Answers.com

McIntyre Final Eight System

 
Wikipedia: McIntyre Final Eight System
 

The McIntyre Final Eight System was devised by Ken McIntyre in addition to the McIntyre Four, Five and Six systems. It is a playoff system of the top 8 finishers in a competition to determine which two teams will play in the Grand Final. The teams play each other over three weeks, with two teams eliminated each week. Teams who finish in a higher position in the competition are given an easier route to the Grand Final.

It is currently the finals series system used by the National Rugby League (since 1999); its first use was by the Australian Football League in 1994. However, starting from the 2000 season, the AFL replaced it with another top 8 system - the same one abandoned by the Australian Rugby League in 1996.

Contents

How it Works

Week 1

  • 1st Qualifying Final: 1st vs 8th
  • 2nd Qualifying Final: 2nd vs 7th
  • 3rd Qualifying Final: 3rd vs 6th
  • 4th Qualifying Final: 4th vs 5th

The teams are then ranked depending on whether they won or lost, then on their position on the ladder before the finals. The two lowest ranked losers are eliminated from the finals, whilst the two highest ranked winners progress straight to Week 3.

A key part of an effective MacIntyre system is scheduling. In the first week games must be played in the following order: 4 vs 5, 3 vs 6, 2 vs 7, 1 vs 8. Teams in the first two games are playing for the chance at a bye in the second week of the finals. If the final two games ultimately go as predicted, then the chance at a bye week or the risk of elimination disappears, so those games need to be played last so there is never a situation where two teams know that their result would certainly not matter.


Week 2

  • 1st Semi Final: 4th highest ranked winner vs 2nd highest ranked loser
  • 2nd Semi Final: 3rd highest ranked winner vs 1st highest ranked loser

The two losing teams are eliminated, the two winning teams progress to Week 3.

Week 3

  • 1st Preliminary Final: 2nd highest ranked winner (from Week 1) vs winner of 2nd Semi Final
  • 2nd Preliminary Final: 1st highest ranked winner (from Week 1) vs winner of 1st Semi Final

The two losing teams are eliminated, the two winning teams progress to Week Four.

Week 4

  • Grand Final: winner of 1st Preliminary Final vs winner of 2nd Preliminary Final

Criticisms

With its adoption by the NRL, debate again has arisen over its fairness. The MacIntyre system rewards teams who have form coming into the finals rather than during the year. In 2008, the first week of the NRL finals saw the reigning champions and minor premiers the Melbourne Storm lose to the 8th placed New Zealand Warriors. Granted a home final as a week 1 winner, the Warriors defeated the Sydney Roosters in the second week and proceeded to the final 4, the first team ever to make it that far from 8th position, whereas the Storm had to travel to Brisbane and win away to continue on. The advantages given to a victor in the first week of the finals, even if that team comes 6th to 8th, including a home final against a team coming off a loss are significant compared to the alternate final 8 system used by the AFL, which protects teams coming 1st to 4th and never give 7th or 8th placed teams home finals.

Another criticism is that, like many other top-8 systems, there is the possibility of games in the first week that are effectively meaningless, where teams have no risk of elimination and results only determine respective opponents in the second week. In the MacIntyre system if first-week results go as planned, then first defeats eighth and second defeats seventh. This leaves the teams who finished from third to sixth effectively playing "dead rubbers" in the first week, with the results merely reshuffling the order of these four teams.

It also possible that in week two, a first week loser may play an (on paper) easier opponent than the team that defeated them in week one, as happened in 2000

Another anomaly of scheduling is that in the second week a team may play higher ranked opponents than the team they defeated. For example the third highest winner (ie the strongest winner of those playing) plays the highest ranked loser rather than the second highest loser (ie the weakest loser). This may ensure no repetition of games in the second week, but it means higher ranked teams end up with more difficult opponents simply for the sake of more interesting scheduling.

Advantages

The major advantages of the system are the number of different combinations of teams which could make the final game and that no matches are repeated twice in the first three weeks.

Also, unlike many other final eight systems, with correct scheduling, in every game the teams are at the very least playing for a chance at a bye week if they win or risk of elimination if they lose.

When compared to other final eight systems, many of which split the participants into two groups, the McIntyre system means only two combinations (1v7 and 2v8) are impossible participants in the Grand Final.

The Top 2 teams after the regular season are rewarded by being given a 'second life' within the finals. If either of these two teams lose to their much lower ranked opponents in the first week, then one of the two losing teams ranked lower than them are eliminated, giving the 1st and 2nd ranked teams a potential second chance in finals week 2.

Competitions

In addition to the NRL, the McIntyre Final Eight System is also used in the Rugby League National League Three in Great Britain, the NSWRL Premier League and Jersey Flegg competitions.

See also

External links


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a word or phrase...
All Community Q&A Reference topics
 
 

 

Copyrights:

Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "McIntyre Final Eight System" Read more