Results for giant impact hypothesis
On this page:
 
Cosmic Lexicon:

Giant impact theory

An explanation for the origin of the Moon from Earth debris which collected in space after a projectile the size of planet Mars smashed into a growing Earth.

 
 
Wikipedia: giant impact hypothesis
The Big Splash. View from the south pole.
Enlarge
The Big Splash. View from the south pole.

The giant impact hypothesis (sometimes referred to as the big whack, or, less frequently, the big splash) is the now-dominant scientific theory for the formation of the Moon, which is thought to have formed as a result of a collision between the young Earth and a Mars-sized body that is sometimes called Theia[1] or, on rare occasion, Orpheus. The name of Theia (IPA: ['θei.a]) is derived from Greek mythology, as Theia was the Titan who gave birth to the Moon goddess Selene. The hypothesis was first proposed at a conference on satellites in 1974 and then published in Icarus in 1975 by Drs. Bill K. Hartmann and Donald R. Davis.

Origins

One hypothesis is that Theia formed at a Lagrangian point relative to Earth, that is, in about the same orbit and about 60° ahead or behind.[2] When the protoplanet Theia had grown to about the size of Mars, it became too massive to reside stably in a Trojan orbit. As a result, its angular distance from Earth fluctuated, with the fluctuations growing larger until it hit the Earth. This is calculated to have occurred 4.533 billion years ago (4.533 Ga); Theia is thought to have struck the Earth at an oblique angle, destroying Theia and ejecting most of Theia's mantle and a significant portion of the Earth's mantle into space, while Theia's core sank into Earth's core. Current estimates based on computer simulations of such an event suggest that some two percent of the original mass of Theia ended up as an orbiting ring of debris, about half of which coalesced into the Moon between one and 100 years after the impact. Regardless of the rotation and inclination the Earth had before the impact, after the impact it would have had a day some five hours long, and the Earth's equator would have shifted closer to the plane of the Moon's orbit.

Geological evidence

Indirect evidence for this impact scenario comes from rocks collected during the Apollo Moon landings, which show oxygen isotope compositions that are nearly the same as the Earth. The highly anorthositic composition of the lunar crust, as well as the existence of KREEP-rich samples, gave rise to the idea that a large portion of the Moon was once molten, and a giant impact scenario could easily have supplied the energy needed to form such a magma ocean. Several lines of evidence show that, if the Moon has an iron-rich core, it must be small. In particular, the mean density, moment of inertia, rotational signature, and magnetic induction response all suggest that the radius of the core is less than about 25% the radius of the Moon, in comparison to about 50% for most of the other terrestrial bodies. Impact conditions can be found that give rise to a Moon that formed mostly from the mantles of the Earth and impactor, with the core of the impactor accreting to the Earth, and which satisfy the angular momentum constraints of the Earth-Moon system.[3]

Animation of Theia forming in Earth's L5 point and then drifting into impact. The animation progresses in one-year steps (before impact) making Earth appear not to move. The view is of the south pole.
Enlarge
Animation of Theia forming in Earth's L5 point and then drifting into impact. The animation progresses in one-year steps (before impact) making Earth appear not to move. The view is of the south pole.

Difficulties

Even the dominant lunar origin theory has some difficulties which have yet to be explained. These difficulties include:

  • Ratios of the Moon's volatile elements are not consistent with the giant impact hypothesis.[4]
  • There is no evidence that the Earth ever had a magma ocean (an implied result of the giant impact hypothesis), and some material was found which may never have been in a magma ocean. [4]
  • Iron oxide (FeO) content of 13% of the bulk Moon properties rule out the derivation of the proto-lunar material from any but a small fraction of Earth's mantle.[5]
  • If the bulk of the proto-lunar material had come from the impactor, the Moon should be enriched in siderophilic elements, when it is actually deficient of those.[6]
  • Certain simulations of the formation of the Moon require about twice the amount of angular momentum that the Earth-Moon system has now. However, these simulations do not take into consideration Earth's rotation before impact. Some researchers consider this as insufficient evidence for disregarding the giant impactor theory.[7][8]

See also

References

Cited references

  1. ^ U. Wiechert, A. N. Halliday, D.-C. Lee, G. A. Snyder, L. A. Taylor, D. Rumble (October 2001). "Science" 294 (12): 345-348. [1]
  2. ^ Belbruno, E.; J. Richard Gott III (2005). "Where Did The Moon Come From?". The Astronomical Journal 129 (3): 1724-1745. arXiv:astro-ph/0405372. 
  3. ^ R. Canup and E. Asphaug (2001). "Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation". Nature 412: 708-712. 
  4. ^ a b Tests of the Giant Impact Hypothesis, J. H. Jones, Lunar and Planetary Science, Origin of the Earth and Moon Conference, 1998 [2]. Note: The source notes evidence that suggests there might never have been a global magma ocean, but the source doesn't explicitly rule out the existence of a magma ocean, either.
  5. ^ The Bulk Composition of the Moon, Stuart R. Taylor, Lunar and Planetary Science, 1997, [3]
  6. ^ E. M. Galimov and A. M. Krivtsov (December 2005). "Origin of the Earth-Moon System". J. Earth Syst. Sci. 114 (6): 593-600.  [4]
  7. ^ Canup, Robin (Spring 1999). Big Bang, New Moon. Technology Today. Southwest Research Institute. Retrieved on 2007-07-25.
  8. ^ Taylor, G. Jeffrey (December 31, 1998). Origin of the Earth and Moon. Planetary Science Research Discoveries (PSRD). Hawaii Institute of Geophysics & Planetology. Retrieved on 2007-07-25.

Scientific references

General references

External links



 
 

Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "giant impact hypothesis" at WikiAnswers.

 

Copyrights:

Cosmic Lexicon. Copyright 1996 Planetary Science Research Discoveries Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Giant impact hypothesis" Read more

Search for answers directly from your browser with the FREE Answers.com Toolbar!  
Click here to download now. 

Get Answers your way! Check out all our free tools and products.

On this page:   E-mail   print Print  Link  

 

Keep Reading

Mentioned In: