imaginary unit: Definition from Answers.com

The powers of i repeat in a cycle:

$\ldots$ (repeats the pattern from blue area)
$i^{-3} = i\,$
$i^{-2} = -1\,$
$i^{-1} = -i\,$
$i^0 = 1\,$
$i^1 = i\,$
$i^2 = -1\,$
$i^3 = -i\,$
$i^4 = 1\,$
$i^5 = i\,$
$i^6 = -1\,$
$\ldots$ (repeats the pattern from blue area)

In mathematics, physics, and engineering, the imaginary unit is denoted by i or the Latin j or the Greek iota (see alternative notations below). It allows the real number system, $\mathbb{R},$ to be extended to the complex number system, $\mathbb{C}.$ Its precise definition is dependent upon the particular method of extension.

The primary motivation for this extension is the fact that not every polynomial equation with real coefficients f(x) = 0 has a solution in the real numbers. In particular, the equation x² + 1 = 0 has no real solution (see "Definition", below). However, if we allow complex numbers as solutions, then this equation, and indeed every non-zero degree polynomial equation f(x) = 0 does have a solution. (See algebraic closure and fundamental theorem of algebra.)

For a history of the imaginary unit, see the history of complex numbers.

The imaginary unit is often loosely referred to as the "square root of −1", however care should be taken as there are in fact two square roots of −1 (namely i and −i). A naïve use of this idea thus may lead to difficulties.

1 Definition
2 i and −i
3 Proper use
4 Square root of the imaginary unit
5 Reciprocal of i
6 Powers of i
7 Euler's formula
- 7.1 Example
8 Operations with i
9 Alternative notations
10 See also
11 Notes
12 References
13 External links

Definition

The imaginary number $i$ is defined solely by the property that its square is $- 1$ . Thus $i$ is a solution to the quadratic equation

$x^2 + 1 = 0, \$

or equivalently,

$x^2 = -1. \$

If we define $i$ in this way and then assume that it can be manipulated as if it were an unknown ("imagined") variable, then it follows from straightforward algebra that the second solution to the above quadratic equations is $- i$ . It is important to realize that, although we call this construction "imaginary," and although the concept of an imaginary number is intuitively more difficult to grasp than that of a real number, the construction is perfectly valid from a mathematical standpoint.

Real number operations can be extended to imaginary and complex numbers by treating i as an unknown quantity while manipulating an expression, and then using the definition to replace any occurrence of $i 2$ with $- 1$ . Higher integral powers of $i$ can also be replaced with −i, 1, i, or −1:

$i^3 = i^2 i = (-1) i = -i \,$

$i^4 = i^3 i = (-i) i = -(i^2) = -(-1) = 1 \,$

$i^5 = i^4 i = (1) i = i. \,$

i and −i

Being a quadratic polynomial with no multiple root, the defining equation x² + 1 = 0 has two distinct solutions, which are equally valid and which happen to be additive and multiplicative inverses of each other. More precisely, once a solution i of the equation has been fixed, the value −i (which, one can prove algebraically, is not equal to i) is also a solution. Since the equation is the only definition of i, it appears that the definition is ambiguous (more precisely, not well-defined). However, no ambiguity results as long as one of the solutions is chosen and fixed as the "positive i". This is because, although −i and i are not quantitatively equivalent (they are negatives of each other), there is no qualitative difference between i and −i. Both imaginary numbers have equal claim to being the number whose square is −1. If all mathematical textbooks and published literature referring to imaginary or complex numbers were rewritten with −i replacing every occurrence of +i (and therefore every occurrence of −i replaced by −(−i) = +i), all facts and theorems would continue to be equivalently valid. The distinction between the two roots x of x² + 1 = 0 with one of them as "positive" is purely a notational relic; neither root can be said to be more primary or fundamental than the other.

The issue can be a subtle one. The most precise explanation is to say that although the complex field, defined as R[X]/ (X² + 1), (see complex number) is unique up to isomorphism, it is not unique up to a unique isomorphism — there are exactly 2 field automorphisms of R[X]/ (X² + 1), the identity and the automorphism sending X to −X. (These are not the only field automorphisms of C, but are the only field automorphisms of C which keep each real number fixed.) See complex number, complex conjugation, field automorphism, and Galois group.

