park and another outside the Royal Pavilion in Brighton.
In Edinburgh, George IV Bridge is a main street linking the Old Town High
Street to the south over the ravine of the Cowgate, designed by the architect Thomas Hamilton in 1829 and completed in 1835. King's
Cross, now a major transport hub sitting on the border of Camden and
Islington in north London, takes its name from a short-lived monument erected to George IV in
the early 1830s. From Roman times the area had been known as 'Battle Bridge'.[64]
The Regency period saw a shift in fashion that was largely determined by George. After political opponents put a tax on wig
powder, he abandoned wearing a powdered wig in favour of natural hair.[65] He wore darker colours than had been previously fashionable as they helped to disguise his size,
favoured pantaloons and trousers over knee breeches because they were looser, and popularised a high collar with neck cloth
because it hid his double chin.[66] His visit to Scotland
in 1822 led to the revival, if not the creation, of Scottish tartan dress as it is known
today.[67]
George IV in popular culture
In the third installment of the BBC comedy series
Blackadder, George IV (as
Prince Regent) was played as an unsympathetic buffoon by the English actor
Hugh Laurie. Much of the humour of the characterization was derived from the real Prince of
Wales's spendthrift ways. An offhand remark by Blackadder for the Prince to "take out those plans for the beach house at Brighton," for instance, was
a reference to the actual Oriental Pavillion at Brighton. At the conclusion of the series, Blackadder has taken advantage of
mistaken identity to assume the identity of the Prince of Wales.
George IV (as Prince of Wales) was played by Rupert
Everett in the 1994 film The Madness of King George, and by
Peter Ustinov in the 1954 film Beau
Brummell. The Prince Regent is also portrayed as the leader of the elite party set in the movie Princess Caraboo, which starred Phoebe Cates and was
set in 1817. Julian Fellowes plays the Prince Regent in The Scarlet Pimpernel, the 1982 television version of the novel, in which Anthony Andrews and Jane Seymour also star.
He appears as a character in Bernard Cornwell's novel Sharpe's Regiment, which is set during the Regency period. He is portrayed as fat,
extravagant and possibly suffering from the same insanity which had afflicted his father. He is an enthusiastic fan of Richard
Sharpe's military exploits, and claims to have been present at the Battle of Talavera
and to have helped Sharpe capture a French standard. In the novel's historical note, Cornwell said he based the remark on an
historical incident when George, during a dinner party at which Wellington was present, claimed to have led a charge at
Waterloo.[68]
Other information
Monarchical Styles of
King George IV of the United Kingdom |
 |
| Reference style |
His Majesty |
| Spoken style |
Your Majesty |
| Alternative style |
Sir |
Titles
(Under the Act of Parliament that instituted the Regency, the Prince's formal title as Regent was Regent of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland,[69] and thus,
during the Regency period his formal style was His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales, Regent of the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Ireland. The simplified style His Royal Highness The Prince Regent, used more commonly even
in official documents, was a shortened version of that formal style.)
Styles
George IV's official style as King of the United Kingdom was "George the Fourth, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Ireland King, Defender of the Faith." He was also King of Hanover.
Honours
British Honours
- KG: Knight of the Garter, 26 December 1765–29 January 1820
- PC: Privy Counsellor, 29 August 1783–29
January 1820
- KT: Knight of the Thistle, as Regent, assumed informally 5 November
1811–29 January 1820
- KP: Knight of St Patrick, as Regent, assumed informally 5 November
1811–29 January 1820
- GCB: Knight Grand Cross of the Bath, as Regent, assumed informally 2
January 1815–29 January 1820
- GCH: Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Guelphic Order, as Regent,
assumed informally 12 August 1815–29 January 1820
- GCMG: Knight Grand Cross of St Michael and St George, as
Regent, assumed informally 27 April 1818–29 January 1820
Sovereign of..., 29 January 1820–26 June 1830
Foreign Honours
Knight of St Andrew, 25 November 1813
Knight of the Holy Spirit, 20 April 1814- Knight of St Michael, 20 April 1814
Knight of the Golden Fleece, 1814
Knight of the Black Eagle, 9 June 1814- Knight Grand Cross of the Red Eagle, 9 June 1814
Knight of the Red Eagle, July 1814
Knight of the Elephant, 15 July 1815
Knight of
St Ferdinand and of Merit, 1816-
Knight of St Januarius, 1816
Riband of the Three United
Military Orders of Christ, Benedict of Aviz and St James of the Sword, 1816- Knight Grand Cross of the Tower
and Sword (for Valour, Loyalty and Merit), 1816
Knight Grand Cross
of Willem, 27 November 1818
Knight of St Hubert,
27 November 1818
Knight Grand Cross of the Southern
Cross, 27 November 1818- Knight Grand Cross of Dom Pedro I,
27 November 1818
- Knight Grand Cross (with Collar) of Carlos III, 27 November 1818
Honorary military appointments
- 4 March 1766-: Captain-General & Colonel, of Honourable Artillery
Company
- 18 July 1796–29 January 1820: Colonel, of the 10th Royal Regiment of (Light) Dragoons (Hussars) , The Prince of
Wales's Own
- 25 July 1815-: Colonel-in-Chief, of the Life Guards (1st and 2nd)
- Field Marshal, assumed 1815
Arms
His arms, when King, were: Quarterly, I and IV Gules three lions passant guardant in pale
Or (for England); II Or a lion rampant within a tressure flory-counter-flory Gules (for Scotland); III Azure a harp Or stringed
Argent (for Ireland); overall an escutcheon tierced per pale and per chevron (for Hanover), I Gules two lions passant guardant Or
(for Brunswick), II Or a semy of hearts Gules a lion rampant Azure (for Lüneburg), III Gules a horse courant Argent (for
Westfalen), the whole inescutcheon surmounted by a crown.[70][71]
Ancestors
