Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

macroevolution

 
Dictionary: mac·ro·ev·o·lu·tion   (măk'rō-ĕv'ə-lū'shən, -ē'və-) pronunciation
 
n.

Large-scale evolution occurring over geologic time that results in the formation of new taxonomic groups.

macroevolutionary mac'ro·ev'o·lu'tion·ar'y (-shə-nĕr'ē) adj.
Search unanswered questions...
Enter a word or phrase...
All Community Q&A Reference topics
Sci-Tech Encyclopedia: Macroevolution
 

Large-scale patterns and processes in the history of life, including the origins of novel organismal designs, evolutionary trends, adaptive radiations, and extinctions. Macroevolutionary research is based on phylogeny, the history of common descent among species. The formation of species and branching of evolutionary lineages mark the interface between macroevolution and microevolution, which addresses the dynamics of genetic variation within populations. Phylogenetic reconstruction, the developmental basis of evolutionary change, and long-term trends in patterns of speciation and extinction among lineages constitute major foci of macroevolutionary studies.

Phylogenetic reconstruction

Phylogenetic relationships are revealed by the sharing of evolutionarily derived characteristics among species, which provides evidence for common ancestry. Shared derived characteristics are termed synapomorphies, and are equated by many systematists with the older concept of homology. Characteristics of different organisms are homologous if they descend, with some modification, from an equivalent characteristic of their most recent common ancestor. Closely related species share more homologous characteristics than do species whose common ancestry is more distant. Species are grouped into clades according to patterns of shared homologies. The clades form a nested hierarchy in which large clades are subdivided into smaller, less inclusive ones, and are depicted by a branching diagram called a cladogram. A phylogenetic tree is a branching diagram, congruent with thecladogram, that represents real lineages of past evolutionary history.

A cladogram or phylogenetic tree is necessary for constructing a taxonomy, but theprinciples by which higher taxa are recognized remain controversial. The traditionalevolutionary taxonomy of G. G. Simpson recognizes higher taxa as units of adaptiveevolution called adaptive zones. Species of an adaptive zone share common ancestry, anddistinctive morphological or behavioral characteristics associated with use ofenvironmental resources. Higher taxa receive Linnean categorical ranks (genus, family,order, and so forth) reflecting the breadth and distinctness of their adaptive zones. All taxa must have a single evolutionary origin, which means that the taxon must include the most recent common ancestor of all included species. A taxon is monophyletic if it contains all descendants of the group's most recent common ancestor, or paraphyletic if some descendants of the group's most recent common ancestor are excluded because they have evolved a new adaptive zone. For example, evolutionary taxonomy of the anthropoid primates groups the orangutan, gorilla, and chimpanzee in the paraphyletic family Pongidae and the humans in the monophyletic family Hominidae. Although the humans and chimpanzees share more recent common ancestry than either does with the gorilla or orangutan, the chimpanzees are grouped with the latter species at the family level and the humans are placed in a different family because they are considered to have evolved a new adaptive zone. The Hominidae and Pongidae together form a monophyletic group at a higher level.See also Animal systematics.

Cladistic taxonomy or phylogenetic systematics accepts only monophyletic taxa because these alone are considered natural units of common descent. Linnean rankings are considered unimportant. Taxa recognized using both the Simpsonian and cladistic taxonomies are standardly used in macroevolutionary analyses of extinction and patterns of diversity through time. The Simpsonian versus cladistic taxonomies often lead to fundamentally different interpretations, however. For example, extinction of a paraphyletic group, such as dinosaurs, would be considered pseudoextinction by cladists because some descendants of the group's most recent common ancestor survive. Birds are living descendants of the most recent common ancestor of all dinosaurs. The dinosaurs as traditionally recognized, therefore, do not form a valid cladistic taxon. See also Aves; Dinosaur; Phylogeny.

Developmental processes

Comparative studies of organismal ontogeny are used to find where in development the key features of higher taxa appear and how developmental processes differ between taxa. Evolutionary developmental biologists denote the characteristic body plans of taxa by the term Bauplan. The major characteristics of animal phyla and their developmental and molecular attributes appear to have arisen and stabilized early in the history of life, during the Cambrian Period. Subsequent evolutionary diversification builds upon the Bauplan established early in animal evolution. See also Cambrian.

