n.
A partnership or conglomerate, formed often to share risk or expertise: a joint venture between the film companies.
On this page
American Heritage Dictionary:
joint venture |
Related Videos:
joint venture |
Click to Play
Click to Play
Click to Play
Click to Play
Barron's Banking Dictionary:
Joint Venture |
Business structure formed by two or more parties for a specific purpose. Joint ventures are similar to partnerships, but are usually limited to one or two projects. In the financial services industry, joint ventures have been widely employed for marketing products or services that one of the parties, acting alone, would have been legally prohibited from doing. Prior to financial modernization legislation enacted in 1999, banks often formed joint ventures with life insurance companies to market annuities and insurance to bank customers.
Federal Antitrust Laws generally treat financial joint ventures as permissible as long as they are pro-competitive, meaning a proposed venture does not interfere with activities of other organizations.
Barron's Real Estate Dictionary:
joint venture |
| Joint Tenancy, Joint Ownership | |
| Joint and Several Liability, Joists |
Gale Encyclopedia of Small Business:
Joint Ventures |
A joint venture is a business enterprise under-taken by two or more persons or organizations to share the expense and (hopefully) profit of a particular business project. "Joint ventures are not business organizations in the sense of proprietorships, partner-ships or corporations," noted Charles P. Lickson in A Legal Guide for Small Business. "They are agreements between parties or firms for a particular purpose or venture. Their formation may be very informal, such as a handshake and an agreement for two firms to share a booth at a trade show. Other arrangements can be extremely complex, such as the consortium of major U.S. electronics firms to develop new microchips…. A joint venture is, in effect, a form ofpartnership that is limited to a particular purpose." Joint ventures have grown in popularity in recent years, despite the relatively high failure rate of such efforts for one reason or another. Creative small business owners have been able to use this business strategy to good advantage over the years, although the practice remains one primarily associated with larger corporations.
Most joint ventures are formed for the ultimate purpose of saving money. This is as true of small neighborhood stores that agree to advertise jointly in the weekly paper as it is of international oil companies that agree to work together for purposes of oil and gas exploration or extraction. Joint ventures are attractive because they enable companies to share both risks and costs.
TYPES OF JOINT VENTURES. Equity-based joint ventures benefit foreign and/or local private interests, groups of interests, or members of the general public. Under non-equity joint ventures (also known as cooperative agreements), meanwhile, the parties seek technical service arrangements, franchise and brand use agreements, management contracts, rental agreements, or one-time contracts, e.g., for construction projects. Participants do not always furnish capital as part of their joint venture commitments. There are, for example, non-equity arrangements in which some companies are more in need of technical services or technological expertise than they are capital. They may want to modernize operations or start new production operations. Thus, they limit partners' participation to technical assistance. Such arrangements often include some funding as well, albeit limited.
Legal Structure of Joint Ventures
As Lickson observed in A Legal Guide for Small Business, joint ventures are governed entirely by the legal agreement that brought them into existence. "Unless the joint venture is formalized by creation of a corporation or partnership, it never ripens into a taxpaying, legal entity on its own. Instead, the joint venture functions through the legal status of the venture participants, known as co-venturers or venture partners," Lickson wrote. "Since the joint venture is not a legal entity on its own, it does not hire people, enter into contracts, or have its own tax liabilities. These matters are handled through the co-venturers. Corporate law, partnership law, and the law of sole proprietorship do not govern joint ventures; contract law governs joint ventures." And as Marc J. Lane noted in the Legal Handbook for Small Business, "since the venture ends at the conclusion of a specific project, issues of continuity of life and free transferability become moot."
Why Joint Ventures Fail
Small business owners should not engage in joint ventures without adequate planning and strategy. They cannot afford to, since the ultimate goal of joint ventures is the same as it is for any type of business operation: to make a profit. Experience dictates that both parties in a joint venture should know exactly what they wish to derive from their partnership. There must be an agreement before the partnership becomes a reality. There must also be a firm commitment on the part of each member to the project and to one another. One of the leading causes for the failure of joint ventures is that some participants do not reveal their true business agendas, or mislead their partners about their ability to uphold their agreed-upon responsibilities.
Many small business consultants counsel clients to approach joint ventures cautiously. They acknowledge that such partnerships can be most valuable in nourishing a company's growth and stability, but also point out that smaller businesses usually have far less margin for error than do multinational corporations, or even mid-sized companies. Some experts recommend that business owners considering a joint venture with another establishment (or establishments) launch a small joint venture first. Such small projects allow companies to test the relationship without committing large amounts of money. This is especially true when companies with different structures, corporate cultures, and strategic plans work together. Such differences are difficult to overcome and frequently lead to failure. That is why a "courtship" is beneficial to joint venture participants.
