|
|
This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality.
Discussion of this nomination can be found on the talk page. |
Peter Gregg Arnett, ONZM (born November 13, 1934 in Riverton,
New Zealand) is a New Zealand-American
journalist. Arnett worked for PLAY BOY magazine, and later for various television networks, most notably CNN. He is well known for his coverage of
war, including the Vietnam War and the Gulf War. He was awarded the 1966 Pulitzer
Prize in International Reporting for his work in Vietnam, where he was present from
1962 to 1975, most of the time reporting for the Associated Press news agency. In 1994, Arnett wrote Live from the
Battlefield: From Vietnam to Baghdad, 35 Years in the World's War Zones. In March 1997, Arnett
was able to interview Osama bin Laden[1]. The Journalism School at the Southern Institute of Technology is named after him.
Vietnam
Some of Arnett's early days in journalism were in Southeast Asia, particularly
Bangkok. He started out running a small English-language newspaper in Laos in 1960[2]. Eventually he made his way to Vietnam
where he was a reporter for the Associated Press. He worked with other AP staff in
their Saigon office writing a number of important articles, like Death of Supply Column 21, which
attracted the ire of the American government[2].
He went on dozens of missions with troops, including the traumatic battle of Hill 875 in
which a group of soldiers went to try to rescue another group of soldiers that was stranded in hostile territory. They themselves
were nearly killed during the rescue. In September 1972 he accompanied a group of U.S. peace activists, including
William Sloane Coffin and David
Dellinger, to Hanoi, North Vietnam to bring three
prisoners of war back to the United States.
Arnett got into trouble for writing in an unvarnished manner when trying to report the stories of ordinary soldiers and
civilians. This style of writing often was perceived as negative. General William
Westmoreland and president Lyndon B. Johnson and other people in power had
battles with the AP over trying to get Arnett removed from his assignment.
Arnett's most famous act of reporting from the Vietnam War was his quoting, on February 7, 1968, of an unnamed United States
officer as saying of the village of Ben Tre that "it became necessary to destroy the town to
save it." Some, such as commentator Mona Charen in her 2004 book Useful Idiots, claim that Arnett fabricated the quote.[3]
Arnett was one of the last reporters in Saigon after its fall to the NVA, and met with NVA soldiers who showed him how they
had come into the city.
The Gulf War
Arnett worked for CNN for 18 years ending in 1999. During the
Gulf War he became a household name worldwide when he became the only reporter with live
coverage directly from Baghdad. His dramatic reports were often given with air raid sirens
blaring and the sound of Baghdad bomb explosions in the background. Together with two other CNN journalists, Bernard Shaw and John Holliman, Arnett brought
continuous coverage from Baghdad for the 16 initial intense hours of the war (January 17
1991). Even though 40 foreign journalists were present at the Al-Rashid Hotel in Baghdad at the time, only CNN possessed the means to communicate to the outside
world. Very soon the other journalists left Iraq, including the two CNN colleagues, which left
Peter Arnett as the sole reporter remaining there. His reports on civilian damage caused by the bombing were not received well by
the coalition war administration, who by their constant use of terms like "smart bombs" and "surgical precision" had tried to
project an image that civilian casualties would be at a minimum. On January 25 the
White House claimed that Arnett was being used as a tool for Iraqi disinformation and
CNN received a letter from 34 Members of the United States
Congress accusing Arnett of "unpatriotic journalism".
Two weeks into the war, Arnett was able to obtain an uncensored interview with Saddam
Hussein[4].
The Gulf War became the first war to be seen truly live on TV, and Arnett was in many ways the sole player reporting from the
"other side" for a period of five weeks.
