Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Global city

 
Geography Dictionary: global city

A city acting as a focus for world finance and trade flows. Twenty-five cities effectively control almost all the world's financial transactions, and New York, London, and Tokyo are at the top of the hierarchy (N. Thrift and R. Martin 1994).

Global cities are also marked by large-scale in-migration and increasing income and occupational polarization. S. Sassen (1991) argues that global cities are witnessing large-scale immigration because migration to rich countries is partly set in motion by flows of foreign direct investment into poorer countries, and because ‘producer services’, like law, accountancy, management, and financial consulting, drive immigration through a demand for low-paid jobs. Global cities are the sites of increasing disparities in income and occupation because increased earnings inequality, together with sharply inflated prices for business inputs, commercial space, and labour, have led to informalization, often under ‘sweatshop’ conditions. Immigrants and other ethnic minorities cannot afford the luxury goods that are offered in global cities. They then seek necessary goods from ‘co-ethnic’ producers, and/or from other low-cost immigrant-run shops. Similarly, the type of niche-market small-batch goods aimed at more affluent consumers associated with the gentrification of large cities leads to labour-intensive, small-scale subcontracting, dominated by migrants.

The growth of the migrant population in global cities has led to an expansion of small-scale producers that can effectively compete with large chain stores and supermarkets, although competition is intense, returns are extremely marginal, and this in turn drives the demand for ever cheaper labour.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia: Global city
Top

A global city (also called world city or sometimes alpha city) is a city deemed to be an important node point in the global economic system. The concept comes from geography and urban studies and rests on the idea that globalization can be understood as largely created, facilitated and enacted in strategic geographic locales according to a hierarchy of importance to the operation of the global system of finance and trade. The most complex of these entities is the "global city," whereby the linkages binding a city have a direct and tangible effect on global affairs through socio-economic means.[1] The terminology of "global city", as opposed to megacity, is thought to have been first coined by Saskia Sassen in reference to London, New York and Tokyo in her 1991 work The Global City,[2] though the term "world city" to describe cities which control a disproportionate amount of global business dates to at least Patrick Geddes' use of the term in 1915.[3]

Contents

Criteria

Global City or world city status is seen as beneficial, and because of this many groups have tried to classify and rank which cities are seen as 'world cities' or 'non-world cities'.[3] Although there is a consensus upon leading world cities,[4] the criteria upon which a classification is made can affect which other cities are included.[3] The criteria for identification tend either to be based on a "yardstick value" ("e.g. if the producer-service sector is the largest sector, then city X is a world city")[3] or on an "imminent determination" ("if the producer-service sector of city X is greater than the producer-service sector of N other cities, then city X is a world city").[3]

Economic characteristics

Political characteristics

Cultural characteristics

  • International, first-name familiarity; whereby a city is recognized without the need for a political subdivision. For example, although there are numerous cities and other political entities with the name Paris or variations on it, one would say "Paris", not "Paris, France".
  • Renowned cultural institutions (often with high endowments), such as notable museums and galleries, notable opera, Orchestras, notable film centres and theatre centres. A lively cultural scene, including film festivals (such as the Berlinale), premieres, a thriving music scene, nightlife, an opera company, art galleries, and street performers, annual parades.
  • Several influential media outlets with an international reach, such as the BBC, Reuters, The New York Times, or Agence France-Presse.
  • A strong sporting community, including major sports facilities, home teams in major league sports, and the ability and historical experience to host international sporting events such as the Olympic Games, Football World Cup, or Grand Slam tennis events.[18]
  • Educational institutions; e.g., universities,[19] international student attendance,[20] research facilities
  • Sites of pilgrimage for world religions
  • Cities containing World Heritage Sites of historical and cultural significance[21]
  • Tourism throughput
  • City as site or subject in Arts and Media, TV, Film, Video Games, Music, Literature, Magazines, Articles, Documentary
  • City as an often repeated historic reference, showcase, or symbolic actions

