Mersenne prime
(mathematics) A Mersenne number that is also a prime number.
|
Results for Mersenne prime
|
On this page:
|
(mathematics) A Mersenne number that is also a prime number.
A Mersenne prime is a Mersenne number that is a prime number.
In mathematics, a Mersenne number is a number that is one less than a power of two,
Mn = 2n - 1.
As of August 2007, only 44 Mersenne primes are known; the largest known prime number (232,582,657−1) is a Mersenne prime and in modern times the largest known prime has nearly always been a Mersenne prime[1]. Like several previous Mersenne primes, it was discovered by a distributed computing project on the Internet, known as the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS).
Many fundamental questions about Mersenne primes remain unresolved. It is not even known whether there is a largest Mersenne prime, which would mean that the set of Mersenne primes is finite. The Lenstra-Pomerance-Wagstaff conjecture asserts that, on the contrary, there are infinitely many Mersenne primes and predicts their order of growth. It is also not known whether infinitely many Mersenne numbers with prime exponents are composite, although this would follow from widely believed conjectures about prime numbers, for example, the infinitude of Sophie Germain primes.
A basic theorem about Mersenne numbers states that in order for Mn to be a Mersenne prime, the exponent n itself must be a prime number. This rules out primality for numbers such as M4 = 24 -1 = 15: since the exponent 4=2×2 is composite, the theorem says that 15 is also composite; indeed, 15 = 3×5. The three smallest Mersenne primes are
While it is true that only Mersenne numbers Mp, where p = 2, 3, 5, … could be prime, it may nevertheless turn out that Mp is not prime even for a prime exponent p. The smallest counterexample is the Mersenne number
which is not a Mersenne prime, even though 11 is a prime number. The lack of an obvious rule to determine whether a given Mersenne number is prime makes the search for Mersenne primes an interesting task, which becomes difficult very soon, since Mersenne numbers grow very fast. The Lucas–Lehmer test for Mersenne numbers is an efficient primality test that greatly aids this task. Search for the largest known prime has somewhat of a cult following. Consequently, a lot of computer power has been expended searching for new Mersenne primes, much of which is now done using distributed computing.
The identity

shows that Mn can be prime only if n itself is prime, which simplifies the search for Mersenne primes considerably. (This follows very simply from the Mersenne property of the sequence of numbers of the form xn - yn. This states that xa - ya | xb - yb if and only if a|b.) The converse statement, namely that Mn is necessarily prime if n is prime, is false. The smallest counterexample is 211−1 = 23×89, a composite number.
Fast algorithms for finding Mersenne primes are available, and the largest known prime numbers as of 2007 are Mersenne primes.
The first four Mersenne primes M2 = 3, M3 = 7, M5 = 31 and M7 = 127 were known in antiquity. The fifth, M13 = 8191, was discovered anonymously before 1461; the next two (M17 and M19) were found by Cataldi in 1588. After nearly two centuries, M31 was verified to be prime by Euler in 1772. The next (in historical, not numerical order) was M127, found by Lucas in 1876, then M61 by Pervushin in 1883. Two more (M89 and M107) were found early in the 20th century, by Powers in 1911 and 1914, respectively.
The best method presently known for testing the primality of Mersenne numbers is based on the computation of a recurring
sequence, as developed originally by Lucas in 1856
[1][2] and improved by
Lehmer in the 1930s, now known as the Lucas-Lehmer test for Mersenne numbers. Specifically, it can be shown that (for
n > 2) Mn = 2n - 1
is prime if and only if Mn divides Sn-2, where S0 =
4 and for k > 0,
.
