Open relationship

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Wikipedia on Answers.com:

Open relationship

Top
The Purple Mobius symbol for polyamory and non-monogamy.

An open relationship is an interpersonal relationship in which the parties want to be together but agree to a form of a non-monogamous relationship.[1] This means that they agree that a romantic or sexual relationship with another person is accepted, permitted, or tolerated. Every open relationship is different because what exactly the relationship entails is defined by the wishes and desires of the parties involved.[2] Some may only allow flirting, whereas others may permit dates, kissing, or sexual acts.[2] By combining most common definitions, the overarching theme is that an open relationship is when the parties involved have two or more romantic or sexual relationships occurring at the same time either as a short term, such as dating, or long term, such as open marriage.[3] Because of an open relationship’s structure, it is flexible enough to allow constant change. With this in mind, the relationship between one and his/her partner is always being renegotiated so that the relationship may grow.[1]

Contents

Open relationships today

Today, the term open relationship may also be used synonymously with open marriage.[1] Both terms encompass the basic foundation of the concepts, which are honesty and each partner having their partner's permission and full awareness to share intimacy with other people outside of their relationship.[1][2]

Open relationships are sometimes referred to as intimate friendships. Intimate friendship is defined as a traditional friendship where sexual contact and intimacy is considered appropriate.[4] For persons in open relationships sex may be more pleasing and they may engage in it more frequently than the average couple.[4]

There are several different styles of open relationships. These include:

  • Multi-partner relationships, between three or more partners where a sexual relationship does not occur between all of the parties involved[1]
  • Hybrid relationships, when one partner is non-monogamous and the other is monogamous[1]

To a large degree, open relationships are a generalization of the concept of a relationship beyond monogamous relationships.[1]

Open relationships may be further classifed into open groups and closed groups. In open groups, multiple partners may change at any time and tend to contain three types of participants: core members, associated members, and affiliated members. Core members are those participants who have been sexually intimate with several others; associated members are those who are involved sexually with at least two members of the group, and affiliated members, are those people who believe in a similar philosophy accepted by others and are seen as members of the group even though they are only involved with their mate, the core member. In a closed group, all participants are core members.[5]

While the concept of an open relationship has been recognized since the 1970s,[citation needed] formal examinations of the concept have been scarce.

Many[who?] believe that open relationships occur more frequently in certain demographics, such as the young rather than the old in America, including more specifically, college-educated, middle-class, rather than noncollege, working-class, or people of certain ethnic and/or other racial minorities.[6] Open relationships may also be more common among females rather than males, especially those in the same categories, such as college-educated, middle-class, white, younger Americans.[6] This may be because women have more to gain by stressing this idea of equal rights, and that the women’s rights movement supports the idea of open relationships.[6] Although not all of these have yet been proven within studies, one idea that has been supported is that those living further away from parental guidance are more likely to partake in open relationships.[6]

Surveys and research[further explanation needed] have shown that male students who either cohabit or live in a communal group are more likely to become involved in open relationships rather than females,[6] and are still more interested in the concept than females even if not participating in open relationships.[6]

Many couples within open relationships are dual-career, meaning that both primary partners have a stable job and/or a career.[4] Both men and women in these, especially in closed groups, are also more likely to be in managerial jobs.[5] Most also are either childfree, or post child-rearing.[4]

