Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

herd

 
Dictionary: herd   (hûrd) pronunciation
n.
    1. A group of cattle or other domestic animals of a single kind kept together for a specific purpose.
    2. A number of wild animals of one species that remain together as a group: a herd of elephants.
    1. A large number of people; a crowd: a herd of stranded passengers.
    2. The multitude of common people regarded as a mass: "It is the luxurious and dissipated who set the fashions which the herd so diligently follow" (Henry David Thoreau). See synonyms at flock1.

v., herd·ed, herd·ing, herds.

v.intr.
To come together in a herd: The sheep herded for warmth.

v.tr.
  1. To gather, keep, or drive (animals) in a herd.
  2. To tend (sheep or cattle).
  3. To gather and place into a group or mass: herded the children into the auditorium.

[Middle English, from Old English heord.]


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Thesaurus: herd
Top

verb

    To urge to move along: drive, run. See move/halt.

Antonyms: herd
Top

v

Definition: gather; shepherd
Antonyms: disperse, scatter


Domestication of animals for food began about 10,000 years ago in the Near East, in the western part of the Fertile Crescent. This coincided with a period of climatic warming following the last retreat of the Pleistocene glaciation in Europe and Asia. Livestock provided a more regular supply of food that tended to mitigate, but not entirely eliminate, the seasonal patterns of resource availability that faced the hunter and gatherer. The Neolithic pattern of keeping animals for food followed shortly after the earliest domestication of plants in the same area of the Near East. Since that time other grazing and browsing animals were domesticated and their origins have been found at different sites around the globe. Table 1 lists major domestic species with earliest dates and places of domestication. All of these species can provide food in the form of meat, organs, marrow, blood, milk, or fat, although some function as draught, pack, or riding animals, and provide wool, hides, skins, hooves, and dung. When the earliest animals were domesticated, they were reserved for slaughter and their meat was used for food. Today, the livestock species listed in Table 1 constitute more than 3,000 breeds or domestic subspecies and provide a variety of foods and materials.

About 6,000 to 7,000 years ago, domestic animals began to be used for milking, wool production, and other purposes in addition to meat in what Andrew Sherratt (1981) has called the "secondary products revolution." Milk production or dairying may have been practiced more than 7,000 years ago in the Near East since there is evidence for milking cattle and ovicaprids (sheep/goats) in Neolithic Europe that dates back to 6,000 years ago. A significant problem in the cultural development of dairying was the biological evolution of tolerance to milk sugar—lactose—through production of the digestive enzyme—lactase—beyond infancy by children and adults. Almost certainly the ability to utilize lactose by breaking down this disaccharide sugar into its digestible monosaccharides occurred by natural selection. The picture of adult lactose tolerance is a complex one of relationships among genetics, digestive physiology, and digestive enzyme adaptation. However, this is one of the best examples that we have of culture change (pastoralism to dairying) actually producing biological change (in genetics of populations) through natural selection.

Animal domestication and herding spread from centers in Eurasia to Europe, South and East Asia, and Africa. The pig was dispersed from Southeast Asia to New Guinea by least 3,000 years ago, and then later to the Pacific Islands. Much later, following Columbus's discovery, European domesticated animals were transported to the New World. In the indigenous New World, the Andean llama and alpaca were the only animals herded throughout North and South America.

Traditions of agro-pastoralism arose in moist areas or areas capable of irrigation: in marginal, semiarid, or arid lands, transhumant (seasonal migrations) and nomadic herding predominated. David Harris (1996) noted that the early Near East Neolithic (about 8,000 years ago) a "package" of foods that included cereals, pulses, goats, and sheep was particularly effective in providing a diet that contributed to population growth and expansion, and the spread of new subsistence practices.

Table 1

Earliest Domestication of Major Livestock Species
Dates are in approximate years before the present
Common NameSpeciesDatePlace Reference
Goats Capra sp. 10,000 Near East (SW Asia) 1
Sheep Ovis sp. 9,000 Near East 1
Pigs Sus sp. 9,000 Near East, China 2
Cattle Bos sp. 8,000 Near East, India 3
Horses Equus caballus 6,000 Eurasian steppes 4
Water Buffalo Babalus babalis 6,000 China 5
Camelids Llama sp. 6,000 Central Andes 6
Donkeys Equus asinus 5,000 NE Africa 4
Camels Camelus sp. 5,000 Arabia (dromedary) Central Asia (bactrian) 7
Yak Bos grunniens >2,000 Tibetan Plateau 8
Reindeer Rangifer tarandus<2,000 Northern Eurasia 9
References: 1Legge (1996), 2Clutton-Brock (1979), 3Clutton-Brock (1989), 4Clutton-Brock (1992), 5Olsen (1993), 6Novoa and Wheeler (1984), 7Köhler-Rollefson (1996), 8Olsen (1990), 9Aikio (1989).

Today, non-Western herding practices range from nomadic pastoralism in Africa, the Near East, and Asia to agro-pastoralism in the Mediterranean, Near East, Africa, and Asia. Diets are highly variable: some populations consume large amounts of animal products, whereas others trade animal products for cereals and sugar, and still others use animal products only to supplement a largely vegetarian diet. Since the earliest period of domestication, livestock have always contributed foods that are high in energy, balanced in nutrients, and both high and balanced in amino acids and the quality of protein. The cultural selection for a balanced diet became crucial to human health when the predominance of cereal and root crops in intensive agriculture contributed to dramatic population increases.

Several examples of pastoral diets can be drawn from Africa. There is considerable variation in food intake, where animal products constituted between 80 percent (Turkana) and 21 percent (Fulani and Baggara) of dietary intakes as a proportion of caloric intake. Moreover, in all these dairying populations milk is said to be a staple food. Other sources of human dietary variation are: (1) animal productivity, (2) seasonal changes, (3) the mix of animal species, breeds, and herd composition, (4) the patterns of animal use, and (5) trade practices. Animal productivity depends on the breeds of livestock, the forage productivity of the environment, and the patterns of herd management—such as ranching, sedentary, transhumant, or nomadic (Little et al. 1999). Well-fed stock will be larger and have more muscle mass and greater body fat deposits. Seasonal changes in semiarid ecosystems lead to loss of body fat and muscle mass in livestock, reduced milk production in lactating females, and lower fat content of milk (Galvin and Little 1999). Different livestock species, breeds, and age/sex groups show variable food productivity; for example, dairy herds will have high proportions of females and high reproductive rates (population increase). Patterns of livestock use vary from largely food production (meat, milk, blood), to use of animals for traction, packing, or riding. In the case of Andean camelids, llamas are principally pack animals, while alpacas provide wool and meat. Trade of animal products for cultivated foods can substantially enrich diets. The concept of "verticality" in highland pastoral peoples entails exchanging of animal products for cultivated food from lowland populations. This is practiced by Indian Bakkarwal sheep and goat herders and by Peruvian Quechua llama and alpaca herders. Pastoralists depending principally on livestock products for food often will have very high protein intakes but low energy (calorie) intakes. Conversely, pastoralists who trade some of their animal products for cereal foods are likely to have adequate protein and higher energy intakes.

Herding of livestock is practiced today on all continents from tropical grasslands to Arctic tundra. More than 75 percent of world meat production in grassland-based ecosystems is from North America, South America, Western Europe, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. Residents of these major Western livestock producing nations (especially the United States, Argentina, and Australia) consume substantial amounts of animal protein and fat calories. Such dietary practices, when combined with sedentary physical activities, have contributed to high rates of cardiovascular disease in many of these Western nations. Another liability resulting from the close contact of humans and livestock are "zoonoses," that is, diseases that originate in animal populations but are transmitted to humans. Examples are bacterial cattle diseases such as anthrax and brucellosis that are widespread around the world. Scrapie in sheep and mad cow disease are neurological degenerative diseases produced by pathogens called prions. When contracted by humans, they are almost always fatal.

