Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Intuitive Surgical

 
Hoover's Company Profiles:

Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(NASDAQ:ISRG)
Contact Information
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
1266 Kifer Rd., Bldg. 101
Sunnyvale, CA 94086-5304
CA Tel. 408-523-2100
Fax 408-523-1390

Type: Public
On the web: http://www.intuitivesurgical.com
Employees: 1,660
Employee growth: 31.4%

Intuitive Surgical is haptic to meet you. Employing haptics (the science of computer-aided touch sensitivity), the firm developed the da Vinci Surgical System, a combination of software, hardware, and optics that allows doctors to perform robotically aided surgery from a remote console. The da Vinci system reproduces the doctor's hand movements in real time, during minimally invasive surgery performed by tiny electromechanical arms and instruments. The company manufactures its systems and relies upon contract manufacturers to supply the instruments and accessories used with the systems. Intuitive Surgical sells its products worldwide through both a direct sales force and independent distributors.

Key numbers for fiscal year ending December, 2011:
Sales: $1,757.3M
One year growth: 24.4%
Net income: $495.1M
Income growth: 29.7%

Officers:
Chairman: Lonnie M. Smith
President, CEO and Director: Gary S. Guthart
SVP and CFO: Marshall L. Mohr

Competitors:
Accuray
Curexo Technology
Medtronic

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Quote, Chart and News:

Intuitive Surgical Inc.

Top
Gale Directory of Company Histories:

Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Top

Incorporated: 1995 as Intuitive Surgical Devices, Inc.
NAIC: 339113 Surgical Appliance and Supplies Manufacturing
SIC: 3842 Surgical Appliances & Supplies

Intuitive Surgical, Inc. is a surgical robotics company that has developed and markets the revolutionary da Vinci Surgical System, which is installed in more than 350 academic and community hospitals in the United States as well as in Saudi Arabia, Australia, and throughout Europe. The $1.5 million system has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for use in procedures such as heart valve repair, prostatectomy, and hysterectomy. Da Vinci combines elements of virtual reality and video games to create a precise robotic surgical system. The surgeon performs work at a console across the room from the patient on an operating table, over which are suspended articulated robot arms that can be fitted with microsurgical instruments (sold under the EndoWrist label), such as scalpels, scissors, and clamps. The instruments are inserted into the patient through "ports," one-centimeter incisions. One of the arms includes a stereo endoscope, which sends visual information to the console where it is rendered into three dimensions and magnified. In this way, an artery can be made to appear the size of a hose. The surgeon positions the endoscope with foot controls and performs the surgical procedure using master controls beneath the console display. The system's software then translates the surgeon's motions into real-time manipulation of the surgical instruments inside the patient. The controls also provide some resistance to improve dexterity. The minimally invasive surgery performed by da Vinci lowers the risk of infection, leads to faster patient recovery, and shortens hospital stays. Based in Sunnyvale, California, Intuitive Surgical is a public company listed on the NASDAQ.

Company Origins: Late 20th-Century Research

The original research that led to the development of da Vinci was performed in the late 1980s at the Stanford Research Institute, later known as SRI International. The goal was to improve the surgical tools available in the rising field of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The concept of MIS dated to the ancient Greeks when Hippocrates made mention of a rectal speculum. The Romans also developed ways to inspect internal organs. The principles of endoscopy--using light, mirrors, and lenses to examine internal organs--were established in the 1800s. In the early 1900s the concept of laparoscopy was laid out, in which an incision was made, primarily in the navel, to allow for the inspection of abdominal and pelvic organs and the treatment of some conditions. In 1973 laparoscopy was first used on cancer patients for observation and biopsy of the liver. The introduction of video cameras in the early 1980s was a major advance in MIS, leading to surgeons using laparoscopy for the removal of gallbladders and ovarian cysts. However, the long instruments inserted in a patient were difficult to maneuver, moving in the opposite direction of the surgeon's hands, and the slightest movement was amplified on the other end. One surgeon compared the task to tying shoelaces with golf clubs.

SRI's efforts to improve microsurgery were aided in 1990 by funding from the National Institutes of Health. Researchers developed a prototype for a robotic surgical system that included major elements of da Vinci, including stereoscopic imaging, ergonomic design, and force feedback. The SRI System, as it was then known, came to the attention of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Administration (DARPA), which was no stranger to technological innovation, having played a key role in the development of the Internet (originally known as the DARPA-net). DARPA saw the SRI System as a way to perform "telesurgery" on the battlefield. The idea was that by using satellite transmission military surgeons hundreds of miles away could use a robotic surgery system to perform life-saving procedures on the wounded in remote locations and then evacuate the patients to a critical-care hospital.

In order to drum up interest in nonmilitary applications, SRI demonstrated the prototype to numerous venture capitalists and others in the early 1990s, but no one expressed serious interest until Dr. Frederick Moll in 1994. Moll received his medical degree from the University of Washington in 1981 and became fascinated by the rise of laparoscopy. He left his residency and developed the safety trocar, a tool that permitted surgeons to create a hole in the abdominal wall without risk of damaging organs. But Moll was as much an entrepreneur as a doctor, if not more so. He also held a bachelor of arts degree in economics from the University of California at Berkeley and a master of science degree in management from Stanford University. He cofounded a company called Endotherapeutics to market the trocar; the business ultimately was acquired by U.S. Surgical in 1992. Moll also cofounded Origin Medsystems, Inc. to develop laparoscopic tools, a company that would be bought by Eli Lilly for $100 million in 1992 and turned into an operating company of cardiac instruments subsidiary Guidant Corporation. Moll stayed on as chief medical officer of the unit.

According to Forbes, Moll initially did not think that the SRI System had much commercial value, just a lot of "wow factor." The more he thought about it, however, the more interested he became and he returned for a second demonstration. He knew that the telesurgery elements of the system could be applied to laparoscopic surgery. He told Technology Review in a 2000 article, "What got me excited wasn't the remote-surgery aspect, but the way the system eliminated the need for a hand to be directly connected to a surgeon's instruments. It offered new ways of solving the challenges in minimally invasive techniques." After failing to interest Guidant in licensing the technology, he approached Mayfield Fund, a venture capital firm that had backed him in the past. Mayfield then teamed up Moll with John Freund, who held both a Harvard medical degree and a Harvard M.B.A., to further examine the potential of Moll's idea. Freund was duly convinced and brought in an electrical engineer, Robert Younge, to provide the necessary technical expertise. Younge was also a Stanford graduate and in 1979 cofounded Acuson Corporation, a major ultrasound developer and manufacturer where Freund had been an executive since 1988. According to U.S. News & World Report, Younge "immediately realized that the technology existed to make a surgical robot feasible. 'It was like getting the stars in the skies to line up at the same time.' "

In 1995 Freund successfully negotiated a technology license from SRI, followed by other licenses for technology from IBM and MIT, and in November he, Moll, and Freund incorporated Intuitive Surgical Devices, Inc. Two years later the company adopted its current name. Mayfield and another venture capital firm, Sierra Ventures, supplied $5 million in seed money. Morgan Stanley Ventures joined in the next round of financing, followed by a number of private investors in subsequent rounds. All told, Intuitive raised $127 million by the end of the 1990s.

Prototype Ready by 1997

Younge went to work refining the SRI System into a viable piece of medical equipment, which was tested on cadavers, and by March 1997 he had a prototype ready. It was called Mona, named after Leonardo da Vinci's painting Mona Lisa. Da Vinci also had invented the world's first robot and his name was ultimately applied to the commercial version of the system. In the meantime, Mona was taken to Belgium for tests on humans, performing such relatively simple procedures as peripheral vascular surgery. It was soon apparent that the imaging was not sufficient, which led to further investment in this area and the development of an endoscope that could provide a 3-D image. What was now known as da Vinci was again sent to Europe in 1998 for testing. In both Paris and Germany the system was used to perform abdominal surgery and several open heart operations.

While Intuitive began the process of seeking FDA approval, which would have to be done on a procedure-by-procedure basis, it began marketing da Vinci in Europe, selling ten systems there in 1999. Intuitive also began preparing to make an initial public offering (IPO) of stock. With Lehman Brothers serving as the lead underwriter, Intuitive completed its IPO in June 2000, netting the company $46 million, despite having been sued for patent infringement by a competitor, Computer Motion, Inc., just a month before the offering.