Reasons for entering an open relationship

An open relationship may form for various reasons. These include

  • a difference emerging between two people in a relationship
  • one partner realizing that they are unable to fulfill the other's needs[1]
  • varying sex drive between partners [1]
  • one or both partners desiring more freedom, companionship, intellectual variety, or a variety of sexual partners[5]
  • a need for challenge: some people feel that their relationship is inadequate unless they are being challenged. Open relationships may create a sense of jealousy, attachment, or possessiveness, all of which are challenges for a relationship to work through.[1] These emotions can also lead to greater self-awareness which may be seen as satisfying to those in open relationships.[1]
  • the enjoyment of new relationship energy, the state of heightened emotional and sexual receptivity and excitement experienced during the formation of a new relationship[1]
  • being able to meet other couples and individuals with a similar outlook with whom the participants can connect with on an intellectual and emotional level[4]
  • personal issues, using sex with different people as a form of distraction from certain problems (having troubles in a dysfunctional family, lacking friends, having been cheated on and trying to compensate for it, working in a stressful environment) or as a way of proving oneself that he/she is sexually attractive
  • being in a relationship of convenience, that is, one that is not based on mutual feeling of love towards each other (anymore), but rather on economic or social factors

Reasons for avoiding an open relationship

Many couples consider open relationships, but choose not to follow through with the idea. If a person attempts to approach their committed monogamous partner about starting an open relationship, the monogamous partner may convince or force them to either stay monogamous or pursue a new partner.[1] There may also be concern that when beginning an open relationship, a partner may become only concerned in their personal development and pay less attention to their partner.[2]

Cultural pressure may also dissuade switching to an open relationship. There is a commonly-held societal stereotype that those involved in open relationships are less committed or mature than those who are in monogamous relationships; and films, media, and self-help books present the message that to desire more than one partner means not having a "true" relationship. Desiring an open relationship is also often claimed to be a phase that a person is passing through before being ready to "settle down".[1]

Hybrid monogamous/non-monogamous relationships are often misunderstood in predominantly monogamous society. For example, the non-monogamous partner can face criticism that they would not be participating in an open relationship if they truly loved the monogamous partner.[1]

Positives and negatives to open relationships

Positives

Although the beginning of an open relationship may seem that the current relationship may end, just because the relationship is entering this with the possibility of new partners does not mean that the current relationship will no longer exist; the relationship simply changes.[2] With this comes freedom. Freedom is one aspect of an open relationship in which people view as one an important positive contribution. These people view freedom as important because whether or not they choose to act on any feelings they may be experiencing towards another, they still have that opportunity.[1] This freedom also gives those in an open relationship the ability to create a different relationship, challenge the stereotypes and explore themselves.[1] Freedom gives those in an open relationship the ability to stray from the typical limits that society places upon a monogamous relationship.[1] The idea of freedom can also be looked at from an additional angle. It can be seen as the ability to make each relationship into whatever the partners decide. Each can be unique and/or different; some may be more important, while others may be deemed as less important, thus dedicating a smaller amount of time, energy, and commitment to it.[1] This also helps with the New Relationship Energy that many couples experience. The ability to have this freedom to experience the NRE without ending an existing relationship gives those in an open relationship the chance to have multiple partners without worrying about an abrupt ending.[1]

Another positive to an open relationship is the sheer fact of having multiple partners. Many people tend to refer to a partner as more than a partner; oftentimes the partner becomes the other’s best friend.[1] This shows that by having an important, intimate relationship with multiple people, one can gain multiple best friends. Having multiple partners also gives a partner the ability to express himself/herself in more ways that fulfill their needs; thus, this leads to a greater amount of satisfaction in a partner’s relationships.[1] By having multiple partners, it makes it easier to not only deal with the emotional burdens but also the financial burdens. If multiple partners are living together, they can divide the expenses and chores of the household more evenly, reducing stress from each other.[1] Another stress that having multiple partners eliminates is the perceptions that people form of each other. When one partner tells another about something that bothers him/her about the other’s personality, it can seem like a simple opinion, but if more than one partner states the same thing, the other is more likely to change, seeing that his/her actions causes stress on the other partners.[1]

Psychological testing has been done and has shown that the level of dysfunctionality, narcissism, neuroticism, pathology, and psychiatry is the same regardless of whether the people in the relationship are in a monogamous relationship or a non-monogamous relationship.[1] Another study had shown that individuals in open relationships tend to rate things as more important than those in monogamous relationships due to their independent and individualistic state of mind.[1] Socially, it has also been proven that many in open relationships tend to be able to communicate more strongly with others and have a better sense of self.[1]

Compersion

Compersion plays a crucial role in open relationships and polyamorous relationships. It is the act of taking joy in a partner’s pleasure and/or happiness from that partner’s experience with an additional partner.[1] For some, the act of compersion is thought of as the inverse of jealousy or the solution to jealousy.[1] Although not everyone is built with this ability, for some it can be learned and may take practice and patience.[1] It is believed that the first step to successfully achieving compersion is being able to let go of negative feelings such as insecurities, fears, or possessiveness over your partner.[1] Compersion is said to also be split into categories, one of which is erotic compersion. This is said to be reached once a partner enjoys or gets turned on by watching his/her counterpart have sex with someone else. It is common for many non-monogamous people to become aroused at the sight of a partner with someone else.[1]

Negatives

One large negative of creating an open relationship is jealousy. Jealousy is commonly present in monogamous relationships, placing another partner or more into the relationship can help increase this.[2] Results of some studies have suggested that jealousy is the problem in open relationships because the actual involvement of a third party is seen as a trigger.[7] Jealousy can be defined as a combination of feelings that develop from negative thoughts that are sometimes associated with fears; they can be anything from weak to strong, violent, and even simply, unpleasant.[2] However, jealousy is not uncommon and is a normal reaction to be experienced.[2] In Constantine and Constantine's study, they found that 80% of participants in open relationships have experienced jealousy at one point or another. This has also been seen in correlation with various other studies and has also been seen to decrease over time.[7] This also results in about one-fifth of those who practice open relationships are free from this jealousy.[7] Also paralleling with the discussion of jealousy are the ways that jealousy is expressed. It is common for those who experience jealousy to express it in destructive, aggressive ways.[7] These can also be emotional devastation, anger, self-punishment, retaliation, and a simply the need for confrontation and/or social support.[8] Although jealousy can be experienced by all partners and sexes involved, there tends to be a difference in the way it is expressed by the different sexes, both males and females.[8] Men are more likely to try to deny their feelings of jealousy, whereas women are more likely to acknowledge them. As being more violent and expressing jealousy through the use of rage is more commonly found among men, and they are more apt to focus on the details, women are more likely to internalize their jealousy and focus on the emotional aspects of her partner's and the third party's relationship.[8] Men will also look for blame among others whereas women look to blame themselves.[8] These women are likely to see themselves as the cause of their jealousy thinking that through some personal change such as changing their attitude, feelings, physical appearance, etc., they could avoid jealousy.[8] Men, on the other hand, are more apt to see a connection with their jealousy and the actual situation.[8] The male is also more likely to hide his feelings whether they are just jealousy or anger, depression, insecurities, etc.[8] Although this jealousy is a negative to open relationships, Clanton and Smith described three different levels of jealousy management: the personal level, the relational level, and the situational level.[8] Here, the personal level is the stage where the individual who is experiencing the jealousy must decide which role he/she plays in the creation of the jealousy. the second level, the relational level, occurs when the partner reassures his/her partner that the third party is not a threat to the primary relationship. This leads into the final level, the situational level, where both the partners of the primary relationship and the third party all share the burden of being the cause of jealousy.[8]

On the other hand, fear, another negative to an open relationship, is something that one should focus more intently upon. Because fear is a natural instinct to help us survive, we must recognize when it is alerting us to a potential threat.[2] These two emotions can develop from a lack of trust for one’s partner, a lack of communication, and a feeling of guilt.[1] The more people involved in a relationship, the harder it becomes to communicate among each other.[1] Along the lines of communication, although those who enter open relationships may attempt to avoid any issues that may occur in the future, obstacles that were never discussed are bound to appear. This may lead to other negatives such as jealousy, fear, or resentment.[1] An additional reason for why these feelings appear is because an open relationship is not insusceptible to cheating.[1] Even though those in open relationships may develop rules and guidelines, by breaking those agreements, the relationship is at the equivalent to a partner cheating. This is also similar to the transition as a whole from a monogamous to a non-monogamous relationship. Just the logistics themselves can be difficult to deal with, especially if you reside together, split finances, own property, or even parent children.[1]

Another negative associated with open relationships is that many community resources are developed for those who are in a monogamous relationship, and/or a relationship which people classify as a primary relationship.[1] Community also plays additional roles in an open relationship. If those who are partaking in an open relationship are not honest and forthright with those in their community, people may assume that the partners involved are cheating, which can affect not only how people perceive those involved, but also how they treat those involved.[1] If a couple in an open relationship is filing for divorce, custody dispute, or multiple other legal proceedings, the fact of the individual(s) can be used against him/her.[1] Other federal laws do not protect individuals on the basis of their marital status, meaning that someone like a landlord can choose to not rent to you due to the fact that you are in an alternative relationship. Similarly, depending on the state that you reside in, it may choose to not recognize a relationship such as an open relationship.[1] The prejudice about open relationships can also be seen in adoption. Only two adults can adopt a child; thus, if those in an open relationship choose to adopt, only two partners will have equal parental rights and the right to make important decisions for the child.[1]

Families and open relationships

Although it is not dominant in society to see those in an open relationship with families, it is something that does exist and is increasing in popularity. These are generally referred to as some variant form of the traditional family.[9] This has been a more common change in our society because it is resulting from changes in societal structures, values, attitudes, beliefs, and activities.[9] The growing trend in open relationships also helps suggest that these basic societal structures are changing, which in return for a family to be successful it must reexamine itself, its purpose, and activities.[9] There are four common different forms, one of which is where a common household is composed usually of three or more monogamous couples who have the ability to use each other for social interactions and sharing resources such as common facilities.[9] It is also not unheard of to see a "family" as a larger group, which consist anywhere from 4 to 50 members that classify themselves as a family. These groups are also sometimes referred to as tribes or networks and are the equivalent to the modern day extended family.[1] Another family form that can be seen is similar to the first type listed, but rather than the couples being monogamous with each other, they begin to swap partners, creating a closed open relationship without any children.[9] The fourth type of untraditional family is an open marriage similar to the previous one, but it only involves less than six members. Here, this family also does not have children, but a family in this aspect refers to those who are married. This form most commonly consists of two-family monogamous couples and sometimes only three parties involved.[9] Although these variant forms of the family can be seen as a threat to the traditional family, there is also a chance that by learning these different and new ways to communicate effectively and efficiently that this may aid in influencing the traditional marriages in specific ways to change and improve.[9]

When looking at a family that is based on an open relationship, it is also common to see anywhere from ex-lovers, to partners’ partners, and biological children to be included.[1] With this in mind one can see that this adds a new dimension to the stereotypical family and is slightly changing the definition of family. Although some in modern day seem to disagree with those involved in open relationships as being able to classify themselves as a family, there are some positive dimensions that an open relationship brings to the family. In a family with more than one adult and a child or children, the more hands that are there, the less stress is placed on the parents. This alleviates some of the work burden because there are now more people to help with changing diapers, helping out with homework, running the children to various extra-curricular activities, helping out with the chores and the domestic realm of the living situation, etc.[1] Despite that variant families have their benefits, specifically within the home, it is also important that many times these groups of people are denied medical, welfare, or social work services by either the law, local interpretations of the law, or local authorities.[8]

