majoritarian

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this article if you can. (October 2007)

This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (August 2009)

A majoritarian electoral system is one which is based on a "winner take all" principle. This is in contrast to the proportional representation (PR) family of electoral systems, which split the mandates in rough proportion with votes gained by each party. It is more or less synonymous with a plurality voting system.

Different varieties

Single-member constituencies (SMC) are often, though not exclusively, used in majoritarian systems. In SMC only one member can win each constituency, which therefore means the number of votes won nationally does not equal the number of seats in the parliament. For instance, a party which wins 50% + 1 of the vote in all constituencies will win 100% of seats, but only 50% +1 of votes.

Often in SMC a two-round system (TRS) is used, especially in the countries of former Soviet Union. Under TRS, the candidate has to obtain at least 50%+1 vote in order to win outright. If no candidate obtains the majority votes, two top candidates run against each other in the second round. This system is often used for presidential elections as well (eg. in France).

Other variations of majortiarian system include Block Vote (BV) and Party Block Vote (PBV). Under BV voters vote in multi-mandate constituencies for as many candidates as there are seats to be filled. The candidates with the most votes win outright. With PBV, parties nominate a "block" of candidates for each multi-mandate constituency. Voters vote for the party, not individual candidates, and the party which wins the most votes wins all the mandates in the constituency.

Effects

The majoritarian model of democracy is the classical theory of democracy in which government by the people is interpreted as government by the majority of the people. The effect of a majoritarian system is that the larger parties gain a disproportionately large share of the vote, while smaller parties are left with a disproportionately small share of the vote. For example, the 2005 UK General election results were as follows:

It can be seen that Labour took a majority of seats, 55%, with only 35% of the vote. The largest two parties took 67.5% of votes and 86% of seats. Meanwhile, the smaller Liberal Democrat party took a fifth of votes but only about a tenth of the seats in parliament, and no other party not on this chart took more than one mainland seat.

Evaluation

The majoritarian system is praised for producing stable majorities in parliament, but is criticized for representing only the largest parties and under-representing more minority opinions, as well as disenfranchising voters in heavily one-sided electorates. It is considered best in countries where the ostensibly fairer proportionally representative system would produce a fragmented parliament, but which are not so unstable that an under-representation of minorities and opinion fragmentation will cause violence or disorder.