Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Malpighiales

 
Sci-Tech Encyclopedia: Malpighiales

One of the largest orders of the rosid eudicotyledons, comprising more than 30 families distributed worldwide. Recent analyses of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences, both plastid and nuclear, led to its recognition, even though the group is highly heterogeneous and difficult to characterize. The largest families are Euphorbiaceae (8000 species), Clusiaceae (1400), Malpighiaceae (1100), Flacourtiaceae (900), and Violaceae (850). Most of the order is composed of woody species, many of regional importance as timber and medicines. Several of the smaller families are significant as well, including Salicaceae (used as coppice, and the original source of aspirin) and Rhizophoraceae (the ecologically significant mangroves). See also Magnoliophyta.


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia: Malpighiales
Top
Malpighiales

flower of Alexandrian Laurel (Calophyllum inophyllum)
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae
(unranked): angiosperms
(unranked): eudicots
(unranked): rosids
Order: Malpighiales
Martius
Families

See text.

Malpighiales is one of the largest orders of flowering plants, containing about 16000 species, approximately 7.8% of the eudicots. [1] The order is very diverse and hard to recognize except with molecular phylogenetic evidence. It is not part of any of the classification systems that are based only on plant morphology. Molecular clock calculations estimate the origin of stem group Malpighiales at around 100 Mya (million years ago) and the origin of crown group Malpighiales at about 90 Mya. [2]

Malpighiales is divided into 32 to 42 families, depending upon which clades in the order are given the taxonomic rank of family. [3] The largest family, by far, is Euphorbiaceae, with about 6300 species in about 245 genera. [4]

In a 2009 study of DNA sequences of 13 genes, 42 families were placed into 16 groups, ranging in size from one to ten families. Almost nothing is known about the relationships among these 16 groups. [3] Malpighiales and Lamiales are the two large orders whose phylogeny remains mostly unresolved. [5]

Contents

Affinities

Malpighiales is a member of a supraordinal group called the COM clade, which consists of the orders Celastrales, Oxalidales, and Malpighiales. [6] Some describe it as containing a fourth order, Huales, separating the family Huaceae into its own order, separate from Oxalidales. [7]

Some recent studies have placed Malpighiales as sister to Oxalidales sensu lato (including Huaceae), [8] [3] while others have found a different topology for the COM clade. [6] [9] [2]

The COM clade is part of an unranked group known as Fabidae or eurosids I. [10] The fabids, in turn, are part of a group that has long been recognized, namely, the rosids. [11]

History

The family Malpighiaceae was the type family for one of the orders created by Jussieu in his classic work, Genera Plantarum in 1789. [12] Friedrich von Berchtold and Jan Presl described such an order in 1820. [13] Unlike modern taxonomists, these authors did not use the suffix "ales" in naming their orders. The name "Malpighiales" is attributed by some to Carl von Martius. [11] In the twentieth century, it was usually associated with John Hutchinson, who used it in all three editions of his book, The Families of Flowering Plants. [14] The name was not used by those who wrote later, in the nineteen seventies, eighties, and nineties.

The first semblance of Malpighiales as we now know it came from a phylogeny of seed plants published in 1993 and based upon DNA sequences of the gene rbcL. [15] This study recovered a group of rosids unlike any group found in any previous system of plant classification. In order to make a clear break with classification systems being used at that time, the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group resurrected Hutchinson's name, even though his concept of Malpighiales included much of what is now in Celastrales and Oxalidales. [16]

Circumscription

Malpighiales is monophyletic and in molecular phylogenetic studies, it receives strong statistical support. [1] Since the APG II system was published in 2003, minor changes to the circumscription of the order have been made. The family Peridiscaceae has been expanded from two genera, to three, and then to four, and transferred to Saxifragales. [3] [17]

The genera Cyrillopsis (Ixonanthaceae), Centroplacus (Centroplacaceae), Bhesa (Centroplacaceae), Aneulophus (Erythroxylaceae), Ploiarium (Bonnetiaceae), Trichostephanus (Samydaceae), Sapria (Rafflesiaceae), Rhizanthes (Rafflesiaceae), and Rafflesia (Rafflesiaceae) had been either added or confirmed as members of Malpighiales by the end of 2009. [3]

Some family delimitations have changed as well, most notably, the segregation of Calophyllaceae from Clusiaceae senso lato when it was shown that the latter is paraphyletic. [3] Some differences of opinion on family delimitation exist as well. For example, Samydaceae and Scyphostegiaceae may be recognized as families or included in a large version of Salicaceae. [18]

Phylogeny

As we know it in 2009, the phylogeny of Malpighiales is, at its deepest level, an unresolved sexadecatomy (16 clades). It has been estimated that complete resolution of the phylogeny will require at least 25000 base pairs of DNA sequence data per taxon. [19] A similar situation exists with Lamiales and it has been analyzed in some detail. [20] The phylogenetic tree shown below is from Wurdack and Davis (2009). The statistical support for each branch is 100% bootstrap percentage and 100% posterior probability, except where labeled, with bootstrap percentage followed by posterior probability.

Malpighiales
98/100 

Putranjivaceae



Lophopyxidaceae




Irvingiaceae


84/100  

Centroplacaceae



Caryocaraceae



Pandaceae



Ixonanthaceae



Humiriaceae



Linaceae




Elatinaceae



Malpighiaceae



84/100  

Ctenolophonaceae


Rhizophoraceae s.l.  

Erythroxylaceae



Rhizophoraceae




99/100  

Balanopaceae


Chrysobalanaceae s.l.  


Trigoniaceae



Dichapetalaceae





Euphroniaceae



Chrysobalanaceae





Ochnaceae s.l.  

Ochnaceae



Medusagynaceae



Quiinaceae



clusioids  
92/98  

Bonnetiaceae



Clusiaceae





Calophyllaceae




Hypericaceae



Podostemaceae





phyllanthoids  

Picrodendraceae



Phyllanthaceae





Peraceae


90/90  

Rafflesiaceae


85/100  

Euphorbiaceae




parietal clade  

Achariaceae


76/98  

Goupiaceae


82/100  

Violaceae


Passifloraceae s.l.  

Malesherbiaceae




Turneraceae



Passifloraceae







Lacistemataceae


Salicaceae s.l.  

Samydaceae




Scyphostegiaceae



Salicaceae









References

  1. ^ a b Peter F. Stevens (2001 onwards). "Malpighiales". In: Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. In: Missouri Botanical Garden Website. (see External links below)
  2. ^ a b Susana Magallón and Amanda Castillo (2009), "Angiosperm diversification through time", American Journal of Botany 96 (1): 349–365, doi:10.3732/ajb.0800060 
  3. ^ a b c d e f Kenneth J. Wurdack and Charles C. Davis. 2009. "Malpighiales phylogenetics: Gaining ground on one of the most recalcitrant clades in the angiosperm tree of life." American Journal of Botany 96(8):1551-1570. (see External links below)
  4. ^ Alan Radcliffe-Smith. 2001. Genera Euphorbiacearum. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew: Richmond, England.
  5. ^ Douglas E. Soltis, Pamela S. Soltis, Peter K. Endress, and Mark W. Chase (2005), Phylogeny and Evolution of the Angiosperms, Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer, ISBN 978-0878938179 
  6. ^ a b Hengchang Wang, Michael J. Moore, Pamela S. Soltis, Charles D. Bell, Samuel F. Brockington, Roolse Alexandre, Charles C. Davis, Maribeth Latvis, Steven R. Manchester, and Douglas E. Soltis (10Mar2009), "Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiosperm-dominated forests", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (10): 3853–3858, doi:10.1073/pnas.0813376106, PMID 19223592, http://www.pnas.org/content/106/10/3853.abstract?etoc 
  7. ^ Alexander B. Doweld. 2001. Prosyllabus Tracheophytorum. Tentamen systematis plantarum vascularium (Tracheophyta). Geos: Moscow, Russia.
  8. ^ Li-Bing Zhang and Mark P. Simmons (2006), "Phylogeny and delimitation of the Celastrales inferred from nuclear and plastid genes", Systematic Botany 31 (1): 122–137, doi:10.1600/036364406775971778 
  9. ^ J. Gordon Burleigh, Khidir W. Hilu, and Douglas E. Soltis (2009), File 7, "Inferring phylogenies with incomplete data sets: a 5-gene, 567-taxon analysis of angiosperms", BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 61, doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-61 
  10. ^ Philip D. Cantino, James A. Doyle, Sean W. Graham, Walter S. Judd, Richard G. Olmstead, Douglas E. Soltis, Pamela S. Soltis, and Michael J. Donoghue (2007), "Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta", Taxon 56 (3): 822–846., http://www.phylodiversity.net/donoghue/publications/MJD_papers/2007/164_Cantino_Taxon07.pdf 
  11. ^ a b Peter F. Stevens (2001 onwards), Angiosperm Phylogeny Website, http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/Research/APweb/welcome.html  (see External links below)
  12. ^ Antoine Laurent de Jussieu 1789. Genera Plantarum:252. Herrisant and Barrois: Paris. (see External links below).
  13. ^ James L. Reveal (2008 onward), "A Checklist of Family and Suprafamilial Names for Extant Vascular Plants", Home page of James L Reveal and C. Rose Broome, http://www.plantsystematics.org/reveal/pbio/fam/supgennames.html 
  14. ^ John Hutchinson The Families of Flowering Plants 3rd edition. 1973. Oxford University Press.
  15. ^ Mark W. Chase et alii (42 authors). 1993. "Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL". Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80(3):528-580.
  16. ^ The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141(4):399-436. (see External links below).
  17. ^ Douglas E. Soltis, Joshua W. Clayton, Charles C. Davis, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Martin Cheek, Vincent Savolainen, André M. Amorim, and Pamela S. Soltis. 2007. "Monophyly and relationships of the enigmatic family Peridiscaceae". Taxon 56(1):65-73.
  18. ^ Mac H. Alford. 2007. "Samydaceae". Version 06 February 2007". In: The Tree of Life Web Project. (see External links below).
  19. ^ Shuguang Jian, Pamela S. Soltis, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Michael J. Moore, Ruiqi Li, Tory A. Hendry, Yin-Long Qiu, Amit Dhingra, Charles D. Bell, and Douglas E. Soltis. 2008. "Resolving an Ancient, Rapid Radiation in Saxifragales". Systematic Biology 57(1):38-57. (see External links below).
  20. ^ Alexandra H. Wortley, Paula J. Rudall, David J. Harris, and Robert W. Scotland. 2005. "How Much Data are Needed to Resolve a Difficult Phylogeny? Case Study in Lamiales". Systematic Biology 54(5):697-709.

External links


 
 
Learn More
Rosidae (magnoliophyta)
Viola biflora
Amanoeae

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

 

Copyrights:

Sci-Tech Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Malpighiales" Read more