One dilemma that those involved in an open relationship may discover is the proper time to explain to a child the type of relationship that the parties involved have. If the parties involved avoid the topic, it is possible that the child will form preconceived notions about the relationship, such as the child recognizes that it is an untraditional relationship and perhaps it is not accepted in society, thus proving to the child that it is a bad thing to be in a form of open relationship.[1] Studies done on the topic have shown that in the majority of cases, the family structure barely affects how the child is raised and how the child develops. The factor that most affects the child is the quality of the familial structure, including things such as the interactions of parental units with the child, and the interaction of parental units with each other.[1] It is also important for child to be told about their parents’ relationship(s) because it helps them to relax and understand how the parents’ relationships will affect the child and understand how the child fits into the picture. A study done by Watson and Watson in 1982 discovered that although 72 percent of the polyamorous respondents wanted to discuss their relationship lifestyle with their children, only 21 percent had actually followed through with it.[1]

Successful open relationships

The most successful relationships have been those that take longer to establish. By taking the time to develop a clear idea of what both partners want out of the openness of a relationship, it allows the parties involve to self-reflect, process the emotions, and deal with possible conflicts.[1] Oftentimes, similarities are found within age, professional interests, religious belief (or lack there of), and an interest in finding alternative relationships.[8] Using discussion as the base to start an open relationship allows for all of the parties to find ways to cope with the change from monogamy to non-monogamy, which creates a healthy and positive relationship.[1] Some people resort to blogging, counseling, keeping a journal, and other groups to help discuss any hesitations and emotions that they may be feeling at any time, whether prior to the open relationship’s beginning, or during the relationship.[1] This communication, as all communication in the relationship, should include honest and thoughtful self-assessment, respect, and compassionate listening and should be never ending.[1] Although a partner may not agree with you, by always searching for a resolution which both parties can agree upon, helps the relationship continue to be strong and forth going.[1] Negotiating the details of the open relationship is also imperative throughout the communication process. When negotiating the details, the goal that should be satisfied to create a successful open relationship, should be that nothing is left unsaid and implied.[1] The negotiation should begin from a neutral place and with both parties in a stable place of mind.[1] Making decisions when partners are in a fight is not the ideal time for negotiating because not all parties involved are in a clear state of mind.[1] When beginning to negotiate both parties involved must remember to approach it with an open mind and heart and continue to see everything with honesty and trust that the partner had good intentions.[1] Many topics that are commonly found in negotiations between couples include honesty, the level of maintenance, trust, time-management,appropriate and inappropriate partners and actions, and the home and any rules that might pertain to what is off-limits.[8]

Other tools that couples utilize in the negotiation process include veto power, prior permission, and interaction between partners.[1] Here, veto power occurs when the original partner has the potential to say no to a new partner in which the decision is respected and followed through.[1] This helps to reassure each partner in the relationship that his/her opinion is important and matters.[1] Although veto power can be a useful tool in negotiation, a successful negotiation and open relationship can still occur without it. Some reject veto power because they believe it limits their partner from experiencing a new relationship and limits their freedom.[1] Regardless of whether veto power is established in a relationship, it still can be abused based on if a partner rejects his/her other’s choice in an additional partner.[1]

Another crucial aspect to communication in an open relationship is honesty. Being honest with a partner enables one to reassure his/her partner, resulting in a stronger relationship.[1] Radical Honesty is a type of honesty which has been proven to work with most open relationships. When using Radical Honesty, a partner must tell the other everything and every detail, even if the other might react in a negative manner. Some who use Radical Honesty believe it as a necessary aspect for an open relationship to be successful.[1] Although honesty works both ways in relationships, it is important to be conscious of not attacking a partner or letting him/her feel left out.[1] It is also important to discuss whether the partners in the open relationship wish to know the details, and whether they wish to know just the basics or all of the details.[1] For some, knowing all of the details helps evade the jealousy factor, but for others it only contributes to his/her jealousy. The concept of honesty also aids with the idea of trust. Trust can be the solution to jealousy, competitiveness, possessiveness, and fear, but it takes time to create this with a partner.[1] When a partner trusts their partner, it can help to relieve any anxiety that the other may experience.[1]

