Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Mesopotamian campaign

 
Military History Companion: Mesopotamian campaign

Mesopotamian campaign (WW I). On 6 November 1914, a force of Indian and British infantry landed at the head of the Persian Gulf ostensibly to protect imperial oil interests, now threatened by Turkey, who had joined the Central Powers on 28 October. Oil had been discovered in the area just prior to 1914, and the sandy wastes swiftly assumed strategic importance as the Anglo-Persian Oil Company began to develop the first oilfields. Moreover, as Briton Cooper Busch has shown, Britain was anxious to preserve her established position in the Gulf, to prevent Turkish agents from stirring up trouble amongst India's Muslims, and to encourage Arab resistance to Turkish rule.

The Mesopotamian campaign in WW I. (Click to enlarge)
The Mesopotamian campaign in WW I.
(Click to enlarge)


Until early 1916 the campaign was directed by the government of India, which left much of the decision-making to its own military authorities and to the C-in-C, Gen Sir John Nixon, who took over in March 1915. Both recognized that as long as they retained only a toehold in Mesopotamia the Turks were at liberty to move down the Tigris and Euphrates against them, and early successes encouraged them to believe that an advance inland would be easy. Political motives remained blurred. An inter-departmental committee in London produced a list of desiderata which included the development of ‘a possible field for Indian colonisation’, and some officials argued in favour of wide territorial annexation.

Despite the campaign's lack of clear strategic focus, its early signs were promising. Basra (which the Turks had already evacuated) was taken on 22 November, and El Qurnah, at the junction of the Tigris and Euphrates, fell on 9 December. Nixon was told to ‘retain complete control of the lower portion of Mesopotamia’—defined as the province of Basra, which he had not fully secured—and to submit plans for an advance on Baghdad. In May 1915 two British columns moved off, one following each river upstream. The 6th Indian Division under Maj Gen Charles Townshend moved up the Tigris towards Baghdad, while Maj Gen Gorringe took his 12th Indian Division to An Nasiriyah on the Euphrates, which fell on 25 July.

These easy successes encouraged Nixon to aim for Baghdad. His logistics were never robust, and it became increasingly difficult to supply the advancing troops: as his supply line grew longer, that of the Turks grew shorter. Nixon was convinced that he could take Baghdad, though Townshend disagreed. The latter's men were unused to the local climate and had begun to tire after the long advance. Despite pleas for reinforcement, 6th Division was ordered to continue along the Tigris, and took a series of river towns before reaching Kut Al Amara. The Turks evacuated their 10, 000-strong garrison, and Townshend occupied Kut, just 120 miles (193 km) from Baghdad, on 28 September 1915.

Opinion on the wisdom of an advance on Baghdad remained divided. Although in October 1915 a joint War Office-Admiralty memorandum warned against the diversion of troops to a campaign ‘which cannot appreciably influence the decision as between the armies of the Allies and those of the Central Powers’, the same month the cabinet concluded that success in Mesopotamia would offset failure in Gallipoli. ‘We are therefore in need of a striking success in the east, ’ it announced. ‘Unless you consider that the possibility of eventual withdrawal is against the advance … we are prepared to order it.’ Although Nixon knew that the Turks had been reinforced, he told Townshend to press on.

Townshend resumed his advance, and though he had to wait six weeks to resupply, by 22 November he was 24 miles (39 km) from Baghdad, where he attacked a strong Turkish defensive line at Ctesiphon, losing over 4, 000 men, one-third of his force. Townshend had pushed his luck too far. He was without reserves, and, faced with the arrival of fresh Turkish troops, was obliged to fall back on Kut Al Amara, where he was besieged. Meanwhile, Nixon had remained 300 miles (482 km) distant in Basra, and was unable to appreciate the gravity of the situation, while the Allied evacuation from Gallipoli allowed the Turks to further reinforce their forces in Mesopotamia. Three attempts at relief failed and on 26 April 1916, his force starving and riddled with disease, Townshend surrendered 2, 000 British and 6, 000 Indian soldiers. The failure of the relief attempts, which had cost a further 21, 000 casualties, allied to the surrender at Kut caused a storm of indignation in England.

In August 1916 Gen Sir Stanley Maude took over as C-in-C and resumed the offensive up the Tigris in December with two corps, an impressive force of 166, 000. By 25 February, he had retaken Kut, and pressed on to the prize, Baghdad, which his main force entered on 11 March 1917. Now Turkish forces began to be stretched in turn, as the British successes at Gaza made demanding calls on their manpower. To secure Baghdad, Maude formed three columns, and sent them further up the Tigris, Euphrates, and Diyala rivers, with the aim of destroying the Turkish field army. Each column won a series of engagements, but Maude died of cholera on 18 November and was succeeded by Lt Gen Sir William Marshall. In January 1918, a small British force under Maj Gen Dunsterville (Dunsterforce) moved north from Baghdad in a race with the Turks to seize the Russian oilfields at Baku, some 500 miles (805 km) distant, which had been vulnerable since Russia's withdrawal from the war, following the November Russian Revolution. Dunsterforce arrived only in August, and had to withdraw the following month after Turkish attacks.

Back in Mesopotamia, the river advances continued throughout 1918, but some of the British force was withdrawn to Palestine to replace troops sent to France to repel the Ludendorff offensive. Five thousand Turkish prisoners were taken in an engagement on the Euphrates at Khan Baghdad on 26 March, and Turkish troops gradually lost their enthusiasm for fighting. In late October 1918, faced with an impending Turkish armistice, a British force under Cobbe pushed up the Tigris to seize the oilfields at Mosul, fighting their last battle with the Turks near the ruins of the ancient Assyrian city of Asshur. The armistice with Turkey of 30 October brought about the surrender of Asshur (Ash Sharqat), but Cobbe moved on to occupy Mosul in early November. In 1918 Mesopotamia assumed its modern name of Iraq, under a British mandate, and imperial forces remained garrisoned there to subdue dissident tribesmen. The campaign, which had begun and ended with the seizure of oilfields, cost the British army 27, 000 men, 13, 000 of whom died of disease. It was indeed a sideshow, conducted without proper strategic control: the courage of the troops engaged, who fought in what were often appalling conditions, merited deeper thought on the part of their leaders.

Bibliography

  • Barker, A. J., The Neglected War: Mesopotamia 1914-1918 (London 1967)
  • Busch, Briton Cooper, Britain, India and the Arabs 1914-1921 (London 1971)

— Peter Caddick-Adams/Richard Holmes

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
British History: Mesopotamian campaign
Top

Mesopotamian campaign, 1914-18. Following Turkey's entry into the First World War in November 1914, a small Anglo-Indian force landed in Mesopotamia. Encouraged by early victories, the British advanced towards Baghdad, but were halted by the Turks in November 1915. A considerable British force was besieged at Kut and surrendered in April 1916. Prestige demanded that this defeat be avenged and in March 1917 the British finally occupied Baghdad.

Wikipedia: Mesopotamian campaign
Top
Mesopotamian campaign
Part of Middle Eastern theatre (World War I)
Mesopotamian campaign 6th Army Siege of Kut.png
The trenches at the Siege of Kut.
Date November 1914 - 14 November 1918
Location Iraq
Result British victory, Treaty of Sèvres.
Territorial
changes
Partitioning of the Ottoman Empire
Belligerents
United Kingdom United Kingdom  Ottoman Empire
Commanders
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg General Nixon
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg General Lake
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg General Maude
Ottoman Flag.svg Khalil Pasha
Ottoman Flag.svg Kâzım Karabekir
Ottoman Flag.svg Nurettin Pasha
Ottoman Flag.svg Hakki Bey
Ottoman Flag.svg General von der Goltz
Strength
112,000 100,000+ ?
Casualties and losses
92,000 100,000 ?

