Results for Hittites
On this page:
 

The Hittites ruled in Anatolia from c.1600-1200 bc. Their capital was Hattushash (modern Bögazkoy) and their heartlands lay east of the river Marassantiya (classical Halys). In addition they dominated client states in Asia Minor: Kizzuwadna (Cilicia) and Tarhuntassa (Lycaonia), and also frontier zones, Gazga (north along the Black Sea coast) and Arzawa (later Ionia). At times they subdued Mesopotamia, and even pushed their rule into Syria and the Palestinian coast, bringing them into conflict with Egypt.

In c.1595 bc, Mursilis I destroyed the Babylonian empire of Hammurabi, but subsequently Hittite power waned in the face of the growth of Mitanni, and did not revive until the late 15th century bc under Tudhaliyas II (1430-1415 bc) and his son Arnuwandas I (1420-1400). They re-established Hittite rule by conquering the Cilician Plain in southern Asia Minor, and then subduing the Arzawa to the west. But the empire builder was Suppiluliumas (1380-1340 bc), whose conquests are recorded by his son Mursilis II (1339-1306 bc) in histories entitled the ‘Deeds’ and ‘Ten-year Annals’. Suppiluliumas conquered Mitanni (based on the upper Euphrates and Tigris), and, using the Amorites as his spearhead, down these rivers and also west into Syria. As a result Muwatallis (1306-1282 bc) confronted Rameses II of Egypt at Kadesh. In his account the pharaoh claims a decisive victory, although the battle was a Hittite ambush and probably ended in, at best, a draw for the Egyptians. Tudhaliyas IV (1250-1220 bc) campaigned in north-west Asia Minor, although this seems to have drained Hittite military resources, and the empire declined after 1200 bc. The war had also weakened the coalition in the region which included Troy, allowing successful Achaean expansion from across the Aegean under Agememnon.

Hittite military organization was based upon the military household of the sovereign, with a substantial royal guard. The Instructions for Military Governors survive (c.1440 bc) regarding the maintenance of military forces in the provinces, and demonstrate the risks of country life from enemy raiders such as the Gasgans. All fortifications were required to have a moat and be securely barred and bolted, with secure supplies of weapons, and food and protection for livestock. Garrison troops were not allowed to be away from their post for more than two days unless pursuing enemy raiders. Scouts were instructed to ensure that the roads and heights were free of enemy before the landworkers were allowed out into the fields. Because of the central role that religion played in Hittite war making, the governors were required to maintain the temples under their charge and also to ensure that the law was properly administered. They seem to have required a kind of feudal military and labour service from the surrounding region. On campaign, the Great King was C-in-C, supported by his High Constable, the royal princes, and ‘Lords of the Realm’ as his generals. The army was raised from the provinces, client states, and allied countries of the Hittite empire; freemen serving oath-bound. The infantry were organized decimally in units of a thousand, with a company and section structure under designated officers.

Hittite strategy can be represented by Mursilis II's campaign against the Arzawa in western Asia Minor. For the first years of his reign he campaigned against the Gasgans to secure his northern border. Then he employed diplomacy to isolate the Arawan King Ukha-zitis from Achaean support. He then devastated Gasgan lands, drew them into battle, and defeated them. He was now free to move against Arzawa, with his ally the king of Kargamis. They defeated the Arzawans at Walma on the river Astarpa and pursued them to their capital Apasas (Ephesos). But Uhka-zitis had abandoned it and fled to the mountain fastness of Arrinanda. Mursilis invested the place in a winter siege and starved the defenders out. This campaign demonstrates the efficiency of the Hittite war machine and the degree of logistic support it must have enjoyed.

