hearsay

n.

1. Unverified information heard or received from another; rumor.
2. Law. Evidence based on the reports of others rather than the personal knowledge of a witness and therefore generally not admissible as testimony.

1. Statement made by an individual within the organization that is based on rumor rather than substantiated facts; gossip.

2. In law, testimony of one person as to the statement of another. It does not prove what the other said but proves the truth of the fact asserted by the other.

noun

Idle, often sensational and groundless talk about others: gossip, gossipry, report, rumor, talebearing, tattle, tittle-tattle, word. Slang scuttlebutt. See words.

n

Definition: unsubstantiated information
Antonyms: confirmed facts, evidence, proof, reality, testimony, truth

---

n

1. the testimony given by a witness who relates not what is known personally but what others have stated. n 2. evidence that does not derive its value solely from the credit of the witness, but rests mainly on the veracity and competency of other persons and is admitted in court only in specified cases, from necessity.

This entry contains information applicable to United States law only.

A statement made out of court that is offered in court as evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

It is the job of the judge or jury in a court proceeding to determine whether evidence offered as proof is credible. Three evidentiary rules help the judge or jury make this determination: (1) Before being allowed to testify, a witness generally must swear or affirm that his or her testimony will be truthful. (2) The witness must be personally present at the trial or proceeding in order to allow the judge or jury to observe the testimony firsthand. (3) The witness is subject to cross-examination at the option of any party who did not call the witness to testify.

Hearsay involves a statement that is oral or written or consists of gestures. Essentially anything intended to assert a fact is considered a statement for the purposes of the hearsay rule. A nodding of the head may be a silent assertion of the word yes. A witness pointing to a gun may be asserting, "That is the murder weapon." Even silence has been accepted as a statement, as when the passengers' failure to complain was offered to prove that a train car was not too cold (Silver v. New York Central Railroad, 329 Mass. 14, 105 N.E.2d 923 [1952]).

In keeping with its three evidentiary requirements, the rule against hearsay prohibits most statements made outside a courtroom from being used as evidence in court. This is because statements made out of court normally are not made under oath, a judge or jury cannot personally observe the demeanor of someone who makes a statement outside the courtroom, and an opposing party cannot cross-examine such a declarant. Out-of-court statements hinder the ability of the judge or jury to probe testimony for inaccuracies caused by ambiguity, insincerity, faulty perception, or erroneous memory. Thus, statements made out of court are perceived as untrustworthy.

But not all out-of-court statements or assertions are impermissible hearsay. If an attorney wishes the judge or jury to consider the fact that a certain statement was made, but not the truthfulness of that statement, the statement is not hearsay and may be admitted as evidence. Suppose a hearing is held to determine a woman's mental competence. Out of court, when asked to identify herself, the woman said, "I am the pope." There is little question that the purpose of introducing that statement as evidence is not to convince the judge or jury that the woman actually is the pope; the truthfulness of the statement is irrelevant. Rather, the statement is introduced to show the woman's mental state; her belief that she is the pope may prove that she is not mentally competent. On the other hand, a defendant's out-of-court statement "I am the murderer," offered in a murder trial to prove that the defendant is the murderer, is hearsay.

Federal and state rules of evidence generally prohibit the admissibility of hearsay but make exceptions for certain categories of statements that inherently contain sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness. Some hearsay exceptions are not based on whether the declarant of the statement is available to testify; others apply only if it can be shown that the declarant is unavailable to testify. A witness who has died is unavailable. A witness who claims some sort of testimonial privilege, such as the attorney-client privilege, is also unavailable to testify for purposes of these exceptions, as is the witness who refuses to testify despite a judge's order, testifies to lack of memory regarding the subject matter, or is too physically or mentally ill to testify.

Hearsay Exceptions When the Declarant's Availability Is Immaterial [nl] 1.

Present Sense Impressions. "A statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter," is admissible hearsay (Fed. R. Evid. 803(1)). An example is the statement "That green pickup truck is going to run that red light."

2.

Excited Utterance. "A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition" is admissible hearsay (Fed. R. Evid. 803(2)). For example, "The robber is pointing a gun at the cop!" is admissible.

3.

A Statement Describing a Then Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition. A statement of the declarant's then existing intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health is admissible, but generally a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed is not. For example, "After eating at that restaurant, I'm feeling rather ill" could be admitted under this exception. But the out-of-court statement "I believe Julie to be the murderer" would not be admitted under this exception.

4.

A Statement Made for Purposes of Medical Diagnosis or Treatment. A statement describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the general character of the cause or external source of those symptoms, is admissible. For example, this statement made to a physician following an accident is admissible: "I slipped and fell on the ice, and then my left leg became numb."

5.

A Recorded Recollection. "A memorandum or record concerning a matter about which a witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection to enable the witness to testify fully and accurately" is admissible (Fed. R. Evid. 803(5)). The record must have been made when the matter was fresh in the witness's memory and must reflect that knowledge correctly. One example is a detailed phone message.

6.

A Record of Regularly Conducted Activity. A record, report, or memo of regularly conducted business activities is exempt from the hearsay prohibition under this rule. Written minutes of a business meeting are a common example. The absence of information normally contained in these types of records may also be excluded from the hearsay prohibition (Fed. R. Evid. 803(6)).

7.

A Public Record or Report. A record, report, statement, or data compilation, in any form, of a public office or agency, setting forth the activities of the office or agency or matters for which there is a legal duty to report, is admissible. Voting records of a city council are an example. Matters observed by law enforcement personnel in criminal cases are excluded under this rule (Fed. R. Evid. 803(6)).

8.

