The mistake or fallacy of arguing to a conclusion that does not bear on the issue at hand, and is therefore irrelevant.
| Philosophy Dictionary: ignoratio elenchi |
The mistake or fallacy of arguing to a conclusion that does not bear on the issue at hand, and is therefore irrelevant.
| Latin Phrase: ignoratio elenchi |
Ignorance of the point in dispute. (The logical fallacy of arguing to the wrong point.)
| Obscure Words: ignoratio elenchi |
| WordNet: ignoratio elenchi |
The noun has one meaning:
Meaning #1:
the logical fallacy of supposing that an argument proving an irrelevant point has proved the point at issue
| Wikipedia: Ignoratio elenchi |
Ignoratio elenchi (also known as irrelevant conclusion[1] or irrelevant thesis) is the informal fallacy of presenting an argument that may in itself be valid, but does not address the issue in question. "Ignoratio elenchi" can be roughly translated by ignorance of refutation, that is, ignorance of what a refutation could logically be; "elenchi" is from the Greek έλεγχος, meaning an argument of disproof or refutation.[2]
Aristotle would describe ignoratio elenchi as a mistake made during a refutation of an argument. He called it "an ignorance" of what makes for a refutation. For Aristotle, ignoratio elenchi amounts to ignorance of logic. To Aristotle all logical fallacies can be reduced to ignoratio elenchi.[citation needed][3]
Contents |
| Look up red herring in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
Similar in category, but with darker implications than ignoratio elenchi, a "red herring" is an answer, given in reply to a questioner, that goes beyond an innocent logical irrelevance. A "red herring" is a deliberate attempt to divert a process of enquiry by changing the subject.
For example:
"I think that we should make the academic requirements stricter for students. I recommend that you support this, because we are in a budget crisis and we do not want our salaries affected."
Topic A is the proposal that academic requirements be raised. Topic B is the possible effects of a budget crisis on teacher salaries. Topic A is abandoned and the unrelated topic B is introduced.
A "red herring" is a debating tactic that seeks desperately to divert a worthy opponent. A digression can, similarly, be a verbal tactic of diversion, but has no place in a serious debate; and the diversion of digression may also be in play.
During a political campaign effort, President Truman referred to accusations that his administrative policies leaked information to Communist Russia as a political red herring.[4]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| heterozetesis | |
| elenchus (philosophy) | |
| fallacy (philosophy) |
Copyrights:
![]() | Philosophy Dictionary. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Copyright © 1994, 1996, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Latin Phrase. © 1999-2009 by Answers Corporation. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Obscure Words. © 2008 by Michael A. Fischer http://home.comcast.net/~wwftd. Read more | |
![]() | WordNet. WordNet 1.7.1 Copyright © 2001 by Princeton University. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Ignoratio elenchi". Read more |