Livestock productivity as food is low when compared to agricultural productivity, and requires either vast grazing lands or substantial importation and use of feed (Jordan 1993). Increasing demand for animal protein has certainly contributed to deforestation through cutting and burning of forests to maintain grasslands. And livestock manure is one of the major pollutants of bodies of water in the United States (Cincotta and Engelman, 2000). An estimate of the global livestock body mass in 1950 was about 340 million metric tons (3.4 × 1011 kg). This biomass of livestock nearly doubled to an estimated 600 million metric tons (6.0 × 1011 kg) in the year 2000 (Cincotta and Engelman, 2000). In contrast, non-Western livestock production in marginal lands that are unsuitable for agriculture (transhumant or nomadic herding) is an efficient system of animal food production that is not environmentally degrading. However, this system of keeping herds represents an exceedingly small proportion of worldwide livestock productivity.

Prions and Mad Cow Disease

Prion diseases are produced by infectious agents that are proteins. These prion proteins resist inactivation by normal procedures because they do not have a normal nucleic acid genetic makeup. Prion diseases are often referred to as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) because of the damage caused to the brain. The two livestock prion diseases that are known today are scrapie in sheep and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease) in cattle. Mad cow disease is transmissible to humans, and another human prion disease, kuru, was probably originally transmitted to humans through a modified form of scrapie via another prion disease called Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease. Mad cow disease is an example of a domestic zoonosis, that is, a disease that is transmitted from a domestic animal to humans. Two other domestic zoonoses that can be transmitted from livestock to humans are brucellosis or ungulent fever (present in goats, sheep, cattle, and pigs) and anthrax (present largely in cattle).

Deforestation and Livestock Grazing

Deforestation dates back in antiquity to the first rise of cities in the Near East about 5,000 years ago. Yet 2,000 years ago, in Roman times, 90 percent of Europe was still forested. Today, there are many causes of deforestation—living space for an increasing human population, agriculture, charcoal production, use of wood for fuel, commercial logging, and others. However, deforestation for herding of livestock, especially cattle, is one of the least productive uses for land. Increasing demands for beef and increasing numbers of fast-food chains internationally have contributed to the growth of cattle ranches in North and South America. It is estimated that more than 10 million hectares (24.7 million acres) of tropical forest are lost each year, and of these losses, about 10 percent or one million hectares are lost to grazing lands.

Bibliography

Aikio, P. "The Changing Role of the Reindeer in the Life of the Sámi." In The Walking Larder: Patterns of Domestication, Pastoralism, and Predation, edited by Juliet Clutton-Brock, pp.169-184. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.

Cincotta, Richard P., and Robert Engelman. Nature's Place: Human Population and the Future of Biological Diversity. Washington, D.C.: Population Action International, 2000.

Clutton-Brock, Juliet. "The Mammalian Remains from the Jericho Tell." Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 45 (1979): 135–158.

Clutton-Brock, Juliet. "Cattle in Ancient North Africa." In TheWalking Larder: Patterns of Domestication, Pastoralism, and Predation, edited by Juliet Clutton-Brock, pp. 200–206. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.

Clutton-Brock, Juliet. Horse Power: A History of the Horse and theDonkey in Human Societies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.

Galvin, Kathleen A. "Nutritional Ecology of Pastoralists in Dry Tropical Africa." American Journal of Human Biology 4 (1992): 209–221.

Harris, David R. "The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia: An Overview." In The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia, edited by David R. Harris, pp. 552–573. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1996.

Köhler-Rollefson, Ilse. "The One-Humped Camel in Asia: Origin, Utilization and Mechanisms of Dispersal." In The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia, edited by David R. Harris, pp. 282–294. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1996.

Legge, Tony. "The Beginning of Caprine Domestication in Southwest Asia." In The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia, edited by David R. Harris, pp. 238–262. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1996.

Little, Michael A., Rada Dyson-Hudson, and J. Terrence Mc-Cabe. "Ecology of South Turkana." In Turkana Herders of the Dry Savanna: Ecology and Biobehavioral Response of Nomads to an Uncertain Environment, edited by Michael A. Little and Paul W. Leslie, pp. 43–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Novoa, C., and Jane C. Wheeler. "Llama and Alpaca." In Evolution of Domesticated Animals, edited by Ian Mason, pp. 116–128. London: Longman, 1984.

Olsen, S. J. "Fossil Ancestry of the Yak: Its Cultural Significance and Domestication in Tibet." Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences 142 (1990): 73–100.