There are few illustrations of the Hittite warriors, but they seem to have worn a long wraparound ‘Hurrian’ robe (rather like a kaftan) and carried a spear and a waisted (violin-shaped) shield. The tall, pointed, and distinctively Hittite cap may have been reserved for officers and nobles, and although a helmet seems likely for the heavy infantry, contemporary Egyptian reliefs depict them as (conventionally) bareheaded. Side weapons included short sword, axe, and mace (possibly reserved for officers). The main strength of the army was in its chariots, drawn by two horses, specially bred and carefully trained. A surviving document, known as Kikkulis' Horse Training Manual, details how this should be done. It describes how they should be fed, with a balance of grass and grain in carefully recorded quantities. There is also a training schedule. Part of this involves driving them over a distance of about 6.2 miles (10 km) (presumably as a kind of route march) to practise them for campaigning. But another section describes a kind of interval training with bursts of galloping between longer, slower drives and rests. This can only have been preparation for battle manoeuvres, although no tactical details are given. Egyptian reliefs generally show Hittite chariots as heavier than their own, carrying a three-man crew. The charioteers, who bore the Hurrian title mariyannu, were an élite group given special privileges. The driver was protected by a shield-bearer; both were armoured in long scale tunics. The chariot also carried a spearman, who may have had the option to dismount in battle as a kind of ‘chariot-runner’. Some lighter, two-man Hittite chariots are depicted, but whether these were adopted from the Egyptians or were of native Anatolian design is unclear. Numbers of Hittite armies are difficult to gauge, but Mursilis II claimed in his Annals to have captured 66, 000 Arwazans in his two-year campaign against them (1332-1331 bc). (Egyptian) figures for the battle of Kadesh ascribe 3, 500 chariots and 35, 000 infantry to the Hittites opposing them, although these are probably exaggerated.

Bibliography

  • Gurney, O. R., The Hittites (Harmondsworth, 1981)

— Matthew Bennett

 
 

Any member of an Indo-European people whose empire (Old Kingdom c. 1700 – 1500 BC, New Kingdom c. 1400 – 1180 BC) was centred in Anatolia and northern Syria. Old Kingdom records detail Hittite territorial expansion; New Kingdom documents contain accounts of the Battle of Kadesh, one of the greatest conflicts of the ancient world, which was fought against Egypt. Hittite kings had absolute power and were viewed as deputies of the gods, at death becoming gods themselves. Hittite society was feudal and agrarian; iron-working technology was developed. The kingdom fell abruptly, possibly because of large-scale migrations of Sea Peoples and Phrygians into parts of the empire.

For more information on Hittite, visit Britannica.com.

 

[CP]

A group of tribes whose origins are uncertain but who emerged as a unified state in the early 2nd millennium bc and expanded to control Anatolia, Syria, and surrounding areas. Their history has three main phases, representing cycles of integration, expansion, and collapse. The Old Kingdom (c.1750–1450 bc) had its capital at Kussara (Hattusas) and later at Boghaz Köy. Mursilis I expanded control by overrunning north Syria in about 1600 bc and pushing as far as Babylon. Under the Empire (c.1450–1200 bc) a stable state was built up covering most of Anatolia and north Syria, displacing the kingdom of the Mitanni, and successfully challenging both Assyria and Egypt. The end of the Empire came suddenly in about 1200 bc when it was overwhelmed by invaders, the identity of whom is uncertain but who were probably part of the general movements of people in the period of unrest in the Mediterranean at the time. During the third phase (c.1200–720 bc) areas such as north Syria continued as neo-Hittite city-states, but in the early 1st millennium bc the Hittite empire came under Assyrian civilization rule after the defeat of the Hittite army by Sargon II c.720 bc. The Hittite language is one of the earliest recorded Indo-European languages; the Hittites also developed a means of smelting iron, a secret they guarded fairly well until their downfall.

 
(hĭt'īts) , ancient people of Asia Minor and Syria, who flourished from 1600 to 1200 B.C. The Hittites, a people of Indo-European connection, were supposed to have entered Cappadocia c.1800 B.C. To the southwest, in the Taurus and Cilicia, were the Luites, relatives of the Hittites; to the southeast, in the Upper Euphrates, the Hurrians (Khurrites). In the country the Hittites then occupied, the aboriginal inhabitants were apparently the Khatti, or Hatti. Hittite names appear c.1800 B.C. on the tablets written by Assyrian colonists (see Assyria) at Kültepe (Kanesh) in Cappadocia. However, real evidence of Hittite existence does not occur until the Old Hittite Kingdom (1600–1400 B.C.). This kingdom, which was centered in Cappadocia, was opposed by the Syrians. The Hittites tried to invade Babylonia but were halted by Egypt and Mitanni.

The Hittite Empire that followed the Old Kingdom, with its capital at Boğazköy (also called Hattusas), was the chief power and cultural force in W Asia from 1400 to 1200 B.C. The famous Hittite rulers date from this period. Among these are Supiluliumash (fl. 1380 B.C.), who is mentioned in the Tell el Amarna letters; Mursilish II (fl. 1335 B.C.); and Hattusilish III (fl. 1300 B.C.). The Hittite Empire was a loose confederation that broke up under the invasions of the Thracians, Phrygians, and Assyrians c.1200 B.C. Several small states arose, with Carchemish becoming an outstanding city. The neo-Hittite kingdom (c.1050–c.700 B.C.) was conquered by the Assyrians, who installed Hittite princes as vassals to their throne.

