Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Hittites

 

The Hittites ruled in Anatolia from c.1600-1200 bc. Their capital was Hattushash (modern Bögazkoy) and their heartlands lay east of the river Marassantiya (classical Halys). In addition they dominated client states in Asia Minor: Kizzuwadna (Cilicia) and Tarhuntassa (Lycaonia), and also frontier zones, Gazga (north along the Black Sea coast) and Arzawa (later Ionia). At times they subdued Mesopotamia, and even pushed their rule into Syria and the Palestinian coast, bringing them into conflict with Egypt.

In c.1595 bc, Mursilis I destroyed the Babylonian empire of Hammurabi, but subsequently Hittite power waned in the face of the growth of Mitanni, and did not revive until the late 15th century bc under Tudhaliyas II (1430-1415 bc) and his son Arnuwandas I (1420-1400). They re-established Hittite rule by conquering the Cilician Plain in southern Asia Minor, and then subduing the Arzawa to the west. But the empire builder was Suppiluliumas (1380-1340 bc), whose conquests are recorded by his son Mursilis II (1339-1306 bc) in histories entitled the ‘Deeds’ and ‘Ten-year Annals’. Suppiluliumas conquered Mitanni (based on the upper Euphrates and Tigris), and, using the Amorites as his spearhead, down these rivers and also west into Syria. As a result Muwatallis (1306-1282 bc) confronted Rameses II of Egypt at Kadesh. In his account the pharaoh claims a decisive victory, although the battle was a Hittite ambush and probably ended in, at best, a draw for the Egyptians. Tudhaliyas IV (1250-1220 bc) campaigned in north-west Asia Minor, although this seems to have drained Hittite military resources, and the empire declined after 1200 bc. The war had also weakened the coalition in the region which included Troy, allowing successful Achaean expansion from across the Aegean under Agememnon.

Hittite military organization was based upon the military household of the sovereign, with a substantial royal guard. The Instructions for Military Governors survive (c.1440 bc) regarding the maintenance of military forces in the provinces, and demonstrate the risks of country life from enemy raiders such as the Gasgans. All fortifications were required to have a moat and be securely barred and bolted, with secure supplies of weapons, and food and protection for livestock. Garrison troops were not allowed to be away from their post for more than two days unless pursuing enemy raiders. Scouts were instructed to ensure that the roads and heights were free of enemy before the landworkers were allowed out into the fields. Because of the central role that religion played in Hittite war making, the governors were required to maintain the temples under their charge and also to ensure that the law was properly administered. They seem to have required a kind of feudal military and labour service from the surrounding region. On campaign, the Great King was C-in-C, supported by his High Constable, the royal princes, and ‘Lords of the Realm’ as his generals. The army was raised from the provinces, client states, and allied countries of the Hittite empire; freemen serving oath-bound. The infantry were organized decimally in units of a thousand, with a company and section structure under designated officers.

Hittite strategy can be represented by Mursilis II's campaign against the Arzawa in western Asia Minor. For the first years of his reign he campaigned against the Gasgans to secure his northern border. Then he employed diplomacy to isolate the Arawan King Ukha-zitis from Achaean support. He then devastated Gasgan lands, drew them into battle, and defeated them. He was now free to move against Arzawa, with his ally the king of Kargamis. They defeated the Arzawans at Walma on the river Astarpa and pursued them to their capital Apasas (Ephesos). But Uhka-zitis had abandoned it and fled to the mountain fastness of Arrinanda. Mursilis invested the place in a winter siege and starved the defenders out. This campaign demonstrates the efficiency of the Hittite war machine and the degree of logistic support it must have enjoyed.

There are few illustrations of the Hittite warriors, but they seem to have worn a long wraparound ‘Hurrian’ robe (rather like a kaftan) and carried a spear and a waisted (violin-shaped) shield. The tall, pointed, and distinctively Hittite cap may have been reserved for officers and nobles, and although a helmet seems likely for the heavy infantry, contemporary Egyptian reliefs depict them as (conventionally) bareheaded. Side weapons included short sword, axe, and mace (possibly reserved for officers). The main strength of the army was in its chariots, drawn by two horses, specially bred and carefully trained. A surviving document, known as Kikkulis' Horse Training Manual, details how this should be done. It describes how they should be fed, with a balance of grass and grain in carefully recorded quantities. There is also a training schedule. Part of this involves driving them over a distance of about 6.2 miles (10 km) (presumably as a kind of route march) to practise them for campaigning. But another section describes a kind of interval training with bursts of galloping between longer, slower drives and rests. This can only have been preparation for battle manoeuvres, although no tactical details are given. Egyptian reliefs generally show Hittite chariots as heavier than their own, carrying a three-man crew. The charioteers, who bore the Hurrian title mariyannu, were an élite group given special privileges. The driver was protected by a shield-bearer; both were armoured in long scale tunics. The chariot also carried a spearman, who may have had the option to dismount in battle as a kind of ‘chariot-runner’. Some lighter, two-man Hittite chariots are depicted, but whether these were adopted from the Egyptians or were of native Anatolian design is unclear. Numbers of Hittite armies are difficult to gauge, but Mursilis II claimed in his Annals to have captured 66, 000 Arwazans in his two-year campaign against them (1332-1331 bc). (Egyptian) figures for the battle of Kadesh ascribe 3, 500 chariots and 35, 000 infantry to the Hittites opposing them, although these are probably exaggerated.

Bibliography

  • Gurney, O. R., The Hittites (Harmondsworth, 1981)

— Matthew Bennett

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics

Any member of an Indo-European people whose empire (Old Kingdom c. 1650 – 1500 BCE, New Kingdom c. 1350 – 1180 BCE) was centred in Anatolia and northern Syria. Old Kingdom records detail Hittite territorial expansion; New Kingdom documents contain accounts of the Battle of Kadesh, one of the greatest conflicts of the ancient world, which was fought against Egypt. Hittite kings had absolute power and were viewed as deputies of the gods, at death becoming gods themselves. Hittite society was feudal and agrarian; iron-working technology was developed. The kingdom fell abruptly, possibly because of large-scale migrations of Sea Peoples and Phrygians into parts of the empire.

For more information on Hittite, visit Britannica.com.

Bible Guide: Hittites
Top

Ancient people named as offspring of Heth, Canaan's second son (Gen 10:15; I Chr 1:13; cf Gen 23:3). They are listed among the peoples who dwelt in Canaan before its conquest by the Israelites (Gen 15:20; 26:34; Ex 3:8; Deut 7:1; Josh 3:10; 9:1; Judg 3:5; I Kgs 9:20; II Chr 8:7; Ezra 9:1; Neh 9:8). Ephron the Hittite sold Abraham the field and cave in which he buried Sarah (Gen chap. 23). Esau married Judith and Basemath, both Hittite women (Gen 26:34), but Rebekah objected to Jacob's attempt to marry a Hittite (Gen 27:46). The Hittites lived in the mountains (Num 13:29; Josh 11:3) and joined King Jabin of Hazor in his battle with Joshua (Josh 11:1-12). God ordered their destruction together with the other Canaanite peoples (Deut 20:17). After the conquest of Canaan the Israelites dwelt among the local peoples including the Hittites, taking their daughters for wives (Judg 3:5-6). Relations between Israelites and Hittites must have been close. When David was still in the wilderness Ahimelech the Hittite was one of his men (I Sam 26:6) and after he became king. Uriah the Hittite, husband of Bathsheba, was one of his thirty warriors (II Sam 11:3ff). King Solomon's numerous alien loves included Hittite women (I Kgs 11:1) and the Bible mentions Hittite kings as his contemporaries (I Kgs 10:29; II Chr 1:17). When the king of Israel waged war against the Syrians, Hittites were his allies (II Kgs 7:6). Scholars are of the opinion that the name Hittites was applied to all the peoples of Syria during the epoch of the kings of Israel.

As far back as the 19th century, documents were discovered in Boghazkoy in Asia Minor, written in a new and hitherto unknown hieroglyphic script; they were identified as Hittite, pertaining to a nation whose name also figures in Egyptian and Assyrian sources. The earliest documents, known as the Cappadocian tablets, comprise legal and commercial letters, written by Assyrian merchants who established commercial colonies in Asia Minor in about the 19th century B.C. Later Hittite literature attributes the foundation of their kingdom of Mursilis I. Labarnas, his heir, conquered Babylon (16th century B.C.). Shuppiluliumas the Great, who reigned in 1380-1350 B.C., founded the Hittite empire. He established Hittite rule over Asia Minor and waged war against northern Syrian city-states. He subdued the kingdom of Mitani and made his sons kings at Carchemish and Aleppo. Hittite power posed a serious threat to Egypt, and under Rameses II the Hittites signed "a treaty of eternal friendship" with Egypt, the pact being engraved on the walls of Egyptian palaces and written on tablets found at Boghazkoy. Later the country was invaded by a wave of "Sea Peoples" and the Hittite cities were razed. The subsequent Late Hittite period was one of decline, with the formation of new kingdoms in Asia Minor, such as the Phrygian kingdom.