Other factors that can have a debilitating impact on joint ventures include marketplace developments, lagging technology, partner's inability (rather than reluctance or refusal) to honor their contractual obligations, and regulatory uncertainties. Another problem with joint ventures concerns the issue of management. The managers of one company may be more adept and/or decisive with their decisionmaking than their counterparts at the other company. This can lead to friction and a lack of cooperation. Projects are doomed to failure if there is not a well-defined decisionmaking process in place that is predicated on mutually recognized goals and strategies.
Benefits of Joint Ventures
Among the most significant benefits derived from joint ventures is that partners save money and reduce their risks through capital and resource sharing. Joint ventures also give smaller companies the chance to work with larger ones to develop, manufacture, and market new products. They also give companies of all sizes the opportunity to increase sales, gain access to wider markets, and enhance technological capabilities through research and development (R&D) underwritten by more than one party. Until relatively recently, U.S. companies were often reluctant to engage in research and development partnerships, and government agencies tried not to become involved in business development. However, with the emergence of countries that feature technologically advanced industries (such as electronics or computer microchips) supported extensively by government funding, American companies have become more willing to participate in joint ventures in these areas. In addition, both federal and state agencies have become more generous with their financial support in these areas. Government's increased involvement in the private business environment has created more opportunities for companies to engage in domestic and international joint ventures.
Further Reading:
Johnson, Howard E. "Reducing the Risks in Joint Ventures." CMA Management. December 2000.
Lane, Marc J. Legal Handbook for Small Business. AMACOM, 1989.
Lickson, Charles P. A Legal Guide for Small Business. Crisp Publications, 1994.
Lynch, Robert Porter, The Practical Guide to Joint Ventures & Corporate Alliances. John Wiley and Sons, 1989.
Moeller, Bud. "Becoming a Corporate 'Partner of Choice.' " Corporate Board. November 2000.
Nueno, Pedro. "Alliances and Other Things." R&D Management. October 1999.
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Architecture & Construction:
joint venture |
A collaborative undertaking by two or more persons or organizations for a specific project (or projects) having many of the legal characteristics of a partnership.
West's Encyclopedia of American Law:
Joint Venture |
An association of two or more individuals or companies engaged in a solitary business enterprise for profit without actual partnership or incorporation; also called a joint adventure.
A joint venture is a contractual business undertaking between two or more parties. It is similar to a business partnership, with one key difference: a partnership generally involves an ongoing, long-term business relationship, whereas a joint venture is based on a single business transaction. Individuals or companies choose to enter joint ventures in order to share strengths, minimize risks, and increase competitive advantages in the marketplace. Joint ventures can be distinct business units (a new business entity may be created for the joint venture) or collaborations between businesses. In a collaboration, for example, a high-technology firm may contract with a manufacturer to bring its idea for a product to market; the former provides the know-how, the latter the means.
All joint ventures are initiated by the parties' entering a contract or an agreement that specifies their mutual responsibilities and goals. The contract is crucial for avoiding trouble later; the parties must be specific about the intent of their joint venture as well as aware of its limitations. All joint ventures also involve certain rights and duties. The parties have a mutual right to control the enterprise, a right to share in the profits, and a duty to share in any losses incurred. Each joint venturer has a fiduciary responsibility, owes a standard of care to the other members, and has the duty to act in good faith in matters that concern the common interest or the enterprise. A fiduciary responsibility is a duty to act for someone else's benefit while subordinating one's personal interests to those of the other person. A joint venture can terminate at a time specified in the contract, upon the accomplishment of its purpose, upon the death of an active member, or if a court decides that serious disagreements between the members make its continuation impractical.
Joint ventures have existed for centuries. In the United States, their use began with the railroads in the late 1800s. Throughout the middle part of the twentieth century they were common in the manufacturing sector. By the late 1980s, joint ventures increasingly appeared in the service industries as businesses looked for new, competitive strategies. This expansion of joint ventures was particularly interesting to regulators and lawmakers.
The chief concern with joint ventures is that they can restrict competition, especially when they are formed by businesses that are otherwise competitors or potential competitors. Another concern is that joint ventures can reduce the entry of others into a given market. Regulators in the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission routinely evaluate joint ventures for violations of antitrust law; in addition, injured private parties may bring antitrust suits.
In 1982 Congress amended the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890 (15 U.S.C.A. § 6a)— the statutory basis of antitrust law — to ease restrictions on joint ventures that involve exports. At the same time, it passed the Export Trading Company Act (U.S.C.A. § 4013) to grant exporters limited immunity to antitrust prosecution. Two years later the National Cooperative Research Act of 1984 (Pub. L. No. 98-462) permitted venturers involved in joint research and development to notify the government of their joint venture and thus limit their liability in the event of prosecution for antitrust violations. This protection against liability was expanded in 1993 to include some joint ventures involving production (Pub. L. No. 103-42).
