Heresy, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is a
"theological or religious opinion or doctrine maintained in opposition, or held to be contrary,
to the Roman Catholic or Orthodox doctrine of
the Christian Church, or, by extension, to that of any church, creed, or religious system, considered as orthodox. By extension,
heresy is an opinion or doctrine in philosophy, politics, science, art, etc., at variance with those generally accepted as
authoritative." The study of heresy is heresiology. The founder of a heresy is called a
Heresiarch.
Etymology
The word "heresy" comes from the Greek αἵρεσις,
hairesis (from αἱρέομαι, haireomai, "choose"), which means either a 'choice of
beliefs or a faction of believers. It was given wide currency by Irenaeus in his
tract Contra Haereses (Against
Heresies) to describe and discredit his opponents in the early Christian Church. He described his own position as orthodox
(from ortho- "right" + doxa "belief") and his position eventually evolved into the position of the early Christian
Church.
Used in this way, the term "heresy" has no purely objective meaning: the category exists only from the point of view of
speakers within a group that has previously agreed about what counts as "orthodox". Any nonconformist view within any field may be perceived as "heretical" by others within that field who are
convinced that their view is "orthodox"; in the sciences this extension is made tongue-in-cheek.
Heretics usually do not define their own beliefs as heretical. Heresy is a value judgement and the expression of a view from
within an established belief system. For instance, Roman Catholics held Protestantism as a
heresy while some non-Catholics considered Catholicism the "Great Apostasy."
For a heresy to exist there must be an authoritative system of dogma designated as orthodox, such as those proposed by
Catholicism. The term orthodox is used in Eastern Orthodoxy, some Protestant churches, in
Islam, some Jewish denominations, and to a lesser extent
in other religions. Variance from orthodox Marxism-Leninism is described as "right" or "left deviationism." The Church of Scientology uses the term "squirreling" to refer to unauthorized alterations of its
teachings or methods.
Religious heresy
Christianity
-
The use of the term "heresy" in the context of Christianity is less common today, with some notable exceptions: see for
example Rudolf Bultmann and the "character" of debates over ordination of women and gay priests. Popular imagination relegates "heresy" to the Middle Ages,[citation needed] when the Church's power in Europe was at its height, but the case of the
scholar and humanist Giordano Bruno was not the last execution for heresy. Heresy
remained an officially punishable offense in Roman Catholic nations until the late 18th century. In Spain, heretics were
prosecuted and punished during the Counter-Enlightenment movement of the
restoration of the monarchy there after the Napoleonic Era.
Orthodox Judaism
-
Orthodox Judaism considers views on the part of Jews which depart from the
traditional Jewish principles of faith to be heretical. In addition,
mainstream Orthodox Judaism holds that all Jews who reject the simple meaning of Maimonides's
13 principles of Jewish faith are heretics.[1] As such,
most of Orthodox Judaism considers Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism to be heretical movements, and regards most of Conservative Judaism as heretical. The liberal wing of Modern Orthodoxy is more tolerant of Conservative Judaism, particularly its right wing, as there
is some theological and practical overlap between these groups.
The law "You shall not cut yourselves" (Deuteronomy 14:1) is interpreted by the Rabbis: "You shall not form divisions, but
shall form one bond." (Source: Talmud Yevamot 13a, Midrash Sifre on Deuteronomy 96)
Besides the term "min" for "heretic," the Talmud uses the words "Hitsonim" (outsiders),
"apikoros," and "kofer ba-Torah" (R. H. 17a), or "kofeir ba-'ikar[2]" (he who denies the fundamentals of faith; Pes. xxiv. 168b). Similar statuses may apply to some of
those branded "poresh mi-darke tsibbur" (he who deviates from the customs of the community; Tosef., Sanh. xiii. 5; R. H. 17a).