A similar issue arises if the complex numbers are interpreted as 2 × 2 real matrices (see complex number), because then both

$X = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \\ 1 & \;\; 0 \end{pmatrix}$

and

$X = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & \;\; 0 \end{pmatrix}$

are solutions to the matrix equation

$X^2 = -I. \$

In this case, the ambiguity results from the geometric choice of which "direction" around the unit circle is "positive" rotation. A more precise explanation is to say that the automorphism group of the special orthogonal group SO (2, R) has exactly 2 elements — the identity and the automorphism which exchanges "CW" (clockwise) and "CCW" (counter-clockwise) rotations. See orthogonal group.

All these ambiguities can be solved by adopting a more rigorous definition of complex number, and explicitly choosing one of the solutions to the equation to be the imaginary unit. For example, the ordered pair (0, 1), in the usual construction of the complex numbers with two-dimensional vectors.

Proper use

The imaginary unit is sometimes written $\sqrt{-1}$ in advanced mathematics contexts (as well as in less advanced popular texts). However, great care needs to be taken when manipulating formulas involving radicals. The notation is reserved either for the principal square root function, which is only defined for real x ≥ 0, or for the principal branch of the complex square root function. Attempting to apply the calculation rules of the principal (real) square root function to manipulate the principal branch of the complex square root function will produce false results:

$-1 = i \cdot i = \sqrt{-1} \cdot \sqrt{-1} = \sqrt{(-1) \cdot (-1)} = \sqrt{1} = 1$ (incorrect).

Attempting to correct the calculation by specifying both the positive and negative roots only produces ambiguous results:

$-1 = i \cdot i = \pm \sqrt{-1} \cdot \pm \sqrt{-1} = \pm \sqrt{(-1) \cdot (-1)} = \pm \sqrt{1} = \pm 1$ (ambiguous).

The calculation rule

$\sqrt{a} \cdot \sqrt{b} = \sqrt{a \cdot b}$

is only valid for real, non-negative values of $a$ and $b$ .

For a more thorough discussion of this phenomenon, see square root and branch.

To avoid making such mistakes when manipulating complex numbers, a strategy is never to use a negative number under a square root sign. For instance, rather than writing expressions like $\sqrt{-7}$ , one should write $i\sqrt{7}$ instead. That is the use for which the imaginary unit was created.

Square root of the imaginary unit

One might assume that a further set of imaginary numbers needs to be invented to account for the square root of i. However this is not necessary as it can be expressed as either of two complex numbers:^[1]

$\pm \sqrt{i} = \pm \frac{\sqrt{2}}2 (1 + i).$

Indeed, squaring the right-hand side gives

$\left( \pm \frac{\sqrt{2}}2 (1 + i) \right)^2 \$	$= \left( \pm \frac{\sqrt{2}}2 \right)^2 (1 + i)^2 \$
	$= \frac{1}{2} (1 + i)(1 + i) \$
	$= \frac{1}{2} (1 + 2i + i^2) \quad \quad \quad (i^2 = -1) \$
	$= \frac{1}{2} (1 + 2i - 1) \$
	$= \frac{1}{2} (2i) \$
	$= i. \$

Reciprocal of i

The reciprocal of i is easily determined:

$\frac{1}{i} = \frac{1}{i} \cdot \frac{i}{i} = \frac{i}{i^2} = \frac{i}{-1} = -i$

Using the identity to generalize division by i to all complex numbers gives:

$\frac{a + bi}{i} = -i\,(a + bi) = -ai - bi^2 = b - ai$

Powers of $i$

The powers of i repeat in a cycle:

$\ldots$

$i^{-3} = i\,$

$i^{-2} = -1\,$

$i^{-1} = -i\,$

$i^0 = 1\,$

$i^1 = i\,$

$i^2 = -1\,$

$i^3 = -i\,$

$i^4 = 1\,$

$\ldots$

This can be expressed with the following pattern where n is any integer:

$i^{4n} = 1\,$

$i^{4n+1} = i\,$

$i^{4n+2} = -1\,$

$i^{4n+3} = -i.\,$

This leads to the conclusion that

$i^n = i^{n \bmod 4}\,$

where mod 4 represents arithmetic modulo 4.

Euler's formula

Euler's formula is

$e^{ix} = \cos(x) + i\sin(x) \,$ ,

where x is a real number. The formula can also be analytically extended for complex x.

Substituting x = π yields

$e^{i\pi} = \cos(\pi) + i\sin(\pi) = -1 + i0 \,$

and one arrives at the elegant Euler's identity:

$e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0.\,$

This remarkably simple equation relates five significant mathematical quantities (0, 1, π, e, and i) by means of the basic operations of addition, multiplication, and exponentiation.

Example

Substitution of x = π/2 − 2πN, where N is an arbitrary integer, produces

$e^{i(\pi/2 - 2N\pi)} = i.\,$

Or, raising each side to the power i,

$e^{i i(\pi/2 - 2N\pi)} = i^i \,$

$e^{-(\pi/2 - 2N\pi)} = i^i \,$ ,

which shows that iⁱ has an infinite number of elements in the form of

$i^i = e^{-\pi/2 + 2\pi N}\,$

where N is any integer. This value is real, but it is not uniquely determined, since the complex logarithm is multiply-valued.

Taking N = 0 provides the principal value

$i^i = e^{-\pi/2} = .207879576....\,$

Operations with i

Many mathematical operations that can be carried out with real numbers can also be carried out with $i$ , such as exponentation, roots, logarithms and trigonometric functions .

A number raised to the ni power is:

$\!\ x^{ni} = \cos(\ln(x^n)) + i \sin(\ln(x^n)).$

The ni^th root of a number is:

$\!\ \sqrt[ni]{x} = \cos(\ln(\sqrt[n]{x})) - i \sin(\ln(\sqrt[n]{x})).$

The imaginary-base logarithm of a number is:

$\log_i(x) = {{2 \ln(x)} \over i\pi}.$

As with any logarithm, the log base i is not uniquely defined.

The cosine of i is a real number:

$\cos(i) = \cosh(1) = {{e + 1/e} \over 2} = {{e^2 + 1} \over 2e} = 1.54308064.$

And the sine of i is imaginary:

$\sin(i) = \sinh(1) \, i = {{e - 1/e} \over 2} \, i = {{e^2 - 1} \over 2e} \, i = 1.17520119 \, i.$

Alternative notations

In electrical engineering and related fields, the imaginary unit is often written as $j\,$ to avoid confusion with electrical current as a function of time, traditionally denoted by i(t) or just i. The Python programming language also uses j to denote the imaginary unit, while in MATLAB, both notations i and j are associated with the imaginary unit.
Some extra care needs to be taken in certain textbooks which define j = −i, in particular to travelling waves (e.g. a right travelling plane wave in the x direction $e^{ i (kx - \omega t)} = e^{ j (\omega t-kx)} \,$ ).
Some texts use the Greek letter iota ( ι ) to write the imaginary unit to avoid confusion. For example: Biquaternion.

Notes

^ University of Toronto Mathematics Network: What is the square root of i? URL retrieved March 26, 2007.

References

Paul J. Nahin, An Imaginary Tale, The Story of √-1, Princeton University Press, 1998

External links

Euler's work on Imaginary Roots of Polynomials at Convergence

This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)

Donate to Wikimedia

	How come when a little kid has an imaginary friend that's generally considered perfectly normal and maybe even cute but when an adult has an imaginary friend their deemed insane and thrown in a asylum? Read answer...
	Is the sum of two pure imaginary numbers always a pure imaginary number? Read answer...
	If you convert from a centi metric unit to a milli metric unit are you going to a smaller unit or a larger unit in size? Read answer...

	A An odd and imaginary signal always has an odd and imaginary Fourier transform?
	Ribosomes function as what kind of unit a single unit two part unit three part unit four part unit or multidivisional unit?
	How many watts of electricity in one unit and what does one unit cost it used to be 1000watts to one unit one kilowatt one unit?

		Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more
		Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Imaginary unit". Read more

	i
	imaginary
	analysis (in mathematics)

imaginary unit

Contents