Infrastructural characteristics

Studies

GaWC studies

Alfa (Alpha) World Cities 2008

One of the first attempts to define, categorize, and rank global cities was made in 1998 by the Globalization and World Cities Study Group and Network (GaWC) based at the geography department of Loughborough University, United Kingdom. The roster was outlined in the GaWC Research Bulletin 5 and ranked cities based on their provision of "advanced producer services" such as accountancy, advertising, finance, and law.[4] The GaWC inventory identifies three levels of global cities and several sub-ranks. This roster generally denotes cities in which there are offices of certain multinational corporations providing financial and consulting services rather than denoting other cultural, political, and economic centres.

Another attempt to redefine and re-categorise leading global cities was made by GaWC in 2004. This new roster acknowledged several new indicators but still ranked economics ahead of political or cultural importance.

The GaWC in 2008 re-published their roster of leading world cities. This roster, similar to the 1998 version is sorted through categories of "Alpha" world cities (four categories), "Beta" world cities (three categories), "Gamma" world cities (three categories), and cities with "High sufficiency" and "Sufficiency" world cities presence.

The GaWC's latest roster of leading Alpha, Beta and Gamma World Cities is reproduced below; see the source for the complete roster:[28][29]

Alpha World Cities ++:

Alpha World Cities +:

Alpha World Cities:

Alpha World Cities :

Beta World Cities +:

Beta World Cities:

Beta World Cities :

Gamma World Cities +:

Gamma World Cities:

Gamma World Cities :

Global Cities Index

In October 2008, the American journal Foreign Policy, in conjunction with consulting firm A. T. Kearney and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, published a ranking of global cities, based on consultation with Saskia Sassen, Witold Rybczynski, and others. Foreign Policy noted that "the world’s biggest, most interconnected cities help set global agendas, weather transnational dangers, and serve as the hubs of global integration. They are the engines of growth for their countries and the gateways to the resources of their regions."[30]

The rankings are based on the evaluation of 24 metrics in five areas: business activity, human capital, information exchange, cultural experience, and political engagement. The top thirty of the 60 cities ranked were:

Rank City Best category (position in that category)
1 New York City Business Activity and Human Capital (1st)
2 London Cultural Experience (1st)
3 Paris Information Exchange (1st)
4 Tokyo Business Activity (2nd)
5 Hong Kong Business Activity and Human Capital (5th)
6 Los Angeles Human Capital (4th)
7 Singapore Business Activity (6th)
8 Chicago Human Capital (3rd)
9 Seoul Information Exchange (5th)
10 Toronto Cultural Experience (4th)
11 Washington, D.C. Political Engagement (1st)
12 Beijing Political Engagement (7th)
13 Brussels Information Exchange (2nd)
14 Madrid Information Exchange (9th)
15 San Francisco Human Capital (12th)
16 Sydney Human Capital (8th)
17 Berlin Cultural Experience (8th)
18 Vienna Political Engagement (9th)
19 Moscow Cultural Experience (6th)
20 Shanghai Business Activity (8th)
21 Frankfurt Business Activity (11th)
22 Bangkok Political Engagement (13th)
23 Amsterdam Business Activity (10th)
24 Stockholm Information Exchange (13th)
25 Mexico City Cultural Experience (9th)
26 Zürich Information Exchange (8th)
27 Dubai Information Exchange (14th)
28 Istanbul Political Engagement (8th)
29 Boston Human Capital (9th)
30 Rome Cultural Experience (15th)

Global Power City Index

The Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation in Tokyo, Japan issued a comprehensive study of 35 global cities in October 2009. The ranking is based on six overall categories, "Economy," "Research & Development," "Cultural Interaction," "Livability," "Ecology & Natural Environment," and "Accessibility," with 69 individual indicators among them.[31] This Japanese ranking also breaks down top ten world cities ranked in subjective categories such as "manager, researcher, artist, visitor and resident."

