Dictionary:
Ni·lo-Sa·har·an (nī'lō-sə-hăr'ən, -hä'rən) ![]() |
| Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: Nilo-Saharan languages |
For more information on Nilo-Saharan languages, visit Britannica.com.
| WordNet: Nilo-Saharan |
The noun has one meaning:
Meaning #1:
a family of East African languages spoken by Nilotic peoples from the Sahara south to Kenya and Tanzania
Synonym: Nilo-Saharan language
| Wikipedia: Nilo-Saharan languages |
| Nilo-Saharan | |
|---|---|
| Geographic distribution: |
Central and East Africa |
| Genetic classification: |
suggested association with Niger-Congo |
| Subdivisions: |
? Gumuz
? Kadu
? Koman
? Songhay
|
| ISO 639-2 and 639-5: | ssa |
The Nilo-Saharan languages are African languages spoken mainly in the upper parts of the Chari and Nile rivers (hence the term "Nilo-"), including historic Nubia, north of where the two tributaries of Nile meet. The languages extend through 17 nations in the northern half of Africa: from Algeria and Mali in the northwest; to Benin, Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the south; and Sudan to Tanzania in the east (excluding the Horn of Africa).
The largest part of its major subfamilies are found in the modern nation of Sudan, through which the Nile River flows in all its incarnations: the White and Blue Nile, which join to form the main Nile at Khartoum. As seen in the hyphenated name (compare map at right), Nilo-Saharan is primarily a family of the African interior, including the greater Nile basin and its tributaries as well as the central Sahara desert.
Joseph Greenberg named the group and argued it was genetic (linguistics) in his 1963 book The Languages of Africa and earlier papers. It includes languages not included in the Niger-Congo family Greenberg introduced in the same work or in the Afroasiatic or Khoisan families.
Contents |
Roughly 11 million people spoke Nilo-Saharan languages as of 1987, according to Merritt Ruhlen's estimate.
A characteristic feature of the family is a tripartite singulative–collective–plurative number system, which is found in every branch but Gumuz. Internally, Nilo-Saharan is quite diverse.
Within the larger Nilo-Saharan language family are a number of major African languages with at least half a million speakers (SIL Ethnologue, 2005 figures):
Dimmendaal (2008) notes that Greenberg (1963) based his conclusion on sound evidence, and that the proposal has become more convincing in the decades since. Mikkola (1999) reviewed Greenberg's evidence and found it convincing. Koman and Gumuz, however, are very poorly known, and therefore difficult to classify, but Songhai has been extensively studied and has yet to be convincingly shown to belong. Roger Blench, on the other hand, notes morphological similarities in all branches but Gumuz, which leads him to believe that the family is likely valid but that Gumuz is a language isolate.
Most linguists who accept Nilo-Saharan accept Songhay as well, and posit that it is divergent due to massive influence from the Mande languages. Christopher Ehret attempts to show Songhay is particularly closely related to the Maban branch of Nilo-Saharan. However, both Bender and Blench note several methodological flaws in Ehret's study, and a failure to provide any evidence for his subclassification.
Also problematic are the Kuliak languages, which are spoken by hunter-gatherers and appear to retain a non-Nilo-Saharan core; Blench believes they may have been similar to the Hadza or Dahalo and shifted incompletely to Nilo-Saharan.
Ehret and Dimmendaal (who had originally supported the inclusion) believe the Kadu languages (also called Kadugli or Tumtum) to form a small family of their own. The Ethnologue by SIL, following Anbessa Tefera and Peter Unseth, considers the poorly attested Shabo language to be Nilo-Saharan, but otherwise unclassified due to lack of data. Ehret and Dimmendaal consider it to be a language isolate on current evidence. Proposals have sometimes been made to add Mande (usually classed as Niger-Congo) to Nilo-Saharan, largely due to its many noteworthy similarities with Songhay. However, most linguists believe that the similarities are due to Mande influence on Songhay, as noted above.
Recently, the extinct Meroitic language of ancient Kush has been accepted by linguists such as Rille, Dimmendaal, and Blench as Nilo-Saharan, though others argue for an Afroasiatic affiliation.
Various subclassifications have been proposed. However, each of the proposed internal groups has been rejected by other researchers: Greenberg's Komuz and Chari-Nile by Bender and Blench, Bender's core Nilo-Saharan by Dimmendaal, and Ehret's Sahelian etc. by all of them. What remains are eight (Dimmendaal) to twelve (Bender) families of no consensus arrangement.
According to Joseph Greenberg (The Languages of Africa) as initially modified by Lionel Bender, they are classified into the following branches:
| Nilo-Saharan |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Komuz and Chari-Nile groups were later abandoned by Bender.
By 2000 Bender had abandoned the Chari-Nile and Komuz branches, and added Kadu, and removed Kuliak from Eastern Sudanic. He states that Shabo cannot yet be adequately classified, but may prove to be Nilo-Saharan.
| Nilo-Saharan |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimendaal's exclusion (pending further evidence) of Koman, Gumuz, and Kadu would eliminate Bender's Core Nilo-Saharan. Widespread doubt about Songhai and Blench's suggestion that Kuliak is divergent due to an origin in incomplete language shift would blur the distinction between Bender's periphery and his Satellite-Core[original research?].
In his non-peer reviewed 2001 reconstruction of Nilo-Saharan, circulated in manuscript form since 1984 and first published in 1989, Christopher Ehret classifies the families in a radically different fashion, moving Koman to the periphery, Songhay deep into the family next to Maban, and Berta into East Sudanic:
| Nilo- Saharan |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blench notes that Ehret failed to consider existing scholarship, such as reconstructions of Proto-Central and Proto-Eastern Sudanic, and provided no evidence whatsoever for his classification. It has not been followed by other researchers.
Proposals for the external relationships of Nilo-Saharan typically center on Niger-Congo: Gregersen (1972) grouped the two together to form Kongo-Saharan, whereas Blench (1995) proposed that Niger-Congo may simply be a member of Nilo-Saharan (coordinate with Central Sudanic.) However, such proposals are treated with reserve by most historical linguists.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Kanuri (member of a Muslim people) | |
| Nubian (Nubia or its peoples) | |
| Nilotic (Nile or the Nile Valley) |
| What is a member of a Saharan nomadic tribe? Read answer... | |
| What is an amphibian that lives in the Saharan Desert? Read answer... | |
| Name one Saharan amphibian? Read answer... |
| What is the animals are in Saharan? | |
| Kumusta ang ilog nilo ngayon? | |
| What is the saharan like? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | WordNet. WordNet 1.7.1 Copyright © 2001 by Princeton University. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Nilo-Saharan languages". Read more |
Mentioned in