The artistic work of the Hittites, as in reliefs, round sculptures, and seals, shows a high state of culture and considerable Babylonian and Assyrian influence. A great number of inscriptions have been uncovered in the Hittite area; these are for the most part in cuneiform. Besides the Babylonian inscriptions, there are many in Hittite hieroglyphs, or Kanesian. The Hittite language is Indo-European. There are several other languages meagerly represented in the Hittite archives: the so-called Luwian (similar to Hittite), and Khattian and Hurrian (both non–Indo-European and apparently unrelated to one another). There is also a hieroglyphic alphabet (or syllabary) liberally represented; the deciphering of this script was aided by the bilingual texts found at Karatepe and was published by H. T. Bossert. The Hittite civilization clearly had many foreign elements, notably from Mesopotamia; its pantheism borrowed most of its concepts from Babylonian, Assyrian, and Hurrian sources. The Hittite law codes are interesting partly because they are to some extent independent of the Babylonian. The Hittites were one of the first peoples to smelt iron successfully.

Bibliography

See D. G. Hogarth, Hittite Seals (1920); E. H. Sturtevant, Comparative Grammar of Hittite (2d ed. 1951); J. Garstang, The Hittite Empire (1929, repr. 1976); O. R. Gurney, The Hittites (rev. ed. 1961); E. Akurgal, The Art of the Hittites (tr. 1962); H. S. Maine, Sr., Ancient Law (1987).


 
Wikipedia: Hittites
For the people of the Hebrew Bible, see Biblical Hittites.
Relief of Suppiluliuma II, last known king of the Hittite Empire
Enlarge
Relief of Suppiluliuma II, last known king of the Hittite Empire

The Hittites were an ancient people from Kaneš who spoke an Indo-European language, and established a kingdom centered at Hattusa (Hittite URUḪattuša) in north-central Anatolia from the 18th century BC. In the 14th century BC, the Hittite empire was at its height, encompassing Anatolia, north-western Syria about as far south as the mouth of the Litani River (a territory known as Amqu), and eastward into upper Mesopotamia. After 1180 BC, the empire disintegrated into several independent "Neo-Hittite" city-states, some surviving until as late as the 8th century BC.

The term "Hittites" is taken from the KJV translation of the Hebrew Bible, translating חתי HTY, or בני-חת BNY-HT "Children of Heth" (Heth being son of Canaan). The archaeologists who discovered the Anatolian Hittites in the 19th century initially identified them with these Biblical Hittites. Today the identification of the Biblical peoples with either the Hattusa-based empire or the Neo-Hittite kingdoms is a matter of dispute.[1]

The Hittite kingdom was commonly called the Land of Hatti by the Hittites themselves. The fullest expression is, "The Land of the City of Hattusa". This description could be applied to either the entire empire, or more narrowly just to the core territory, depending upon context. The word "Hatti" is actually an Akkadogram, rather than Hittite; it is never declined according to Hittite grammar rules. Despite the use of "Hatti", the Hittites should be distinguished from the Hattians, an earlier people who inhabited the same region until the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC, and spoke a non-Indo-European language called Hattic. The Hittites referred to their language as Nesili (or in one case, Kanesili), an adverbial form meaning "in the manner of (Ka)nesa." This presumably reflects their origins in the ancient city of Kanesh (modern day Kultupe, Turkey). Many of the modern city names in Turkey are derived from their original Hittite names, such as Sinop and Adana, showing the impact of Hittite culture in Anatolia.

The Hittites were also famous for their skill in building and using chariots.[citation needed] The Hittites were pioneers of the Iron Age, demonstrating great skills in the manufacture of iron artifacts from as early as the 14th century BC, when letters to foreign rulers reveal the demand for their iron goods. The Hittites were not, however, the first to work iron, and iron remained a precious metal throughout the history of their empire. The Hittites passed much knowledge and lore from the Ancient Near East to the newly arrived Greeks in Europe.

