oligarchy

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. It needs additional citations for verification. Tagged since March 2011. It may contain wording that merely promotes the subject without imparting verifiable information. Tagged since February 2009. It contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. Tagged since March 2011.

Look up oligarchy in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

Oligarchy (from Greek ὀλιγαρχία (oligarkhía); from ὀλίγος (olígos), meaning "a few", and ἄρχω (archo), meaning "to rule, to govern, to command")^[1][2][3] is a form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small number of people. These people could be distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, corporate, or military control. Such states are often controlled by a few prominent families who pass their influence from one generation to the next.

Throughout history, some oligarchies have been tyrannical, relying on public servitude to exist, although others have been relatively benign. Aristotle pioneered the use of the term as a synonym for rule by the rich, for which the exact term is plutocracy, but oligarchy is not always a rule by wealth, as oligarchs can simply be a privileged group, and do not have to be connected by bloodlines as in a monarchy. Some city-states from ancient Greece were oligarchies.

Examples of oligarchies

Some other examples include the former Soviet Union where only members of the Communist Party were allowed to vote or hold office, Vaishali, the French First Republic government under the Directory, and the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (only the nobility could vote). In the time of the ancient Greeks, Sparta was an oligarchy that clashed with the democratic city-state of Athens, (these two nations eventually clashed in the Peloponnesian war in which Sparta defeated Athens causing the city state to rule much of Greece for some time). A modern example of oligarchy could be seen in South Africa during the twentieth century. Here, the basic characteristics of oligarchy are particularly easy to observe, since the South African form of oligarchy was based on race. After the Second Boer War, a tacit agreement or understanding was reached between English- and Afrikaans-speaking whites. Together, they made up about twenty percent of the population, but this small percentage ruled the vast non-white and mixed-race population. Whites had access to virtually all the educational and trade opportunities, and they proceeded to deny this to the black majority even further than before.

Although this process had been going on since the mid-17th- 18th century, after 1948 it became official government policy and became known worldwide as apartheid. This lasted until the arrival of democracy in South Africa in 1994, punctuated by the transition to a democratically-elected government dominated by the black majority.

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union on 31 December 1991, privately owned Russia-based multinational corporations, including producers of petroleum, natural gas, and metal have become oligarchs. Privatization allowed executives to amass phenomenal wealth and power almost overnight. In May 2004, the Russian edition of Forbes identified 36 of these oligarchs as being worth at least $1 billion.^[4]

A well-known fictional oligarchy is represented by the Party in George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Another emerging oligarchy is the rule of Sri Lanka under the Rajapaksa family. The president, Mahinda Rajapaksa has nepotistically appointed hundreds of his family members into governmental postions. The Rajapaksa brothers are in direct control of the country's most powerful government institutions. A new constitutional amendment by the president has seen the elimination of presidential term limits. Minority tamil uprisings demanding equality has been militarily defeated with tens of thousands of civilians summarily executed after the last war. Dissenters, including journalists, human rights advocates and politicians have been disappeared or forced to flee the country.

Mexico, although the fourteenth largest economy in the world and the second largest in Latin America after Brazil, suffers from severe inequality in income and wealth distribution. This leaves power in the hands of the wealthy minority; large gaps remain between the lower and upper classes, and as few as 10% of the population are responsible for 40% of the national income.

Arguably North Korea is an oligarchy because the power descends from one family to another.

Modern democracy as oligarchy

This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2010)

Robert Michels believed that any political system eventually evolves into an oligarchy. He called this the iron law of oligarchy. According to this school of thought, modern democracies should be considered as oligarchies. In these systems, actual differences between viable political rivals are small, the oligarchic elite impose strict limits on what constitutes an acceptable and respectable political position, and politicians' careers depend heavily on unelected economic and media elites. Thus the popular phrase: there is only one political party, the incumbent party.

Corporate Oligarchy (Corporatocracy)

Corporate oligarchy is a form of power, governmental or operational, where such power effectively rests with a small, elite group of inside individuals, sometimes from a small group of educational institutions, or influential economic entities or devices, such as banks, commercial entities that act in complicity with, or at the whim of the oligarchy, often with little or no regard for constitutionally protected prerogative. Monopolies are sometimes granted to state-controlled entities, such as the Royal Charter granted to the East India Company, or privileged bargaining rights to unions (labor monopolies) with very partisan political interests.

Athenian techniques to prevent the rise of oligarchy

Especially during the Fourth Century BC, after the restoration of democracy from oligarchical coups, the Athenians used the drawing of lots for selecting government officers in order to counteract what the Athenians acutely saw as a tendency toward oligarchy in government if a professional governing class were allowed to use their skills for their own benefit.^[5] They drew lots from large groups of adult volunteers as a selection technique for civil servants performing judicial, executive, and administrative functions (archai, boulē, and hēliastai).^[6] They even used lots for very important posts, such as judges and jurors in the political courts (nomothetai), which had the power to overrule the Assembly.^[7]

See also

Government terms:

• Aristocracy
• Elitism
• Crony capitalism
• Democracy
• Dictatorship
• Form of government
• Kleptocracy
• Meritocracy
• Netocracy
• Oligopoly
• Plutocracy
• Political family
• Theocracy
• Timocracy
• Power behind the throne
• Russian oligarchs
• Fascism
• Anarchism

Relevant authors:

• Vilfredo Pareto
• Gaetano Mosca
• Thomas R. Dye
• Robert Michels
• Plato
• Webster Tarpley

References

External links

• Online Text: Leonard Whibley, Greek Oligarchies: Their Character and Organisation (1869), still the only full-scale treatment of oligarchy in Classical Greece.
• M Hollingsworth and S Lansley, Londongrad, From Russia With Cash, 2009, 4th Estate