Intuitive was not the only company interested in robot surgery and was in fact a latecomer to the party. Computer Motion was founded in 1989 specifically to develop surgical robots, relying on NASA technology used to assemble equipment remotely in space. The company went public in 1997 and was the early leader in surgical robots. Its signature product was the ZEUS Robotic Surgical System, which also was approved for use in Europe and awaiting approval from the FDA. It, too, combined robotic arms (called Aesop), computer control, and a video console (called Hermes), as well as voice-recognition software to allow the surgeon to call out specific comments to the arms. A third player in the field, Integrated Surgical Systems Inc., had introduced RoboDoc to perform total hip arthroplasty and other orthopedic surgeries. It was Computer Motion that became Intuitive's chief rival, and in the early 2000s the two companies traded expensive lawsuits.

A short time after going public, Intuitive received FDA clearance to use da Vinci on gallbladder disease and gastroesophageal disease. The company's prospective cited gallbladder removals as a major use for da Vinci, but that promise did not pan out due to the far-less-expensive laparoscopic tools that were available to perform the relatively simple operation. The system was in need of an application and found it in prostate surgery, for which the FDA granted approval in June 2001. While the company enjoyed some U.S. sales in 2000, business picked up in 2001 as doctors began to realize the benefits of performing prostate surgery with da Vinci, achieving greater control and precision with less loss of blood and quicker patient recovery. The system also was being used in thoracic operations and mitral-valve heart repair.

In 2002 Moll and Younge left Intuitive to found another medical start-up, Hansen Medical, which developed a robotic system to move diagnostic catheters within a patient in order to perform procedures. Moll remained on Intuitive's board of directors until the beginning of 2003.

Merger with Chief Rival in 2003

Although da Vinci was receiving good review from doctors and a great deal of press coverage, sales were slow. The system was expensive and the microsurgery tools and microchips it employed could only be used several times before they had to be discarded. On average an operation consumed about $1,500 worth of these tools. Moreover, the litigation between Intuitive and Computer Motion was making potential customers nervous about a financial commitment to a company that might be the losing party in the patent disputes. The matter was resolved in June 2003 when Intuitive and Computer Motion agreed to merge. The merger proved to be a tremendous success on a number of levels. The Zeus system was phased out in favor of da Vinci, eliminating the difficulty customers experienced in choosing between the two, and the combined company was able to realize efficiencies of operations by now relying on a single sales force, a consolidated financial department, and other support areas. Sales picked up, aided in no small measure by the increasing number of procedures the FDA approved da Vinci to perform. While Intuitive was nearing profitability, however, the other major player in the field, Integrated Surgical Systems, was struggling to survive and in 2005 shut down.

In 2004 revenues increased 51 percent to $138.8 million and Intuitive recorded net income of $23.5 million, the company's first profitable year. Sales improved to $227.3 million in 2005 and net income soared to $94.1 million. Da Vinci was clearly establishing itself in the medical community, but it remained an expensive device and in the opinion of some was too large. Nevertheless, its potential remained enormous. In the spring of 2005 da Vinci received FDA approval to perform hysterectomies, a procedure performed five times more often than prostate surgery. Perhaps in the future da Vinci could be used to perform tele-surgery, as its original developers envisioned. Ideally, a specialist could perform several surgeries a day in scattered operating rooms far from his office, and perhaps military surgeons could indeed operate on soldiers hundreds of miles away. For the time being, however, such uses for da Vinci remained a future possibility, primarily due to the lag times caused by transmission delays over long distances, limiting the effective range to 30 miles by wireless communication and 200 miles by cable connection, as well as the unreliability of network communications. Intuitive's researchers continued to pursue the concept of telesurgery, but for the time being at least saw it as a way to speed up the training of surgeons learning to use robotic-assisted surgery by letting them work under the guidance of seasoned users. Regardless, Intuitive estimated that its market, in terms of selling da Vinci systems, consumable tools, and service contracts, could easily top $2 billion a year.

Principal Subsidiaries

Computer Motion, Inc.

Principal Competitors

Boston Scientific Corporation; Johnson & Johnson; Medtronic, Inc.

Further Reading

Alpert, Bill, "Cold Hands," Barron's, June 8, 1998, p. H26.

Barrett, Jennifer, "Cutting Edge," Newsweek, December 12, 2005.

Comarow, Avery, and Thomas Hayden, "Rob Younge & Frederic Moll: A Robot That Fixes Hearts," U.S. News & World Report, December 25, 2000, p. 50.

Ditlea, Steve, "Robo Surgeons," Technology Review, November 2000, p. 74.

Kichen, Steve, "Medical Renaissance," Forbes.com, July 27, 2005.