Particularly important to the evolutionary diversification of life are historical processes that generate change by altering the timing of organismal development, a phenomenon called heterochrony. Heterochronic changes can produce either paedomorphic or paeramorphic results. Paedomorphosis denotes the retention of preadult characteristics of ancestors in the adult stages of descendants; peramorphosis is the opposite outcome, in which the descendant ontogeny transcends that of the ancestor, adding new features at the final stages. Heterochronic changes can be produced by changing the rates of developmental processes or the times of their onset or termination.

Developmental dissociation occurs when different kinds of heterochronic change alter the development of different parts of the organism independently. Extensive dissociation can fundamentally restructure organismal ontogeny, producing ontogenetic repatterning. However, it is rare that a single heterochronic transformation affects all parts of the organism simultaneously. For most taxa, novel morphologies are produced by a mosaic of different heterochronic processes and by changes in the physical location of developmental events within the organism.

Long-term trends

Traditional Darwinian theory emphasizes natural selection acting on varying organisms within populations as the main causal factor of evolutionary change. Over many generations, the accumulation of favorable variants by natural selection produces new adaptations andnew species. Macroevolutionary theory postulates two additional processes analogous tonatural selection that act above the species level and on much longer time scales. Anevolving lineage ultimately experiences one of two fates, branching speciation orextinction. Lineages that have a high propensity to produce new species and an ability towithstand extinction will dominate evolutionary history.

The higher-level process of differential speciation and extinction caused by the varyingcharacteristics of species or lineages has been called species selection. Because theprecise meaning of the term species is controversial, the more neutral terms lineageselection and clade selection are sometimes substituted for species selection. Most speciesshow an evolutionary duration from a few million to approximately 10 million years in thefossil record between geologically instantaneous events of branching speciation. Speciesselection therefore generally occurs on a time scale of millions of years, rather than thegenerational time scale of natural selection. Species selection may be the primary factorunderlying morphological evolutionary trends at this scale if lineages evolve by punctuatedequilibrium, in which most morphological evolutionary change accompanies branchingspeciation, and species remain morphologically stable between speciational events. See also Speciation.

The fossil record reveals mass extinctions in which enormous numbers of species frommany different taxa are lost within a relatively short interval of geological time. Somelineages may be better able to survive mass extinction events than others, and thecharacteristics that make a lineage prone to survive mass extinction may be very differentfrom those that influence species selection between events of mass extinction. Catastrophicspecies selection denotes differential survival and extinction of lineages during events ofmass extinction as determined by character variation among lineages. Prior to theCretaceous mass extinction, dinosaur taxa dominated mammalian taxa, whereas mammalssurvived the mass extinction and then diversified extensively. The characteristics of theancestral mammals may have permitted them to survive environmental challenges to whichdinosaurs were susceptible. See also Extinction (biology); Fossil; Mammalia; Paleontology; Permian.

Because natural selection, species selection, and catastrophic species selection candiffer in the biological characteristics they promote, higher-level processes may undo orreverse evolutionary trends arising from lower-level processes. See also Organic evolution.


 
Biology Q&A: What is macroevolution?
Top

Macroevolution is large-scale change that can generate entire new groups of related species, also known as a clade. One example would be the movement of plants onto land; all terrestrial plants are descended from that event, which occurred during the Devonian period 400 million years ago.

Previous question: What is microevolution?
Next question: What is the founder effect?


 
WordNet: macroevolution
Top
Note: click on a word meaning below to see its connections and related words.

The noun has one meaning:

Meaning #1: evolution on a large scale extending over geologic era and resulting in the formation of new taxonomic groups


 
Wikipedia: Macroevolution
Top
Part of the Biology series on
Evolution
Introduction
Mechanisms and processes

Adaptation
Genetic drift
Gene flow
Mutation
Natural selection
Speciation

Research and history

Evidence
Evolutionary history of life
History
Modern synthesis
Social effect
Theory and fact
Objections / Controversy

Evolutionary biology fields

Cladistics
Ecological genetics
Evolutionary development
Human evolution
Molecular evolution
Phylogenetics
Population genetics

Biology Portal · v  d  e 

Macroevolution is a scale of analysis of evolution in separated gene pools.[1] Macroevolutionary studies focus on change that occurs at or above the level of species, in contrast with microevolution,[2] which refers to smaller evolutionary changes (typically described as changes in allele frequencies) within a species or population.