Archaeological discovery

Further information: Hittite sites
Lion Gate of Hattusa, the capital of Hittites, modern Boğazköy, Turkey
Enlarge
Lion Gate of Hattusa, the capital of Hittites, modern Boğazköy, Turkey

The Hittites used cuneiform letters. Archaeological expeditions have discovered in Hattushash entire sets of royal archives in cuneiform tablets, written either in Babylonian, the diplomatic language of the time, or in the various dialects of the Hittite confederation.[2]

The first archaeological evidence for the Hittites appeared in tablets found at the Assyrian colony of Kültepe (ancient Karum Kanesh), containing records of trade between Assyrian merchants and a certain "land of Hatti". Some names in the tablets were neither Hattic nor Assyrian, but clearly Indo-European.[citation needed]

The script on a monument at Boğazköy by a "People of Hattusas" discovered by William Wright in 1884 was found to match peculiar hieroglyphic scripts from Aleppo and Hamath in Northern Syria. In 1887, excavations at Tell El-Amarna in Egypt uncovered the diplomatic correspondence of Pharaoh Amenhotep III and his son Akhenaton. Two of the letters from a "kingdom of Kheta" -- apparently located in the same general region as the Mesopotamian references to "land of Hatti" -- were written in standard Akkadian cuneiform script, but in an unknown language; although scholars could read it, no one could understand it. Shortly after this, Archibald Sayce proposed that Hatti or Khatti in Anatolia was identical with the "kingdom of Kheta" mentioned in these Egyptian texts, as well as with the biblical Hittites. Sayce's identification came to be widely accepted over the course of the early 20th century; and the name "Hittite" has become attached to the civilization uncovered at Boğazköy.

Egypto-Hittite Peace Treaty (c. 1258 BC) between Hattusili III and Ramesses II is the best known early written peace treaty. Istanbul Archaeology Museum
Enlarge
Egypto-Hittite Peace Treaty (c. 1258 BC) between Hattusili III and Ramesses II is the best known early written peace treaty. Istanbul Archaeology Museum

During sporadic excavations at Boğazköy (Hattusa) that began in 1906, the archaeologist Hugo Winckler found a royal archive with 10,000 tablets, inscribed in cuneiform Akkadian and the same unknown language as the Egyptian letters from Kheta — thus confirming the identity of the two names. He also proved that the ruins at Boğazköy were the remains of the capital of a mighty empire that at one point controlled northern Syria.

The language of the Hattusa tablets was eventually deciphered by a Czech linguist, Bedřich Hrozný (18791952), who on 24 November 1915 announced his results in a lecture at the Near Eastern Society of Berlin. His book about his discovery was printed in Leipzig in 1917, with the title The Language of the Hittites; Its Structure and Its Membership in the Indo-European Linguistic Family. The preface of the book begins with:

The present work undertakes to establish the nature and structure of the hitherto mysterious language of the Hittites, and to decipher this language [...] It will be shown that Hittite is in the main an Indo-European language.

For this reason, the language came to be known as the Hittite language, even though that was not what its speakers had called it. The Hittites themselves apparently called their language nešili "(in the manner) of (the city of) Neša" and hence it has been suggested that the more technically correct term, "Neshite", be used instead. Nonetheless, convention continues and "Hittite" remains the standard term used.

Under the direction of the German Archaeological Institute, excavations at Hattusa have been underway since 1907, with interruptions during both wars. Kültepe has been successfully excavated by late Professor Tahsin Özgüç (died in 2005) since 1948. Excavations on a smaller scale have also been carried out in the immediate surroundings of Hattusa, including the rock sanctuary of Yazılıkaya, which contains numerous rock-cut reliefs portraying the Hittite rulers and the gods of the Hittite pantheon.

Language

Main article: Hittite language

The Hittite language (or Nesite) is recorded fragmentarily from about the 19th century BC (in the Kultepe texts, see Ishara). It remained in use until about 1100 BC. Hittite is the best attested member of the Anatolian branch of the Indo-European language family. Due to marked differences in its structure and phonology some early philologists, most notably Warren Cowgill even argued that it should be classified as a sister language to the Indo-European languages, rather than a daughter language (see Indo-Hittite). By the end of the Hittite Empire, the Hittite language had become a written language of administration and diplomatic correspondence. The population of most of the Hittite Empire by this time spoke Luwian dialects, another Indo-European language of the Anatolian family that had originated to the West of the Hittite region.