Some authorities opine that all of these are consigned to Gehinnom for all eternity (Tosef., Sanh. l.c.; comp. ib. xii. 9,
apparently belonging to xiii. 5: "He who casts off the yoke [of the Law], and he who severs the Abrahamic covenant; he who
interprets the Torah against the halakic tradition, and he who pronounces in full the Ineffable Name—all these have no share in
the world to come,") or possibly have no afterlife at all.[3]
The Mishnah says the following have no share in the world to come: "He who denies that the
Torah is divinely revealed, and the apiḳoros." R. Akiba says, "also he who reads heretical books". This is explained in the
Talmud (Sanh. 100b) to mean "sifre Ẓeduḳim" (Sadducean writings); but this is an alteration by the censor of "sifre ha-Minim"
(books of the Gnostics or Heretics). The Biblical version, "That ye seek not after your own heart" (Num. xv. 39), is explained
(Sifre, Num. 115; Ber. 12b) as "Ye shall not turn to heretic views ["minut"] which lead your heart away from God" (see
Maimonides, "Yad," 'Akkum, ii. 3).
In summarizing the Talmudic statements concerning heretics in Sanh. 90-103, Maimonides ("Yad," Teshubah, iii. 6-8) says:
"The following have no share in the world to come, but are cut off, and perish, and receive their punishment for all time for
their great sin: the minim, the apiḳoresim, they that deny the belief in the Torah, they that deny the belief in resurrection of
the dead and in the coming of the Redeemer, the apostates, they that lead many to sin, they that turn away from the ways of the
[Jewish] community... Five are called 'minim': (1) he who says there is no God and the world has no guide; (2) he who says the
world has more than one guide; (3) he who ascribes to the Lord of the Universe a body and a figure; (4) he who says that God was
not alone and Creator of all things at the world's beginning; (5) he who worships some star or constellation as an intermediating
power between himself and the Lord of the World.
"The following three classes are called 'apiḳoresim': (1) he who says there was no prophecy nor was there any wisdom that came
from God and which was attained by the heart of man; (2) he who denies the prophetic power of Moses our master; (3) he who says
that God has no knowledge concerning the doings of men.
"The following three are called 'koferim ba-Torah': (1) he who says the Torah is not from God: he is a kofer even if he says a
single verse or letter thereof was said by Moses of his own accord; (2) he who denies the traditional interpretation of the Torah
and opposes those authorities who declare it to be tradition, as did Zadok and Boethus; and (3) he
who says, as do the Nazarenes and the Mohammedans, that the Lord has given a new dispensation instead of the old, and that he has
abolished the Law, though it was originally divine."
It is noteworthy, however, that Abraham ben David, in his critical notes, objects to Maimonides characterizing as heretics all
those who attribute corporeality to God; and he insinuates that the Kabbalists (of his time)
were not heretics. Similarly, Biblical critics who doubt or deny the Mosaic origin of every portion of the Pentateuch, would
protest against this Maimonidean (or Talmudic; see Sanh. 99a) conception of heresy (some ascribe a similar view to
Ibn Ezra based on his commentary to Deut. i. 2).
Heresy in Islam
The two main bodies of Islam are the Sunnis and the
Shi'as. These main denominations view each other as heretical. Groups like the
Sufis, the Hurufiya and the Bektashi are regarded as heretical. Although Sufism is often accepted as valid by Shi'a and some Sunnis, Sunni
movements like Wahhabism view it as heretical.
Both the Ahmadiyya and the Nation of Islam are
regarded by many Muslim Ulema as being apostate, but in the case of the Ahmadiyya movement, attitudes towards
designating the sect apostatical, heretical or Islamic differ depending on region or Islamic schools of thought. In
Pakistan, where most Ahmadis live, the state considers the group to be apostatical; whereas in
the neighbouring state of Iran, the same group is considered to fall within the bounds of Islamic
belief. Another example concerning the Ahmadiyya movement is the Al-Azhar Islamic
University in Egypt, which accepts a certain Ahmadi belief concerning the nature of
prophethood in Islam, considered by other schools as being heretical, to fall within Islamic jurisdiction.
