These terms have multiple meanings. However, here are "normative" answers.
Religious Pluralism typically is the belief that all religions are essentially "true" or at least valid. This is in contrast with Religious Exclusivism which believes that one religion is correct and the rest are wrong/invalid, and Religious Inclusivism where more than one may be true/valid... but not necessarily all of them. John Hick is probably the best known of the Religious Pluralists.
Interfaith Dialogue has to do with intentional discussion between different faiths/religions with the purpose of great mutual understanding. This is in contrast with Interfaith Apologetics (dialogue) or Polemics (monologue), where the purpose is to convert.
It is thought by some (John Hick, for example) that one must be a religious pluralist (relativizing one's own beliefs) to be effective at interfaith dialogue. However, others, such as Martin Buber, would argue that pluralism is not a requirement... just mutual respect.