| This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. See talk page for details. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2009) |
In number theory, the Mertens function is
where μ(k) is the Möbius function. The function is named in honour of Franz Mertens.
Less formally, M(n) is the count of square-free integers up to n that have an even number of prime factors, minus the count of those that have an odd number. M(n) = 0 for the n values
- 2, 39, 40, 58, 65, 93, 101, 145, 149, 150, 159, 160, 163, 164, 166, 214, 231, 232, 235, 236, 238, 254, ... (sequence A028442 in OEIS).
Because the Möbius function has only the values −1, 0, and +1, it is obvious that the Mertens function moves slowly and that there is no k such that |M(k)| > k. The Mertens conjecture went even further, stating that there would be no k where the absolute value of the Mertens function exceeds the square root of k. The Mertens conjecture was disproven in 1985. However, the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to a weaker conjecture on the growth of M(k), namely
. Since high values for M grow at least as fast as the square root of k, this puts a rather tight bound on its rate of growth. Here, O refers to Big O notation.
Contents |
Representations
As an integral
|
|
This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this section if you can. (December 2009) |
Using the Euler product one finds that
where ζ(s) is the Riemann zeta function and the product is taken over primes. Then, using this Dirichlet series with Perron's formula, one obtains:
where C is a closed curve encircling all of the roots of ζ(s).
Conversely, one has the Mellin transform
which holds for Re(s) > 1.
A curious relation given by Mertens himself involving the second Chebyshev function is:
A good evaluation, at least asymptotically, would be to obtain, by the method of steepest descent, an inequality:
assuming that there are not multiple non-trivial roots of ζ(ρ) you have the "exact formula" by residue theorem:
Weyl conjectured that Mertens function satisfied the approximate functional-differential equation
where H(x) is the Heaviside step function, B are Bernoulli numbers and all derivatives with respect to t are evaluated at t = 0.
Titchmarsh (1960) provided a Trace formula involving a sum over mobius function and zeros of Riemann Zeta in the form
where 't' sums over the imaginary parts of nontrivial zeros, and (g, h) are related by a Fourier transform so
As a sum over Farey sequences
Another formula for the Mertens function is
where
is the Farey sequence of order n.
This formula is used in the proof of the Franel–Landau theorem.[1]
As a determinant
M(n) is the determinant of the n × n Redheffer matrix, a (0,1) matrix in which aij is 1 if either j is 1 or i divides j.
Calculation
The Mertens function has been computed for an increasing range of n.
| Person | Year | Limit |
| Mertens | 1897 | 104 |
| von Sterneck | 1897 | 1.5 × 105 |
| von Sterneck | 1901 | 5 × 105 |
| von Sterneck | 1912 | 5 × 106 |
| Neubauer | 1963 | 108 |
| Cohen and Dress | 1979 | 7.8 × 109 |
| Dress | 1993 | 1012 |
| Lioen and van der Lune | 1994 | 1013 |
| Kotnik and van der Lune | 2003 | 1014 |
Notes
- ^ Edwards, Ch. 12.2
References
- Edwards, Harold (1974). Riemann's Zeta Function. Mineola, New York: Dover. ISBN 0-486-41740-9.
- F. Mertens, "Über eine zahlentheoretische Funktion", Akademie Wissenschaftlicher Wien Mathematik-Naturlich Kleine Sitzungsber, IIa 106, (1897) 761–830.
- A. M. Odlyzko and H.J.J. te Riele, "Disproof of the Mertens Conjecture", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 357, (1985) pp. 138–160.
- Weisstein, Eric W., "Mertens function" from MathWorld.
- Values of the Mertens function for the first 10,000 n are given by A002321.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)