Investopedia Financial Dictionary:
Joint Venture - JV |
The cooperation of two or more individuals or businesses in which each agrees to share profit, loss and control in a specific enterprise.
Investopedia Says:
Forming a joint venture is a good way for companies to partner without having to merge. JVs are typically taxed as a partnership.
Related Links:
Learn what corporate restructuring is, why companies do it and why it sometimes doesn't work. The Basics Of Mergers And Acquisitions
Rather than be a jack-of-all-trades, an owner should rely on a network of trusted experts. Small Business: It's All About Relationships
New ventures have only a 50% chance of making it through the first five years. Find out why. Reality Check: Why Startups Fail
Incorporating these steps will help your business thrive in a competitive market. In Small Business, Success Is Spelled With 5 "C"s
Wikipedia on Answers.com:
Joint venture |
|
|
This article is written like a personal reflection or essay rather than an encyclopedic description of the subject. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (April 2010) |
|
|
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2010) |
A joint venture (JV) is a business agreement in which parties agree to develop, for a finite time, a new entity and new assets by contributing equity. They exercise control over the enterprise and consequently share revenues, expenses and assets. There are other types of companies such as JV limited by guarantee, joint ventures limited by guarantee with partners holding shares.
In European law, the term 'joint-venture' (or joint undertaking) is an elusive legal concept, better defined under the rules of company law. In France, the term 'joint venture' is variously translated as 'association d'entreprises', 'entreprise conjointe', 'coentreprise' or 'entreprise commune'. But generally, the term societe anonyme loosely covers all foreign collaborations. In Germany, 'joint venture' is better represented as a 'combination of companies' (Konzern).[1]
With individuals, when two or more persons come together to form a temporary partnership for the purpose of carrying out a particular project, such partnership can also be called a joint venture where the parties are "co-venturers".
The venture can be for one specific project only - when the JV is referred to more correctly as a consortium (as the building of the Channel Tunnel) - or a continuing business relationship. The consortium JV (also known as a cooperative agreement) is formed where one party seeks technological expertise or technical service arrangements, franchise and brand use agreements, management contracts, rental agreements, for one-time contracts. The JV is dissolved when that goal is reached.
Some major joint ventures include Dow Corning, MillerCoors, Sony Ericsson, Penske Truck Leasing, and Owens-Corning.
A joint venture takes place when two parties come together to take on one project. In a joint venture, both parties are equally invested in the project in terms of money, time, and effort to build on the original concept. While joint ventures are generally small projects, major corporations also use this method in order to diversify. A joint venture can ensure the success of smaller projects for those that are just starting in the business world or for established corporations. Since the cost of starting new projects is generally high, a joint venture allows both parties to share the burden of the project, as well as the resulting profits.
Since money is involved in a joint venture, it is necessary to have a strategic plan in place. In short, both parties must be committed to focusing on the future of the partnership, rather than just the immediate returns. Ultimately, short term and long term successes are both important. In order to achieve this success, honesty, integrity, and communication within the joint venture are necessary.
|
Contents
|
In the era of the Internet, finding opportunities for exploiting an idea is sizeable together with remote, or advertised, communicating. There are also the blogging networks as well the social networking sites and search engines. There are also other venues to find a JV partner such as seminars, exhibitions, directories and the plain newspaper advertising of opportunities. One should not forget websites which have become prosperous like eBay and Amazon.com, Wikipedia, YouTube to name the most obvious. Forming JVs with distributor and marketing agencies is possible in this flat world to market a product. But finding an entrepreneur for a JV is another task.
Nonetheless, there are risk-takers- venture capitalists, angel investors and venture managers (see: Carried interest) – especially in the high-tech industries like IC chips or biotechnology. Although they typically exit once an idea or an opportunity proves itself, there are watchful funds and investors who could go in for a JV.
Joint ventures have also become more prominent in the world of alternative investments since the financial crisis began in 2007. In an Opalesque.TV[2] video, Tim Krochuk of hedge fund GRT Capital Partners describes how hedge funds have begun teaming up with traditional long-only asset managers in joint ventures to provide alternative capabilities to existing traditional asset management firms. The emergence of these joint ventures continues the trend of alternative investments becoming a larger piece of traditional portfolios.
Formulating the JV is a series of steps, one which needs a lot of work and yet, at the same time, precision. One can here only underline the steps or information that will be needed by the JV candidate. They are: [3]
While the following offers some insight to the process of joining up with a committed partner to form a JV, it is often difficult to determine whether the commitments come from a known and distinguishable party or an intermediary. This is particularly so when the language barrier exists and one is unfamiliar with local customs, especially in approaches to government, often the deciding body for the formation of a JV or dispute settlement.