The search for Mersenne primes was revolutionized by the introduction of the electronic digital computer. The first successful identification of a Mersenne prime, M521, by this means was achieved at 10:00 P.M. on January 30, 1952 using the U.S. National Bureau of Standards Western Automatic Computer (SWAC) at the Institute for Numerical Analysis at the University of California, Los Angeles, under the direction of Lehmer, with a computer search program written and run by Prof. R.M. Robinson. It was the first Mersenne prime to be identified in thirty-eight years; the next one, M607, was found by the computer a little less than two hours later. Three more — M1279, M2203, M2281 — were found by the same program in the next several months. M4253 is the first Mersenne prime that is titanic, M44497 is the first gigantic, and M6,972,593 is the first megaprime, meaning a prime with at least 1,000,000 digits.[3] All three were the first known prime of any kind of that size.
,or

by setting c = 2a, d = 1, and n = b
proof



proof
By

If n is not prime, or n = ab where 1 < a,b < n. Therefore, 2a - 1 would divide 2n - 1, or 2n - 1 is not prime.
is prime, and 31 is 1 plus a multiple of 2*5. Example II: 211 - 1=23*89, 23=1+2*11, and 89=1+8*11, and also 23*89=1+186*11.
proof
If q divides 2p - 1 then 2p is congruent to 1 mod q, so p divides the order of the multiplicative group mod q, by Lagrange's Theorem. This group has order q-1, so q-1=kp for some k, and q=1+kp. But q must be odd, and p is odd,(except for p=2) so k is even.
Mersenne primes were considered already by Euclid, who found a connection with the perfect numbers. They are named after 17th century French scholar Marin Mersenne, who compiled a list of Mersenne primes with exponents up to 257. His list was only partially correct, as Mersenne mistakenly included M67 and M257 (which are composite), and omitted M61, M89, and M107 (which are prime). Mersenne gave no indication how he came up with his list, and its rigorous verification was completed more than two centuries later.
The table below lists all known Mersenne primes (sequence A000668 in OEIS):
| # | n | Mn | Digits in Mn | Date of discovery | Discoverer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | ancient | ancient |
| 2 | 3 | 7 | 1 | ancient | ancient |
| 3 | 5 | 31 | 2 | ancient | ancient |
| 4 | 7 | 127 | 3 | ancient | ancient |
| 5 | 13 | 8191 | 4 | 1456 | anonymous [4] |
| 6 | 17 | 131071 | 6 | 1588 | Cataldi |
| 7 | 19 | 524287 | 6 | 1588 | Cataldi |
| 8 | 31 | 2147483647 | 10 | 1772 | Euler |
| 9 | 61 | 2305843009213693951 | 19 | 1883 | Pervushin |
| 10 | 89 | 618970019…449562111 | 27 | 1911 | Powers |
| 11 | 107 | 162259276…010288127 | 33 | 1914 | Powers[5] |
| 12 | 127 | 170141183…884105727 | 39 | 1876 | Lucas |
| 13 | 521 | 686479766…115057151 | 157 | January 30 1952 | Robinson |
| 14 | 607 | 531137992…031728127 | 183 | January 30 1952 | Robinson |
| 15 | 1,279 | 104079321…168729087 | 386 | June 25 1952 | Robinson |
| 16 | 2,203 | 147597991…697771007 | 664 | October 7 1952 | Robinson |
| 17 | 2,281 | 446087557…132836351 | 687 | October 9 1952 | Robinson |
| 18 | 3,217 | 259117086…909315071 | 969 | September 8 1957 | Riesel |
| 19 | 4,253 | 190797007…350484991 | 1,281 | November 3 1961 | Hurwitz |
| 20 | 4,423 | 285542542…608580607 | 1,332 | November 3 1961 | Hurwitz |
| 21 | 9,689 | 478220278…225754111 | 2,917 | May 11 1963 | Gillies |
| 22 | 9,941 | 346088282…789463551 | 2,993 | May 16 1963 | Gillies |
| 23 | 11,213 | 281411201…696392191 | 3,376 | June 2 1963 | Gillies |