Bid'ah in Religious Matters In Islam, bid‘ah (Arabic: بدعة) is any type of innovation. Though innovations in worldly matters
are acceptable to an extent, innovation within the religion is seen as a sin in Islam, as Muhammad stated as such:
“Whoever innovates something in this matter of ours [i.e., Islam] that is not a part of it, will have it rejected.” [1] [2] In
addition, the Qur'an (which Muslims believe is the word of God) states:
" ..This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My favor upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your
religion."[3]
Religious innovation means inventing a new way of worshipping Allah that was not originally included in the message revealed to
Muhammad. There is ample evidence in the Qur'an and Sunnah that bid'ah has never been tolerated in Sunni Islam, be it from
Muhammad, or his companions, or the pious predecessors - particularly the four Imams (Abu Hanifa an-Nu‘man, Malik ibn Anas,
Muhammad ibn Idris ash-Shafi`i, and Ahmad ibn Hanbal). The late Shaikh Muhammad Uthaimeen, a prominent modern day scholar of
Islam, wrote: "And there is no such thing in Islaam as bid’ah hasanah (good innovation)." [9] When a religious innovation is
committed, it is generally felt that the innovator is assuming that the Sunnah is not good enough, that he must resort to
something "better." Even though this statement would be an admission of disbelief [10] - there are some innovations that contain
shirk and there are some which allow someone to remain a Muslim, while his action is rejected (regardless of any sincerity it
might have had)[11].
In Islam there are seven categories of Individuals:
- Mu'min: used to describe a muslim Believer.
- Fajir: used to describe a muslim who is wicked/evil doer, a sinner (by action).
- Fasiq: used to describe a muslim who openly violates Islamic law.
- Munafiq: Hypocrite, one who believes in another religion but declares to be a muslim.
(sometimes used in non religious context).
- Kafir: unbeliever in God, a sinner (by rejecting Islam), a person who hides, denies, or covers
the truth. It is used to describe an unbeliever or an apostate from Islam)
- Zindiq: A previous muslim who no longer accepts Islam.
- Eh'le ketab: Believers of monotheist religions with a book. (Jews and
Christians)
Contemporary heresy
Today, heresy can be without a religious context as the holding of ideas that are in fundamental disagreement with the
status quo in any practice and branch of knowledge. Religion is not a necessary component of the term's definition. The
revisionist paleontologist Robert T. Bakker, who
published his findings as The Dinosaur Heresies, jokingly treated the mainstream view of dinosaurs as the dogma of a religion.
Political writers and historians have compared the persecution of Trotsky and his
followers by Stalin to the persecution of heretics by Christian churches - though the term
was not used by Stalin himself.
The term heresy is also used as an ideological pigeonhole for contemporary
writers because by definition heresy depends on contrasts with an established orthodoxy. For
example, the tongue-in-cheek contemporary usage of heresy, such as to categorize a "Wall Street heresy" or a "Republican heresy",
are metaphors which invariably retain a subtext that links orthodoxies in geology or biology or
any other field to the dogmas of religion (although religion may not necessarily appear as an explicit component). Heresy, in
these expanded metaphoric senses, is intended to allude to both the difference between the person's views and the
mainstream, and the boldness of such a person in propounding these views, despite their unpopularity or even forceful
opposition.
In modern American history, the term heresy has been applied in the United States to the position of those Catholic
politicians and voters who publicly profess support for abortion. In July 2004, the group De Fide achieved wide notoriety when it
coined the expression "Right-to-Murder Heresy" in reference to abortion. It and 3,000 other Catholics filed the first
"class-action" denunciation for heresy against Senator John F. Kerry, soon followed by more denunciations against four other
well-known pro choice Republican and Democratic senators.
Following those events, in February 2006, Bishop Robert F. Vasa of the Diocese of Baker, Oregon widened the national debate by
becoming the first sitting Roman Catholic Ordinary to publicly raise the question of heresy in reference to those who support or
vote in favor of abortion.
Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to:
On September 28, 2007, Gaston Hebert, the diocese administrator (per the July
11 Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) stated that 6 Arkansas nuns were
excommunicated for heresy (the first in the diocese's 165-year history). They refused to
recant the doctrines of the Community of the Lady of All Nations (Army of Mary). They 6 nuns are members of the Good Shepherd Monastery of Our Lady of Charity and Refuge in Hot
Springs. Sister Mary Theresa Dionne, 82, one of 6, said they will still live at the convent property, which they own. The sect believe that its 86-year-old
founder, Marie Paule Giguere, is the reincarnation
of the Virgin Mary.[4]
Selected quotations
- Marcello Truzzi will be considered as eccentric and incompetent, whereas if the
person is an exoheretic, he will be regarded as a crackpot, charlatan, or fraud."[5]
- James G. March on the relation between madness,
heresy, and genius: "... we sometimes find that such heresies have been the foundation for bold
and necessary change, but heresy is usually just new ideas are foolish or dangerous and appropriately rejected or ignored. So
while it may be true that great geniCauses; Showing That it Is Not Lawful For Any Pownoted that Isaac Asimov distinguished between two types of scientific heretic: "Endoheretics are appropriately
credentialed scientists. If the person is outside the scientific community or at least outside of his specialty, he is an
exoheretic. If a person is an endoheretic, he er on Earth to Compel in Mattwrote in his Treatise of Civil Power in
Ecclesiastical at to the people as in a tongue unknown. They should first interpret to them that heresy ers of Religion
(1659): "But we shall not carry it thus; another Greek apparition stands in our way, heresy
and heretic; in like manner also railed uses are usually heretics, heretics are rarely great geniuses."[6]
- John Milton by what it signifies in that language, is no word of evil note, meaning only
the choice or following of any opinion, goocrazy. Most daring d or bad, in religion, or any other learning; and thus not only in
heathen authors but in the New Testament itself, without censure or blame Acts xv, 5, 'Certain of the heresy of the Pharisees
which believed', and xxvi, 5 'After the exactest heresy of our religion I lived a Pharisee.' In which sense Presbyterian or
Independent may without reproach be called a heresy. Where it is mentioned with blame, it seems to differ little from schism: I
Cor. xi, 18, 19, 'l hear that there be schisms among you,' &c. 'for there must also heresies be among you,' &c. Though
some, who write of heresy aftcan judge definitively the sense of scripture to another man's conscience, which is well known to be
a general maxim of the Protestant religion, it follows plainly that he who holds in religion that belief or those opinions which
to his conscience and utmost understanding appear with most evidence of probability in the scripture, though to others er their
own heads, would make it far worse than schism; whenas on the contrary, schism signifies division, and in light, which we now
only have, of the scripture. Seeing, therefore, that no man, the worst sense; heresy, choice only of one opinion before another,
which may be without discord. In apostolic times, therefore, ere the Scripture was written, heresy waheretic than his censurers,
who do but the same thing themselves, while they censure him for so doing." See the full text of this Treatise a doctrine maintained against the doctrine by them
delivered; which in these times can be no otherwise defined than a doctrine maintained against the no synod, no justly censured
for a _room/civil_power/index.shtml here, provided by Dartmouth College's of men, though called the church, he seem erroneous, can
be.edu/~milton/reading_room/ Milton Reading Room.
References
- ^ The Limits of Orthodox Theology: Maimonides' Thirteen Principles
Reappraised, by Marc B. Shapiro, ISBN 1874774900
- ^ See Maimonides, and his differentiation between different statuses in
Hilchos Teshuvah
- ^ See Maimonides, and his differentiation between different statuses in
Hilchos Teshuvah
- ^ CNN, Six Arkansas
nuns excommunicated for heresy
- ^ Truzzi, Marcello. Reflection on the Reception of Unconventional Claims
of Science. Frontier Perspectives 1 (1990).
- ^ Coutou, Diane. Ideas as Art. Harvard Business Review 84 (2006): 83-89.
See also
External links
References
- ^ The Limits of Orthodox Theology: Maimonides' Thirteen Principles
Reappraised, by Marc B. Shapiro, ISBN 1874774900
- ^ See Maimonides, and his differentiation between different statuses in
Hilchos Teshuvah
- ^ See Maimonides, and his differentiation between different statuses in
Hilchos Teshuvah
- ^ CNN, Six Arkansas
nuns excommunicated for heresy
- ^ Truzzi, Marcello. Reflection on the Reception of Unconventional Claims
of Science. Frontier Perspectives 1 (1990).
- ^ Coutou, Diane. Ideas as Art. Harvard Business Review 84 (2006): 83-89.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