Geography

The Hittite Empire (red) at the height of its power  in ca. 1290 BC, bordering on the Egyptian Empire (green)
Enlarge
The Hittite Empire (red) at the height of its power in ca. 1290 BC, bordering on the Egyptian Empire (green)

The Hittite kingdom was centered around the lands surrounding Hattusa and Neša, known as "the land Hatti" (URUHa-at-ti). After Hattusa was made capital, the area encompassed by the bend of the Halys River (which they called the Marassantiya) was considered the core of the Empire, and some Hittite laws make a distinction between "this side of the river" and "that side of the river", for example, the reward for the capture of an eloped slave after he managed to flee beyond the Halys is higher than that for a slave caught before he could reach the river.

To the south of the core territory was the land of Kizzuwatna in the area of the Taurus Mountains. To the west, the confederacy of Arzawa. To the north, the mountain people of the Kaskians. To the east, the Mitanni. After the incorporation or association of Arzawa and Mitanni (under Suppiluliuma I), the Hittite sphere of influence under Mursili II bordered on the Hayasa-Azzi to the east, on the Ahhiyawa and the newly-forming Assuwa confederacy to the west, on Egypt-controlled Canaan to the south, and on Assyria to the south-east.

History

The Hittite kingdom is conventionally divided into three periods, the Old Hittite Kingdom (ca. 17501500 BC), the Middle Hittite Kingdom (ca. 15001430 BC) and the New Hittite Kingdom (the Hittite Empire proper, ca. 14301180 BC).

The earliest known member of a Hittite speaking dynasty, Pithana, was based at the city of Kussara. In the 18th century BC Anitta, his son and successor, made the Hittite speaking city of Neša into one of his capitals and adopted the Hittite language for his inscriptions there. However, Kussara remained the dynastic capital for about a century until Labarna II adopted Hattusa as the dynastic seat, possibly taking the throne name of Hattusili, "man of Hattusa", at that time.

The Old Kingdom, centered at Hattusa, peaked during the 16th century BC, and even managed to sack Babylon at one point, but made no attempt to govern there, enabling the Kassite to rise to prominence there and rule it for over 400 years.

During the 15th century BC, Hittite power fell into obscurity, re-emerging with the reign of Tudhaliya I from ca. 1400 BC. Under Suppiluliuma I and Mursili II, the Empire was extended to most of Anatolia and parts of Syria and Canaan, so that by 1300 BC the Hittites were bordering on the Egyptian sphere of influence, leading to the inconclusive Battle of Kadesh in 1274 BC.

Civil war and rivalling claims to the throne, combined with the external threat of the Sea Peoples weakened the Hittites and by 1160 BC, the Empire had collapsed. "Neo-Hittite" post-Empire states, petty kingdoms under Assyrian rule, may have lingered on until ca. 700 BC, and the Bronze Age Hittite and Luwian dialects evolved into the sparsely attested Lydian, Lycian and Carian languages.

Remnants of these languages lingered into Persian times and were finally extinct by the spread of Hellenism.

Peace Treaty with Mitannis

In a treaty between the Hittites and the Mitanni, the deities Mitra, Varuna, Indra, and Nasatya (Ashvins) are invoked.

Mythology

Main article: Hittite mythology

Hittite religion and mythology was heavily influenced by Mesopotamian mythology, increasingly so as history progressed. In earlier times, Indo-European elements may still be clearly discerned, for example Tarhunt the god of thunder, and his conflict with the serpent Illuyanka.

Hittite government

The Hittites are thought to have had the first constitutional monarchy. This consisted of a king, royal family, the pankus (who monitored the king's activities), and an often rebellious aristocracy. The Hittites also made huge advances in legislation and justice. They produced the Hittite laws. These laws rarely used death as a punishment. For example, the punishment for theft was to pay back the amount stolen.

Biblical Hittites

Main article: Hittites in the Bible

Genesis indicates that the "Hittites" (sons of Heth) were descendants of Ham through his son, Canaan. However, it is uncertain, and there has been some debate, as to whether this designation was intended to signify any or all of: 1) the original Hattites of Hatti, 2) their Indo-European conquerors (Nesili), who retained the name "Hatti" for Central Anatolia, and are today referred to as the "Hittites" (the subject of this article), or 3) a Canaanite group, who may or may not have been related to either or both of the Anatolian groups, and who also may or may not be identical with the later Neo-Hittites.

The Biblical Hittites are said to be a great power who dwell "in the mountains" and "towards the north" of Canaan. Some scholars,[citation needed] on the basis of the Documentary Hypothesis which holds that the Hebrew Bible was redacted well after the fall of the Hittite Empire, assume these Biblical references may be to the "Neo-Hittite" (Luwian) polities.