A Record of a Vital Statistic. A data compilation, in any form, of births, fetal deaths, other deaths, or marriages, if the report is made to a public office pursuant to requirements of the law, is a hearsay exception (Fed. R. Evid. 803(9)).

9.

A Record of a Religious Organization. A statement contained in a regularly kept record of a religious organization may be exempt from the prohibition against hearsay. Some examples are statements of birth, marriage, divorce, death, legitimacy, ancestry, relationship by blood or marriage, or similar facts of personal or family history (Fed. R. Evid. 803(11)).

10.

A Marriage, Baptismal, or Similar Certificate. "Statements of fact contained in a certificate that the maker performed a marriage or other ceremony or administered a sacrament, made by a clergyman, public official, or other person authorized by the rules or practices of a religious organization or by law to perform the act certified, and purporting to have been issued at the time of the act or within a reasonable time thereafter," are admissible (Fed. R. Evid. 803(12)).

11.

A Family Record. "Statements of fact concerning personal or family history contained in family Bibles, genealogies, charts, engravings on rings, inscriptions on family portraits, engravings on urns, crypts, or tombstones" are hearsay exceptions (Fed. R. Evid. 803(13)).

12.

A Record of Documents Affecting an Interest in Property. A record purporting to establish or affect an interest in property, such as a notice of a tax lien placed on a house, is admissible hearsay if the record is a record of a public office and an applicable statute authorizes the recording of documents of that kind in that office.

13.

A Statement in an Ancient Document. A statement in a document in existence twenty years or more, the authenticity of which is established, is admissible hearsay. One example is a statement in a letter written thirty years ago, provided the letter's authenticity can be proved.

14.

A Market Report or Other Commercial Publication. "Market quotations, tabulations, lists, directories, or other published compilations, generally used and relied upon by the public or by persons in particular occupations," are exceptions to the rule against hearsay (Fed. R. Evid. 803(17)).

15.

A Learned Treatise. Statements contained in a published treatise, periodical, or pamphlet on a subject of history, medicine, or other science or art, established as a reliable authority by the testimony or admission of an expert witness, are admissible (Fed. R. Evid. 803(18)).

16.

Reputation Concerning Personal or Family History. A reputation among members of a person's family by blood, adoption, or marriage, or among a person's associates, or in the community, concerning the person's birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, death, ancestry, or legitimacy is an exception to the rule against hearsay. For example, the out-of-court statement "My sister was adopted," although hearsay, is admissible (Fed. R. Evid. 803 (19)).

17.

Reputation Concerning Boundaries or General History. "Reputation in a community, arising before the controversy, as to boundaries of or customs affecting lands in the community, and reputation as to events of general history important to the community or state or nation in which located," are admissible (Fed. R. Evid. 803(20)). For example, "Stein's land extends south to the river" involves the reputation of a land's boundary and falls within this exception.

18.

Reputation as to Character. The "reputation of a person's character among associates or in the community" is admissible hearsay (Fed. R. Evid. 803(21)). One example is the statement "Sergei has never said a dishonest word."

19.

A Judgment of a Previous Conviction. A plea or judgment of guilt for a crime punishable by death or imprisonment of more than one year is admissible hearsay (Fed. R. Evid. 803(22)).

Hearsay Exceptions When the Declarant Is Unavailable to Testify [nl]1.

Former Testimony. Testimony given as a witness at another hearing in the same or a different proceeding, or in a deposition, is admissible when the declarant is unavailable, provided the party against whom the testimony is now being offered had the opportunity to question or cross-examine the witness (Fed. R. Evid. 804(1)).

2.

A Statement Made Under the Belief of Impending Death. A statement made by a declarant who, when making the statement, believed death to be imminent, is admissible to show the cause or circumstances of the death. For example, the statement "Horace shot me," made moments before the declarant died, is admissible for the purpose of proving that Horace committed murder (Fed. R. Evid. 804(2)).

3.

A Statement Against the Declarant's Interest. A statement that, at the time of its making, was contrary to the declarant's pecuniary or proprietary interest, or that subjected the declarant to civil or criminal liability, is admissible if the declarant is unavailable to testify. For example, the statement "I never declare all my income on my tax returns" could subject the declarant to criminal tax fraud liability, and is thus an admissible statement against interest (Fed. R. Evid. 804(3)).

4.

A Statement of Personal or Family History. A statement concerning the declarant's own birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, legitimacy, or similar fact of personal family history is admissible hearsay when the declarant is unavailable to testify (Fed. R. Evid. 804(4)).

Information heard by one person about another. Hearsay is generally inadmissible as evidence in a court of law because it is based on the reports of others rather than on the personal knowledge of a witness.

This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)

Dansk (Danish)
n. - rygte, forlydende, omtale

Nederlands (Dutch)
praatjes, geruchten

Français (French)
n. - on-dit, ouï-dire

Deutsch (German)
n. - Gerücht, Hörensagen

Ελληνική (Greek)
n. - διάδοση, φήμη, πληροφορία εξ ακοής, (νομ.) έμμεση μαρτυρία

Italiano (Italian)
diceria

Português (Portuguese)
n. - boato (m)

Русский (Russian)
молва

Español (Spanish)
n. - rumor

Svenska (Swedish)
n. - hörsägen

中文（简体）(Chinese (Simplified))
谣言, 道听途说, 传闻

中文（繁體）(Chinese (Traditional))
n. - 謠言, 道聽途說, 傳聞

한국어 (Korean)
n. - 소문, 풍문

日本語 (Japanese)
n. - 噂, 風聞

العربيه (Arabic)
‏(الاسم) إشاعه, شئ يسمع من شخص آخر‏

עברית (Hebrew)
n. - ‮שמועה, דיבורים, רכילות‬

If you are unable to view some languages clearly, click here.

To select your translation preferences click here.