Olsen, S. J. "Evidence of Early Domestication of the Water Buffalo in China." In Skeletons in Her Cupboard: Festschrift for Juliet Clutton-Brock, edited by A. Clason, S. Payne, and H-P. Uerpmann, pp. 151–156. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 34, 1993.

Sherratt, Andrew. "Plough and Pastoralism: Aspects of the Secondary Products Revolution." In Pattern of the Past: Studies in Honor of David Clarke, edited by Ian Hodder, Glynn Isaac, and Norman Hammond, pp. 261–305. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

—Michael A. Little

1. natural congregation of animals into groups; see also flocking.
2. management of animals into large groups or herds by humans to facilitate animal husbandry procedures.

Word Tutor: herd
Top
pronunciation

IN BRIEF: A number of cattle or other large animals feeding or living together.

pronunciation We must plant the sea and herd its animals. — Jacques Cousteau (1910-1997)

Tutor's tip: Tell them what the "herd" (group of animals or people) "heard" (past tense of hear).

Wikipedia: Herd
Top
A herd of Wildebeest

A herd is a large group of animals and is a form of collective animal behavior. The term is usually applied to mammals, particularly ungulates. Other terms are used for similar phenomena in other types of animal. For example, a large group of birds is usually called a flock (this may also refer to certain mammals as well) and a large group of carnivores is usually called a pack. In addition, special collective nouns may be used for particular taxa: for example a flock of geese, if not in flight, is sometimes called a gaggle. However, in theoretical discussions in behavioural ecology, the generic term "herd" is used for all these kinds of assemblage. A herd may also refer to one that tends and cares for such groups (i.e. shepherds tend to sheep, and goatherds tend to goats, etc.).

When an association of animals (or, by extension, people) is described as a "herd", the implication is that the group tends to act together (for example, all moving in the same direction at a given time), but that this does not occur as a result of planning or co-ordination. Rather, each individual is choosing behaviour that corresponds to that of the majority of other members, possibly through imitation or possibly because all are responding to the same external circumstances. A herd can be contrasted with a co-ordinated group where individuals have distinct roles. Many human groupings, such as army detachments or sports teams, show such co-ordination and differentiation of roles, but so do some animal groupings such as those of eusocial insects, which are co-ordinated through pheromones and other forms of animal communication. Conversely, some human groupings may behave more like herds.

Contents

Why do animals herd?

Flock of birds in flight

The question of why animals group together is one of the most fundamental in sociobiology and behavioural ecology. As noted above, the term "herd" is most commonly used of grazing animals such as ungulates, and in these cases it is believed that the strongest selective pressure leading to herding rather than a solitary existence is protection against predators. There is clearly a tradeoff involved, since on the one hand a predator may hesitate to attack a large group of animals, while on the other a large group offers an easily detected target. It is generally believed that the most important protective factor is risk dilution - even if a predator attacks the herd, the risk for any individual that it will be the victim is greatly reduced. In the case of predators, it is often unclear whether the term "herd" is appropriate, since there may be some degree of co-ordination or role differentiation in group hunting. Predator groups are commonly smaller than grazing groups, since although a pack may be more effective at pulling down prey than a single animal, the prey then has to be shared between all members, so that the weaker animals will often be better off hunting smaller prey on their own.

The structure and size of herds

A herd is by definition relatively unstructured. However, there may be one or a few animals which tend to be imitated by the rest of the members of the herd more than others. An animal taking this role is called a "control animal", since its behaviour will predict that of the herd as a whole. It cannot be assumed, however, that the control animal is deliberately taking a leadership role. Control animals are not necessarily, or even usually, those that are socially dominant in conflict situations, though they frequently are. Group size is an important characterestic of the social environment of gregarious species.

A Snow Goose gaggle may contain thousands.

Domestic herds

Domestic animal herds are assembled by humans for practicality in raising them and controlling them. Their behaviour may be quite different from that of wild herds of the same or related species, since both their composition (in terms of the distribution of age and sex within the herd) and their history (in terms of when and how the individuals joined the herd) are likely to be very different.

A herd of goats in the Greek Highlands

Human parallels

The term herd is also applied metaphorically to human beings in social psychology, with the concept of herd behaviour. However both the term and concepts that underlie its use are controversial.

