Henry Baldwin

(b. New Haven, Conn., 14 Jan. 1780; d. Philadelphia, Pa., 21 Apr. 1844; interred Greendale Cemetery, Meadville, Pa.), associate justice, 1830–1844. Born of aristocratic stock, Baldwin received an LL.D. degree from Yale University in 1797. Thereafter, he studied in Philadelphia with Alexander J. Dallas. Having gained admission to the bar, Baldwin set out for Ohio, but he settled in Pittsburgh, where he quickly gained social and political prominence. Throughout western Pennsylvania he became known for his intelligence, indefatigability, and ribald sense of humor.

After the death of his first wife, he married Sally Ellicott, and they established a second home in Crawford County, Pennsylvania, from which he was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1816. Reared as a Federalist, Baldwin was often at odds with rural Jeffersonian Republican party regulars. Ill health forced Baldwin's resignation in 1822, but six years later, he energetically supported Andrew Jackson's presidential candidacy.

With the death of Justice Bushrod Washington in 1829, Jackson nominated Baldwin to the Supreme Court, passing over Pennsylvania Chief Justice John Bannister Gibson and Horace Binney of Philadelphia. Baldwin was confirmed with only two dissenting votes.

Baldwin's views on major constitutional issues were generally consistent over his fourteen‐year tenure. He supported unobstructed interstate commerce, sought to preserve states' rights, and regarded slaves as private property. When federal power was pitted against state sovereignty, Baldwin argued against expansion of the former. The vehemence of this position first appeared in a dissent in Ex parte Crane (1831), in which he objected to the extension of federal court jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus.

In constitutional interpretation, Baldwin was a moderate, eschewing the extremes of autonomous state sovereignty and expanded federal supremacy. Baldwin in 1837 published an extended pamphlet, A General View of the Origin and Nature of the Constitution and Government of the United States …, in which he presented a “full explanation of what may be deemed my peculiar views of the constitution” (p. 1). He placed himself in a middle category between the extremes, writing that he belonged among those “willing to take the Constitution … as it is, and to expound it by the accepted rules of interpretation” (p. 37). He believed that by exercising political sensitivity the Supreme Court could arbitrate disputes over which powers belonged to the federal government and which to the states. Baldwin's key votes between 1830 and 1844 reveal him as a moderate, pro‐Northern justice in cases dealing with the role of corporations, federal‐state relations, and slavery.

Baldwin's abrasive individualism ran counter to and helped to break down the consensual nature of the Marshall Court. In 1831, for example, he dissented seven times, violating a long‐standing norm of Court unanimity. Sociable and well liked early in his career, Baldwin grew increasingly eccentric and, on occasion, violent. He may have suffered from an obsessive‐compulsive syndrome, exacerbated in his final years by financial problems. He died, penniless, of paralysis in 1844.

— Robert G. Seddig

• Born: Jan. 14, 1780, New Haven, Conn.
• Education: Yale College, LL.D., 1797; studied law under Alexander J. Dallas, Washington, D.C.
• Previous government service: U.S. representative from Pennsylvania, 1817–22
• Appointed by President Andrew Jackson Jan. 4, 1830; replaced Bushrod Washington, who died
• Supreme Court term: confirmed by the Senate Jan. 6, 1830, by a 41–2 vote; served until Apr. 21, 1844
• Died: Apr. 21, 1844, Philadelphia, Pa.

Henry Baldwin was a strong supporter of Andrew Jackson's 1828 Presidential campaign. In 1830, President Jackson rewarded Baldwin with an appointment to the Supreme Court. Justice Baldwin tended to support states' rights in cases involving conflict between federal power and state sovereignty. However, he argued against extreme positions in support of either state sovereignty or federal supremacy. He claimed to be searching for a middle-of-the-road position between the two extremes.

Justice Baldwin clashed with Chief Justice John Marshall and helped to destroy the unity of the Court. In 1831, for example, he dissented seven times from the majority opinions of the Court. This was a dramatic departure from the tradition of unanimity that Marshall had established.

Justice Baldwin became irritable and erratic as he aged, a striking change from the good humor of the early years of his career. Toward the end of his life, he was often angry and occasionally violent. He was deeply in debt by 1844, when he died of paralysis.

Henry Baldwin was a prominent Pennsylvania attorney and politician who later became an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, where he served for fourteen years.

Descended from an aristocratic British family dating back to the seventeenth century, Baldwin was born January 14, 1780, in New Haven, Connecticut. He grew up on a farm near New Haven and later moved to the city to attend Yale College. After graduating with honors in 1797, he studied law in Philadelphia with Alexander J. Dallas, a noted attorney. Admitted to the bar a short time later, Baldwin originally planned to establish a practice in Ohio, but instead settled in Pittsburgh. He then established a successful law firm with two other young attorneys. By his midtwenties, Baldwin had established a reputation as a legal scholar, in part because of his thorough and well-researched law briefs. He had also developed an extensive personal law library, which contained a large collection of valuable English case reports and was among the finest and largest in the Northeast. Furthermore, Baldwin and his law partners were known for their political and civic leadership. The three published a newspaper, the Tree of Liberty, which supported the Republican party of western Pennsylvania. In addition to his political activities and his law practice, Baldwin found time for business, acting as part-owner of several mills in Pennsylvania and Ohio.

After the death of his first wife, Baldwin married Sally Ellicott, and they established a residence in Crawford County, Pennsylvania. In 1816, Baldwin was elected representative to the U.S. Congress for that area. As a congressman, Baldwin was active in trade issues and was a strong advocate of tariff protection. He was also involved in mediating boundary disputes between northern and southern states and their representatives. He was twice reelected to the House. In 1822, he was forced to resign his seat because of illness. He returned home to Pennsylvania, where he once again practiced law and was active in local political affairs.

Baldwin soon became an avid supporter of Andrew Jackson and was a trusted adviser to Jackson concerning Pennsylvania politics. After Jackson was elected president in 1828, Baldwin hoped to become secretary of the treasury, but the appointment instead went to Samuel D. Ingham. The following year, after the death of Justice Bushrod Washington, Jackson nominated Baldwin to the U.S. Supreme Court, against the wishes of his vice president, John C. Calhoun, who preferred another candidate. Though Baldwin's protectionist views created some controversy, he was confirmed by the Senate with only two dissenting votes, from southern senators who opposed his policies on tariffs.

On the bench, Baldwin was at first a strong supporter of the liberal views of Chief Justice John Marshall but gradually moved toward a more moderate interpretation of the Constitution, favoring neither state sovereignty nor federal supremacy. In 1837, he published a pamphlet, A General View of the Origin and Nature of the Constitution and Government of the United States, in which he set forth what he termed his "peculiar views of the Constitution." In this work, he emphasized his position as a moderate on the Court, stating that he tended to take the Constitution "as it is, and to expound it by the accepted rules of interpretation." Baldwin also believed that the Court must be politically sensitive when determining which powers belonged to the federal government and which remained with the states.

One of Baldwin's most influential majority opinions was United States v. Arredondo, 31 U.S. 691, 6 Pet. 691, 8 L. Ed. 547 (1832), in which the Court held that public policy prevented the government from violating federal land treaties. With respect to the issue of slavery, however, Baldwin's views were considered to be much more radical than those held by other members of the Court. In Groves v. Slaughter, 40 U.S. 449, 15 Pet. 449, 10 L. Ed. 800 (1841), the Court considered the constitutionality of a Mississippi provision that prevented the importation of slaves into the state. The Court ultimately struck down the statute on technical reasons, but Baldwin, in a separate opinion, argued that slaves were property as well as persons and viewed the prohibition as an obstruction of interstate commerce. He was the sole dissenter in United States v. The Schooner Armistead, 40 U.S. 518, 15 Pet. 518, 10 L. Ed. 826 (1841), in which the Court held that slaves who had mutinied and taken over the slave ship transporting them from Africa should be set free. Though he did not write an opinion, Baldwin had earlier maintained that the slaves should be returned to the custody of the slave traders.

As was the practice in the Court at the time, Baldwin traveled the circuit he represented, which included Pennsylvania and New Jersey, to hear cases. He heard important cases involving the construction of a will that made a bequest for charitable purposes and also presided over the trial of John F. Braddel, who in 1840 was accused of robbing the mails.

In his later years, Baldwin was plagued by financial and personal difficulties. He never fully recovered from losing a great deal of money during the depression of 1820. He also suffered from the failure of several speculative businesses, and he had to support some of his adult children when they got into financial trouble. He was eventually forced to sell his renowned personal law library to the Library of Congress to raise money. He also published and sold volumes of the opinions he decided while traveling the circuit.

At the same time, Baldwin's behavior became erratic and he was widely reported to be suffering from mental illness. While on the bench, he was often restless, inattentive, and abusive to litigants and his fellow justices. While on the circuit, he also exhibited bizarre behavior at times, often having coffee and cakes brought to him while he heard cases. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was reported to be so concerned about Baldwin's unpredictable behavior that he advised President Jackson not to take action against the Bank of the United States because Baldwin, as presiding judge over the case in Philadelphia, would be unreliable.