The Hittite kingdom was a divine establishment, the king and queen ministering side by side at religious ceremonies.

The Hittite pantheon consisted of numerous gods and goddesses, headed by the god of thunder and the sun goddess; their children and grandchildren were gods of storm. In addition, there were gods of mountains, rivers, springs, heaven and earth, clouds and winds. The gods were the masters and men their slaves. Initially, the gods were represented by simple stones. The god of storm subsequently assumed the form of a bull and later still, was given a human likeness. Other gods were symbolized by lions, stags and horses. Hittite ritual included solemn feasts and the sacrifice of animals. Divination was common and well organized, with questions submitted to an oracle whose answers were recorded on tablets.

The Hittite legal code consisted of two sections, each containing 100 laws. There were laws relating to assault and violence, slavery, marriage, theft, adultery, etc. Capital punishment was confined to special offenses, such as sorcery and defiance of the king.

Hittite farmers produced wheat, barley, grapes and other fruits. Their domestic animals included horses, cattle, sheep and goats, swine, dogs, fowl and honey bees. Manufacture of pottery by means of a potter's wheel began about 2000 B.C. The Hittite pottery is mostly monochrome, highly burnished with beautiful shapes featuring elaborate spouts and handles.

Hittite literature included myths and epics, Sumerian-Akkadian-Hittite dictionaries; prescriptions for divination by the hour of birth and by examination of the liver, kidney, facial features and the constellations of the stars. From Mesopotamian literature, they translated lists of temples, incantations, medical texts, hymns to various gods, prayers, renderings of the Gilgamesh Epic and a fable about the great kings of the Akkadian dynasty.

Numerous gigantic works of art, some sculptured in rock have been discovered. Dating to the Hittite empire and later periods, they are mostly reliefs depicting gods, kings and lions, the majority engraved on the orthostats which lined the walls of temples, palaces and tombs. Hittite architecture inclined to simplicity, houses being built of mud bricks set in wooden frames. Minor arts are represented by a large number of cylinder seals, decorated with animals, humans, gods, as well as ring seals made of silver. With the fall of the Hittite kingdom in 700 B.C. all traces of Hittite art vanish.

Concordance
Gen 15:20; 23:10; 25:9; 26:34; 36:2,49; 29-30; 50:13. Ex 3:8,17; 13:5; 23:23, 28,33:2; 34:11. Num 13:29. Deut 7:1; 20:17. Josh 1:4; 3:10; 9:1; 11:3; 12:8; 24:11. Judg 1:26; 3:5. I Sam 26:6. II Sam 11:3, 6,17, 21, 24; 12:9-10; 23:39. I Kgs 9:20; 10:29; 11:1; 15:5. II Kgs 7:6. I Chr 11:41. II Chr 1:17; 8:7. Ezra 9:1. Neh 9:8. Ezek 16:3, 45



[CP]

A group of tribes whose origins are uncertain but who emerged as a unified state in the early 2nd millennium bc and expanded to control Anatolia, Syria, and surrounding areas. Their history has three main phases, representing cycles of integration, expansion, and collapse. The Old Kingdom (c.1750–1450 bc) had its capital at Kussara (Hattusas) and later at Boghaz Köy. Mursilis I expanded control by overrunning north Syria in about 1600 bc and pushing as far as Babylon. Under the Empire (c.1450–1200 bc) a stable state was built up covering most of Anatolia and north Syria, displacing the kingdom of the Mitanni, and successfully challenging both Assyria and Egypt. The end of the Empire came suddenly in about 1200 bc when it was overwhelmed by invaders, the identity of whom is uncertain but who were probably part of the general movements of people in the period of unrest in the Mediterranean at the time. During the third phase (c.1200–720 bc) areas such as north Syria continued as neo-Hittite city-states, but in the early 1st millennium bc the Hittite empire came under Assyrian civilization rule after the defeat of the Hittite army by Sargon II c.720 bc. The Hittite language is one of the earliest recorded Indo-European languages; the Hittites also developed a means of smelting iron, a secret they guarded fairly well until their downfall.

 
Columbia Encyclopedia: Hittites
Top
Hittites (hĭt'īts), ancient people of Asia Minor and Syria, who flourished from 1600 to 1200 B.C. The Hittites, a people of Indo-European connection, were supposed to have entered Cappadocia c.1800 B.C. To the southwest, in the Taurus and Cilicia, were the Luites, relatives of the Hittites; to the southeast, in the Upper Euphrates, the Hurrians (Khurrites). In the country the Hittites then occupied, the aboriginal inhabitants were apparently the Khatti, or Hatti. Hittite names appear c.1800 B.C. on the tablets written by Assyrian colonists (see Assyria) at Kültepe (Kanesh) in Cappadocia. However, real evidence of Hittite existence does not occur until the Old Hittite Kingdom (1600-1400 B.C.). This kingdom, which was centered in Cappadocia, was opposed by the Syrians. The Hittites tried to invade Babylonia but were halted by Egypt and Mitanni.

The Hittite Empire that followed the Old Kingdom, with its capital at Boğazköy (also called Hattusas), was the chief power and cultural force in W Asia from 1400 to 1200 B.C. The famous Hittite rulers date from this period. Among these are Supiluliumash (fl. 1380 B.C.), who is mentioned in the Tell el Amarna letters; Mursilish II (fl. 1335 B.C.); and Hattusilish III (fl. 1300 B.C.). The Hittite Empire was a loose confederation that broke up under the invasions of the Thracians, Phrygians, and Assyrians c.1200 B.C. Several small states arose, with Carchemish becoming an outstanding city. The neo-Hittite kingdom (c.1050-c.700 B.C.) was conquered by the Assyrians, who installed Hittite princes as vassals to their throne.

The artistic work of the Hittites, as in reliefs, round sculptures, and seals, shows a high state of culture and considerable Babylonian and Assyrian influence. A great number of inscriptions have been uncovered in the Hittite area; these are for the most part in cuneiform. Besides the Babylonian inscriptions, there are many in Hittite hieroglyphs, or Kanesian. The Hittite language is Indo-European. There are several other languages meagerly represented in the Hittite archives: the so-called Luwian (similar to Hittite), and Khattian and Hurrian (both non-Indo-European and apparently unrelated to one another). There is also a hieroglyphic alphabet (or syllabary) liberally represented; the deciphering of this script was aided by the bilingual texts found at Karatepe and was published by H. T. Bossert. The Hittite civilization clearly had many foreign elements, notably from Mesopotamia; its pantheism borrowed most of its concepts from Babylonian, Assyrian, and Hurrian sources. The Hittite law codes are interesting partly because they are to some extent independent of the Babylonian. The Hittites were one of the first peoples to smelt iron successfully.

Bibliography

See D. G. Hogarth, Hittite Seals (1920); E. H. Sturtevant, Comparative Grammar of Hittite (2d ed. 1951); J. Garstang, The Hittite Empire (1929, repr. 1976); O. R. Gurney, The Hittites (rev. ed. 1961); E. Akurgal, The Art of the Hittites (tr. 1962); H. S. Maine, Sr., Ancient Law (1987).


Wikipedia: Hittites
Top
Lion Gate of Hattusa, the capital of Hittites, modern Boğazköy, Turkey

The Hittites were an ancient Anatolian people who spoke a language of the Anatolian branch of the Indo-European language family[1] and established a kingdom centered at Hattusa (Hittite URUḪattuša) in north-central Anatolia (on the Central Anatolian plateau) ca. the 18th century BC. The Hittite empire reached its height ca. the 14th century BC, encompassing a large part of Anatolia, north-western Syria about as far south as the mouth of the Litani River (a territory known as Amqu), and eastward into upper Mesopotamia. After ca. 1180 BC, the empire disintegrated into several independent "Neo-Hittite" city-states, some surviving until as late as the 8th century BC.

The term "Hittites" was taken from the KJV (King James Version) translation of the Hebrew Bible, translating חתי HTY, or בני-חת BNY-HT "Children of Heth". (Heth is a son of Canaan.) The archaeologists who discovered the Anatolian Hittites in the 19th century initially identified them with these Biblical Hittites. Today the identification of the Biblical peoples with either the Hattusa-based empire or the Neo-Hittite kingdoms is a matter of dispute.[2]

The fullest identified designation of the Hittite kingdom is "The Land of the City of Hattusa". This description could be applied to either the entire empire, or more narrowly just to the core territory, depending on context. The word "Hatti" is actually an Akkadogram, rather than Hittite; it is never declined according to Hittite grammatical rules. Despite the use of "Hatti", the Hittites should be distinguished from the Hattians, an earlier people who inhabited the same region until the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC, and spoke a non-Indo-European language called Hattic. The Hittites themselves referred to their language as Nesili (or in one case, Kanesili), an adverbial form meaning "in the manner of (Ka)nesa", presumably reflecting a high concentration of Hittite speakers in the ancient city of Kanesh (modern Kültepe, Turkey). Many modern city names in Turkey are first recorded under their Hittite names, such as Sinop and Adana, reflecting the contiguity of modern Anatolia with its ancient past.

Although belonging to the Bronze Age, the Hittites were forerunners of the Iron Age, developing the manufacture of iron artifacts from as early as the 14th century BC, when letters to foreign rulers reveal the demand for their iron goods. Recent excavations, however, have discovered evidence of iron tool production dating back at least as far as the 20th century BC.[3] Hittite weapons were made from bronze though; iron was so rare and precious that it was employed only as prestige goods. But the Hittites were famous for their skill in building and using chariots. These chariots gave them a military superiority as illustrated on a plate from Carchemish.[4]

Contents

Archaeological discovery

The Hittites used cuneiform letters. Archaeological expeditions have discovered in Hattushash entire sets of royal archives in cuneiform tablets, written either in Akkadian, the diplomatic language of the time, or in the various dialects of the Hittite confederation.[5]

The first archaeological evidence for the Hittites appeared in tablets found at the Assyrian colony of Kültepe (ancient Karum Kanesh), containing records of trade between Assyrian merchants and a certain "land of Hatti". Some names in the tablets were neither Hattic nor Assyrian, but clearly Indo-European.[citation needed]

The script on a monument at Boğazköy by a "People of Hattusas" discovered by William Wright in 1884 was found to match peculiar hieroglyphic scripts from Aleppo and Hamath in Northern Syria. In 1887, excavations at Tell El-Amarna in Egypt uncovered the diplomatic correspondence of Pharaoh Amenhotep III and his son Akhenaton. Two of the letters from a "kingdom of Kheta" -- apparently located in the same general region as the Mesopotamian references to "land of Hatti" -- were written in standard Akkadian cuneiform script, but in an unknown language; although scholars could read it, no one could understand it. Shortly after this, Archibald Sayce proposed that Hatti or Khatti in Anatolia was identical with the "kingdom of Kheta" mentioned in these Egyptian texts, as well as with the biblical Hittites. Others such as Max Muller agreed that Khatti was probably Kheta, but proposed connecting it with Biblical Kittim, rather than with the "Children of Heth". Sayce's identification came to be widely accepted over the course of the early 20th century; and the name "Hittite" has become attached to the civilization uncovered at Boğazköy.

During sporadic excavations at Boğazköy (Hattusa) that began in 1906, the archaeologist Hugo Winckler found a royal archive with 10,000 tablets, inscribed in cuneiform Akkadian and the same unknown language as the Egyptian letters from Kheta — thus confirming the identity of the two names. He also proved that the ruins at Boğazköy were the remains of the capital of an empire that at one point controlled northern Syria.

Under the direction of the German Archaeological Institute, excavations at Hattusa have been underway since 1907, with interruptions during both wars. Kültepe has been successfully excavated by Professor Tahsin Özgüç since 1948 until his death in 2005. Smaller scale excavations have also been carried out in the immediate surroundings of Hattusa, including the rock sanctuary of Yazılıkaya, which contains numerous rock-cut reliefs portraying the Hittite rulers and the gods of the Hittite pantheon.

Museums

The Museum of Anatolian Civilizations in Ankara, Turkey houses the richest collection of Hittite and Anatolian artifacts.

Geography

The Hittite Empire (red) at the height of its power in ca. 1290 BC, bordering on the Egyptian Empire (green)

The Hittite kingdom was centered on the lands surrounding Hattusa and Neša, known as "the land Hatti" (URUHa-at-ti). After Hattusa was made capital, the area encompassed by the bend of the Halys River (Turkish: Kızılırmak, which Hittites called the Marassantiya) was considered the core of the Empire, and some Hittite laws make a distinction between "this side of the river" and "that side of the river", for example, the reward for the capture of an eloped slave after he managed to flee beyond the Halys is higher than that for a slave caught before he could reach the river.

To the west and south of the core territory lay the region known as Luwiya in the earliest Hittite texts. This terminology was replaced by the names Arzawa and Kizzuwatna with the rise of those kingdoms.[6] Nevertheless, the Hittites continued to refer to the language that originated in these areas as Luwian. Prior to the rise of Kizzuwatna, the heart of that territory in Cilicia was first referred to by the Hittites as Adaniya.[7] Upon its revolt from the Hittites during the reign of Ammuna,[8] it assumed the name of Kizzuwatna and successfully expanded northward to encompass the lower Anti-Taurus mountains as well. To the north lived the mountainous people called the Kaskians. To the southeast of the Hittites lay the Hurrian empire of Mitanni. At its peak during the reign of Mursili II, the Hittite empire stretched from Arzawa in the west to Mitanni in the east, many of the Kaskian territories to the north including Hayasa-Azzi in the far northeast, and on south into Canaan approximately as far as the southern border of Lebanon, incorporating all of these territories within its domain.