Also dealing with communication is the discussion of boundaries. In order for an open relationship to be successful, it helps for boundaries to be discussed. The three primary types of boundaries are physical, which is along the lines of not touching someone without permission being given; sexual boundaries; and emotional boundaries, which is avoiding the discussion of specific emotions.[1] To determine these boundaries with anyone, they should first be expressed with a partner. These help to clarify everything ranging from who, what, where, and when.[1] This also brings up the concept of consent. If there is no consent, it is important to never pressure the partner into it, and is important to realize that the relationship will not be successful without it.[1] For instance, it is important for the boundaries of who meaning both geographically and interpersonally (such as in the community, friends, family, etc.) can be additional partners, what types of physical limits are placed on that relationships (such as kissing, dating, or other sexual activities), and whether relations will take place in a separate bedroom or playroom.[1] Boundaries help to set out rules; rules help guide partners as to what is acceptable and what is not. They also help people to feel safe and that they are just as important in the open relationship as their partners.[1] Rules should not be enacted unless all parties have agreed upon them. These agreements help support that the parties involved and are reassuring them about the boundaries and the open relationship as a whole.[1] Although there is no formal written legally binding contracts in which these agreements are found, some couples agree to create a relationship contract. These can be useful in not only negotiating, but also clearly articulating the needs, wants, limits, expectations, and commitments that is expected of the parties involved.[1] This can help strengthen bonds between a couple and help strengthen trust. Although this aids in many successful relationships and limits miscommunication, it does not prevent misunderstandings or hurtful actions. It does however help to limit these.[1]

Other aspects of open relationships that aid in the success include time management. Even though it is common to have a serious commitment with one partner, it is still important to negotiate the time spent between all partners is important.[1] Some find that if they cannot evenly distribute their time that they forego a partner. With many people, it is common to see the desire to give an unlimited amount of love, energy and emotion to others, but the limited amount of time in a day limits the actual time spent with each partner.[1] This is also not aided by other obligations that people experience daily such as work, school, children, and traveling time.[1] As this is seen, one of the most successful techniques to managing time and creating a successful open relationship is to be realistic and knowing what aspects of life take precedent.[1] Generally people who are good at open relationships have mastered this concept of time management.[1] When a partner is feeling overwhelmed or overburdened, the ideal reaction is to communicate it to all parties involved.[1] However, this can become confused with the argument of quantity over quality, making time management a confusing concept. A successful open relationship is built off of the quality of interaction between partners, not just the amount of time.[1]

Time management can also be related to equity theory. Equity theory stresses the importance of fairness in relationships.[8] Those relationships where equity can be seen allow the parties involved to feel as if they are being treated fairly regardless of whether they are being treated equally.[8] This becomes an important concept because it teaches the importance of how each relationship and each person in an open relationship has a different role. The secondary relationships should be considered equitable when the amount of time and energy devoted to the parties revolved is returned to the original party.[8] This will ensure a direct parallel relationship. When considering equity theory, maintaining harmony among all parties and avoiding conflict is crucial for success. Thus, despite the specific contribution, everyone involved should receive equally.[8] If equality is not reached than the relationship becomes unsuccessful because it is likely for the person who feels that he/she has been treated unfairly to experience jealousy or become unhappy and depressed with the relationship and his/her role in the relationship.[8]

One of the most significant factors that aids a relationship in being successful is that it is about making the relationship fit the needs of all parties involved.[1] No two open relationships will be the same, and the relationship will change due to the current circumstances at each specific moment. The style of the open relationship should mirror the parties involved values, goals, desires, needs and philosophies.[1]

Statistics

1983 study by Philip Blumstein and Pepper Schwartz:[1]

  • 15 percent of married couples in a sample of 3,574 couples, had “an understanding that allows non-monogamy under some circumstances”
  • 28 percent of cohabitating couples had “an understanding that allows non-monogamy under some circumstances”
  • 29 percent of lesbian couples had “an understanding that allows non-monogamy under some circumstances”
  • 65 percent of gay male couples had “an understanding that allows non-monogamy under some circumstances”