The term has acquired a semi-technical usage in behavioral finance to describe the largest group of market investors or market speculators who tend to 'move with the market,' or 'follow the general market trend.' This is at least a plausible example of genuine herding, though according to some researchers it results from rational decisions through processes such as information cascade and rational expectations. Other researchers, however, ascribe it to non-rational process such as mimicry, fear and greed contagion. "Contrarians" or contrarian investors are those who deliberately choose to invest or speculate counter to the "herd".

See also


Translations: Herd
Top

Dansk (Danish)
n. - hjord, flok, mængde
v. intr. - samle sig
v. tr. - vogte, drive, genne

Nederlands (Dutch)
een kudde hoeden, voort-/samendrijven, kudde, roedel

Français (French)
n. - troupeau, troupe (de chevaux), bande, harde, (fig) troupeau (de gens) (péj)
v. intr. - rassembler, rassembler (qn) en troupeau, être entassé
v. tr. - s'assembler dans qch

Deutsch (German)
n. - Herde, Rudel
v. - zusammentreiben, hüten

Ελληνική (Greek)
n. - αγέλη, κοπάδι, βοσκός, (καθομ.) μπουλούκι, στίφος
v. - μαζεύω/-ομαι σε κοπάδι

Italiano (Italian)
riunire in gregge, gregge

Português (Portuguese)
n. - rebanho (m)
v. - arrebanhar(-se), pastorear

Русский (Russian)
стадо, толпа, ходить стадом, быть вместе, примкнуть, собирать в стадо

Español (Spanish)
n. - rebaño, hato, manada, piara
v. intr. - unirse, ir en grupo
v. tr. - guardar, reunir en manada, conducir, apiñar

Svenska (Swedish)
n. - hjord, massa, herde
v. - gå i hjord, valla, vara i lag, vakta, vara guide för en turistgrupp

中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
兽群, 牧人, 人群, 聚在一起, 成群, 群集, 放牧, 使成群

中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
n. - 獸群, 牧人, 人群
v. intr. - 聚在一起, 成群
v. tr. - 群集, 放牧, 使成群

한국어 (Korean)
n. - 무리, 군중, 목자, 평민
v. intr. - 떼짓다, 모이다
v. tr. - 모으다, ~의 무리를 지키다

日本語 (Japanese)
n. - 群れ, 大勢, 民衆, 大衆, 飼う人
v. - 集まる, 群がる, 駆り集める, 番をする, 群れをなす, 集める

العربيه (Arabic)
‏(الاسم) قطيع, سرب, جماعه من الناس, تنظمها رابطه مشتركه, الجمهور, الدهماء (فعل) يجتمع أو يسير على شكل قطيع, يأتلف, يمتزج في جماعته, يرعى القطعان, يجمع, يقود, يسوق, يضع ضمن جماعه‏

עברית (Hebrew)
n. - ‮עדר, המון, רועה, בעל עדרים‬
v. intr. - ‮התאסף‬
v. tr. - ‮קיבץ, נהג עדר‬


Shopping: herd
Top
 
 
Learn More
Goat
Mammals
Meat

What does nomadic herding do? Read answer...
What can be called a herd? Read answer...
Is herd a pronoun? Read answer...

Help us answer these
What is mean by herding?
What is the herd mentality?
They work with their herds?

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

 

Copyrights:

Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Thesaurus. Roget's II: The New Thesaurus, Third Edition by the Editors of the American Heritage® Dictionary Copyright © 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Answers Corporation Antonyms. © 1999-2009 by Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
Food & Culture Encyclopedia. Encyclopedia of Food and Culture. Copyright © 2003 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Veterinary Dictionary. Saunders Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary 3rd Edition. Copyright © 2007 by D.C. Blood, V.P. Studdert and C.C. Gay, Elsevier. All rights reserved.  Read more
Word Tutor. Copyright © 2004-present by eSpindle Learning, a 501(c) nonprofit organization. All rights reserved.
eSpindle provides personalized spelling and vocabulary tutoring online; free trial Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Herd" Read more
Translations. Copyright © 2007, WizCom Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved.  Read more