The ideal process of selecting a JV partner emerges from:
Companies are also called JVs in cases where there are dominant partners together with participation of the public. There may also be cases where the public shareholding is substantial but the founding partners retain their identity. These companies may be 'public' or 'private' companies. It would be out of place to describe them, except to say there are many in India.
Further consideration relates to starting a new legal entity ground up. Such an enterprise is sometimes called 'an incorporated JV', one 'packaged' with technology contracts (knowhow, patents, trademarks and copyright), technical services and assisted-supply arrangements.
The consortium JV (also known as a cooperative agreement) is formed where one party seeks technological expertise or technical service arrangements, franchise and brand use agreements, management contracts, rental agreements, for 'one-time' contracts, e.g., for construction projects. They dissolve the JV when that goal is reached.
A nascent JV project outlines:
Its feasibility, besides its profitability, is assessed (in terms of government control over the JV) by considering it, along with the Articles which will regulate it, by its strength or weakness factors (for the economy or the country) in aspects such as:
A JV can be brought about in the following major ways:
In the U.K and India - and in many Common Law countries - a joint-venture (or else a company formed by a group of individuals) must file with the appropriate authority the Memorandum of Association. It is a statutory document which informs the outside public of its existence. It may be viewed by the public at the office in which it is filed. A sample can be seen at wikimedia.org.[4] Together with the Articles of Association, it forms the 'constitution' of a company in these countries.
The Articles of Association regulate the interaction between shareholders and the directors of a company and can be a lengthy document of up to 700,000+ pages. It deals with the powers relegated by the stockholders to the Directors and those withheld by them, requiring the passing of ordinary resolutions, special resolutions and the holding of Extraordinary General Meetings to bring the Directors' decision to bear.
A Certificate of Incorporation[5] or the Articles of Incorporation[6] is a document required to form a corporation in the US (in actuality, the State where it is incorporated) and in countries following the practice. In the US, the 'constitution' is a single document. The Articles of Incorporation is again a regulation of the Directors by the stock-holders in a company.
By its formation the JV becomes a new entity with the implication:
On the receipt of the Certificate of Incorporation a company can commence its business.
This is a legal area and is fraught with difficulty as the laws of countries differ, particularly on the enforceability of 'heads of' or shareholder agreements. For some legal reasons it may be called a Memorandum of Understanding. It is done in parallel with other activities in forming a JV. Though dealt with briefly for a shareholders' agreement,[7]) some issues must be dealt with here as a preamble to the discussion that follows. There are also many issues which are not in the Articles when a company starts up or never ever present. Also, a JV may elect to stay as a JV alone in a 'quasi partnership' to avoid any nonessential disclosure to the government or the public.
Some of the issues in a shareholders' agreement are:
There are many features which have to be incorporated into the Shareholders Agreement which is quite private to the parties as they start off. Normally, it requires no submission to any authority.
The other basic document which must be articulated is the Articles which is a published document and known to members.
This repeats the Shareholders Agreement as to the number of Directors each founder can appoint to the (see Board of Directors). Whether the Board controls or the Founders. The taking of decisions by simple majority (50%+1) of those present or a 51% or 75% majority with all Directors present (their alternates/proxy); the deployment of funds of the firm; extent of debt; the proportion of profit that can be declared as dividends; etc. Also significant is what will happen if the firm is dissolved; one of the partner dies. Also, the 'first right' of refusal if the firm is sold, sometimes its puts and calls.
Often the most successful JVs are those with 50:50 partnership with each party having the same number of Directors but rotating control over the firm, or rights to appoint the Chairperson and Vice-chair of the Company. Sometimes a party may give a separate trusted person to vote in its place proxy vote of the Founder at Board Meetings.[8]
Recently, in a major case the Indian Supreme Court has held that Memorandums of Understanding (whose details are not in the Articles of Association) are "unconstitutional" giving more transparency to undertakings.
It is interesting to study the joint-venture laws of China because they are of recent vintage and because such a unique law exists.
According to a report of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2003, China was the recipient of US$53.5 billion in direct foreign investment, making it the world's largest recipient of direct foreign investment for the first time, to exceed the USA. Also, it approved the establishment of nearly 500,000 foreign-investment enterprises.[9] The US had 45,000 projects (by 2004) with an in-place investment of over 48 billion.[10]
Until 1949, no guidelines existed on how foreign investment was to be handled due to the restrictive nature of China toward foreign investors. Since Mao Zedong initiatives in foreign trade began to be applied, and law applicable to foreign direct investment was made clear in 1979, the first Sino-foreign equity venture took place in 2001.[11] The corpus of the law has improved since then.
Companies with foreign partners can carry out manufacturing and sales operations in China and can sell through their own sales network. Foreign-Sino companies have export rights which are not available to wholly Chinese companies, as China desires to import foreign technology by encouraging JVs and the latest technologies.
Under Chinese law, foreign enterprises are divided into several basic categories. Of these, five will be described or mentioned here: three relate to industry and services and two as vehicles for foreign investment. Those 5 categories of Chinese foreign enterprises are: the Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Ventures (EJVs), Sino-Foreign Co-operative Joint Ventures (CJVs), Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprises (WFOE), although they do not strictly belong to Joint Ventures, plus foreign investment companies limited by shares (FICLBS), and Investment Companies through Foreign Investors (ICFI). Each category is described below.
The EJV Law is between a Chinese partner and a foreign company. It is incorporated in both Chinese (official) and in English (with equal validity), with limited liability. Prior to China's entry into WTO – and thus the WFOEs – EJVs predominated. In the EJV mode, the partners share profits, losses and risk in equal proportion to their respective contributions to the venture's registered capital. These escalate upwardly in the same proportion as the increase in registered capital.
The JV contract accompanied by the Articles of Association for the EJV are the two most fundamental legal documents of the project. The Articles mirror many of the provisions of the JV contract. In case of conflict the JV document has precedence These documents are prepared at the same time as the feasibility report. There are also the ancillary documents (termed "offsets" in the US) covering know-how and trademarks and supply-of-equipment agreements.
The minimum equity is prescribed for investment (truncated),[3][12] where the foreign equity and debt levels are:[13]
There are also intermediary levels.
The foreign investment in the total project must be at least 25%. No minimum investment is set for the Chinese partner. The timing of investments must be mentioned in the Agreement and failure to invest in the indicated time, draws a penalty.
Co-operative Joint Ventures (CJVs)[14] are permitted under the Sino-Foreign Co-operative Joint Ventures. Co-operative enterprises are also called Contractual Operative Enterprises.
The CJVs may have a limited structure or unlimited – therefore, there are two versions. The limited-liability version is similar to the EJVs in status of permissions - the foreign investor provides the majority of funds and technology and the Chinese party provides land, buildings, equipment, etc. However, there are no minimum limits on the foreign partner which allows him to be a minority shareholder.
The other format of the CJV is similar to a partnership where the parties jointly incur unlimited liability for the debts of the enterprise with no separate legal person being created. In both the cases, the status of the formed enterprise is that of a legal Chinese person which can hire labor directly as, for example, a Chinese national contactor. The minimum of the capital is registered at various levels of investment.
Other differences from the EJV are to be noted:
Convenience and flexibility are the characteristics of this type of investment. It is therefore easier to find co-operative partners and to reach an agreement.
With changes in the law, it becomes possible to merge with a Chinese company for a quick start. A foreign investor does not need to set up a new corporation in China. Instead, the investor uses the Chinese partner's business license, under a contractual arrangement. Under the CJV, however, the land stays in the possession of the Chinese partner.
There is another advantage: the percentage of the CJV owned by each partner can change throughout the JV's life, giving the option to the foreign investor, by holding higher equity, obtains a faster rate of return with the concurrent wish of the Chinese partner of a later larger role of maintaining long-term control.
The parties in any of the ventures, EJV, CJV or WFOE prepare a feasibility study outlined above. It is a non-binding document - the parties are still free to choose not to proceed with the project. The feasibility study must cover the fundamental technical and commercial aspects of the project, before the parties can proceed to formalize the necessary legal documentation. The study should contain details referred to earlier under Feasibility Study[9] (submissions by the Chinese partner).
There is basic law of the PRC concerning enterprises with sole foreign investment controls, WFOEs. China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) around 2001 has had profound effects on foreign investment. Not being a JV, they are considered here only in comparison or contrast.
To implement WTO commitments, China publishes from time to time updated versions of its 'Catalogs Investments' (affecting ventures) prohibited, restricted.
The WFOE is a Chinese legal person and has to obey all Chinese laws. As such, it is allowed to enter into contracts with appropriate government authorities to acquire land use rights, rent buildings, and receive utility services. In this it is more similar to a CJV than an EJV.
WFOEs are expected by PRC to use the most modern technologies and to export at least 50% of their production, with all of the investment is to be wholly provided by the foreign investor and the enterprise is within his total control.
WFOEs are typically limited liability enterprises (like with EJVs) but the liability of the Directors, Managers, Advisers, and Suppliers depends on the rules which govern the Departments or Ministries which control product liability, worker safety or environmental protection.
An advantage the WFOE enjoys over its alternates is the protection to its know-how but a principal disadvantage is absence of an interested and influential Chinese party.
As of the 3rd Quarter 2004 the WFOEs had replaced EJVs and CJVs as follows:[15]
| Type JV | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 (3Qr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFOE | 46.9 | 50.3 | 60.2 | 62.4 | 66.8 |
| EJV,% | 35.8 | 34.7 | 20.4 | 29.6 | 26.9 |
| CJV,% | 15.9 | 12.9 | 9.6 | 7.2 | 5.2 |
| Misc JV* | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.1 |
| CJVs (No.)** | 1735 | 1589 | 1595 | 1547 | 996 |
(*)=Financial Ventures by EJVs/CJVs (**)=Approved JVs
These enterprises are formed under the Sino-Foreign Investment Act. The capital is composed of value of stock in exchange for the value of the property given to the enterprise. The liability of the shareholders, including debt, is equal to the amount of shares purchased by each partner.
The registered capital of the company the share of the paid-in capital. The minimum amount of the registered capital of the company should be RMB 30 million. These companies can be listed on the only two PRC Stock Exchanges – the Shangri and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges. Shares of two types are permitted on these Exchanges – Types “A” and Type “B” shares.
Type A are only to be used by Chinese nationals and can be traded only in RMB. Type “B” shares are denominated in Remembi but can be traded in foreign exchange and by Chinese nationals having foreign exchange. Further, State enterprises which have been approved for corporatization can trade in Hong Kong in “H” share and in NYSE exchanges.
“A” shares are issued to and traded by Chinese nationals. They are issued and traded in Renminbi. “B” shares are denominated in Renminbi but are traded in foreign currency. From March 2001, in addition to foreign investors, Chinese nationals with foreign currency can also trade “B” shares.
Brief coverage is provided.
Investment Companies are those established in China by sole foreign-funded business or jointly with Chinese partners who engage in direct investment. It has to be incorporated as a company with limited liability.
The total amount of the investor's assets during the year preceding the application to do business in China has to be no less than US $ 400 million within the territory of China. The paid-in capital contribution has to exceed $ 10 million. Furthermore, more than 3 project proposals of the investor's intended investment projects must have been approved. The shares subscribed and held by foreign Investment Companies by Foreign Investors (ICFI) should be 25%. The investment firm can be established as an EJV.
India has an open philosophy on capital markets, and it closely parallels its English peers in operation. The Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) has close to 5,000 listed shares, and trades in several thousand more, making it the largest stock exchange in the world.[16] The National Stock Exchange is the other exchange at present. English is one of the preferred languages of the market, and its policies are first announced in English.
The Indian people are skilled and entrepreneurial by nature as evident in world markets, but in India, less than 1% of its billion population at present – that is, only 11 million people – representing 3% of households invest in the market.[17]
People who work the market in other languages are adept in recognizing concepts in derivatives and futures and trade in them. India is one of three countries that has supercomputers, one of six that has satellite launching facilities and has over 100 Fortune 500 companies doing R&D in the country.[18]
India does not restrict the repatriation of investments, dividends, profits and if need be, the principal, through the single autonomous entity, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The Indian currency (the rupee) is 100% convertible for earnings at free-market rates.
India's new policies (described below) have resulted in aggregate foreign investment flowing into India, increasing from US$103 million in 1990-91 to US$61.8 billion in 2007/2008.[19][20]
India's basic outlines of industrial development were framed by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru in 1956, making the private sector a participant in development, but giving the public sector a dominant position.[21]
However, by the early 1990s, the situation in the world economies turned: Japan entered a phase of stagnancy of growth, the pace of the "Asian tigers" slowed, as did the European economy. But, also, the country's balance of payments crisis.
To counteract these effects a new policy was born in July 1991, the reformed New Industrial Policy (NIP).[22] It and later modifications (further liberalization) streamlines procedures, deregulated industrial licensing, and vastly expanded the role for the private sector, while shrinking the Public Sector. Also, anti-trust laws (the Monopoly and Restrictive Practices Act) were trimmed and customs duties for industrial goods slashed. The restrictive Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) was replaced by the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA).
Industrial policy divided industry into three categories:
Only six industries are exclusively reserved for the public sector: trading (except single-brand retailing), agricultural or plantation activities, housing and real estate business (except development of townships), atomic energy, gambling or betting/lottery business, and retail construction of residential/commercial premises, roads or bridges are on the negative list for foreign participation.
India's investment policy, as of April 2010, is presented at the site.[23] Briefly, India allows investments both through Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), meant for long-term controlling investments and Portfolio Investment – taking a position by buying shares of a company – which is likely short-term capital market operation. Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) from reputable institutions (like pension funds, mutual funds) may (and do) participate in the Indian capital markets.
Industrial approvals are automatic (RBI approval of investment) for most manufacturing industries with equity investment up to 51% foreign control and as of 1997 to 74% in certain select industries (See the current policy highlighted above). For another 36 sectors there are varying limits without output restrictions. RBI approvals come within two weeks for the invested entity. Investments can flow to the country prior to approvals for such cases. Even in sectors limited to 51%, a higher level of control, up to 74%, is feasible if approach is made to the Foreign Investment Promotiomn Board (FIPB) – thus, "administered" licensing. Investments up to 100% are allowed in power generation, coal washeries, electronics, an Export Oriented Unit (EOU) in the EPZ's.
NRI (Non-Resident Indians), PIO (People of Indian Origin), and OCBs (Overseas Commercial Bodies) have relaxed accommodation
Industrial licensing of the 1951 policy is applicable to “Annex II” (not shown here) industries which revolve around certain key natural resources. It is administered through FIPB.
JV companies are the preferred form of corporate investment but there are no separate laws for joint ventures. Companies which are incorporated in India are treated on par as domestic companies.
Private companies (only about $2500 is the lower limit of capital, no upper limit) are allowed[24] in India together with and public companies, limited or not, likewise with partnerships. sole proprietorship too are allowed. However, the latter are reserved for NRIs.
Through capital market operations foreign companies can transact on the two exchanges without prior permission of RBI but they cannot own more than 10 percent equity in paid-up capital of Indian enterprises, while aggregate foreign institutional investment (FII) in an enterprise is capped at 24 percent.
The establishment of wholly owned subsidiaries (WOS) and project offices and branch offices, incorporated in India or not. Sometimes, it is understood, that branches are started to test the market and get its flavor. Equity transfer from residents to non-residents in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is usually permitted under the automatic route. However, if the M&As are in sectors and activities requiring prior government permission (Appendix 1 of the Policy) then transfer can proceed only after permission.[20]
Joint ventures with trading companies are allowed together with imports of secondhand plants and machinery.
It is expected that in a JV, the foreign partner supplies technical collaboration and the pricing includes the foreign exchange component, while the Indian partner makes available the factory or building site and locally made machinery and product parts. Many JVs are formed as public limited companies (LLCs) because of the advantages of limited liability.[25]
JVs are expected in the nuclear industry following the NSG waivers for nuclear trade. The nuclear power industry has been witnessing several JVs. The country has set an imposing target of achieving an installed capacity of 20 GW by 2020 and 63 GW by 2030. The total size of the Indian nuclear power market will be around $40 billion by 2020 with a growth rate (AAGR) of 9.2% in installed nuclear capacity during 2008–20. The total investments made are to a tune of around $1.30 billion following the Indo-US nuclear deal in 2008.[26]
There is a group of industries reserved for the small-scale sector wherein foreign investment cannot exceed 24%, and if does, then approval is necessary from the FIPB, and the unit loses its 'smallness' and requires an industrial license.[27]
There are many JVs. lying outside of this discussion – Hindusthan Unilever-Unilever, Suziki-Govt. of India (Maruti Motors), Bharti Airteli-Singapore Telecom, ITC-Imperial Tobacco, P&G Home Products, Whirlpool, having financial participation with the financial institutions and the lay public which are monitored by SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India), also an autonomous body. This lies outside this discussion.
Under the country's laws, a public company must:
There are several other provisions contained in the Companies Act 1956 which also need to be followed.
For the automatic route, RBI allows:[28]
Lump sum payments not exceeding US$2 million.
Royalty payable is limited to 5% for domestic sales and 8% for exports, without any restriction on the duration of the royalty payments. The royalty limits are net of taxes and are calculated according to standard conditions. Payments are made through RBI.
The royalty is calculated on the basis of the net ex-factory sale price of the product, exclusive of excise duties, minus the cost of the standard bought-out components and the landed cost of imported components, irrespective of the source of procurement, including ocean freight, insurance, custom duties, etc.
Issue of equity shares against lump sum fees and royalty fees is permitted.
For exceeding this norm, the firm has to approach FPBI.
India is a common law country with a written constitution, guaranteeing individual and property rights.
There is a single hierarchy of courts.
Arbitration can be in India or International Commercial Arbitration.
The country has recently enacted the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("New Law"). The New Law is based on the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (Model Law).[24]
All agreements are under Indian laws.
