(mathematics) The 2p-dimensional rational cohomology classes in an n-dimensional algebraic manifold M which are carried by algebraic cycles are those with dual cohomology classes representable by differential forms of bidegree (n-p, n-p) on M.
| Sci-Tech Dictionary: Hodge conjecture |
(mathematics) The 2p-dimensional rational cohomology classes in an n-dimensional algebraic manifold M which are carried by algebraic cycles are those with dual cohomology classes representable by differential forms of bidegree (n-p, n-p) on M.
| 5min Related Video: Hodge conjecture |
| Wikipedia: Hodge conjecture |
The Hodge conjecture is a major unsolved problem in algebraic geometry which relates the algebraic topology of a non-singular complex algebraic variety and the subvarieties of that variety. More specifically, the conjecture says that certain de Rham cohomology classes are algebraic, that is, they are sums of Poincaré duals of the homology classes of subvarieties. The Hodge conjecture is one of the Clay Mathematics Institute's Millennium Prize Problems, so there is a US$1,000,000 prize for proving the Hodge conjecture.
Contents |
Let X be a compact complex manifold of complex dimension n. Then X is an orientable smooth manifold of dimension 2n, so its cohomology groups lie in degrees zero through 2n. Assume that X is a Kähler manifold, so that there is a decomposition on its cohomology with complex coefficients:

where Hp,q(X) is the subgroup of cohomology classes which are represented by harmonic forms of type (p, q). That is, these are the cohomology classes represented by differential forms which, in some choice of local coordinates
, can be written as a harmonic function times
. (See Hodge theory for more details.) Taking wedge products of these harmonic representatives corresponds to the cup product in cohomology, so the cup product is compatible with the Hodge decomposition:

Since X is a complex manifold, X has a fundamental class.
Let Z be a complex submanifold of X of dimension k, and let i : Z → X be the inclusion map. Choose a differential form α of type (p, q). We can integrate α over Z:

To evaluate this integral, choose a point of Z and call it 0. Around 0, we can choose local coordinates
on X such that Z is just
. If p > k, then α must contain some dzi where zi pulls back to zero on Z. The same is true if q > k. Consequently, this integral is zero if (p, q) ≠ (k, k).
More abstractly, the integral can be written as the cap product of the homology class of Z and the cohomology class represented by α. By Poincaré duality, the homology class of Z is dual to a cohomology class which we will call [Z], and the cap product can be computed by taking the cup product of [Z] and α and capping with the fundamental class of X. Because [Z] is a cohomology class, it has a Hodge decomposition. By the computation we did above, if we cup this class with any class of type (p, q) ≠ (k, k), then we get zero. Because
, we conclude that [Z] must lie in
. Loosely speaking, the Hodge conjecture asks:
Let:

We call this the group of Hodge classes of degree 2k on X.
The modern statement of the Hodge conjecture is:
A projective complex manifold is a complex manifold which can be embedded in complex projective space. Because projective space carries a Kähler metric, the Fubini-Study metric, such a manifold is always a Kähler manifold. By Chow's theorem, a projective complex manifold is also a smooth projective algebraic variety, that is, it is the zero set of a collection of homogenous polynomials.
Another way of phrasing the Hodge conjecture involves the idea of an algebraic cycle. An algebraic cycle on X is a formal combination of subvarieties of X, that is, it is something of the form:

The coefficients are usually taken to be integral or rational. We define the cohomology class of an algebraic cycle to be the sum of the cohomology classes of its components. This is an example of the cycle class map of de Rham cohomology, see Weil cohomology. For example, the cohomology class of the above cycle would be:
![\sum_i c_i[Z_i].\,](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/c/4/5/c4568e098a978e18ecbd97111f7201b7.png)
Such a cohomology class is called algebraic. With this notation, the Hodge conjecture becomes:
The first result on the Hodge conjecture is due to Solomon Lefschetz. In fact, it predates the conjecture and provided some of Hodge's motivation.
is the cohomology class of a divisor on X. In particular, the Hodge conjecture is true for H2.A very quick proof can be given using sheaf cohomology and the exponential exact sequence. (The cohomology class of a divisor turns out to equal to its first Chern class.) Lefschetz's original proof proceeded by normal functions, which were introduced by Henri Poincaré. However, Griffiths's transversality theorem shows that this approach cannot prove the Hodge conjecture for higher codimensional subvarieties.
By the Hard Lefschetz theorem, one can prove:
Combining the above two theorems implies that Hodge conjecture is true for Hodge classes of degree 2n − 2. This proves the Hodge conjecture when X has dimension at most three.
The Lefschetz theorem on (1,1)-classes also implies that if all Hodge classes are generated by the Hodge classes of divisors, then the Hodge conjecture is true:

