Asked:
16 minutes ago

Asked:
26 minutes ago

More new questions »

Answered

In Numbers

Irrational numbers are numbers that cannot be expressed as fractions with whole numbers. They are generally roots (such as the square root of two) or constants (such as pi and… e). They are interesting because they cannot be exactly expressed as decimal numbers because they never terminate or repeat themselves. (MORE)

Answered

In Numbers

The product of two irrational numbers may be rational or irrational. For example, sqrt(2) is irrational, and sqrt(2)*sqrt(2) = 2, a rational number. On the other hand, (2^(1/4…)) * (2^(1/4)) = 2^(1/2) = sqrt(2), so here two irrational numbers multiply to give an irrational number. (MORE)

Answered

In Numbers

Any number that can be completely written down with digits is rational. You appear to have succeeded in writing down the number you're asking about, so it's a rational nu…mber. (MORE)

Answered

In Numbers

No. An irrational number can only be part of a whole number. Every whole number is rational. 1000000

Answered

In Algebra

Sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't. The square root of 2 and the square root of 3 are both irrational, as is their product, the square root of 6. The square root of 2 and …the square root of 8 are both irrational, but their product, the square root of 16, is rational (in fact, it equals 4). (MORE)

Answered

An irrational number is a real number that cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers. In decimal terms, it is a real number that has either a terminating decimal or an i…nfinitely recurring decimal. This would apply whatever the integer base, such as binary, octal, hexadecimal. (MORE)

Answered

In Uncategorized

the 5s because it has better service but it dosent have diffrent colrs just silver gold and black

Answered

20c + 5 = 5c + 65 Divide through by 5: 4c + 1 = c + 13 Subtract c from both sides: 3c + 1 = 13 Subtract 1 from both sides: 3c = 12 Divide both sides by 3: c = 4

Answered

In Numbers

The square root of 2 is irrational, yet the product of it with itself is 2. So the answer is no.

Answered

In Numbers

No, because if need be it can be expressed as a fraction whereas irrational numbers can't be expressed as fractions.