The process of speciation may fall within the purview of either, depending on the forces thought to drive it. Paleontology, evolutionary developmental biology, comparative genomics and genomic phylostratigraphy contribute most of the evidence for the patterns and processes that can be classified as macroevolution. An example of macroevolution is the appearance of feathers during the evolution of birds from theropod dinosaurs.

Contents

Origin of the term

Russian entomologist Yuri Filipchenko (or Philipchenko, depending on the transliteration) first coined the terms "macroevolution" and "microevolution" in 1927 in his German language work, "Variabilität und Variation".[3] Since the inception of the two terms, their meanings have been revised several times and even fallen into disfavor amongst scientists who prefer to speak of biological evolution as one process.[3]

Macroevolution and the modern evolutionary synthesis

Within the Modern Synthesis school of thought, macroevolution is thought of as the compounded effects of microevolution. Thus, the distinction between micro- and macroevolution is not a fundamental one – the only difference between them is of time and scale. However, it should be noted that time is not a necessary distinguishing factor – macroevolution can happen without gradual compounding of small changes; whole-genome duplication can result in macroevolution occurring over a single generation - especially in plants. One of the most significant applications of this is found in the evolution of the vertebrates, which was mediated by duplications of the hox gene complex.

Research topics

Some examples of subjects whose study falls within the realm of macroevolution:

Criticisms of macroevolution

The term "macroevolution" frequently arises within the context of the evolution/creation debate, usually used by creationists alleging a significant difference between the evolutionary changes observed in field and laboratory studies and the larger scale macroevolutionary changes that scientists believe to have taken thousands or millions of years to occur. They may accept that evolutionary change is possible within species ("microevolution"), but deny that one species can evolve into another ("macroevolution").[1]

These arguments are rejected by mainstream science, which holds that there is ample evidence that macroevolution has occurred in the past.[3][4] The consensus of the scientific community is that the alleged micro-macro division is an artificial construct made by creationists and does not accurately reflect the actual processes of evolution. Evolutionary theory (including macroevolutionary change) remains the dominant scientific paradigm for explaining the origins of Earth's biodiversity. Its occurrence, while controversial with the public at large, is not disputed within the scientific community.

While details of macroevolution are continuously studied by the scientific community, the overall theory behind macroevolution (i.e. common descent) has been overwhelmingly consistent with empirical data. Predictions of empirical data from the theory of common descent have been so consistent that biologists often refer to it as the "fact of evolution".[5][6]

Nicholas Matzke and Paul R. Gross have accused creationists of using "strategically elastic" definitions of micro- and macroevolution when discussing the topic.[1] The actual definition of macroevolution accepted by scientists is "any change at the species level or above" (phyla, group, etc.) and microevolution is "any change below the level of species." Matzke and Gross state that many creationist critics define macroevolution as something that cannot be attained, as these critics describe any observed evolutionary change as "just microevolution".[1]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Matzke, Nicholas J. and Paul R. Gross. 2006. Analyzing Critical Analysis: The Fallback Antievolutionist Strategy. In Eugenie Scott and Glenn Branch, Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design is Wrong for Our Schools, Beacon Press, Boston ISNB:0807032786
  2. ^ Dobzhansky, Theodosius Grigorievich (1937). Genetics and the origin of species. New York, Columbia Univ. Press. LC QH366 .D6. , p12
  3. ^ a b c Macroevolution: Its definition, Philosophy and History
  4. ^ CB901: No Macroevolution
  5. ^ 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent, Douglas L. Theobald, TalkOrigins Archive, Vers. 2.83, 2004, 12 Jan, 2004.
  6. ^ Laurence Moran (1993). "Evolution is a Fact and a Theory". TalkOrigins Archive. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-fact.html. Retrieved on 2008-02-07. 

External links


 
 

 

Copyrights:

Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Sci-Tech Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Biology Q&A. The Handy Biology Answer Book. 2004 ©Visible Ink Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
WordNet. WordNet 1.7.1 Copyright © 2001 by Princeton University. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Macroevolution" Read more