(1821–94). German physiologist and physicist, born at Potsdam. He was the son of Ferdinand Helmholtz, a teacher of philology and philosophy in the gymnasium. His mother's maiden name was Penne; she was descended from the Quaker founder of Philadelphia, William Penn. Hermann Helmholtz became the founder of the science of perceptual physiology. He carried out a vast number of observational experiments, often with himself as observer, as well as physiological experiments for explanations. He also formulated psychological concepts which have lasting significance. His immense range — he was one of the greatest physicists of the 19th century — even includes ideas on
aesthetics and art. He was also a director of research, and with his
Popular Lectures a lucid presenter of science: by following a suggestion of his, his student Heinrich Hertz (1857–94) discovered how to confirm James Clerk Maxwell's theoretical prediction of radio waves. Helmholtz was professor of physiology at Königsberg (1849), Bonn (1855), and Heidelberg (1858). Then in 1871 he became professor of physics at Berlin, and from 1888 to 1894 was president of the Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, which he designed as 'an institute for the experimental promotion of exact science and the
technique of precision'. It is, however, for his earlier work on the nervous system and especially on vision and hearing, and as the founder of the experimental study of
perception, that he concerns us here.
His first great achievement, in 1850, was to measure the rate of conduction of signals in nerves. It had been thought that sensory signals arrive at the brain immediately. Indeed, the founder of modern physiology,
Johannes Müller (1801–58) considered it to be beyond experimental possibility to measure the neural conduction rate, because nerves are so short, in comparison with the astronomical distances over which the velocity of light had been estimated, that no instrument could measure the very short time differences. But Helmholtz's friend
Emil Du Bois-Reymond (1816–96), the originator of electrophysiology, suggested that there might be a molecular basis for neural conduction, so it could be a great deal slower than the velocity of light. Further, a new instrument, the chronograph, was invented in 1849, making it possible to record short durations and rapid changes with an electrically operated pen on a revolving drum. Helmholtz used this with frog preparations, and then on humans. The method with humans was to find the difference between
reaction times to a stimulus at, say, the ankle and the calf of the leg. Since the muscle action time (which he also succeeded in measuring) would be the same in either case, a longer reaction time from the ankle must be due to conduction time in the nerve of the leg. Helmholtz found it to be comparable to the speed of sound, rather than of light. His father commented in a letter to him: 'the results at first appeared to me surprising, since I regard the idea and its bodily expression not as successive, but as simultaneous, a single living act, that only becomes bodily and mental on reflection; and I could as little reconcile myself to your view, as I could admit that a star that had disappeared in Abraham's time should still be visible.' This was, however, a misunderstanding which was for some time shared by the older physiologists, for as Helmholtz immediately pointed out to his father: 'the interaction of mental and physical processes is initiated in the brain, and consciousness, intellectual activity, has nothing to do with the transmission of the message from the skin, from the retina, or from the ear, to the brain. In relation to intelligence this transmission within the body is as external as the propagation of sound from the place at which it takes origin, to the ear.' The measurements did however lead Helmholtz to appreciate that the brain is quite slow, for reaction times are much longer than they should be from the speed of signals in peripheral nerves, and so he came to appreciate that a great deal of routeing and switching of signals must be going on during perception, and for decisions for muscle movement. This led to analogies between brain function and telephone exchange switching, and then computers.
Helmholtz was philosophically a thoroughgoing empiricist, believing that sensory signals only have significance as the result of associations built up by learning. We are essentially separate from the world of objects, and isolated from external physical events, except for neural signals which, somewhat like language, must be learned and read according to various assumptions, which may or may not be appropriate. This is the basis of Helmholtz's interest in perceptual and especially visual
illusions. More generally, it is the basis also of his notion, at that time disturbing, that perceptions are 'unconscious inferences'. This challenged the prevailing view that responsibility, and just blame and praise, depend on consciously held reasons and motivations.
Sigmund Freud's slightly later notion of an active unconscious mind is a rather different idea, though equally shocking to the Victorians. For Helmholtz it was simply that most of what goes on in the nervous system is not represented in consciousness. Physiological and psychological experiments are important, and often surprising in their findings, because we cannot experience or discover by introspection how we see or think, or even know on what data our perceptions and beliefs are based. Thus Helmholtz wrote of visual illusions, in his last paper on perception (1894):
- Knowledge gained through daily experience, with all its accidents, does not usually have the range and completeness which it is possible to obtain with experiments. ... We usually refer to incorrect inductive inferences concerning the meaning of our perceptions as illusions of the senses. For the most part they are the result of incomplete inductive inferences. Their occurrence is largely related to the fact that we tend to favour certain ways of using our sense organs — those ways which provide us with the most reliable and most consistent judgements about the forms, spatial relations, and properties of the objects we observe. ... Unusual perceptions, concerning whose meaning we have no trained knowledge, occur with unusual positions and movements of our sense organs, and incorrect interpretations of these perceptions may result. We can, in fact, lay down the general rule that with abnormal positions and movements of the eyes, the intuitions which occur are those of the objects which would naturally have to exist in order to produce the same perceptions under the conditions of normal vision.
Then, after pointing out that ordinary plane mirrors produce illusions of this kind, though we are seldom actually misled, he adds: 'most observers know how to change an unusual kind of observation into one that is common and normal, thus causing the illusion to be recognized and to disappear.' Thus
after-images impressed on the retina by a flash of light are seen as external objects, even though we may realize they are illusory, as we move our eyes and find part of the visual world moving with them. The illusion persists but we are not fooled by it.
Helmholtz was remarkable in combining shrewd psychological accounts with extraordinarily powerful physical insights, as in his work on the conservation of energy. His experimental and inventive skills were also remarkable. They led to the ophthalmoscope (1851) for examining the retina; the ophthalmometer for measuring the curvature of the optical surface of the eye; and the Young–Helmholtz trichromatic theory of
colour vision, which is the basis of current theories. In
hearing, he introduced the resonance theory of pitch discrimination. That he achieved his results before there were stable sources of light, or electronic instruments for producing and measuring sound waves, humbles the present-day investigator.
Helmholtz's
Treatise on Physiological Optics (3 vols., 1856–67; trans. 1924–5, reprinted 1962, 2000) is the foundation of the science of visual perception and well worth reading today by the serious student. His
On the Sensations of Tone (1863; 4th edn. 1877, trans. 1954) was his main work on perception in hearing, and his
Popular Lectures (1881; 1962) range from painting through perception to physics and the basis of geometry.
(Published 1987)— Richard L. Gregory
Bibliography- Kahl, R. (ed.) (1971). Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz.
- Koenigsberger, L. (1906). Hermann von Helmholtz. The fullest and best biography, with a good account of the development of most of his ideas.
- McKendrick, J. G. (1899). Hermann von Helmholtz. More concerned with his work in physics than on perception or the mind.
- Wade, N. (2000). Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics (5th edn.). Trans. J. Southall.
- Warren, R. M., and Warren, R. P. (1968). Helmholtz on Perception: Its Physiology and Development. A selection of Helmholtz's writings on perception, with a short life and excellent comments on his work and ideas.