Janus report in 1993:[1]

  • Sample of 1,800 people
  • 21 percent said they participated in open marriage

Oprah.com survey in 2007:[1]

  • Surveyed over 14,000 people
  • 21 percent stated they were in an open marriage

Only 5% of marriages have "open marriage" agreements[10]

About half of the committed male couple relationships are "open" relationships which gives them the ability to have sexual relations without affection with others[11]

The majority (72%) of those in open relationships are in a first marriage, which on average, has lasted 11 years, where it has been considered "opened" for three of those years [8]

Types of open relationships

Polyfidelity

This term was coined by the Keristans and directly translates to mean faithful to many partners. It is used to describe relationships that uses an evenly distributed rotating sleeping schedule that determined who sleeps together when. In this type of relationship, no one sleeps with anyone outside of those originally involved in the group.[1] The modern make up of a polyfidelitous group consists of three or more partners but rarely exceeds six partners.[1] These groups tend to live together, and commonly do the actions of a typical family such as raise children, share resources, make important decisions together, etc.[1] Although a group is often closed, meaning that no outsiders are allowed to enter, for those groups that are open, negotiations on boundaries and other important topics are discussed and agreed upon by everyone.[1] Some of the most common reasons for people choosing polyfidelity include wanting multiple intimate and meaningful relationships, and having several partners in a committed group.[1]

Swinging

Swinging occurs when both partners in a committed relationship become non-monogamous as a couple and agree for both partners to involve themselves sexually with other couples as a social activity.[2] Most swingers attend swinging clubs to aid them in becoming sexually stimulated.[1] Although this is the case, some also attend just for the fun social atmosphere and put less emphasis on the sexual component.[1] Swinging became a popular topic of non-monogamy in 1972 when many books were written on the topic, one of the most famous being ‘’Open Marriage: A New Life Style for Couples.’’[1] This book was based on interviews of people’s opinions and philosophies and sold over 1.5 million copies.[1] Swinging in the United States, was the first documented form of non-monogamy for both bisexual individuals and heterosexual individuals.[1] Along with the written definition of swinging, many swingers consider themselves emotionally monogamous, meaning that the sexual relationships with others outside of their primary relationship is seen as casual, and something more recreational.[1] Although this is the case, swingers also worry about becoming too emotionally involved with others, presenting a threat to their primary relationship.[2] Like all open relationships and polyamorous relationships, there are multiple types of swinging. Soft swinging, involves two couples having sex in the same room with their respective spouse/partner. In this type of swinging, the couples involved have no intention of switching partners, rather they watch each other.[1] Another style of swinging is swinging with one. This involves couples playing together with one other person, often times another woman.[1] Swinging with another couple and swinging with a group are other alternative styles of swinging. These are similar to each other in the fact that couples are having sex with another couple’s partners.[1]

Polyamory

While “open relationship” is sometimes used as a synonym for “polyamory” or “polyamorous relationship,” these terms are generally differentiated. The “open” in “open relationship” usually refers to the sexual aspect of a non-closed relationship, whereas “polyamory” refers to the extension of a relationship by allowing bonds to form (which may be sexual or otherwise) as additional long term relationships. Polyamory also translates into many loves and refers to the ability to love more than a single person simultaneously.[2] One of the key differences generally associated between polyamory and open relationships is that poly relationships usually involve emotions as well with sex, versus the open relationship, which tends to revolve around the physical sexual connection.[1] However, there is enough overlap between the two concepts (open relationships and polyamory) that “open relationship” is sometimes used as a catch-all substitute when speaking to people who may not be familiar with polyamory. This term, along with the term “friends with benefits” are fairly newly developed and coined terms that have come about within the past few decades.[2] Although the exact date of when the term polyamory came about is unknown, some sources have been able to place its roots back to the 1960s.[1] It is also said that before the term was officially coined that the basic concepts revolved around consensual, responsible non-monogamous relationships.[1] Although this term is most commonly associated with sex outside of a monogamous relationship, it may also include friendships, companionship, support, love, camaraderie, intimacy, connection, and commitment.[1] Polyamorous is also similar to open relationships because there are many different ways partake in polyamory. It also involves concepts such as multilateral marriages, which according to the Constantines is a relationship that consists of three or more partners who all consider to be married to each other and refer to their partners as cowife and cohusband.[1] Multilateral marriages preceded the ideas of polyfidelity, which is a specific type of polyamory.