Baldwin's tenure on the Court ended on April 21, 1844, when he died of paralysis at the age of sixty-four. He was deeply in debt at the time of his death, and friends and family took up a collection to pay for his funeral expenses.

Henry Baldwin
Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court
In office January 18 1830 – April 21 1844
Nominated by	Andrew Jackson
Preceded by	Bushrod Washington
Succeeded by	Robert Cooper Grier
Born	January 14 1780(1780--) New Haven, Connecticut
Died	April 21 1844 (aged 64) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Henry Baldwin (January 14, 1780 - April 21, 1844) was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from January 18, 1830, to April 21, 1844. He was the half-brother of Abraham Baldwin.

In 1797 (aged 17) Baldwin received a doctor of laws degree from Yale University. He was elected to the United States Congress as a member of the Democratic-Republican Party in 1816, representing Pennsylvania, but resigned after six years because of his declining health and failing finances. He strongly supported the election of Andrew Jackson in the election of 1828. After the death of Bushrod Washington in 1829, Jackson nominated Baldwin to the Supreme Court.

Baldwin considered resigning in 1831. In a letter to President Jackson, he complained about the Court’s extension of its powers. Some historians believe that Baldwin suffered from mental illness during this period. However, he continued to serve on the court until his death.

Justice Baldwin was personally opposed to slavery. In the case of Johnson v. Tompkins, 13 F. Cas. 840 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1833), he instructed the jury that although slavery's existence "is abhorrent to all our ideas of natural right and justice," the jury must respect the legal status of slavery. He was the sole dissenter in the Amistad Case, in which the Court decided to free a ship of illegally imported African slaves.

In another federal case, Justice Baldwin interpreted the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Constitution. That case was Magill v. Brown, 16 Fed. Cas. 408 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1833), in which Justice Baldwin stated: "We must take it therefore as a grant by the people of the state in convention, to the citizens of all the other states of the Union, of the privileges and immunities of the citizens of this state." This eventually became the view accepted by the Supreme Court, and remains so.

Justice Baldwin was a friend and admirer of Chief Justice John Marshall, and wrote of Marshall that "no commentator ever followed the text more faithfully, or ever made a commentary more accordant with its strict intention and language." Baldwin was at Marshall's bedside when the old Chief Justice died in 1835.

In 1837, Justice Baldwin authored a treatise titled A General View of the Origin and Nature of the [[Constitution of the Constitution and Government of the United States: Deduced from the Political History and Condition of the Colonies and States.[1] Baldwin opposed the two prevailing schools of Constitutional interpretation: the strict constructionists and the school of liberal interpretation. Likewise, his views followed a middle course between the extremes of states' rights on the one hand, and nationalism on the other hand.

Justice Baldwin suffered from paralysis in later years and died a pauper, aged 64. Historian William J. Novak of the University of Chicago has written that, "Baldwin’s jurisprudence has been treated rather shabbily by historians."[2]

Baldwin was the great-great-great-great-grandfather of actor Christopher Reeve.^{[citation needed]}

Further reading

• Robert G. Seddig. "Henry Baldwin", The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Kermit L. Hall ed. 1992.
• G. Edward White. The Marshall Court & Cultural Change, 1815-35. Published in an abridged edition, 1991.

Sources

• Henry Baldwin (judge) at the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress
• The Political Graveyard
• Legal Encyclopedia

Preceded by John Woods	Member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Pennsylvania's 14th congressional district 1817-1822	Succeeded by Walter Forward
Preceded by Bushrod Washington	Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States January 18, 1830 – April 21, 1844	Succeeded by Robert Cooper Grier

The Marshall Court
1830–1834:	Wm. Johnson | G. Duvall | J. Story | S. Thompson | J. McLean | H. Baldwin
1835:	G. Duvall | J. Story | S. Thompson | J. McLean | H. Baldwin | J.M. Wayne
The Taney Court
1836–1837:	J. Story | S. Thompson | J. McLean | H. Baldwin | J.M. Wayne | P.P. Barbour
1837–1838:	J. Story | S. Thompson | J. McLean | H. Baldwin | J.M. Wayne | P.P. Barbour | J. Catron
1838–1841:	J. Story | S. Thompson | J. McLean | H. Baldwin | J.M. Wayne | P.P. Barbour | J. Catron | J. McKinley
1842–1843:	J. Story | S. Thompson | J. McLean | H. Baldwin | J.M. Wayne | J. Catron | J. McKinley | P.V. Daniel
1843–1844:	J. Story | J. McLean | H. Baldwin | J.M. Wayne | J. Catron | J. McKinley | P.V. Daniel

This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)