Introduction
The Articles of Association determine how a company is run. It is a set of 'by-laws' which form the 'constitution' of the Company. It is often required by Law to be part of the Joint- Venture agreement. Some clauses relating to the following may be absent. Where this the case, it is assumed that the provisions as laid out in the in Company Law apply. The Articles can cover a medley of topics, mot all of which is required in a country's law. Although all will not be discussed, it can cover:
Some agreements mention that the Articles of Association as given in Company Law apply to the agreement except where specifically differing; and others say, explicitly, that they do not bind that the agreement and that it contains all legally acceptable bye-laws. The typical Articles in an Indian Public Sector Company are given in.[29]
A Company is essentially run by the shareholders, but for convenience, and day-to-day working, by the Directors. The shareholders elect the directors at the Annual General Meeting (AGM), which is statutory. Thus, the Board of Directors (BOD).
The number of directors depends on the size of the Company and statutory requirements. The Chairperson is generally a well-known outsider but he /she may be a working Executive, typical of an American enterprise. The Directors may or may not be employees of the Company.
There are usually some major shareholders who form the company. Each usually has the right to nominate, without objection of the other, certain number of directors who become nominees for the election by the shareholder body at the AGM. The Treasurer and Chairperson is usually the privilege of one of the JV partners (which nomination can be shared). Shareholders can also elect Independent directors - persons not associated with the promoters of the company. person is generally a well-known outsider but he /she may be a working Executive. The Directors may or may not be employees
Once elected, the BOD manages the Company. The shareholders play no part till the next AGM. or EGM. The Objectives and the purpose of the Company are determined in advance by the shareholders and the Memorandum of Association (MOA) - which denotes the name of the Company, its Head- Office, its Directors and the main purposes of the Company - for public access. It cannot be changed except at an AGM or Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) and statutory allowance. The MOA is generally filed with a 'Registrar of Companies' who is an appointee of the Government. For their assurance the shareholders, an Auditor is elected at each AGM. The MOA is currently dispensed with in many countries.
The Board meets several times each year. At each meeting there is an 'agenda' before it. A minimum number of Directors (a quorum) is required to meet. This is either determined by the 'bye-laws' or is statutory. It is Presided by the Chairperson or in his absence, by the Vice-Chair. The Directors survey their area of responsibility. They may determine to make a 'Resolution' at the next AGM or if it is an urgent matter, at an EGM. The Directors who are the electives of one major shareholder, may present his/her view but this is not necessarily so - they may have to view the Objectives of the Company and competitive position. The Chair may have to 'break' the vote if there is a 'tie'. At the AGM, the various Resolutions are put to vote.
The AGM is called with a notice sent to all shareholders. A certain quorum of shareholders are required to meet. If the quorum requirement is not met, it is canceled and another Meeting called. If it at that too a quorum is not met, a Third Meeting is called and the members present, unlimited by the quorum, take all decisions.
Decisions are taken by a show of hands; the Chair is always present. When a decision made by a show of hands is challenged, it is done by a count of votes. Voting can be taken in person or by marking the paper sent by the Company. A person who is not a shareholder of the Company can vote if he/she has the 'proxy', an authorization from the shareholder. Each share carries the votes assigned to it. Some votes maybe for the decision, others not. Two types of decision, known as the ordinary resolution and the other a special resolution, can be tabled at a Director's meeting. The Ordinary Resolution requires the endorsement by a majority vote, sometimes easily met by partners' vote. The special resolution requires 60%, 70% or 80% of the vote as stipulated by the 'constitution' or the very same bylaws of the Company. Shareholders other than partners are required to vote. The matters which require the Ordinary and special resolution to be passed are enumerated. A typical Articles of Association is shown in the Nestle S.A. or Nestle Ltd.[30]
The JV is not a permanent structure. It can be dissolved when:
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| associate architect, associated architect | |
| Corporate Joint Venture (in accounting) | |
| iPlanet (technology) |
| What types of joint venture are there? Read answer... | |
| Can you sell your portion and be out of a joint venture? Read answer... | |
| Does merger includes joint venture? Read answer... |
| What are the motives for a joint venture explain with an example of a joint venture? | |
| What are the advantages of a joint venture? | |
| Who is the Most unsuccessful joint venture? |
Copyrights:
![]() |
![]() | American Heritage Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more |
![]() | Barron's Banking Dictionary. Dictionary of Banking Terms. Copyright © 2006 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Barron's Real Estate Dictionary. Dictionary of Real Estate Terms. Copyright © 2008 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() |
![]() | Gale Encyclopedia of Small Business. Encyclopedia of Small Business. Copyright © 2002 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more |
![]() |
![]() | McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Architecture & Construction. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Architecture and Construction. Copyright © 2003 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more |
![]() |
![]() | West's Encyclopedia of American Law. West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Copyright © 1998 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more |
![]() | Investopedia Financial Dictionary. Copyright ©2010, Investopedia.com - Owned and Operated by Investopedia US, A Division of ValueClick, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() |
![]() | Wikipedia on Answers.com. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article Joint venture. Read more |
Mentioned in