Answers.com

off-label

 
Dictionary: off-la·bel   (ôf''bəl, ŏf'-)
 
adj.

Of or relating to a drug prescribed to treat a condition for which it has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a word or phrase...
All Community Q&A Reference topics
 
Wikipedia: Off-label use
Top

Off-label use is the practice of prescribing pharmaceuticals for a purpose outside the scope of a drug's approved label, most often concerning the drug's indication. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires numerous clinical trials to prove a drug's safety and efficacy in treating a given disease or condition. If satisfied that the drug is safe and effective, the drug's manufacturer and the FDA agree on specific language describing dosage, route and other information to be included on the drug's label. More detail is included in the drug's package insert.

However, once the FDA approves a drug for prescription use, they do not attempt to regulate the usage of the medicine, and so the physician makes decisions based on her or his best judgment. It is legal in the United States and in many other countries to use drugs off-label, including controlled substances such as opiates, even though it is a common misconception that it is unlawful to do so. Actiq, for example, is commonly prescribed off-label even though it is a Schedule II controlled substance. However, it is unlawful to market, advertise or otherwise promote the off-label use of drugs, including controlled substances.

Off-label use of medications is very common. Up to one-fifth of all drugs are prescribed off-label and amongst psychiatric drugs, off-label use rises to 31% (Radley, et al. 2006).[1] New drugs are often not tested for safety and efficacy specifically in children. Therefore, it is believed that 50-75% of all medications prescribed by pediatricians in the U.S. are for off-label applications.[2]

Some drugs are used more frequently off-label than for their original, FDA-approved indications. A 1991 study by the U.S. General Accounting Office found that one-third of all drug administrations to cancer patients were off-label, and more than half of cancer patients received at least one drug for an off-label indication[citation needed]. Frequently, the standard of care for a particular type or stage of cancer involves the off-label use of one or more drugs. An example is the use of tricyclic antidepressants to treat neuropathic pain. This old class of antidepressants is now rarely used for clinical depression due to side effects, but the tricyclics are often effective for treating pain.

Contents

Law

In the United States, FDA regulations permit physicians and other healthcare practitioners to prescribe approved medications for other than their intended indications. Marketing information for the drug will list one or more indications, that is, illnesses or medical conditions for which the drug has been shown to be both safe and effective. Pharmaceutical companies are not allowed to promote a drug for any other purpose without formal FDA approval.

However, once a drug has been approved for sale for one purpose, physicians are free to prescribe it for any other purpose that in their professional judgment is both safe and effective, and are not limited to official, FDA-approved indications. This off-label prescribing is most commonly done with older, generic medications that have found new uses but have not had the formal (and often costly) applications and studies required by the FDA to formally approve the drug for these new indications. However, there is usually extensive medical literature to support the off-label use.

In 1993, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved gabapentin, marked by Pfizer under the name "Neurontin", only for treatment of seizures. Pfizer subsidiary Warner-Lambert used activities not usually associated with sales promotion, including continuing medical education and research, to promote gabapentin, so that within 5 years the drug was being widely used for the off-label treatment of pain and psychiatric conditions. In 2004, Warner-Lambert admitted to charges that it violated FDA regulations by promoting the drug for pain, psychiatric conditions, migraine, and other unapproved uses. [3] The company paid $430 million to the federal government to settle the case.[4]

Access to pharmaceutical industry documents have revealed marketing strategies used to promote drugs for off-label use. [5] The United States federal government is aggressively pursuing criminal and civil cases against pharmaceutical companies and their employees for promoting off-label uses of prescription drugs.[6] Between 2003 and 2008, U.S. federal prosecutors and state attorneys general brought more than a dozen cases against drug makers for off-label marketing and won more than $6 billion in criminal and civil settlements.[7]

The position of the British General Medical Council on off-label prescribing may be found here.

Veterinary medicine

The veterinarian has a much smaller pharmacopeia available than does the human practitioner. Therefore, drugs are more likely to be used "off-label"—typically, this involves the use of a human medication in an animal, where there is no corresponding medication licenced for that species. This problem is compounded in "exotic" species (such as reptiles and rodents) where there are very few, if any licenced medications. In addition, especially in Europe, equine veterinarians are forced to use many drugs off-label, as the horse is classified as a food-producing animal and many veterinary drugs are labeled specifically not for use in animals intended for human consumption.

Examples of off-label use (and non-use)

See also

References

  1. ^ http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/166/9/1021
  2. ^ http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95985619
  3. ^ Jane E. Henney, MD (15 Aug 2006). "Editorial: Safeguarding Patient Welfare: Who's In Charge?". Annals of Internal Medicine 145 (4): 305–307. PMID 16908923. http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/145/4/305?etoc. Retrieved on 2006-08-14. 
  4. ^ US Department of Justice Press Release: Warner-Lambert to Pay $430 Million to Resolve Criminal & Civil Health Care Liability Relating to Off-Label Promotion, retrieved 14 August 2006
  5. ^ Michael A. Steinman, MD; Lisa A. Bero, PhD; Mary-Margaret Chren, MD; and C. Seth Landefeld, MD (15 Aug 2006). "Narrative Review: The Promotion of Gabapentin: An Analysis of Internal Industry Documents" (abstract). Annals of Internal Medicine 145 (4): 284–293. PMID 16908919. http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/145/4/284. Retrieved on 2006-08-14. 
  6. ^ Erika Kelton, "Sales tactics, whistleblowers and qui tam lawsuits in the pharmaceutical industry"
  7. ^ Chris Adams (February 1, 2009). "Late move on drugs by Bush FDA could be dangerous". McClatchy Newspapers. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/61113.html. 
  8. ^ http://www.joepaduda.com/archives/000875.html
  9. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,,1799772,00.html
  10. ^ http://www.naabt.org/documents/The_Buprenorphine_effect_on_Depression.pdf
  11. ^ Bodkin JA. et al. (1995): "Buprenorphine Treatment of Refractory Depression", Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 15:49-57. PMID 7714228
  12. ^ http://www.leeheymd.com/charts/dep4_1.html
  13. ^ http://idahodur.isu.edu/leaflets/2004/GABAPENTIN%20EDU%20LEAFLET%202004.pdf
  14. ^ http://drugs.nmihi.com/whd/pregnancy.html
  15. ^ http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic643.htm#section~Medication

External references


 
 

 

Copyrights:

Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Off-label use" Read more

 

Mentioned in