Artifacts

Most of the Hittite artifacts can be viewed in Museum of Anatolian Civilizations in Ankara, Turkey. It is one of the richest museums about Anatolian Civilizations in the world.

References

  1. ^ See, for example, Singer, Itamar "The Hittites and the Bible Revisited" in Maeir, A.M. and de Miroschedji, P. ed., I Will Speak the Riddle of Ancient Times, Archaeological and Historical Studies in Honor of Amihai Mazar on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday (2006, Eisenbrauns)
  2. ^ The Hittite Empire Chapter V - by Vahan M. Kurkjian

Literature

  • Akurgal, Ekrem - The Hattian and Hittite Civilizations; Publications of the Republic of Turkey; Ministry of Culture; 2001; 300 pages; ISBN 975-17-2756-1
  • Trevor R. Bryce, "Life and Society in the Hittite World," Oxford (2002).
  • Trevor R. Bryce, The Kingdom of the Hittites, Oxford (1999).
  • C. W. Ceram, The Secret of the Hittites: The Discovery of an Ancient Empire. Phoenix Press (2001), ISBN 1-84212-295-9.
  • Hans Gustav Güterbock, Hittite Historiography: A Survey, in H. Tadmor and M. Weinfeld eds. History, Historiography and Interpretation: Studies in Biblical and Cuneiform Literatures, Magnes Press, Hebrew University (1983) pp. 21-35.
  • J. G. Macqueen, The Hittites, and Their Contemporaries in Asia Minor, revised and enlarged, Ancient Peoples and Places series (ed. G. Daniel), Thames and Hudson (1986), ISBN 0-500-02108-2.
  • George E. Mendenhall, The Tenth Generation: The Origins of the Biblical Tradition, The Johns Hopkins University Press (1973), ISBN 0-8018-1654-8.
  • Erich Neu, Der Anitta Text, (StBoT 18), Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden (1974).
  • Louis L. Orlin, Assyrian Colonies in Cappadocia, Mouton, The Hague (1970).
  • The Hittites and Hurrians in D. J. Wiseman Peoples of the Old Testament Times, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1973).
  • O.R. Gurney, The Hittites, Penguin (1952), ISBN 0-14-020259-5
  • Kloekhorst, Alwin (2007), Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon, ISBN 9004160922O

In Popular Culture

Of all works of modern literature dealing with the Hittites, the most widespread - and from which non-historians are most likely to draw information on them - is the best-selling historical novel The Egyptian by Mika Waltari, originally published in Finnish in 1945 and soon translated to numerous languages worldwide and remaining long in print.

In this book, the Hitties are depicted as relentless, utterly ruthless aggressors bent on universal conquest. This description of them had less to do with historical fact (though Waltari did make considerable use of historical sources) and more with the fact that the book was written during the Second World War and the Hittite Empire as described in it was clearly intended to represent Nazi Germany - with King Suppiluliuma I shown as an ancient Hitler and the Hittite iron-working and use of war-chariots depicted as the equivalent of the Wehrmacht tanks.

In quite a different vein, a fictionalized version of Suppiluliuma I's son and successor Mursili II appears in the Japanese manga Red River. He is "Kail Mursili", which according to Beal would be an anachronism - since he is not named "Mursili" in any texts prior to those of his own reign, and was likely named something else. Kail is one of the comic's main protagonists and is portrayed as noble and brave, as well as a sexy playboy.

In the movie Ghostbusters, the fictional demigod Gozer is said to have been worshipped by the Hittites, Sumerians and Mesopotamians. Gozer's minion, Zuul, comes heralding Gozer's impending return.

The Hittites are among the civilizations which can be selected in the computer games Age of Empires and Civilization III.

In the movie Deadly Blessing from 1981 by Wes Craven the main anatagoists are a sort of modern Hittite, an ultra-conservative version of the Amish, and described in the movie as "The Hittites make the Amish look like swingers".

External links

Commons-logo.svg
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
History of Hittites Series
History of the Hittites Battle of Kadesh Hittite military oath


 
 

Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "Hittites" at WikiAnswers.

 

Copyrights:

Military History Companion. The Oxford Companion to Military History. Copyright © 2001, 2004 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Archaeology Dictionary. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology. Copyright © 2002, 2003 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Hittites" Read more

Search for answers directly from your browser with the FREE Answers.com Toolbar!  
Click here to download now. 

Get Answers your way! Check out all our free tools and products.

On this page:   E-mail   print Print  Link  

 

Keep Reading

Mentioned In: