For more information on Hippolyte-Adolphe Taine, visit Britannica.com.
| Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: Hippolyte-Adolphe Taine |
For more information on Hippolyte-Adolphe Taine, visit Britannica.com.
| 5min Related Video: Hippolyte Taine |
| Biography: Hippolyte Adolphe Taine |
The French critic and historian Hippolyte Adolphe Taine (1828-1893) was one of the most prominent intellectual figures of his period in France. His emphasis on scientific methods in criticism formed the basis of contemporary critical techniques.
Hippolyte Taine was born in Vouziers in the Ardennes on April 21, 1828, into a family of civil servants. His childhood was spent in an enlightened cultural atmosphere in which earnest intellectual pursuits mingled with an early exposure to the arts and to nature. By the age of 14, when he moved to Paris with his widowed mother, he had developed an intense intellectuality matched only by his profound love of nature.
Taine's passion for knowledge and especially for philosophy made him highly receptive to the multitude of intellectual and scientific trends of his time. By the time he had completed his university studies at the École Normale Supérieure, he had investigated almost every philosophical and scientific concept known. Upon leaving the university he was prepared to formulate his own critical apparatus in order to investigate bodies of knowledge.
Taine's most productive years coincided with the reign of Napoleon III. The Second Empire, beneath its social glitter and economic growth, was highly oppressive to liberal intellectuals. Taine abandoned all hopes of a professorial career at the university. He withdrew from public life and devoted his energies to research in a large variety of fields. All of his studies centered on the problem of the human condition and were underlain by his naive but honest belief in the explicability of human nature by means of scientific inquiry.
The culmination of this belief found its expression in Taine's central work, De l'intelligence (1870). It summed up all his previous interests in psychology and philosophy and fused the converging lines of his critical thought. His works preceding De l'intelligence encompass a great variety of interests and touch on almost every phase of intellectual and artistic production. His dissertation on the fables of Jean de La Fontaine, completed in 1853 and published in its final form in 1860 (La Fontaine et ses fables), was a presentation of Taine's concept of esthetics. It expressed in essence his doctrine of scientific determinism by attributing "racial" distinctions to climatic and geographical differences. His work on the French philosophers of the 19th century (Les Philosophes français du XIX siècle, 1857) was a critical evaluation of the major philosophical concepts of the century, and his essays on a wide variety of subjects represented a further elaboration of his critical system. These volumes included Essais de critique et d'histoire (1858), Nouveaux essais (1865), and Derniers essais (1894).
Taine formulated his critical system most clearly in the introduction to the five volumes of one of his major works, Histoire de la littérature anglaise (1863). He stated that every reality, psychological, esthetic, or historical, can be reduced to a distinctly definable formula by discovering in each reality a single operative principle. This basic principle is governed by a system of laws that he reduced to his famous triad of race, environment, and time ("la race, le milieu, le moment"). Taine applied this critical system in all of his works, including his analyses of the development of the arts of Greece, Italy, and the Netherlands, presented in a series of lectures spanning more than 20 years at the École des Beaux-Arts and published in two volumes, Philosophie de l'art (1865-1869).
The Franco-Prussian War of 1870 profoundly disturbed Taine. From then until his death, he applied himself to an analysis of French history in an attempt to uncover the causes of France's defeat and the Commune of 1871 (Les Origines de la France contemporaine, 1875-1893). He died in Paris on March 9, 1893.
Further Reading
There is no biography of Taine in English. Sholom J. Kahn, Science and Aesthetic Judgement: A Study in Taine's Critical Method (1953), analyzes Taine's esthetic theory. For an evaluation of his influence upon modern literary criticism see William K. Wimsatt, Jr., and Cleanth Brooks, Literary Criticism: A Short History (1957). A cogent defense of the methodology of historical criticism is in Edmund Wilson, The Triple Thinkers (1938).
| French Literature Companion: Hippolyte-Adolphe Taine |
Taine, Hippolyte-Adolphe (1828-93). French critic and historian. Taine is exemplary of the way in which a writer can dominate his era and yet be virtually unknown a century later. Lacking the armature of imagined form, ideas dissolve into the intellectual gene-pool. The irony is that Taine saw this with exceptional lucidity. In some ways he was the Sartre of his time (Taine-and- Renan/Sartre-and- Camus); but where Sartre was able to produce works of the imagination as well as works of the intellect, the imaginative writer in Taine was repressed, finding an outlet only in occasional heightened language (the purple passages of Les Origines de la France contemporaine, 1875-93) and frequent similes (one of these—‘Le vice et la vertu sont des produits comme le vitriol et le sucre’—is all that the average reader recalls of Taine's enormous output).
His year of crisis was 1862, and it is described in a rare diary entry reproduced in the Vie et correspondance (1902-7). At 34 this only son of a humble country lawyer from Vouziers in the Ardennes had become the leading critic of his generation. He had published articles on a wide range of subjects. Collected, recast, and prefaced, these became a series of influential books: Les Philosophes français du XIXe siècle (1857), an iconoclastic attack on the dominant spiritualiste philosophy (and on Victor Cousin in particular); the Essais de critique et d'histoire (1858); the Nouveaux essais de critique et d'histoire (1865), in which he boldly championed Balzac and Stendhal; and the Histoire de la littérature anglaise (1864).
But he had unrealized ambitions as a philosopher and in 1862 he had recently discovered a vocation as a creative writer, beginning a novel, Étienne Mayran (published posthumously); at the same time he had a liaison with the novelist Camille Selden, a somewhat mysterious, romantic figure who had an association with Heine. His critical work had convinced him that greatness only comes from the imagination. But he chose reason rather than risk: he broke with Camille Selden and abandoned his novel. The shock of the Commune may have been responsible for the anti-revolutionary emphasis of Les Origines, but the ‘decision’ to become a historian rather than a novelist is the resolution of the 1862 crisis.
The mythical opposition is a familiar, universal one—Sartre said he always felt inferior to writers like Rimbaud because they, unlike him, ‘ont su se perdre’. All his life Taine worked at this binary opposition: each individual he studied—Byron, Shakespeare, Michelet, Guizot, Macaulay, Racine, Danton, Napoleon—exemplified and extended it. The symbolic figure he called the ‘Poet’, the creator working with the imagination and (avant la lettre) the unconscious, achieves greatness, but it may be at the cost of his life or his sanity: and, for Taine, the same source that produces great works of the imagination produces the atrocities of the Terror. Better the safe world of the figure he calls the ‘Orator’, rational and controlled. This reflects Taine's historical moment—post-Romantic—but he knew well that posterity cherishes the poets and that orators get short shrift. He reflected on this—and implicitly on his own oblivion—in a series of poignant articles collected as Derniers essais de critique et d'histoire (1894).
Taine became the spokesman for the new positivist, determinist, anticlerical, anti-Romantic philosophy which was to influence Zola so much. Zola was, however (and for good reason), the only contemporary critic to see in him the repressed Romantic. Not until the publication of the correspondence and the early manuscript material was the Romantic metaphysician recognized. Pre-Freud and pre-Marx, Taine is still relevant as a psychologist (in De l'intelligence, 1870) and as a sociologist (in the Origines) because of the way he lived out the contradictions of the scientific method. His insistence on the need for empirical observation was in conflict with a heroic commitment to system. His explanatory concepts are often inadequate—as when he explains a writer by three forces, ‘race’, ‘milieu’, and ‘moment’, and by their ‘contrariété’ or ‘concordance’. But his struggle to reconcile a rationalist, continental outlook with the empiricism characteristic of the English, objectivity with subjectivity, remains relevant a century after his death.
[Colin Evans]
Bibliography
| Columbia Encyclopedia: Hippolyte Adolphe Taine |
Bibliography
See study by L. Weinstein (1972).
| Wikipedia: Hippolyte Taine |
Hippolyte Adolphe Taine (21 April 1828 in Vouziers – 5 March 1893 in Paris) was a French critic and historian. He was the chief theoretical influence of French naturalism, a major proponent of sociological positivism, and one of the first practitioners of historicist criticism. Literary historicism as a critical movement has been said to originate with him.[1] Taine is particularly remembered for his three-pronged approach to the contextual study of a work of art, based on the aspects of what he called race, milieu, and moment.
Taine had a profound effect on French literature; the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica asserted that "the tone which pervades the works of Zola, Bourget and Maupassant can be immediately attributed to the influence we call Taine's."
Contents |
Taine was born in Vouziers, but entered a boarding school, the Institution Mathé, whose classes were conducted at the Collège Bourbon, at the age of 13 in 1841, after the death of his father.[2] He excelled as a student, receiving a number of prizes in both scientific and humanistic subjects, and taking two Baccalauréat degrees at the École Normale before he was 20.[3] Taine's contrarian politics led to difficulties keeping teaching posts,[4] and his early academic career was decidedly mixed; he failed the exam for the national Concours d'Agrégation in 1851.[5] After his dissertation on sensation was rejected, he abandoned his studies in the social sciences, feeling that literature was safer.[6] He completed a doctorate at the Sorbonne in 1853, with considerably more success in his new field; his dissertation, Essai sur les fables de La Fontaine, won him a prize from the Academie Francaise.[7]
Taine was criticized, in his own time and after, by both conservatives and liberals; his politics were idiosyncratic, but had a consistent streak of skepticism toward the left; at the age of 20, he wrote that "the right of property is absolute."[8] Peter Gay describes Taine's reaction to the Jacobins as stigmatization, drawing on The French Revolution, in which Taine argues:
Some of the workmen are shrewd Politicians whose sole object is to furnish the public with words instead of things; others, ordinary scribblers of abstractions, or even ignoramuses, and unable to distinguish words from things, imagine that they are framing laws by stringing together a lot of phrases.[9]
This reaction led Taine to reject the French Constitution of 1793 as a Jacobin document, dishonestly presented to the French people.[10] Taine rejected the principles of the Revolution in favor of the individualism of his concepts of regionalism and race, to the point that one writer calls him one of "the most articulate exponents of both French nationalism and conservatism."[11]
Other writers, however, have argued that, though Taine displayed increasing conservatism throughout his career, he also formulated an alternative to rationalist liberalism that was influential for the social policies of the Third Republic.[12] Taine's complex politics have remained hard to read; though admired by liberals like Anatole France, he has been the object of considerable disdain in the twentieth century, with a few historians working to revive his reputation.[13]
Taine is best known now for his attempt at a scientific account of literature, based on the categories of race, milieu, and moment. Taine used these words in French (race, milieu et moment); the terms have become widespread in literary criticism in English, but are used in this context in senses closer to the French meanings of the words than the English meanings, which are, roughly, nation, environment, and time.
Taine argued that literature was largely the product of the author's environment, and that an analysis of that environment could yield a perfect understanding of the work of literature. In this sense he was a sociological positivist (see Auguste Comte), though with important differences. Taine did not mean race in the specific sense now common, but rather the collective cultural dispositions that govern everyone without their knowledge or consent. What differentiates individuals within this collective race, for Taine, was milieu: the particular circumstances that distorted or developed the dispositions of a particular person. The moment is the accumulated experiences of that person, which Taine often expressed as momentum; to some later critics, however, Taine's conception of moment seemed to have more in common with Zeitgeist.[14]
Though Taine coined and popularized the phrase "race, milieu, et moment," the theory itself has roots in earlier attempts to understand the aesthetic object as a social product rather than a spontaneous creation of genius. Taine seems to have drawn heavily on the philosopher Johann Gottfried Herder's ideas of volk (people) and nation in his own concept of race; the Spanish writer Emilia Pardo Bazán has suggested that a crucial predecessor to Taine's idea was the work of Germaine de Staël on the relationship between art and society.[15]
Taine's influence on French intellectual culture and literature was enormous. He had a special relationship, in particular, with Émile Zola. As critic Philip Walker says of Zola, "In page after page, including many of his most memorable writings, we are presented with what amounts to a mimesis of the interplay between sensation and imagination which Taine studied at great length and out of which, he believed, emerges the world of the mind."[16] Zola's reliance on Taine, however, was occasionally seen as a fault; Miguel de Unamuno, after an early fascination with both Zola and Taine, eventually concluded that Taine's influence on literature was, all in all, negative.[17]
Taine also influenced a number of nationalist literary movements throughout the world, who used his ideas to argue that their particular countries had a distinct literature and thus a distinct place in literary history. In addition, post-modern literary critics concerned with the relationship between literature and social history (including the New Historicists) continue to cite Taine's work, and to make use of the idea of race, milieu, and moment. The critic John Chapple, for example, has used the term as an illustration of his own concept of "composite history."[18]
The chief criticism of race, milieu, and moment at the time the idea was created was that it did not sufficiently take into account the individuality of the artist, central to the creative genius of Romanticism. Even Zola, who owed so much to Taine, made this objection, arguing that an artist's temperament could lead him to make unique artistic choices distinct from the environment that shaped his general viewpoint; Zola's principal example was the painter Édouard Manet. Similarly, Gustave Lanson argued that race, milieu, and moment could not among themselves account for genius; Taine, he felt, explained mediocrity better than he explained greatness.[19]
A distinct criticism concerns the possible sloppiness of the logic and scientific basis of the three concepts. As Leo Spitzer has written, the actual science of the idea, which is vaguely Darwinian, is rather tenuous, and shortly after Taine's work was published a number of objections were made on scientific grounds.[20] Spitzer also points out, again citing period sources, that the relationship between the three terms themselves was never well understood, and that it is possible to argue that moment is an unnecessary addition implied by the other two.
Taine's principal works, in chronological order:
| Wikisource has original works written by or about: Hippolyte Taine |
| Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Hippolyte Taine |
| Preceded by Louis Léonard de Loménie |
Seat 25 Académie française 1878–1893 |
Succeeded by Albert Sorel |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| sociology of literature | |
| National Romanticism (art) | |
| Thomas Hart Benton (art) |
| Who is Sir Louis Hippolyte Lafontaine? Read answer... | |
| Who does alexis tain like? Read answer... | |
| Platform number of the train to tain? Read answer... |
| Who is aramand hippolyte louis fizeau? | |
| Where can i get on job training in taining dogs? | |
| What taining is needed for carpenters? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Biography. © 2006 through a partnership of Answers Corporation. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | French Literature Companion. The New Oxford Companion to Literature in French. Copyright © 1995, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Hippolyte Taine". Read more |
Mentioned in