The Mesopotamian campaign was a campaign in the Middle Eastern theatre of the Great War fought between the Allies represented by the British Empire, mostly troops from the Indian Empire, and the Central Powers, mostly of the Ottoman Empire.

Contents

Background

The Ottoman Empire had conquered the region in the early 16th century. The empire had a loose control over the region. The Ottomans never tried to build an efficient system of administration given the fact that it took four months for a caravan to arrive at the capital. With the turn of the 19th century came reforms, and thus the empire tried to solve this issue. Work began on a Berlin to Baghdad Railroad as early as 1888. Mostly complete by 1915 with only four gaps in the tracks, the travel dropped down to only 21 days from Istanbul to Baghdad.

The Anglo-Persian Oil Company had the exclusive rights to work petroleum deposits throughout the Persian Empire except in the provinces of Azerbaijan, Ghilan, Mazendaran, Asdrabad, and Khorasan.[1] In 1914, before the war, the British government had contracted with the company for oil for the navy.[1] Kuwait was another strategic factor for the British.

The Ottoman Empire did not expect any major action in this region.

The operational area of the Mesopotamian campaign was limited to the lands watered by the rivers Euphrates and Tigris. The main challenge was moving the supplies and troops through the swamps and deserts which surrounded the area of conflict.

Shortly after the European war started, the British sent a military force to protect Abadan. In Abadan was one of the world's earliest oil refineries. British operational planning included land troops in the Shatt-al-Arab. A reinforced Indian 6th (Poona) Infantry Division from the British Indian Army was assigned, designated as Indian Expeditionary Force D (IEFD).

The Ottoman Fourth Army was located in the region. The army was composed of two corps, the XII Corps with 35th and 36th Divisions at Mosul and XIII Corps with the 37th and 38th Divisions at Baghdad.

On 29 October 1914, after the Pursuit of Goeben and Breslau, Breslau bombarded the Black Sea port of Theodosia. On 30 October the High Command in Istanbul changed the force distribution. On 2 November Grand Vizier Said Halim Pasha expressed regret to the Allies for the operations of the navy. Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Sazonov said it was too late and Russia considered this raid as an act of war. The Cabinet tried to explain that hostilities were begun without its sanction by German officers serving in the navy. The Allies insisted on reparations to Russia, the dismissal of German officers from the Goeben and Breslau, and the internment of the German ships until the end of the war. But before the Ottoman government responded Great Britain and France declared war on the Ottoman Empire on 5 November. CUP's official Declaration of War came on 14 November.[2]

When the Caucasus Campaign became a reality with the Bergmann Offensive, Enver Pasha sent the 37th Division and the XIII Corps Headquarters to the Caucasus in support of the Third Army. The entire XII Corps was deployed to the Sinai and Palestine Campaign. The Fourth Army Headquarters was sent to Syria, to replace the Second Army Headquarters which went to Istanbul. In place of the Fourth Army was "Iraq Area Command" with only the 38th Division under its command.[3]

Mesopotamia was a low priority area for the Ottomans. Regiments of the XII and XIII Corps were maintained at low levels in peacetime. Lieutenant Colonel Süleyman Askeri Bey became the commander. He redeployed portions of the 38th Division at the mouth of Shatt-al-Arab. The rest of the defensive force was stationed in Basra. The Ottoman General Staff did not even possess a proper map of Mesopotamia. They tried to draw a map with the help of some people who used to work in Iraq before the war, although this attempt failed. Enver Pasha bought two German maps scaled 1/1,500,000.

Operations

1914

1914, Initial British offence

On 6 November 1914, the British offensive began with the naval force bombarding the old fort at Fao, which was located at the point where Shatt-al-Arab meets the Persian Gulf. The Fao Landing of British Indian Expeditionary Force D (IEF D) comprising the 6th (Poona) Division led by Lieutenant General Arthur Barrett, with Sir Percy Cox as Political Officer was opposed by 350 Ottoman troops and 4 cannons. By mid-November, the Poona Division was fully ashore and moved towards the town of Basra.

On 22 November, the British occupied the city of Basra against a force of 2900 Arab conscripts of the Iraq Area Command commanded by Suphi Pasha. Suphi Pasha and 1200 prisoners were captured by the British shortly after. The main Ottoman army, under the overall command of Khalil Pasha was located 275 miles north-west around Baghdad. They made only weak efforts to dislodge the British.

1915


On 2 January, Süleyman Askeri Bey assumed the Iraq Area Command. The Ottoman Army did not have any other resources at the time to move to this region because other areas such as Gallipoli, the Caucasus, and Palestine had higher priority. Süleyman Askeri Bey sent letters to Arab sheiks in an attempt to organize them to fight against the British. He wanted to retake the Shatt-al-Arab region at any cost.

On 12 April, Süleyman Askeri attacked the British camp at Shaiba with 3800 troops early in the morning. These forces provided by Arab sheiks did not produce results. However, the Turkish infantry launched a series of relentless attacks on the fortified British camp for two days. When the British cavalry counter attacked, he called the attacks off. Ottoman losses numbered 1000 men killed or wounded and another 400 taken prisoner as well as two artillery field pieces lost. The retreat ended 75 miles up the river at Hamisiye. Süleyman Askeri was wounded at Shaiba. The disappointed and depressed Süleyman Askeri shot himself at the hospital in Baghdad[4] In his place Colonel Nurettin was appointed commander of the Iraq Area Command on 20 April 1915. Nurettin was one of the few officers to reach high command without the benefit of a staff college education. He did, however, have extensive combat experience.[5]


Due to the unexpected success British command reconsidered their plan and General Sir John Nixon was sent in April 1915 to take command. He ordered Charles Vere Ferrers Townshend to advance to Kut or even to Baghdad if possible. Townshend and his small army advanced up the Tigris river. They defeated several Ottoman forces sent to halt him.

Enver Pasha worried about the possible fall of Baghdad. He realized the mistake of underestimating the importance of the Mesopotamian campaign. He ordered the 35th Division and Mehmet Fazıl Pasha to return to their old location, which was Mosul. The 38th Division was reconstituted. The Sixth Army was created on 5 October 1915, and its commander was a 76 year old German General Colmar von der Goltz. Von der Goltz was a famous military historian who had written several classic books on military operations. He had also spent many years working as a military adviser in the Ottoman Empire. However, he was in Thrace commanding the Ottoman First Army and would not reach the theater for some time. Colonel Nurettin the former commander of the Iraq Area Command was still in charge on the ground.[6]

On 22 November, Townshend and Nurettin fought a battle at Ctesiphon, a town 25 miles south of Baghdad. The conflict lasted five days. The battle was a stalemate as both the Ottomans and the British ended up retreating from the battlefield. Townshend concluded that a full scale retreat was necessary. However, Nurettin realized the British were retreating and cancelled his retreat, then followed the British.[7] Townshend withdrew his division in good order back to Kut-al-Amara. He halted and fortified the position. Nurettin pursued with his forces. He tried to encircle the British with his XVIII Corps composed of the 45th Division, 51st Division and 2nd Tribal Cavalry Brigade.[8] The exhausted and depleted British force was urged back to the defenses of Kut-al-Amara. The retreat finalized on 3 December. Nurettin encircled the British at Kut-al-Amara, and sent other forces down river to prevent the British from marching to the relief of the garrison.