See also


Further reading

External links

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz ca cb cc cd ce cf cg ch ci cj ck cl cm cn co cp cq cr cs ct cu cv cw cx cy cz da db dc Tristan Taormino (1 May 2008). Opening up: a guide to creating and sustaining open relationships. Cleis Press. pp. 13–. ISBN 978-1-57344-295-4. http://books.google.com/books?id=XZyo3x1wscMC&pg=PR13. Retrieved 20 November 2011. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Leonie Linssen; Stephan Wik (1 August 2010). Love Unlimited: The Joys and Challenges of Open Relationships. Findhorn Press. pp. 11–. ISBN 978-1-84409-183-6. http://books.google.com/books?id=gq1s3zxqPHUC&pg=PA11. Retrieved 20 November 2011. 
  3. ^ Boston Women's Health Book Collective (19 April 2005). Our bodies, ourselves: a new edition for a new era. Simon and Schuster. pp. 165–. ISBN 978-0-7432-5611-7. http://books.google.com/books?id=xlx94hWpe6YC&pg=PA165. Retrieved 25 November 2011. 
  4. ^ a b c d e Ramey, James W. (July/August 1977). "The Sexual Bond: Alternative Life Styles". Society 14 (5): 43–47. doi:10.1007/BF02700827. 
  5. ^ a b c Ramey, James W. (October 1975). "Intimate Groups and Networks: Frequent Consequence of Sexually Open Marriage". The Family Coordinator 24 (4): 515–530. http://www.jstor.org/stable/583035. 
  6. ^ a b c d e f Hollander, Elaine K.; Howard M. Vollmer (1). "Attitudes Toward "Open Marriage" Among College Students as Influenced by Place of Residence". Youth and Society 6 (3). http://yas.sagepub.com/content/6/1/3. 
  7. ^ a b c d Buunk, Bram (August 1981). "Jealousy in Sexually Open Marriages". JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND ECONOMIC ISSUES 4 (3): 357–371. doi:10.1007/BF01257944. 
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Watson, Mary Ann (February 1981). "Sexually Open Marriage: Three Perspectives". Alternative Lifestyles 4 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF01082086. 
  9. ^ a b c d e f g Cogswell, Betty E.; Marvin B. Sussman (October 1972). "Changing Family and Marriage Forms: Complications for Human Service Systems". The Family Coordinator 21 (4): 505–516. http://www.jstor.org/stable/5802694. 
  10. ^ Shere Hite (1 January 1989). The Hite report: women and love : a cultural revolution in progress. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-010492-9. http://books.google.com/books?id=hLbwuJReX7oC. Retrieved 20 November 2011. [page needed]
  11. ^ Wayne Weiten; Dana S. Dunn; Elizabeth Yost Hammer (1 January 2011). Psychology Applied to Modern Life: Adjustment in the 21st Century. Cengage Learning. p. 326. ISBN 978-1-111-18663-0. http://books.google.com/books?id=CGu96TeAZo0C. Retrieved 20 November 2011. [page needed]

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

Copyrights:

Mentioned in

The Blood Oranges (1997 Drama Film)
Les Nanas (1985 Comedy Film)
The Bird Names (Rock Band, 2000s)