History

Egypto-Hittite Peace Treaty (c. 1258 BC) between Hattusili III and Ramesses II is the best known early written peace treaty. Istanbul Archaeology Museum

The Hittite kingdom is conventionally divided into three periods, the Old Hittite Kingdom (ca. 1750–1500 BC), the Middle Hittite Kingdom (ca. 1500–1430 BC) and the New Hittite Kingdom (the Hittite Empire proper, ca. 1430–1180 BC).

The earliest known member of a Hittite speaking dynasty, Pithana, was based at the city of Kussara. In the 18th century BC Anitta, his son and successor, made the Hittite speaking city of Neša into one of his capitals and adopted the Hittite language for his inscriptions there. However, Kussara remained the dynastic capital for about a century until Labarna II adopted Hattusa as the dynastic seat, possibly taking the throne name of Hattusili, "man of Hattusa", at that time.

The Old Kingdom, centered at Hattusa, peaked during the 16th century BC. The kingdom even managed to sack Babylon at one point, but made no attempt to govern there, enabling the Kassite to rise to prominence and rule for over 400 years.

During the 15th century BC, Hittite power fell into obscurity, re-emerging with the reign of Tudhaliya I from ca. 1400 BC. Under Suppiluliuma I and Mursili II, the Empire was extended to most of Anatolia and parts of Syria and Canaan, so that by 1300 BC the Hittites were bordering on the Egyptian sphere of influence, leading to the inconclusive Battle of Kadesh in 1274 BC.

Civil war and rivalling claims to the throne, combined with the external threat of the Sea Peoples weakened the Hittites and by 1160 BC, the Empire had collapsed. "Neo-Hittite" post-Empire states, petty kingdoms under Assyrian rule, may have lingered on until ca. 700 BC, and the Bronze Age Hittite and Luwian dialects evolved into the sparsely attested Lydian, Lycian and Carian languages.

Remnants of these languages lingered into Persian times and were finally extinct by the spread of Hellenism.

Hittite government

Relief of Suppiluliuma II, last known king of the Hittite Empire

The Hittites are thought to have had the first constitutional monarchy. This consisted of a king, royal family, the pankus (who monitored the king's activities), and an often rebellious aristocracy. The Hittites also made huge advances in legislation and justice. They produced the Hittite laws. These laws rarely used death as a punishment. For example, the punishment for theft was to pay back the amount stolen.

Language

The Hittite language (or Nesili) is recorded fragmentarily from about the 19th century BC (in the Kültepe texts, see Ishara). It remained in use until about 1100 BC. Hittite is the best attested member of the Anatolian branch of the Indo-European language family.

The language of the Hattusa tablets was eventually deciphered by a Czech linguist, Bedřich Hrozný (1879—1952), who on 24 November, 1915 announced his results in a lecture at the Near Eastern Society of Berlin. His book about his discovery was printed in Leipzig in 1917, under the title The Language of the Hittites; Its Structure and Its Membership in the Indo-European Linguistic Family. The preface of the book begins with:

The present work undertakes to establish the nature and structure of the hitherto mysterious language of the Hittites, and to decipher this language [...] It will be shown that Hittite is in the main an Indo-European language.

For this reason, the language came to be known as the Hittite language, even though that was not what its speakers had called it. The Hittites themselves apparently called their language nešili "(in the manner) of (the city of) Neša" and hence it has been suggested that the more technically correct term, "Nesite", be used instead. Nonetheless, convention continues and "Hittite" remains the standard term used.

Due to its marked differences in its structure and phonology, some early philologists, most notably Warren Cowgill even argued that it should be classified as a sister language to Indo-European languages (Indo-Hittite), rather than a daughter language. By the end of the Hittite Empire, the Hittite language had become a written language of administration and diplomatic correspondence. The population of most of the Hittite Empire by this time spoke Luwian dialects, another Indo-European language of the Anatolian family that had originated to the west of the Hittite region.

Mythology

Hittite religion and mythology was heavily influenced by Mesopotamian mythology, increasingly so as history progressed. In earlier times, Indo-European elements may still be clearly discerned, for example Tarhunt the god of thunder, and his conflict with the serpent Illuyanka.

