Of, relating to, or involving more than two political parties.
Dictionary:
mul·ti·par·ty (mŭl'tə-pär'tē) ![]() |
Of, relating to, or involving more than two political parties.
| Wikipedia: Multi-party system |
| This article is part of the Politics series |
| Party politics |
| Political spectrum |
| Left-right politics Left-wing · Right-wing Syncretic |
| Party platform |
| Party system |
| Dominant-party Multi-party Non-partisan Single-party Two-party |
| Lists |
| Ideologies Parties by ideology Parties by country Parties by UN geoscheme |
| Politics portal |
A multi-party system is a system in which three or more political parties have the capacity to gain control of government separately or in coalition.
Unlike a single-party system (or a non-partisan democracy), it encourages the general constituency to form multiple distinct, officially recognized groups, generally called political parties. Each party competes for votes from the enfranchised constituents (those allowed to vote). A multi-party system is essential for representative democracies, because it prevents the leadership of a single party from setting policy without challenge.
If the government includes an elected Congress or Parliament the parties may share power according to Proportional Representation or the First-past-the-post system. In Proportional Representation, each party wins a number of seats proportional to the number of votes it receives. In first-past-the-post, the electorate is divided into a number of districts, each of which selects one person to fill one seat by a plurality of the vote. First-past-the-post is not conducive to a proliferation of parties, and naturally gravitates toward a two-party system, in which only two parties have a real chance of electing their candidates to office. This gravitation is known as Duverger's law. Proportional Representation, on the other hand, does not have this tendency, and allows multiple major parties to arise.
This difference is not without implications. A two-party system requires voters to align themselves in large blocs, sometimes so large that they cannot agree on any overarching principles. Along this line of thought, some theories argue that this allows centrists to gain control. On the other hand, if there are multiple major parties, each with less than a majority of the vote, the parties are forced to work together to form working governments. This also promotes a form of centrism.
The United States is an example of where there may be a multi-party system but that only two parties have ever formed government. Germany, India, France, and Israel are examples of nations that have used a multi-party system effectively in their democracies (though in each case there are two parties larger than all others, even though most of the time no party has a parliamentary majority by itself). In these nations, multiple political parties have often formed coalitions for the purpose of developing power blocs for governing.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Solidarity (Politics) | |
| Joaquim Alberto Chissano (Mozambican president) | |
| Congo (country of west-central Africa) |
| Need for multiparty system in india? Read answer... | |
| Is ireland a dominant or multiparty system? Read answer... | |
| Multiparty democary is still a myth in african nations do you agree? Read answer... |
| Why do you need a multiparty system? | |
| What are the disadvantage of a multiparty? | |
| How do you use the word multiparty in a sentence? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Multi-party system". Read more |
Mentioned in