mimesis

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. It needs additional citations for verification. Tagged since October 2010. It may contain original research. Tagged since October 2010.

Mimesis (Greek: μίμησις (mīmēsis), from μιμεῖσθαι (mīmeisthai), "to imitate," from μῖμος (mimos), "imitator, actor") is a critical and philosophical term that carries a wide range of meanings, which include imitation, representation, mimicry, imitatio, receptivity, nonsensuous similarity, the act of resembling, the act of expression, and the presentation of the self.^[1]

In ancient Greece, mimesis was an idea that governed the creation of works of art, in particular, with correspondence to the physical world understood as a model for beauty, truth and the good. Plato contrasted mimesis, or imitation, with diegesis, or narrative. After Plato, the meaning of mimesis eventually shifted toward a specifically literary function in ancient Greek society, and its use has changed and been re-interpreted many times since then.

One of the best-known modern studies of mimesis, understood as a form of realism in the arts, is Erich Auerbach's Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Published in 1946 and written while the author was in exile from Nazi Germany, the book opens with a famous comparison between the way the world is represented in Homer's Odyssey and the way it appears in the Bible. From these two seminal Western texts, Auerbach builds the foundation for a unified theory of representation that spans the entire history of Western literature, including the Modernist novels being written at the time Auerbach began his study.

The Frankfurt school critical theorist T.W. Adorno made use of mimesis as a central philosophical term, interpreting it as a way in which works of art embodied a form of reason that was non-repressive and non-violent.^{[citation needed]}

Mimesis has been theorised by thinkers as diverse as Plato, Aristotle, Philip Sidney, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Adam Smith, Sigmund Freud, Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno, Erich Auerbach, Luce Irigaray, René Girard, Nikolas Kompridis, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Michael Taussig, Merlin Donald, and Homi Bhabha.^{[citation needed]}

Classical definitions

Plato

Both Plato and Aristotle saw in mimesis the representation of nature. Plato wrote about mimesis in both Ion and The Republic (Books II, III and X). In Ion, he states that poetry is the art of divine madness, or inspiration. Because the poet is subject to this divine madness, it is not his/her function to convey the truth.^{[citation needed]} As Plato has it, truth is the concern of the philosopher only. As culture in those days did not consist in the solitary reading of books, but in the listening to performances, the recitals of orators (and poets), or the acting out by classical actors of tragedy, Plato maintained in his critique that theatre was not sufficient in conveying the truth.^{[citation needed]} He was concerned that actors or orators were thus able to persuade an audience by rhetoric rather than by telling the truth.^{[citation needed]}

In Book II of The Republic, Plato describes Socrates' dialogue with his pupils. Socrates warns we should not seriously regard poetry as being capable of attaining the truth and that we who listen to poetry should be on our guard against its seductions, since the poet has no place in our idea of God.^[2]

In developing this in Book X, Plato tells of Socrates' metaphor of the three beds: one bed exists as an idea made by God (the Platonic ideal); one is made by the carpenter, in imitation of God's idea; one is made by the artist in imitation of the carpenter's.^[3]

So the artist's bed is twice removed from the truth. The copiers only touch on a small part of things as they really are, where a bed may appear differently from various points of view, looked at obliquely or directly, or differently again in a mirror. So painters or poets, though they may paint or describe a carpenter or any other maker of things, know nothing of the carpenter's (the craftsman's) art,^{[citation needed]} and though the better painters or poets they are, the more faithfully their works of art will resemble the reality of the carpenter making a bed, nonetheless the imitators will still not attain the truth (of God's creation).^{[citation needed]}

The poets, beginning with Homer, far from improving and educating humanity, do not possess the knowledge of craftsmen and are mere imitators who copy again and again images of virtue and rhapsodise about them, but never reach the truth in the way the superior philosophers do.

Aristotle

Part of a series on
Aristotelianism
Aristotelianism Peripatetic school physics ethics term logic view of women view of God (unmoved mover)
Corpus Aristotelicum Physics Organon Nicomachean Ethics Politics Metaphysics On the Soul Rhetoric Poetics
Ideas Correspondence theory of truth hexis virtue ethics (golden mean) four causes telos phronesis eudaimonia arete temporal finitism antiperistasis nature potentiality and actuality universals (substantial form) hylomorphism mimesis substances (ousia) and accidents essence category of being magnanimity sensus communis rational animal genus-differentia definition
Influences and followers Plato Alexander the Great Theophrastus Avicenna Averroes Maimonides St. Thomas Aquinas Alasdair MacIntyre Martha Nussbaum
Related Platonism Commentaries on Aristotle Scholasticism Conimbricenses Pseudo-Aristotle
Philosophy portal
v t e

Similar to Plato's writings about mimesis, Aristotle also defined mimesis as the perfection and imitation of nature. Art is not only imitation but also the use of mathematical ideas and symmetry in the search for the perfect, the timeless, and contrasting being with becoming. Nature is full of change, decay, and cycles, but art can also search for what is everlasting and the first causes of natural phenomena. Aristotle wrote about the idea of four causes in nature. The first formal cause is like a blueprint, or an immortal idea. The second cause is the material, or what a thing is made out of. The third cause is the process and the agent, in which the artist or creator makes the thing. The fourth cause is the good, or the purpose and end of a thing, known as telos.

Aristotle's Poetics is often referred to as the counterpart to this Platonic conception of poetry. Poetics is his treatise on the subject of mimesis. Aristotle was not against literature as such; he stated that human beings are mimetic beings, feeling an urge to create texts (art) that reflect and represent reality.

Aristotle considered it important that there be a certain distance between the work of art on the one hand and life on the other; we draw knowledge and consolation from tragedies only because they do not happen to us. Without this distance, tragedy could not give rise to catharsis. However, it is equally important that the text causes the audience to identify with the characters and the events in the text, and unless this identification occurs, it does not touch us as an audience. Aristotle holds that it is through "simulated representation", mimesis, that we respond to the acting on the stage which is conveying to us what the characters feel, so that we may empathise with them in this way through the mimetic form of dramatic roleplay. It is the task of the dramatist to produce the tragic enactment in order to accomplish this empathy by means of what is taking place on stage.

In short, catharsis can only be achieved if we see something that is both recognisable and distant. Aristotle argued that literature is more interesting as a means of learning than history, because history deals with specific facts that have happened, and which are contingent, whereas literature, although sometimes based on history, deals with events that could have taken place or ought to have taken place.

Aristotle thought of drama as being "an imitation of an action" and of tragedy as "falling from a higher to a lower estate" and so being removed to a less ideal situation in more tragic circumstances than before. He posited the characters in tragedy as being better than the average human being, and those of comedy as being worse.

Michael Davis, a translator and commentator of Aristotle writes:

Contrast to diegesis

It was also Plato and Aristotle who contrasted mimesis with diegesis (Greek διήγησις). Mimesis shows, rather than tells, by means of directly represented action that is enacted. Diegesis, however, is the telling of the story by a narrator; the author narrates action indirectly and describes what is in the characters' minds and emotions. The narrator may speak as a particular character or may be the invisible narrator or even the all-knowing narrator who speaks from above in the form of commenting on the action or the characters.

In Book III of his Republic (c. 373 BCE), Plato examines the style of poetry (the term includes comedy, tragedy, epic and lyric poetry):^[5] All types narrate events, he argues, but by differing means. He distinguishes between narration or report (diegesis) and imitation or representation (mimesis). Tragedy and comedy, he goes on to explain, are wholly imitative types; the dithyramb is wholly narrative; and their combination is found in epic poetry. When reporting or narrating, "the poet is speaking in his own person; he never leads us to suppose that he is any one else"; when imitating, the poet produces an "assimilation of himself to another, either by the use of voice or gesture".^[6] In dramatic texts, the poet never speaks directly; in narrative texts, the poet speaks as himself or herself.^[7]

In his Poetics, the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle argues that kinds of poetry (the term includes drama, flute music, and lyre music for Aristotle) may be differentiated in three ways: according to their medium, according to their objects, and according to their mode or manner (section I); "For the medium being the same, and the objects the same, the poet may imitate by narration—in which case he can either take another personality as Homer does, or speak in his own person, unchanged—or he may present all his characters as living and moving before us" (section III).

Though they conceive of mimesis in quite different ways, its relation with diegesis is identical in Plato's and Aristotle's formulations; one represents, the other reports; one embodies, the other narrates; one transforms, the other indicates; one knows only a continuous present, the other looks back on a past.

In ludology, mimesis is sometimes used to refer to the self-consistency of a represented world, and the availability of in-game rationalisations for elements of the gameplay. In this context, mimesis has an associated grade: highly self-consistent worlds that provide explanations for their puzzles and game mechanics are said to display a higher degree of mimesis. This usage can be traced back to the essay "Crimes Against Mimesis".^[8]

Dionysian imitatio

Dionysian imitatio is the influential literary method of imitation as formulated by Greek author Dionysius of Halicarnassus in the 1st century BCE, which conceived it as technique of rhetoric: emulating, adaptating, reworking and enriching a source text by an earlier author.^[9][10]

Dionysius' concept marked a significant depart from the concept of mimesis formulated by Aristotle's in the 4th century BCE, which was only concerned with "imitation of nature" instead of the "imitation of other authors".^[9] Latin orators and rhetoricians adopted the literary method of Dionysius' imitatio and discarded Aristotle's mimesis.^[9]

Samuel Taylor Coleridge

Mimesis, or imitation, as he referred to it, was a crucial concept for Samuel Taylor Coleridge's theory of the imagination. Coleridge begins his thoughts on imitation and poetry from Plato, Aristotle and Philip Sidney, adopting their concept of imitation of nature instead of other writers. His significant^{[citation needed]} departure from the earlier thinkers lies in his arguing that art does not reveal a unity of essence through its ability to achieve sameness with nature. Coleridge claims:

[T]he composition of a poem is among the imitative arts; and that imitation, as opposed to copying, consists either in the interfusion of the SAME throughout the radically DIFFERENT, or the different throughout a base radically the same.^[11]

Here, Coleridge opposes imitation to copying, the latter referring to William Wordsworth's notion that poetry should duplicate nature by capturing actual speech. Coleridge instead argues that the unity of essence is revealed precisely through different materialities and media. Imitation, therefore, reveals the sameness of processes in nature.

Luce Irigaray

The Belgian feminist Luce Irigaray used the term to describe a form of resistance where women imperfectly imitate stereotypes about themselves so as to show up these stereotypes and undermine them.^[12]

Michael Taussig

In Mimesis and Alterity (1993), the anthropologist Michael Taussig examines the way that people from one culture adopt another's nature and culture (the process of mimesis) at the same time as distancing themselves from it (the process of alterity). He describes how a legendary tribe, the "white Indians", or Cuna, have adopted in various representations figures and images reminiscent of the white people they encountered in the past (without acknowledging doing so).

Taussig, however, criticises anthropology for reducing yet another culture, that of the Cuna, for having been so impressed by their exotic (and superior) technologies of the whites, that they raised them to the status of gods. To Taussig, this reductionism is suspect, and he argues thus from both sides in his Mimesis and Alterity to see values in the anthropologists' perspective, at the same time as defending the independence of a lived culture from anthropological reductionism. (Taussig 1993:47,48)

Salvador Minuchin

Salvador Minuchin developed Structural Family Therapy (SFT) in the 1960s. One of Minuchin's SFT techniques is the process of "joining" that occurs between the therapist and the family. Mimesis is one of four ways to accomplish joining with a family. Mimesis is becoming like the family in the manner or content of their communications, adjusting behavioral style to fit that of the family. The therapist does this by using similar interpersonal styles and language as the family, such as joking with a jovial family or using the same metaphors that family members use. (Snow, Crethar, Robey, and Carlson 2005: 137–40).

Mimesis. Pedagogy of Expression

To make oneself like someone (or something) else in voice or gesture is to do the mimesis of the person (or of the thing) whom (which) one makes oneself like (Plato, Republic, 393c ff.). This activity takes place, albeit with different characteristics depending on the age, in the spontaneous play of children born anywhere in the world. The educational potential of mimesis is the subject of study and research in Italy by the Laboratory of Pedagogy of Expression of the Department of Educational Design of the University "Roma Tre". The research activities of MimesisLab are developed in three distinct areas which work in synergy: philosophy of education, experimental pedagogy, artistic productions. This research has shown that an intensification of attention to mimesis in educational practice results in a corresponding development of human qualities which have potential for reshaping a coexistence, in which participation in happiness is enhanced. These findings open essential pathways for intercultural education, peace education, education for empathy.

Bibliography

• ADORNO, THEODOR W., Teoria estetica, Torino, Einaudi, 1977.
• AGOSTINO, Le confessioni.
• ALIGHIERI, DANTE, Convivio.
• ARONADIO, FRANCESCO, Platone Resp. 509 d-511 e: la chiarezza dei contenuti cognitivi e il sapere diretto, in “Elenchos”, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 2006, 27 (2), pp. 409-424.
• ASMIS, ELIZABETH, Plato on poetic creativity, in Kraut, Richard (a cura di), The Cambridge companion to Plato, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992, pp. 338-364.
• ARISTOTELE, De anima.
• ARISTOTELE, Metafisica.
• IARISTOTELE, Poetica.
• ARISTOTELE, Politica.
• BAUMAN, ZYGMUNT, Modernità liquida, Laterza, Bari, 2002.
• BELFIORE, ELIZABETH, A theory of imitation in Plato’s Republic, in “Transactions of the American Philological Association”, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1984, 114, pp. 121-146.
• BEIL WAUGH, JOANNE, Art and Morality: The End of an Ancient Rivalry?, in “Journal of Aesthetic Education”, University of Illinois Press, Champaign, 1986 (Spring), 20 (1), pp. 5-17.
• BENJAMIN, WALTER, Angelus Novus. Saggi e frammenti, Einaudi, Torino, 1995.
• BOGGIO, MARICLA, Il Corpo Creativo. La parola e il gesto in Orazio Costa, Bulzoni, Roma, 2001.
• BOGGIO, MARICLA, Mistero e Teatro. Orazio Costa, regìa e pedagogia, Bulzoni, Roma, 2004.
• BOGGIO, MARICLA, Orazio Costa maestro di teatro, Bulzoni, Roma, 2007.
• BRUMBAUGH, ROBERT S., A retracted exile?: poetry and Republic 614b2, in “Ancient philosophy”, Methesis Publications, Pittsburgh, 1992, XII, pp. 172-173.
• BUFFIERE, FELIX, Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque, Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1956.
• BÜTTNER, STEFAN, Psychologie und Poetik bei Platon: Argumente für die Einheit der Platonischen Dichtungstheorie, in “Antike und Abendland”, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2001, 47, pp. 41-65.
• COHEN, TOM, Anti-mimesis from Plato to Hitchicock, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
• COLLI, GIAN GIACOMO, Una Pedagogia Dell'Attore. L'insegnamento di Orazio Costa, II ed. riv. e acc., Bulzoni, Roma, 1996.
• COSTA GIOVANGLI, ORAZIO, Dell’analogia mimica come base del¬l’interpretazione scenica, in Colli, Gian Giacomo, Una Pedagogia Dell'Attore.

L'insegnamento di Orazio Costa, II ed. riv. e acc., Bulzoni, Roma, 1996.

• DESCLOS, MARIE LAURENCE, Idoles, icônes et phantasmes dans le dialogues de Platon, in “Revue de métaphysique et de morale”, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 2000, 3, pp. 301-327.
• DERRIDA, JACQUES, La farmacia di Platone, Jaca Book, Milano, 2007.
• DIES, AUGUSTE, Introduction, in Platon, Œuvres complete, Tome VI, La République, livres I-III, Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1947.
• DILLEY, ROY, Ways of Knowing, Forms of Power, in “Cultural Dynamics”, University of Texas, Austin, 1999, 11 (1), pp. 33-55.
• DINAPOLI, FRANCESCA, La “Paideia” nel progetto politico di Platone, in “Orpheus”, Università di Catania - Centro di Studi sull’An¬tico Cristianesimo, Catania, 2005, N. S. 26 (1-2), pp. 89-103.
• DIXSAUT, MONIQUE (a cura di), Études sur la République de Platon, Vrin, Paris, 2005.
• DUCCI, EDDA, Essere e comunicare, Anicia, Roma, 2002.
• DUCCI, EDDA, Approdi dell’umano. Il dialogare minore, Anicia, Roma, 1999.
• DUCCI, EDDA, L’uomo umano, Anicia, Roma, 2008.
• DUCCI, EDDA, La parola nell’uomo, La Scuola, Brescia, 2005.
• DUCCI, EDDA, Libertà liberata. Libertà Legge Leggi, Anicia, Roma, 1994.
• DUNCAN, ISADORA, Lettere dalla danza, La casa Usher, Firenze, 1980.
• DUNCAN, ISADORA, L’Arte della Danza, a cura di Eleonora Barbara Nomellini e Patrizia Veroli, L’Epos, Palermo, 2007.
• DYKMAN, AMINADAV, ET GODZICH, WLAD (a cura di), Platon et les poètes, Unité de littérature comparée - Faculté des Lettres - Université de Genève, Genève, 1996.
• DYSON, MICHAEL, Poetic imitation in Plato Repubblic 3, in “Antichthon”, Macquarie University - Australian Society for Classical Studies, Sydney, 1988, 22, pp. 42-53.
• EARLE, BO, Plato, Aristotle, and the imitation of reason, in “Philophy and Literature”, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2003, 27 (2), pp. 382-401.
• ELSE, GERALD F., ‘Imitation’ in the Fifth Century, in “Classical Philology”, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 53 (2), 1958, pp. 73-90
• ELSE, GERALD F., The structure and the date of book 10 of Plato’s Republic, Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Heidelberg, 1972.
• FABRO, CORNELIO, La nozione metafisica di partecipazione, S. E. I., Torino, 1963.
• FATTAL, MICHEL (a cura di), La philosophie de Platon, 1, L’Harmattan, Paris, 2001.
• FINK, EUGEN, Fenomeni fondamentali dell’esistenza umana, Edizioni ETS, Pisa, 2006.
• FISCHER, FRACK, Qu’est-ce qu’une expérience “aisthétique” selon Platon?, in “Dialogue”, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, 2003, 42 (1), pp. 27-52.
• FREEDBERG, DAVID, ET GALLESE VITTORIO, Movimento, emozione, empatia. I fenomeni che si producono a livello corporeo osservando le opere d'arte, in “Prometeo”, Mondadori, Milano, 2008, 26 (103), pp. 52-59 (trad. it. dall’articolo del 2007: Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience, in “Trends in Cognitive Sciences”, 11, pp. 197–203).
• FRONTEROTTA, FRANCESCO, Il problema della methexis: a proposito di un lungo dibattito platonico. In “Elenchos”, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1999, 20 (2), pp. 397-415.
• GADAMER, HANS G., Studi platonici, ed. it. a cura di Giovanni Moretto, Marietti, Casale Monferrato, 1983.
• GADAMER, HANS G., L’attualità del bello. Studi di estetica ermeneutica, a cura di Riccardo Dottori, Marietti, Genova, 1986.
• GADAMER, HANS G., Verità e metodo, a cura di Gianni Vattimo, Bompiani, Milano, 1983.
• GALLESE, VITTORIO, Empathy, embodied simulation, and mirroring mechanisms. Commentary on “Towards a neuroscience of empathy” by Doug Watt, in “Neuropsychoanalysis”, International Neuropsychoanalysis Society, London, 2007, 9 (2), pp. 146-151.
• GALLESE, VITTORIO, Embodied simulation: from neurons to phenomenal experience, in “Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences”, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2005, 4, pp. 23–48.
• GALLESE, VITTORIO, Before and below ‘theory of mind’: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition, in “Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B”, Royal Society Publisching, London, 2007, 362, pp. 659-669.
• GALLESE, VITTORIO, Corpo vivo, simulazione incarnata e intersoggettività: Una prospettiva neurofenomenologica, in Cappuccio, Massimiliano (a cura di), Neurofenomenologia, Bruno Mondadori, Milano, 2006, pp. 293-326.
• GALLESE, VITTORIO, Il corpo teatrale: mimetismo, neuroni specchio, simulazione incarnata, in “Culture Teatrali”, I Quaderni del Battello Ebbro, Porretta Terme (Bo), 2008, 16, pp. 13-38.
• GALLESE, VITTORIO, ET MIGONE, PAOLO, ET EAGLE, MORRIS N., La simulazione incarnata: i neuroni specchio, le basi neurofisiologiche dell’intersoggettività e alcune implicazioni per la psicoanalisi, in “Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane”, FrancoAngeli, Milano, 2006, XL, 3, pp. 543-580.
• GASTALDI, SILVIA, Mimesis e psyche nel Libro X della Repubblica, in Migliori, Maurizio, et Napolitano Valditara, Linda M., et Fermani, Arianna, Interiorità e anima, la psychè in Platone, Vita e pensiero, Milano, 2007, pp. 109-122.
• GASTALDI, SILVIA, Paideia/mythologia, in Platone, La Repubblica, trad. e commento a cura di Mario Vegetti, vol. II, libro II-III, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1998, pp. 333-392.
• GASTALDI, SILVIA, La mimesis e l’anima, in Platone, La Repubblica, trad. e commento a cura di Mario Vegetti, vol. VII, libro X, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 2007, pp. 93-149.
• GAUDREAULT, ANDRÉ, Mimèsis et diègèsis chez Platon, in “Revue de métaphysique et de morale”, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1989, 94, pp. 79-92.
• GEBAUER, GUNTER, ET WULF, CHRISTOPH, Mimesis. Kultur, Kunst, Gesellschaft, Rowohlt, Reinbeck, 1992.
• GENTILE, GIOVANNI, Manuale di pedagogia come scienza filosofica, V ed. riv., Sansoni, Firenze, 1955.
• GIULIANO, FABIO MASSIMO, Filosofia versus poesia: Platone davanti a un’antica disputa, in Arrighetti, Graziano (a cura di), Letteratura e riflessioni sulla letteratura nella cultura classica: atti del convegno, Pisa, 7-9 giugno 1999, Giardini Editori e Stampatori in Pisa, Pisa, 2000, pp. 377-400.
• GIULIANO, FABIO MASSIMO, Platone e la poesia: teoria della composizione e prassi della ricezione, Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin, 2005.
• GIRARD, RENÉ, La violenza e il sacro, Adelphi, Milano, 1980.
• GOLDMAN, LAURENCE, Child’s play: mith, mimesis and make-believe, Berg, Oxford, 1998.
• GRAHAM, VICKI, “Into the Body of Another": Mary Oliver and the Poetics of Becoming Other, in “Papers on Language and Literature”, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, 1994, September 22, 4 (30), pp. 352-372.
• GOMPERZ, THEODOR, Platone, in Pensatori greci, III, La Nuova Italia, Firenze, 1953.
• HALLIWELL, STEPHEN, The aesthetic of mimesis. Ancient texts and modern problems, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2002 (trad. it., L’estetica della mimesis. Testi antichi e problemi moderni, a cura di Giovanni Lombardo, trad. di Daniele Guastini e Loriana Maimone Ansaldo Patti, Aesthetica, Palermo, 2009).
• HASKINS, EKATERINA VALERI CHUGAEVA, Mimesis between poetics and rhetoric: performance culture and civic education in Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle, in “Rhetoric Society Quartely”, Penn State University - Rhetoric Society of America, University Park, 2000, 30 (3), pp. 7-34.
• HAVELOCK, ERIC ALFRED, Cultura orale e civiltà della scrittura. Da Omero a Platone, Laterza, Roma-Bari, 1973.
• HEIDEGGER, MARTIN, L’origine dell’opera d’arte, a cura di Gino Zaccaria e Ivo De Gennaro, Marinotti, Milano, 2000.
• HORN, CHRISTOPH, ET RAPP, CHRISTOF, Intuition und Methode: Abschied von einem Dogma der Platon – und Aristoteles – Exegese, in “Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse”, Schöningh, Paderborn, 2005, 8, pp. 11-14.
• IRWIN, TERENCE H., Art and philosophy in Plato’s dialogues, in “Phronesis”, Brill, Leiden, 1996, 41 (3), pp. 335-350.
• JAEGER, WERNER, Paideia. La formazione dell’uomo greco, La Nuova Italia, Firenze, 1959.
• JANAWAY, CHRISTOPHER, Images of Excellence: Plato's Critique of the Arts, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
• JOUSSE, MARCEL, L'antropologia del gesto, Edizione Paoline, Roma, 1979.
• JOUSSE, MARCEL, La manducazione della parola, Edizione Paoline, Roma, 1980.
• JOUSSE, MARCEL, Le Parlant, la Parole et le Souffle, Gallimard, Paris, 1978.
• KARDAUN, MARIA, Der mimesisbegriff in der griechishen Antike: Neubetrachtungen eines umstrittenen Begriffes als Ansatz, zu einer neuen Interpretation der platonischen Kunstauffassung, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1993.
• KIRBY, JOHN T., Mimesis and diegesis: foundation of aesthetic theory in Plato and Aristotle, in “Helios”, Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, 1991, 18, pp. 113-128.
• KOLLER, HERMANN, Die mimesis in der antike. Nachahmung, Darstellung, Ausdruck, Francke, Berna, 1954.
• KOSMAN, LOUIS ARYEH, Silence and imitation in the Platonic dialogues, in Klagge, James C., et Smith, Nicholas D. (a cura di), Methods of interpreting Plato and his dialogues, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992, pp. 73-92.
• LESZL, WALTER GABRIELE, Plato's Attitude to Poetry and the Fine Arts and the Origins of Aesthetics, Part I, in Études Platoniciennes I, Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 2004, pp. 113-197; Part II, in Études Platoniciennes II, Paris, 2006, pp. 285-351; Part III, in Études Platoniciennes III, Paris, 2007, pp. 247-334.
• LI VOLSI, ROCCO, La dottrina platonica del linguaggio, in “Sapienza”, Ed. Domenicana Italiana, Napoli, 2004, 57 (4), pp. 427-447.
• LIDDELL, GEORGE HENRY, ET SCOTT, ROBERT, Greek-English Lexikon, Claredon Press, Oxford, 1996.
• MAMARY, ANNE J., Redeeming Mimesis, in “Méthexis”, Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin, 2001, 14, pp. 73-85.
• MARCHAND, TREVOR H. J., Muscles, morals and mind: craft apprenticeship and the formation of person, in “British Journal of Educational Studies”, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, 2008 (September), 56 (3), pp. 245–271.
• MATTEI, FRANCESCO, Sfibrata paideia. Bulimia della formazione Anoressia dell’educazione, Anicia, Roma, 2009.
• MELBERG, ARNE, Theories of mimesis (Literature, Culture, Theory), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
• MERLEAU-PONTY, MAURICE, La prosa del mondo, trad. it. Marina Sanlorenzo, Editori Riuniti, Roma, 1984.
• MICALELLA, DINA, Platone e la voce del pubblico, in De Martino, Francesco, et Sommerstein, Alan H. (a cura di), Lo spettacolo delle voci, Levante Editore, Bari, 1995, pp. 117-129.
• MIGLIORI, MAURIZIO, Lo schema onto-epistemico della linea. In “Elenchos”, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 2006, 27 (2), pp. 459-484.
• MIGLIORI, MAURIZIO, ET NAPOLITANO VALDITARA, LINDA M., ET FERMANI, ARIANNA, Interiorità e anima, la psychè in Platone, Vita e pensiero, Milano, 2007.
• MITSCHERLING, JEFF, Plato’s misquotation of the poets, in “Classical Quarterly”, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005, N. S. 55 (1), pp. 295-298.
• MONDOLFO, ROBERTO, Il pensiero antico. Storia della filosofia greco-romana, La Nuova Italia, Firenze, 1961.
• MUCKELBAUER, JOHN, Imitation and invention in antiquity: an historical-theoretical revision, in “Rhetorica”, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2003, 21 (2), pp. 61-88.
• MULLER, ROBERT, La musique et l’imitation, in Fattal, Michel (a cura di), La philosophie de Platon, 1, L’Harmattan, Paris, 2001, pp. 103-137.
• MURRAY, PENELOPE, Inspiration and mimesis in Plato, in Barker, Andrew, et Warner, Martin (a cura di), The language of the cave, Academic Printing and Publishing, Edmont, 1992, pp. 27-46.
• NADDAF, GÉRRD, Literacy and poetic performance in Plato’s “Laws”, in “Ancient Philosophy”, Duquesne University - Department of Philosophy, Pittsburgh, 2000, 20 (2), pp. 339-350.
• NADDAFF, RAMONA, Exiling the poets: the production of censorship in Plato’s “Republic”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002.
• NIETZSCHE, FRIEDRICH, La genealogia della morale, in Opere filosofiche, vol. II, in Classici della filosofia, Utet, Torino, 2003.
• OLIVER, MARY, American primitive, Little, Boston, 1983.
• PAXSON, THOMAS D. JR., Art and Paideia, in “Journal of Aesthetic Education”, (Special Issue: Paestum and Classical Culture: Past and Present), 1985 (Spring), 19 (1), University of Illinois Press, Champaign pp. 67-78.
• PLATON, Œuvres completes, Tome VI, La République, livres I-III, trad. Emile Chambry, Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1947.
• PLATON, Œuvres completes, Tome VII, I partie, La République, livres IV-VII, trad. Emile Chambry, Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1956.
• PLATON, Œuvres completes, Tome VII, II partie, La République, livres VIII-X, trad. Emile Chambry, Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1957.
• PLATON, Dialoghi filosofici, a cura di Giuseppe Cambiano et Francesco Adorno, in Classici della Filosofia, Utet, Torino, 1970-1988.
• PLATON, Tutte le opere, a cura di Enrico V. Maltese, Newton Compton, Roma, 1997.
• PLATON, La Repubblica, trad. it. e cura di Mario Vegetti, BUR, Milano, 2007.
• PLATON, La Repubblica, trad. e commento a cura di Mario Vegetti, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1998-2007.
• PLATON, La Repubblica, trad. it. a cura di Franco Sartori, Bari, Laterza, 1999.
• PLUTARCO, Vite, Classici Utet, Torino, 1992.
• PROIMOS, CONSTANTINOS, Reading Platonic and Neoplatonic notions of mimesis with and against Martin Heidegger, in “Scripta classica Israelica”, Israel Society for the promotion of classical studies, Jerusalem, 2002, 21, pp. 45-55.
• RABASSINI, ANDREA, L’analogia platonica tra il Sole e il Bene nell’interpretazione di Marsilio Ficino, in “Rivista di storia della filosofia”, FrancoAngeli, Milano, 2005, 60 (4), pp. 609-629.
• RANGOS, SPYRIDON, Proclus on poetic mimesis, symbolism, and truth, in “Oxford Studies in Ancient philosophy”, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999, 17, pp. 249-277.
• RASMUSSEN, BJØRN, Beyond imitation and representation: extended comprehension of mimesis in drama education, in “Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance”, Routledge, London, 2008, 13 (3), pp. 307-319.
• RICŒUR, PAUL, La critica e la convinzione, trad. it. a cura di Daniella Iannotta, Jaca Book, Milano, 1997.
• RIZZERIO-DEVIS, LAURA, Dialectique et art dans la «République» e le «Sophiste» de Platon, in “Revue philosophique de Louvain”, Institut Supérieur de Philosophie de l’Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, 1999, 97 (2), pp. 231-252.
• RIZZOLATTI, GIACOMO, ET SINIGAGLIA, CORRADO, So quel che fai. Il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio, Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 2006.
• ROBIN, LEON, Storia del pensiero greco, Mondadori, Milano, 1970.
• ROBIN, LEON, Platone, Cisalpino, Bologna, 1996.
• RODRIGO, PIERRE, Platon e l’art austère de la distanciation, in Fattal, Michel (a cura di), La philosophie de Platon, L’Harmattan, Paris, 2001, 1, pp. 139-165.
• ROSEN, STANLEY, La querelle entre la philosophie et la poésie, in De Mattéi, Jean-François (a cura di), La naissance de la raison en Grèce: actes du congrès de Nice, mai 1987, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1990, pp. 325-331.
• ROUSSEAU, JEAN-JACQUES, Emilio o dell’educazione, ed. int. a cura di Emma Nardi, La Nuova Italia, Firenze, 2002.
• SALOMON, NICOLETTA, La zattera di mimesis, I Greci, la creazione, l’arte, Marsilio, Venezia, 2001.
• SCARAMUZZO, GILBERTO, In-tendere. L’umana sophia di Luigi pirandello, Anicia, Roma, 2005.
• SCARAMUZZO, GILBERTO, Paideia Mimesis. Attualità e urgenza di una riflessione inattuale, Anicia, Roma, 2010.
• SCARAMUZZO, GILBERTO (a cura di), Mimopaideia. Buone pratiche per una Pedagogia dell’Espressione, Anicia. Roma, 2011.
• SLINGS, SIMON R. (a cura di), Platonis Rempublicam, in Scriptorum classicorum. Bibliotheca Oxoniensis, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.
• STEFANINI, LUIGI, Platone, Cedam, Padova, 1932-1935.
• STEFANINI, LUIGI, Imaginismo come problema filosofico, I, Cedam, Padova, 1936.
• STENZEL, JULIUS, Platone educatore, Laterza, Bari, 1966.
• TAYLOR, ALFRED EDWARD, Platone. L’uomo e l’opera, La Nuova Italia, Firenze, 1987.
• TEISSERENC, F, Mimèsis narrative et formation du caractère, in Dixsaut, M. (a cura di), Études sur la République de Platon, 1. De la Justice, Vrin, Paris, 2005, pp. 65-87.
• UNTERSTEINER, MARIO, Introduzione, in Platone, Repubblica Libro X, Luigi Loffedo, Napoli, 1966.
• VELOSO, CLAUDIO WILLIAM, Il problema dell’imitare in Aristotele, in “Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica”, 2000, N. S. 65, pp. 63-97.
• VERDENIUS, WILLEM JACOB, Mimesis: Plato's doctrine of artistic imitation and its meaning to us, Brill Archive, Leiden, 1972.
• VERNANT, JEAN-PIERRE, Nascita di immagini e altri scritti su religione, storia, ragione, trad. it. di Angela Montagna, Il Saggiatore, Milano, 1982.
• VERNANT, JEAN-PIERRE, Figure, idoli, maschere. Il racconto mitico da simbolo religioso a immagine artistica, trad. it. di Adriana Zangara, Il Saggiatore, Milano, 2001.
• WIEGMANN, HERMANN, Plato’s critique of the poets and the misunderstanding of his epistemological argumentation, in “Philosophy and rhetoric”, Penn State University Press, University Park, 1990, 23, pp. 109-124.
• WULF, CHRISTOPH, Mimesis, in Wulf, Christoph (a cura di), Le idee dell’antropologia, ed. it. a cura di Andrea Borsari, Bruno Mondadori, Milano, 2002, pp. 1039-1053.
• WULF, CHRISTOPH, Mímesis. L’arte e i suoi modelli, trad. it. a cura di Paolo Costa, Mimesis, Milano, 1995.
• WULF, CHRISTOPH (a cura di), Le idee dell’antropologia, ed. it. a cura di Andrea Borsari, Bruno Mondadori, Milano, 2002.
• YATES, VELVET, Madman, sophist, and imitator: Plato’s strategies for representing the poet, Thesis (Ph. D.), Princeton Uniersity, Princeton, 1998.
• ZELLER EDUARD, MONDOLFO RODOLFO, La filosofia dei Greci nel suo sviluppo storico, p. II, v. III, La Nuova Italia, Firenze, 1974.

See also

• Illusionistic tradition
• Life imitating art

Notes

References

• Auerbach, Erich. 1953. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Princeton: Princeton UP. ISBN 0-691-11336-X.
• Coleridge, S.T. 1983. Biographia Literaria. v.1 eds. James Engell and W. Jackson Bate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP. ISBN 0-691-09874-3.
• Davis, Michael. 1999. The Poetry of Philosophy: On Aristotle's Poetics. South Bend, Indiana: St Augustine's P. ISBN 1-890318-62-0.
• Elam, Keir. 1980. The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. New Accents Ser. London and New York: Methuen. ISBN 0-416-72060-9.
• Gebauer, Gunter, and Christoph Wulf. 1992. Mimesis: Culture—Art—Society. Trans. Don Reneau. Berkeley and London: U of California P, 1995. ISBN 0-520-08459-4.
• Kaufmann, Walter. 1992. Tragedy and Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton UP. ISBN 0-691-02005-1.
• Pfister, Manfred. 1977. The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Trans. John Halliday. European Studies in English Literature Ser. Cambridige: Cambridge UP, 1988. ISBN 0-521-42383-X.
• Prang, Christoph. 2010. Semiomimesis: The influence of semiotics on the creation of literary texts. Peter Bichsel's Ein Tisch ist ein Tisch and Joseph Roth's Hotel Savoy. In: Semiotica. Vol. 2010, Issue 182, S. 375–96.
• Tatarkiewicz, Władysław. 1980. A History of Six Ideas: An Essay in Aesthetics. Trans. Christopher Kasparek. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. ISBN 90-247-2233-0.
• Taussig, Michael. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-90686-5.
• Snow, Kim; Crethar, Hugh; Robey, Patricia & Carlson, John. 2005. "Theories of Family Therapy (Part 1)". As cited in "Family Therapy Review: Preparing for Comprehensive Licensing Examination." 2005. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 0-8058-4312-4.
• Sen, R. K., Mimesis, Calcutta: Syamaprasad College, 2001
• Sen, R. K., Aesthetic Enjoyment: Its Background in Philosophy and Medicine, Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1966

External links

Look up mimesis in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

• Plato's Republic II, transl. Benjamin Jowell
• Plato's Republic III, transl. Benjamin Jowell
• Plato's Republic X, transl. Benjamin Jowell
• INFINITE REGRESS OF FORMS Plato's recounting of the "bedness" theory involved in the bed metaphor
• The University of Chicago, Theories of Media Keywords
• University of Barcelona Mimesi (Research on Poetics & Rhetorics in Catalan Literature)
• Mimesislab, Laboratory of Pedagogy of Expression of the Department of Educational Design of the University "Roma Tre"
• "Mimesis", an article by Władysław Tatarkiewicz for the Dictionary of History of Ideas