Biblical Hittites

The Hebrew Bible refers to "Hittites" in several passages, ranging from Genesis to the post-Exilic Ezra-Nehemiah. Genesis 10 (the Table of Nations) links them to an eponymous ancestor Heth, a descendant of Ham through his son Canaan. The Hittites are thereby counted among the Canaanites. The Hittites are usually depicted as a people living among the Israelites - Abraham purchases the Patriarchal burial-plot of Machpelah from "Ephron HaChiti", Ephron the Hittite, and Hittites serve as high military officers in David's army. In 2 Kings 7:6, however, they are a people with their own kingdoms (the passage refers to "kings" in the plural), apparently located outside geographic Canaan, and sufficiently powerful to put a Syrian army to flight.

It is a matter of considerable scholarly debate whether the biblical "Hittites" signified any or all of: 1) the original Hattites of Hatti; 2) their Indo-European conquerors (Nesili), who retained the name "Hatti" for Central Anatolia, and are today referred to as the "Hittites" (the subject of this article); or 3) a Canaanite group who may or may not have been related to either or both of the Anatolian groups, and who also may or may not be identical with the later Neo-Hittite (Luwian) polities.[9]

Other biblical scholars have argued that rather than being connected with Heth, son of Canaan, instead the Anatolian land of Hatti was mentioned in Old Testament literature and apocrypha as "Kittim" (Chittim), a people said to be named for a son of Javan.

Physical appearance, origins, and genetics

Pharaoh Ramses II often referred to the Hittites as humty which translated from ancient Egyptian meant "women-soldiers", as it was the practice of male Hittite warriors to wear their hair long.[10] Scholars have also regarded the Hittites to be of a "Mediterranean ethnic group".[11] Archeologist Henry Heras's analysis of Egyptian portrayals of the Hittites, coincided with this view as they appeared to possess physical characteristics typical of Mediterranean people.[12] Some scholars believed that this may point to a north-east African origin as such physical traits have been thought to originate in this area.[13][14] Similar physical characteristics were possessed by the ancient Greeks leading some to suspect that both ancient Greeks and Hittites descended from similar prehistoric populations in the Near East and Aegean.[15] Physical anthropological analysis of populations alone, however, is an insufficient basis for grouping peoples into races, substantiating theories of folk migrations and accounting for the origins of ancient people due to many complicated factors.[16][17]

The exact origins of the Hittites have been enshrouded in mystery for quite some time. While it has been argued that Hittite culture and language developed locally in Anatolia,[18][19] it has been far more common to view the Hittites and their ways as intrusive. Possible geographic origins from the west (Balkans), east (via or along the Caspian Sea or from the Armenian highlands), and north (across the Black sea) are just some of the proposed migration routes.[20] The process has been viewed as one of conquering elites[21] but alternatively as peaceful coupled with gradual assimilation.[20] In archaeological terms, relationships of the Hittites to the Ezero culture of the Balkans and Maikop culture of the Caucasus have been considered within the migration framework.[22]

A genetic study based on modern male Anatolian y-chromosome DNA has revealed gene flow from multiple geographic origins which may correspond to various migrations over time. The predominant male lineages of Anatolian males are shared with European and neighboring Near Eastern populations (94.1%). Lineages related to Central Asia, India, and Africa were far less prevalent among the males sampled. No specific lineage was determined or identified as "Hittite", however the y-chromosome haplogroup G-M201 was implied to have a possible association with the Hattians.[23]

See also

References

  1. ^ Dr Andrew McCarthy, University of Edinburgh, Archaeology 1B Lecture
  2. ^ See, for example, Singer, Itamar "The Hittites and the Bible Revisited" in Maeir, A.M. and de Miroschedji, P. ed., I Will Speak the Riddle of Ancient Times, Archaeological and Historical Studies in Honor of Amihai Mazar on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday (2006, Eisenbrauns)
  3. ^ "Excavation in Turkey Set to Rewrite History of Iron Age," Asahi Shimbun, 27 March 2009.
  4. ^ Kate Santon: Archaeology, Parragon Books Ltd, London 2007
  5. ^ The Hittite Empire Chapter V - by Vahan M. Kurkjian
  6. ^ A Short Grammar of Hieroglyphic Luwian, John Marangozis (2003)
  7. ^ Beal, Richard H.,"The History of Kizzuwatna and the Date of the Šunaššura Treaty", Orientalia 55 (1986) pp. 424ff.
  8. ^ ibid. p. 426
  9. ^ See Marten H. Woudstra, New International Commentary on the Old Testament: Book of Joshua, p.60, fn.33 and Trevor Bryce, The Kingdom of the Hittites, p.389 ff.
  10. ^ Healy, M. and Mcbride, A. 1992. New Kingdom Egypt (Elite). Opsrey: Elms Court
  11. ^ P. 141 Racial Theories in Fascist Italy By Aaron Gillette
  12. ^ P. 447 Studies in Proto-Indo-Mediterranean Culture By Henry Heras
  13. ^ P. 144 The Mediterranean Race: A Study of the Origin of European Peoples By Giuseppe Sergi
  14. ^ P. 266 Myths of Babylonia and Assyria. (Myth and legend in lit. and art). By Donald Alexander Mackenzie
  15. ^ P. 126 Man By Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland
  16. ^ Jordan-Bychov, T. and Jordan B. 2002. The European Culture Area. Lanham, MD: Roman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  17. ^ Mallory, J. and D.Q. Adams (eds.) 1997. Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. London: Fitzroy Dearborn.
  18. ^ Renfrew, C. 1999. Time Depth, Convergence Theory, and Innovation in Proto-Indo-European: 'Old Europe' as a PIE Linguistic Area. Journal of Indo-European Studies. 27 (3 & 4): 257-294
  19. ^ Renfrew, C. 1987. Archaeology and Language. The puzzle of Indo-European Origins. Cambridge University Press
  20. ^ a b Steiner, G. 1990. The Immigration of the First Indo-Europeans into Anatolia Reconsidered. Journal of Indo-European Studies. 18 (1 & 2): 185-214
  21. ^ Puhvel, J. 1994. Anatolian: Autochton or Interloper. Journal of Indo-European Studies. 22 (3 & 4): 251-264
  22. ^ Mallory, J. 1989. In Search of the Indo-Europeans. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson
  23. ^ C. Cinnioglu et al. (2004), Excavating Y-chromosome haplotype strata in Anatolia, Human Genetics 114(2):127-48.

Literature

  • Akurgal, Ekrem - The Hattian and Hittite Civilizations; Publications of the Republic of Turkey; Ministry of Culture; 2001; 300 pages; ISBN 975-17-2756-1
  • Trevor R. Bryce, "Life and Society in the Hittite World," Oxford (2002).
  • Trevor R. Bryce, The Kingdom of the Hittites, Oxford (1999).
  • C. W. Ceram, The Secret of the Hittites: The Discovery of an Ancient Empire. Phoenix Press (2001), ISBN 1-84212-295-9.
  • Hans Gustav Güterbock, Hittite Historiography: A Survey, in H. Tadmor and M. Weinfeld eds. History, Historiography and Interpretation: Studies in Biblical and Cuneiform Literatures, Magnes Press, Hebrew University (1983) pp. 21–35.
  • J. G. Macqueen, The Hittites, and Their Contemporaries in Asia Minor, revised and enlarged, Ancient Peoples and Places series (ed. G. Daniel), Thames and Hudson (1986), ISBN 0-500-02108-2.
  • George E. Mendenhall, The Tenth Generation: The Origins of the Biblical Tradition, The Johns Hopkins University Press (1973), ISBN 0-8018-1654-8.
  • Erich Neu, Der Anitta Text, (StBoT 18), Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden (1974).
  • Louis L. Orlin, Assyrian Colonies in Cappadocia, Mouton, The Hague (1970).
  • The Hittites and Hurrians in D. J. Wiseman Peoples of the Old Testament Times, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1973).
  • O.R. Gurney, The Hittites, Penguin (1952), ISBN 0-14-020259-5
  • Kloekhorst, Alwin (2007), Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon, ISBN 9004160922O
  • Patri, Sylvain (2007), L'alignement syntaxique dans les langues indo-européennes d'Anatolie, (StBoT 49), Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden, ISBN 978-3-447-05612-0

also, a manga has been made called "red river or "anatolia story" which is based on the history of the hitites

External links


 
 
Learn More
Ramesses II
Boğazkale
Hittite (member of an ancient people)

Who overthrew the Hittites? Read answer...
What was the Hittite government? Read answer...
What is the meaning of hittite? Read answer...

Help us answer these
Pictures of hittite?
What are lions for hittite's?
Government of the hittites?

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

 

Copyrights:

Military History Companion. The Oxford Companion to Military History. Copyright © 2001, 2004 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Bible Guide. Illustrated Dictionary & Concordance of the Bible. Copyright © 1986 by G.G. The Jerusalem Publishing House, Ltd. All rights reserved.  Read more
Archaeology Dictionary. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology. Copyright © 2002, 2003 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/ Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Hittites" Read more

 

Mentioned in