For most abelian varieties, the algebra
is generated in degree one, so the Hodge conjecture holds. In particular, the Hodge conjecture holds for sufficiently general abelian varieties, for products of elliptic curves, and for simple abelian varieties. However, David Mumford constructed an example of an abelian variety where
is not generated by products of divisor classes. André Weil generalized this example by showing that whenever the variety has complex multiplication by an imaginary quadratic field, then
is not generated by products of divisor classes. Moonen and Zahren proved that in dimension less than 5, either
is generated in degree one, or the variety has complex multiplication by an imaginary quadratic field. In the latter case, the Hodge conjecture is only known in special cases.
Hodge's original conjecture was:
is the cohomology class of an algebraic cycle with integral coefficients on X.This is now known to be false. The first counterexample was constructed by Michael Atiyah and Friedrich Hirzebruch. Using K-theory, they constructed an example of a torsion Hodge class, that is, a Hodge class α such that for some positive integer n, nα = 0. Such a cohomology class cannot be the class of a cycle. Burt Totaro reinterpreted their result in the framework of cobordism and found many examples of torsion classes.
The simplest adjustment of the integral Hodge conjecture is:
is the cohomology class of an algebraic cycle with integral coefficients on X.This is also false. János Kollár found an example of a Hodge class α which is not algebraic, but which has an integral multiple which is algebraic.
A natural generalization of the Hodge conjecture would ask:
This is too optimistic, because there are not enough subvarieties to make this work. A possible substitute is to ask instead one of the two following questions:
Claire Voisin proved that the Chern classes of coherent sheaves give strictly more Hodge classes than the Chern classes of vector bundles and that the Chern classes of coherent sheaves are insufficient to generate all the Hodge classes. Consequently, the only known formulations of the Hodge conjecture for Kähler varieties are false.
Hodge made an additional, stronger conjecture than the integral Hodge conjecture. Say that a cohomology class on X is of level c if it is the pushforward of a cohomology class on a c-codimensional subvariety of X. The cohomology classes of level at least c filter the cohomology of X, and it is easy to see that the cth step of the filtration
satisfies

Hodge's original statement was:

Grothendieck observed that this cannot be true, even with rational coefficients, because the right-hand side is not always a Hodge structure. His corrected form of the Hodge conjecture is:
is the largest sub-Hodge structure of
contained in 
This version is open.
The strongest evidence in favor of the Hodge conjecture is the algebraicity result of Cattani, Deligne and Kaplan. Suppose that we vary the complex structure of X over a simply connected base. Then the topological cohomology of X does not change, but the Hodge decomposition does change. It is known that if the Hodge conjecture is true, then the locus of all points on the base where the cohomology of a fiber is a Hodge class is in fact an algebraic subset, that is, it is cut out by polynomial equations. Cattani, Deligne, and Kaplan proved that this is always true, without assuming the Hodge conjecture.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Best of the Web: Hodge conjecture |
Some good "Hodge conjecture" pages on the web:
Math mathworld.wolfram.com |
| Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles | |
| Millennium Prize Problems | |
| Hodge cycle |
| What is the synonym for conjecture? Read answer... | |
| Where is bob hodges? Read answer... | |
| Who is dalton hodges? Read answer... |
| Who is nicholas hodges? | |
| Who is shari hodges? | |
| What is the symbol for conjecture? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Hodge conjecture". Read more |
Mentioned in