6th Army field HQ

On 7 December, the siege of Kut began. From the Ottoman perospective; Siege of Kut prevented Sixth Army to perform other operations. From the British perspective, defending Kut as opposed to retreating back to Basra was a mistake since Kut was isolated. It could be defended, but it could not be resupplied. Von der Goltz helped the Ottoman forces build defensive positions around Kut. The Sixth Army was reorganized into 2 corps, the XIII and the XVIII. Nurettin Paşa gave command to Von der Goltz. With the reorganization the Sixth Army laid siege to the British. New fortified positions established down river fended off any attempt to rescue Townshend. Townshend suggested an attempt to break out but this was initially rejected by Sir John Nixon, however he relented. Nixon under the command of General Aylmer established a relief force. General Aylmer made three major attempts to break the siege, but each effort was unsuccessful.

1916

On 20 January, Enver Pasha replaced Nurettin Pasha with Colonel Halil Kut. Nurettin Pasha did not want to work with a German General. He send a telegram to War ministry "The Iraq Army has already proven that it does not need the military knowledge of Goltz Paşa…" After the first failure, General Nixon was replaced by General Lake. British forces received small quantities of supplies from the air. These drops were not enough to feed the garrison, though. Halil Kut forced the British to choose between starving or surrendering, though in the mean time they would try to lift the siege.

Between January-March 1916, both Townshend and Aylmer launched several attacks in an attempt to lift the siege. In sequence, the attacks took place at the Battle of Sheikh Sa'ad, the Battle of the Wadi, the Battle of Hanna, and the Battle of Dujaila Redoubt. These series of British attempts to break through the encirclement did not succeed and their costs were heavy. Both sides suffered high casualties. In February, XIII Corps received 2nd Infantry Division as a reinforcement. Food and hopes were running out for Townshend in Kut-al-Amara. Disease were spreading rapidly and could not be cured.

On 19 April Field Marshal Von der Goltz died of cholera. On 24 April, an attempt by the paddle steamer “Julnar” to reach the town by river failed. Townshend surrendered on 29 April 1916. 8,000 soldiers became captives of the Ottomans.

The British viewed the loss of Kut as a humiliating defeat. It had been many years since such a large body of British Army soldiers had surrendered to an enemy. Also this loss followed only four months after the British defeat at the Battle of Gallipoli. Nearly all the British commanders involved in the failure to rescue Townshend were removed from command. The Ottomans proved they were good at holding defensive positions against superior forces.

1917

1917, General Maude's Army captures Kut
March 1917, British troops entering Baghdad.

The British refused to let this defeat stand and so the new commander, General Maude was given additional reinforcements and equipment. For the next six months he trained and organized his army. At the same time, the Turkish Sixth Army was growing weaker. Halil Pasha received very few replacements, and ended up disbanding the weak 38th Division and used its soldiers as replacements for his other divisions, the 46th, 51st, 35th, and 52nd.[9]

Maude launched offensive was launched on 13 December 1916. The British advanced up both sides of the Tigris river, forcing the Ottoman army out of a number of fortified positions along the way. General Maude's offensive was methodical, organized, and successful. Halil Pasha was able to concentrate most of his forces against Maude near Kut. However, Maude switch his advance to the other bank of the Tigris, bypassing most of the Turkish forces. The Turkish XVIII Corps escaped destruction only by fighting some desperate rear guard actions. It did lose quite a bit of equipment and supplies. [10] The British occupied Kut and continued to advance up the Tigris.

By early March, the British were at the outskirts of Baghdad, and the Baghdad garrison, under the direct command of the Governor of Baghdad province Khalil Pasha, tried to stop them on the Diyala river. General Maude outmanoeuvered the Ottoman forces, destroyed an Ottoman regiment and captured the Ottoman defensive positions. Khalil Pasha retreated in disarray out of the city. On 11 March 1917 the British entered Baghdad where they were greeted as liberators. The British Indian Army played a significant role in the liberation of Baghdad. Amidst the confusion of the retreat a large part of the Ottoman army (some 15,000 soldiers) were captured. A week after the city fell, General Maude issued the oft-quoted Proclamation of Baghdad, which contained the famous line "our armies do not come into your cities and lands as conquerors or enemies, but as liberators".