| 24 | 19,937 | 431542479…968041471 | 6,002 | March 4 1971 | Tuckerman |
| 25 | 21,701 | 448679166…511882751 | 6,533 | October 30 1978 | Noll & Nickel |
| 26 | 23,209 | 402874115…779264511 | 6,987 | February 9 1979 | Noll |
| 27 | 44,497 | 854509824…011228671 | 13,395 | April 8 1979 | Nelson & Slowinski |
| 28 | 86,243 | 536927995…433438207 | 25,962 | September 25 1982 | Slowinski |
| 29 | 110,503 | 521928313…465515007 | 33,265 | January 28 1988 | Colquitt & Welsh |
| 30 | 132,049 | 512740276…730061311 | 39,751 | September 19 1983[6] | Slowinski |
| 31 | 216,091 | 746093103…815528447 | 65,050 | September 1 1985[7] | Slowinski |
| 32 | 756,839 | 174135906…544677887 | 227,832 | February 19 1992 | Slowinski & Gage on Harwell Lab Cray-2 [8] |
| 33 | 859,433 | 129498125…500142591 | 258,716 | January 4 1994 [9] | Slowinski & Gage |
| 34 | 1,257,787 | 412245773…089366527 | 378,632 | September 3 1996 | Slowinski & Gage [10] |
| 35 | 1,398,269 | 814717564…451315711 | 420,921 | November 13 1996 | GIMPS / Joel Armengaud [11] |
| 36 | 2,976,221 | 623340076…729201151 | 895,932 | August 24 1997 | GIMPS / Gordon Spence [12] |
| 37 | 3,021,377 | 127411683…024694271 | 909,526 | January 27 1998 | GIMPS / Roland Clarkson [13] |
| 38 | 6,972,593 | 437075744…924193791 | 2,098,960 | June 1 1999 | GIMPS / Nayan Hajratwala [14] |
| 39 | 13,466,917 | 924947738…256259071 | 4,053,946 | November 14 2001 | GIMPS / Michael Cameron [15] |
| 40* | 20,996,011 | 125976895…855682047 | 6,320,430 | November 17 2003 | GIMPS / Michael Shafer [16] |
| 41* | 24,036,583 | 299410429…733969407 | 7,235,733 | May 15 2004 | GIMPS / Josh Findley [17] |
| 42* | 25,964,951 | 122164630…577077247 | 7,816,230 | February 18 2005 | GIMPS / Martin Nowak [18] |
| 43* | 30,402,457 | 315416475…652943871 | 9,152,052 | December 15 2005 | GIMPS / Curtis Cooper & Steven Boone [19] |
| 44* | 32,582,657 | 124575026…053967871 | 9,808,358 | September 4 2006 | GIMPS / Curtis Cooper & Steven Boone [20] |
*It is not known whether any undiscovered Mersenne primes exist between the 39th (M13,466,917) and the 44th (M32,582,657) on this chart; the ranking is therefore provisional.
To help visualize the size of the 44th known Mersenne Prime, a standard word processor layout (12pt Times New Roman, 1" margins) would require 2,769 pages to display the number in base 10. [citation needed]
Mersenne numbers are very good test cases for the special number field sieve algorithm, so often the largest number factorised has been a Mersenne number. As of March 2007, 21039 - 1 is the record-holder, after a calculation taking about a year on a couple of hundred computers, mostly at NTT in Japan and at EPFL in Switzerland. See integer factorization records for links to more information.
Mersenne primes are interesting to many for their connection to perfect numbers. In the 4th century BC, Euclid demonstrated that if Mp is a Mersenne prime then
is an even perfect number. In the 18th century, Leonhard Euler proved that, conversely, all even perfect numbers have this form. It is unknown whether there are any odd perfect numbers.
The binary representation of 2n − 1 is the digit 1 repeated n times, for example, 25 − 1 = 111112 in the binary notation. The Mersenne primes are therefore the base-2 repunit primes.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
Some good "Mersenne prime" pages on the web:
Math mathworld.wolfram.com |
Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "Mersenne prime" at WikiAnswers.
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Mersenne prime". Read more |
Mentioned In: