Marxist geography attempts to explain the world and also to change it. Marxism sees human beings gradually transforming themselves from stage to stage until they reach social perfection, and this transformation is seen as an aim towards which societies should be moving. This change is brought about by ‘dialectical’ processes—conflict between opposing forces—bringing forth a new synthesis which again is contradicted, and so on. The forces shaping society are seen as entities, which include capital, labour, capitalism and other modes of production, the state, class, society, and the market.
Marxist geography highlights the dialectical relationships between social processes and the natural environment and spatial relationships. It is concerned with the modes of production which underlie the superstructure of society. It sees spatial and environmental problems, such as the destruction of habitats or uneven development, originating deep within the social formations of capitalism. It is aimed at changing the fundamental operations of social processes by changing the workings of production. Marxist geography is the study of the inherent contradictions of capitalism as they appear in the landscape and as they relate to each other.
Examples may be given of the changing structures and contradictions of capitalism. There is an inherent contradiction in a capitalist state which seeks to generate better conditions funded by taxation. Higher demand for raw materials generates higher costs. More output leads to more pollution and, in an environment where the authorities require strict controls on pollution, costs again rise. The result of these contradictions is the movement by multinational firms from established industrial regions in search of new environments to develop (despoil) and of new, politically virgin, labour to hire (exploit).
Marxist geography has been widely criticized: for the ethnocentric and patriarchal nature of its assumptions, for the passive role apportioned to individuals, who have been turned into non-decision-makers, for its preoccupation with class and industry and its neglect of environmental issues, and by postmodernists, who reject overarching meta-theory.