Halil Pasha withdrew his battered Sixth Army up river and established his headquarters in Mosul. He had about 30,000 total troops with which to oppose Maude. In April, he received the 2nd Infantry Division, but overall the Ottoman strategic position was bad in the spring of 1917.[11] After the capture of Baghdad, Maude stopped his advance. He felt his supply lines were were too long, conditions in the summer made campaigning difficult and he had been denied reinforcements he felt he needed.[12]

General Maude died of cholera on 18 November. He was replaced by General William Marshall who halted operations for the winter.

1918

Reaching Little Zab River, 120 kilometers in two days

The British resumed their offensive in late February 1918 capturing Hīt and Khan al Baghdadi in March, and Kifri in April. For the rest of the 1918, the British had to move troops to the Sinai and Palestine Campaign in support of the Battle of Megiddo. General Marshall moved some of the forces east in support of General Lionel Dunsterville's operations in Persia during the summer of 1918. His very powerful army was "astonishingly inactive, not only in the hot season but through most of the cold" [13]. The fight in Mesopotamia was not wanted anymore.

Armistice conditions between the Allies and the Ottoman Empire began negotiations with the turn of October. General Marshall, following instructions from the War Office that "every effort was to be made to score as heavily as possible on the Tigris before the whistle blew[14]" went on the offensive for the last time. General Alexander Cobbe commanded a British force from Baghdad on 23 October 1918. Within two days it covered 120 kilometers, reaching the Little Zab River, where it expected to meet and engage the Turkish Sixth Army operating under Ismail Hakki Bey. He fought a battle at the Battle of Sharqat, capturing nearly the entire Turkish force.

Armistice of Mudros, October

On 30 October 1918, the Armistice of Mudros was signed and both parties accepted their current positions. General Marshall accepted the surrender of Khalil Pasha and the Ottoman 6th Army at the same day. But Cobbe did not hold his current position as the armistice required, and continued to advance on Mosul in the face of Turkish protests.[14] British troops marched unopposed into Mosul on the 14 November 1918. The ownership of the Mosul Province and its rich oil fields became an international issue.

The war in Mesopotamia was over on 14 November 1918. It was 13 days after the Armistice and the same day as the occupation of Istanbul.

Aftermath

With British Indian forces already on the ground, the British imported civil servants from India who had previous knowledge and experience on how the government of a colony is supposed to run. The expulsion of Ottomans from the region shook the centuries old power balance. Arabs who believed that the expulsion of the Ottomans would lead to greater independence and fought against the Ottoman forces along the Allies faced another dilemma. They were disappointed with the arguments regarding the establishment of British Mandate of Mesopotamia.

Three important anticolonial secret societies had been formed in the region during 1918 and 1919. At Najaf, Jamiyat an Nahda al Islamiya (The League of the Islamic Awakening) was organized. Al Jamiya al Wataniya al Islamiya (The Muslim National League) was formed with the object of organizing and mobilizing the population for major resistance. In February 1919, in Baghdad, a coalition of Shia merchants, Sunni teachers and civil servants, Sunni and Shia ulama, and Iraqi officers formed the Haras al Istiqlal (the Guardians of Independence). The Istiqlal had member groups in Karbala, Najaf, Kut, and Hillah. The British were in a precarious situation with the Issue of Mosul. They were adopting almost desperate measures to protect their interests. The Iraqi revolt against the British developed just after they declared their authority. It was put down by the RAF Iraq Command during the summer of 1920.