Rank City Score Best category (position)
1 New York City 330.4 Economy (1.) Research & Development (1.)
2 London 322.3 Cultural Interaction (1.)
3 Paris 317.8 Livability (1.) Accessibility (1.)
4 Tokyo 305.6 Economy (2.) Research & Development (2.)
5 Singapore 274.4 Economy (5.) Cultural Interaction (5.)
6 Berlin 259.3 Livability (2.)
7 Vienna 255.1 Ecology & Natural Environment (3.)
8 Amsterdam 250.5 Accessibility (3.)
9 Zürich 242.5 Ecology & Natural Environment (2.)
10 Hong Kong 242.5 Economy (4.)
11 Madrid 242.5 Ecology & Natural Environment (7.) Accessibility (7.)
12 Seoul 242.1 Research & Development (4.)
13 Los Angeles 240.0 Research & Development (5.)
14 Sydney 237.3 Ecology & Natural Environment (9.)
15 Toronto 234.6 Livability (5.)
16 Frankfurt 232.9 Accessibility (5.)
17 Copenhagen 231.7 Economy (9.) Livability (9.)
18 Brussels 229.9 Livability (8.)
19 Geneva 229.7 Ecology & Natural Environment (1.)
20 Boston 226.2 Research & Development(6.)

Following positions and scores:

21. Shanghai (224.1), 22. Chicago (221.1), 23. Vancouver (219.1), 24. San Francisco (218.1), 25. Osaka (215.1), 26. Beijing (211.4), 27. Kuala Lumpur (204.1), 28. Milan (203.5), 29. Bangkok (199.1), 30. Fukuoka (196.5), 31. Taipei (195.9), 32. Moscow (179.5), 33. Sao Paulo (177.7), 34. Mumbai (165.5), 35. Cairo (132.2)

Statistics

Rank Population of city (proper) Population of metropolitan area[32] Percentage foreign born[33] Expatriate cost of living[9] Metro systems by annual passenger ridership Metro systems by the route length Annual airport traffic by passenger[34] Number of billionaires (U.S. dollars)[35] Gross Metropolitan Product at total PPPs[36]
1 Mumbai Tokyo Dubai Tokyo Tokyo London London New York City Tokyo
2 Shanghai Seoul Miami Osaka Moscow New York City New York City London New York City
3 Karachi Mexico City Amsterdam Moscow New York City Berlin Tokyo Moscow Los Angeles
4 Delhi New York City Toronto Geneva Seoul Madrid Atlanta Hong Kong Chicago
5 Istanbul Mumbai Muscat Hong Kong Mexico City Moscow Chicago Los Angeles Paris
6 São Paulo Jakarta Vancouver Zürich Paris Seoul Paris Dallas London
7 Moscow Sao Paolo Auckland Copenhagen Hong Kong Shanghai Los Angeles Istanbul Osaka
8 Seoul Delhi Geneva New York City London Paris Dallas San Francisco Mexico City
9 Beijing Osaka Mecca Beijing Osaka Beijing Frankfurt Chicago,
Mumbai,
São Paulo,
Tokyo
Philadelphia
10 Mexico City Shanghai The Hague Singapore São Paulo Tokyo Beijing n/a Washington, D.C.

See also

References

  1. ^ Sassen, Saskia - The global city: strategic site/new frontier
  2. ^ Sassen, Saskia - The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. (1991) - Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-07063-6
  3. ^ a b c d e Doel,M. & Hubbard, P., (2002), "Taking World Cities Literally: Marketing the City in a Global Space of flows",City, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 351-368. Subscription required
  4. ^ a b GaWC Research Bulletin 5, GaWC, Loughborough University, 28 July 1999
  5. ^ Urban Characteristics,City Level, 1993PDF (61.6 KB), "World Resources 1998-99", WRI, 1998.
  6. ^ Global Urban Indicators Database 2 (1998 data) (data sets in .ZIP), UN-HABITAT
  7. ^ World Indices, Bloomberg
  8. ^ J.V. Beaverstock, World City Networks 'From Below', GaWC, Loughborough University, 29 September 2005
  9. ^ a b Mercer's 2008 Cost of living highlights, Mercer, 02 June 2009
  10. ^ The World's Billionaires, Forbes, 2008
  11. ^ Chapter 5: Globalization and cultural choicePDF (352 KB), "2004 Human Development Report" (page 99), UNDP, 2004
  12. ^ Chapter 9: Urban DataPDF (196 KB), "World Resources 1998-99", WRI, 1998
  13. ^ City Profiles, UN
  14. ^ Mobility 2001PDF (1.59 MB), WBCSD
  15. ^ WORLD URBANIZATION PROSPECTS: THE 2003 REVISIONPDF (3.73 MB), UN, 2004
  16. ^ World-wide quality of living survey, Mercer, 10 April 2006
  17. ^ The city development indexPDF, "THE STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES REPORT 2001", UN-HABITAT, 21 June 2006
  18. ^ P. De Groote, Economic and Tourism Aspects of the Olympic Games, GaWC, Loughborough University, 21 September 2005
  19. ^ [1]PDF (registration required)
  20. ^ K. O'Connor, International Students and Global Cities, GaWC, Loughborough University, 17 February 2005
  21. ^ World Heritage List, UNESCO
  22. ^ Estimated Ridership of the World’s Largest Public Transit Systems, 1998
  23. ^ COMMUTER RAIL (SUBURBAN RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL) IN THE UNITED STATES: INTERNATIONAL CONTEXTPDF (218 KB), October 2003
  24. ^ Traffic Intensity by International Urban Area: 1990
  25. ^ Largest seaports of the world
  26. ^ Mapping the Global Network Economy on the Basis of Air Passenger Transport Flows, GaWC, Loughborough University, 8 December 2004
  27. ^ The World's Best Skylines
  28. ^ "The World According to GaWC 2008". Globalization and World Cities Study Group and Network (GaWC). Loughborough University. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2008t.html. Retrieved 2009-05-07. 
  29. ^ "The World According to GaWC 2008 - Graph". Globalization and World Cities Study Group and Network (GaWC). Loughborough University. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2008c.html. Retrieved 2009-05-27. 
  30. ^ "The 2008 Global Cities Index". Foreign Policy (November/December 2008). October 21, 2008. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4509. Retrieved 2008-10-31. 
  31. ^ "Global Power City Index 2009". Tokyo, Japan: Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation. October 22, 2009. http://www.mori-m-foundation.or.jp/english/research/project/6/pdf/GPCI2009_English.pdf. Retrieved 2009-10-29. 
  32. ^ R.L. Forstall, R.P. Greene, and J.B. Pick, "Which are the largest? Why published populations for major world urban areas vary so greatly", City Futures Conference, (University of Illinois at Chicago, July 2004) – Table 5 (p.34)
  33. ^ gstudy.com international statisticsPDF (522 KB)
  34. ^ http://www.aci.aero/aci/aci/file/Press%20Releases/2007_PRs/PR_180707_TOP10.pdf
  35. ^ In Pictures: Top Billionaire Cities, Forbes, 3 June 2009
  36. ^ PriceWaterhouseCoopers, "UK Economic Outlook, March 2007", page 5. ""Table 1.2 – Top 30 urban agglomeration GDP rankings in 2005 and illustrative projections to 2020 (using UN definitions and population estimates)"" (PDF). http://www.ukmediacentre.pwc.com/imagelibrary/downloadMedia.asp?MediaDetailsID=863. Retrieved 2007-03-09. 

External links


Shopping: Global city
Top
 
 

 

Copyrights:

Geography Dictionary. A Dictionary of Geography. Copyright © Susan Mayhew 1992, 1997, 2004. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Global city" Read more