Moukheiber, Zina, "Dr. Robot," Forbes, March 6, 2000, p. 159.

Popolow, Gerry, "Robotic Systems Transform the Operating Room," Robotics World, November/December 1999, p. 32.

Salisbury, J. Kenneth, Jr., "The Heart of Microsurgery," Mechanical Engineering, December 1998, p. 46.

Wysocki, Bernard, Jr., "Robots in the OR," Wall Street Journal, February 26, 2004, p. B1.

— Ed Dinger


Wikipedia on Answers.com:

Intuitive Surgical

Top
Intuitive Surgical Inc.
Type Public (NASDAQISRG)
S&P 500 Component
Industry Medical Appliances & Equipment
Founded 1995
Headquarters Sunnyvale, California, USA
Key people Gary S. Guthart, CEO
Lonnie M. Smith, Chairman
Products da Vinci Surgical System
Revenue increase $600.8 million USD (2007)[1]
Operating income increase $206.7 million USD (2007) [1]
Net income increase $144.5 million USD (2007) [1]
Employees 935
Website www.intuitivesurgical.com

Intuitive Surgical Inc. (NASDAQISRG) is a corporation that manufactures robotic surgical systems, most notably the da Vinci Surgical System. The da Vinci Surgical System allows surgery to be performed remotely using robotic manipulators. The company is part of the Nasdaq-100 and S&P 500. Intuitive Surgical has installed over 1,242 systems worldwide as of July, 2009.[2] Computer Motion was a competitor that merged with Intuitive Surgical in 2003.

Contents

History

The research that eventually led to the development of the da Vinci Surgical System was performed in the late 1980s at non-profit research institute SRI International.[3] In 1990, SRI received funding from the National Institutes of Health. SRI developed a prototype robotic surgical system that caught the interest of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which was interested in the system for its potential to allow surgeons to operate remotely on soldiers wounded on the battlefield.

In 1994, Dr. Frederic Moll became interested in the SRI System, as the device was known at the time. At the time, Moll was employed by Guidant. He tried to interest Guidant in backing it, to no avail. In 1995, Moll was introduced to John Freund, who had recently left Acuson Corporation. Freund negotiated an option to acquire SRI's intellectual property and incorporated a new company that he named Intuitive Surgical Devices, Inc. At that point Freund, Moll, and Robert Younge (also from Acuson) wrote the business plan for the company and raised its initial venture capital. Early investors included the Mayfield Fund, Sierra Ventures, and Morgan Stanley.

The company refined the SRI System into a prototype known originally as "Lenny" (after the young Leonardo da Vinci), which was ready for testing in 1997. As the company's prototypes became more advanced, they were named using da Vinci themes. One was named "Leonardo", and another was "Mona". The final version of the prototype was nicknamed the da Vinci Surgical System, and the name stuck when the system was eventually commercialized. After further testing, Intuitive Surgical began marketing this system in Europe in 1999, while awaiting FDA approval in the United States.

The company raised $46 million in an initial public offering in 2000. That same year, the FDA approved use of the da Vinci Surgical System for general laparoscopic surgery, which can be used to address gallbladder disease and gastroesophageal disease. In 2001, the FDA approved use of the system for prostate surgery. The FDA has subsequently approved the system for thoracoscopic surgery, cardiac procedures performed with adjunctive incisions, and gynecologic procedures.[4]

Shortly before going public, Intuitive Surgical was sued for patent infringement by Computer Motion, Inc, its chief rival. Computer Motion had actually gotten into the robotic surgery field earlier than Intuitive Surgical, with its own system, the ZEUS Robotic Surgical System. Although the ZEUS system was approved in Europe, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had not yet approved it for any procedure at the time that the FDA first approved the da Vinci system. The uncertainty created by the litigation between the companies was a drag on each company's growth. In 2003, Intuitive Surgical and Computer Motion agreed to merge, thus ending the litigation between them.[5] The ZEUS system was ultimately phased out in favor of the da Vinci system.

da Vinci Surgical System

Da Vinci Surgical System
Laproscopic Surgery Robot.jpg
Manufacturer Intuitive Surgical

The da Vinci Surgical System is a robotic surgical system. The system is controlled by a surgeon from a console. It is commonly used for prostatectomies and increasingly for cardiac valve repair and gynecologic surgical procedures.[6][7]

Overview

The da Vinci System has been designed to improve upon conventional laparoscopy, in which the surgeon operates while standing, using hand-held, long-shafted instruments, which have no wrists. The da Vinci System consists of a surgeon’s console that is typically in the same room as the patient and a patient-side cart with four interactive robotic arms controlled from the console. Three of the arms are for tools that hold objects, act as a scalpel, scissors, bovie, or unipolar or dipolar electrocautery instruments. The fourth arm is for an endoscopic camera with two lenses that gives the surgeon full stereoscopic vision from the console. The surgeon sits at the console and looks through two eye holes at a 3-D image of the procedure, meanwhile maneuvering the arms with two foot pedals and two hand controllers. The da Vinci System scales, filters and translates the surgeon's hand movements into more precise micro-movements of the instruments, which operate through small incisions in the body.

By providing surgeons with superior visualization, enhanced dexterity, greater precision and ergonomic comfort, the da Vinci Surgical System makes it possible for more surgeons to perform minimally invasive procedures involving complex dissection or reconstruction. For the patient, a da Vinci procedure can offer all the potential benefits of a minimally invasive procedure, including less pain, less blood loss and less need for blood transfusions. Moreover, the da Vinci System can enable a shorter hospital stay, a quicker recovery and faster return to normal daily activities.[8]

A da Vinci Surgical System costs approximately $1.5 Million dollars.[9] The new da Vinci SI released in April 2009 cost about $1.75 Million. In addition, there are maintenance contracts plus expenditures for instruments used during surgery. Surgical procedures performed with the robot take longer than traditional ones. Critics have pointed out that hospitals have a hard time recovering the cost and that most clinical data does not support the claim of improved patient outcomes.[7]

Criticism

While the use of robotic surgery has become an item in the advertisement of medical services, critics point out a lack of studies that indicate long-term results are superior to results following laparoscopic surgery.[10] On the other hand, there is no question that some procedures that have traditionally been performed with large incisions can be converted to "minimally invasive" endoscopic procedures with the use of the Da Vinci, shortening length-of-stay in the hospital and reducing recovery times. But because of the hefty cost of the robotic system it is not clear that it is cost-effective for hospitals and physicians despite any benefits to patients since there is no additional reimbursement paid by the government or insurance companies when the system is used. Data are absent to show that these increased costs can be justified. Another problem is that in the medical literature very experienced surgeons tend to publish their results. These, however, may not be representative of surgeons with lesser experience.[10] And there is a steep learning curve for surgeons who adopt use of the system.

References

  1. ^ a b c Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (2008-02-14). "Form 10-K Annual Report for 2007". SEC. http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1342960/000119312508058998/d10k.htm#toc53073_5. Retrieved 2009-01-15. 
  2. ^ Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (2008-10-17). "Form 10-Q for Quarter Ending September 30, 2008". SEC. http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1035267/000119312508212329/d10q.htm. Retrieved 2009-01-15. 
  3. ^ "Intuitive Surgical." International Directory of Company Histories. The Gale Group, Inc, 2006. Answers.com 30 Jan. 2009. http://www.answers.com/topic/intuitive-surgical-inc (other facts from History section from same source)
  4. ^ http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/corporate/companyprofile/index.aspx
  5. ^ http://sec.edgar-online.com/2003/03/07/0000891618-03-001169/Section10.asp Merger information
  6. ^ Robots as surgical enablers, MarketWatch, 3 February 2005
  7. ^ a b Prepping Robots to Perform Surgery, The New York Times, 4 May 2008
  8. ^ J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. Epub 2008 Mar 6. PMID 18439499
  9. ^ http://www.jyi.org/news/nb.php?id=1499
  10. ^ a b Gina Kolata (February 13, 2010). "Results Unproven, Robotic Surgery Wins Converts". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/14/health/14robot.html. Retrieved March 11, 2010. 

External links


 
 

 

Copyrights:

Hoover's Company Profiles. © 2012 Hoover's, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Quote, Chart and News. Copyright © QuoteMedia. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (View delay times for all exchanges). RT Realtime, DL+ Realtime BATS, EOD End Of Day, PD Previous Day. Halted. Market Data powered by QuoteMedia, fundamentals by Morningstar. Terms of use Read more
$copyright.smallImage.alttext Gale Directory of Company Histories. International Directory of Company Histories. Copyright © 2006 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia on Answers.com. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article Intuitive Surgical Read more

Follow us
Facebook Twitter
YouTube