The Ottoman parliament mostly accepted the cede of the region, but they had a different view on the issue of Mosul. They declared the Misak-ı Milli. Misak-ı Milli stated that the Mosul Province was a part of their heartland, based on a common past, history, concept of morals and laws. Presumably, from a British perspective, if Mustafa Kemal Atatürk succeeded in securing the stability in his efforts to establish Republic of Turkey, he would have turned his attention to recovering Mosul and penetrate into Mesopotamia, where the native population would probably join him. The British Foreign Secretary attempted to disclaim any existence of oil in the Mosul area. On 23 January 1923, Lord Curzon argued that the existence of oil was no more than hypothetical.[14] However, according to Armstrong, "England wanted oil. Mosul and Kurds were the key."[15]

Casualties

The British and the British Indian Army forces lost 92,000 soldiers in the Mesopotamian campaign. Ottoman losses are unknown but the British captured a total of 45,000 prisoners of war. By the end of 1918 the British had deployed 410,000 men into the area though only 112,000 of them were combat troops. The vast majority of the British empire forces in this campaign were recruited from India.

Bibliography

  • The Campaign in Mesopotamia by Brigadier-General F. J. Moberly (4 vols, 1923-27, HMSO, official history)
  • A. J. Barker (1967) The Neglected War. Faber and Faber.
  • Mesopotamia Campaign - from The Long, Long Trail website, downloaded January, 2006.
  • Strachan, Hew (2003). The First World War, pp 123-125. Viking (Published by the Penguin Group)
  • Fromkin, David (1989). A Peace to End All Peace. Avon Books.
  • U.S. Military Academy map of the 1915 Campaign
  • U.S. Military Academy map of the Siege of Kut
  • Esposito, Vincent (ed.) (1959). The West Point Atlas of American Wars - Vol. 2; map 53. Frederick Praeger Press.
  • Briton Cooper Busch (1971) Britain, India, and the Arabs 1914-1921. University of California Press.
  • Wilcox, Ron (2006) Battles on the Tigris. Pen and Sword Military
  • Cato, Conrad. The Navy in Mesopotamia, 1914-1917. London: Constable & Co., 1917.
  • The Secrets of a Kuttite: An Authentic Story of Kut, Adventures in Captivity and Stamboul Intrigue by Captain E. O. Mousley R.F.A. (1922; John Lane, The Bodley Head, London & New York)

External links

References

  1. ^ a b The Encyclopedia Americana, 1920, v.28, p.403
  2. ^ CUP Declaration of War, 14 November
  3. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Ottoman Army Effectiveness in World War I: a comparative study (Routledge, New York, 2007), 67, 68.
  4. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Ordered to Die: A history of the Ottoman Army in the First World War (Greenwood Press, Wesport, CT 2001), 110.
  5. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Ottoman Army Effectiveness in World War I: a comparative study (Routledge, New York, 2007), 75.
  6. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Ottoman Army Effectiveness in World War I: a comparative study (Routledge, New York, 2007), 75.
  7. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Ottoman Army Effectiveness in World War I: a comparative study (Routledge, New York, 2007), 76, 77.
  8. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Ottoman Army Effectiveness in World War I: a comparative study (Routledge, New York, 2007), 80.
  9. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Ordered to Die: A history of the Ottoman Army in the First World War (Greenwood Press, Wesport, CT 2001), 164.
  10. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Ordered to Die: A history of the Ottoman Army in the First World War (Greenwood Press, Wesport, CT 2001), 165.
  11. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Ordered to Die: A history of the Ottoman Army in the First World War (Greenwood Press, Wesport, CT 2001), 166.
  12. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Ordered to Die: A history of the Ottoman Army in the First World War (Greenwood Press, Wesport, CT 2001), 166.
  13. ^ Cyril Falls, "The Great War" pg. 329
  14. ^ a b c Peter Sluglett, "The Primacy of Oil in Britain’s Iraq Policy", in the book "Britain in Iraq: 1914-1932" London: Ithaca Press, 1976, pp. 103-116
  15. ^ Harold Courtenay Armstrong Gray Wolf, Mustafa Kemal: An Intimate Study of a Dictator. page 225

Battles of the campaign

See also



 
 

 

Copyrights:

Military History Companion. The Oxford Companion to Military History. Copyright © 2001, 2004 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
British History. A Dictionary of British History. Copyright © 2001, 2004 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Mesopotamian campaign" Read more