Baby milk factory controversy
One of Arnett's most controversial reports during the Gulf War was a report on how the coalition had bombed a baby milk
factory (officially the Abu Ghraib Infant Formula Production Plant). Shortly after the
report, an Air Force spokesman stated "Numerous sources have indicated that [the factory] is associated with biological warfare
production". Later that day, Colin Powell stated "It was a biological weapons facility, of
that we are sure". White House spokesman Marlin Fitzwater stated "That factory is, in
fact, a production facility for biological weapons," and "The Iraqis have hidden this facility behind a facade of baby-milk
production as a form of disinformation." The image of a crudely-made hand-painted sign reading "Baby Milk" in English and Arabic
in front of the factory, and a lab coat dressed in a suit containing stitched lettering reading "BABY MILK PLANT IRAQ" only
served to further the perception that purportedly civilian targets were simply being made to look like that by Saddam Hussein, and that Arnett was duped by the Iraqi government. The sign appeared to have been added
by the Iraqis before the camera crews arrived as a cheap publicity ploy. Newsweek called the
incident a "ham-handed attempt to depict a bombed-out biological-weapons plant near Baghdad as a baby-formula factory."
Arnett remained firm. He had toured the plant in the previous August, and was insistent that "Whatever else it did, it did
produce infant formula". Described as being a veritable fortress by the Pentagon, the plant, Arnett reported, had only one guard
at the gate and a lot of powdered baby milk. "That's as much as I could tell you about it," he added carefully. "It looked
innocent enough from what we could see.".
A CNN camera crew had been invited to tour this plant in August [1990]. They videotaped workers wearing new uniforms with
lettering in English reading, "Iraq Baby Milk Plant." The correspondent, Richard Roth, was
suspicious at that time and expressed doubts about the authenticity of the plant when he aired his report. Arnett expressed no
such suspicions.
Interviewed later, Michel Wery, the plant's French contractor who helped build it, gave an interview in which he stated that
the plant was producing solely baby milk when it started up in 1979, and was not equipped to breed pathogens. The plant closed in
1980, he said, when the last French technicians working for his company left Baghdad. No one from Wery’s company has been back
since then. Wery said he had heard that production had restarted after the United Nations embargo put in place in the fall of
1991, but he doubted whether that was possible after a 10-year lull. Two dairy technicians had been
in the plant at least four times since to make repairs; one stated that, during a visit in May 1990, said that it was all normal
dairy equipment and that the plant was actually canning milk powder. The suspicious uniform stitching was actually part of the
original uniforms supplied by the French, and in fact the footage showing the uniforms was shot in August, 1990.
Part of the problem in reconciling the various U.S. and foreign accounts is that administration officials said they were
constrained by security considerations from revealing exactly how they knew about the plant. At the same time, the New Zealand
technicians and the French builder were not at the plant after May and cannot be certain of what happened after their
departure.
White House reports diverged at this time. One official claimed that the plant was converted in 1990. Another claimed that it
was a "backup" bioweapons facility, which had not yet been converted. A third said that it was not a bioweapons facility, but
that it was used to make items crucial to bioweapons research; all three claimed insider information. In a confidential memo from
December 1992, a State Department employee discussed the issue of the plant and reported that there were no hidden chambers or
inappropriate machinery, and that it appeared to be a perfectly normal factory for producing powdered milk.
The Iraqi “Baby Milk Factory” camouflaged on the right
The plant had undergone security modifications since May 1990. Amongst these were camouflage paint on all the buildings in the
complex, a security fence, and the positioning of two SA-2 Surface-to-air missile batteries.
In addition, the Iraqis had claimed that they were getting powdered milk for the plant from Nestlé, but Nestlé said that was false. They said they had supplied no products to this plant.
Colin Powell gave the president a briefing a week before the plant was bombed. Powell
told President Bush that intelligence based from agents inside Iraq stated that the Iraqis had altered the plant into a
biological weapons plant.
The Iraq Survey Group visited the facility in May of 2004 and found that it was
inoperable and had been out of operation for some time prior to the invasion. The plant was searched extensively and no evidence
was found of WMD production, although the production facilities and factory floor were littered with remnants of baby milk
production, including large piles of powdered baby milk that had congealed into solid masses.
Operation Tailwind
In 1998 Arnett narrated a joint venture between CNN and
Time Magazine called NewsStand, which described what he called "Operation Tailwind." The report said that the US Army had
used Sarin against a group of deserting US soldiers in
Laos in 1970. In response, The
Pentagon commissioned another report contradicting CNN's. CNN subsequently retracted the story after conducting an
internal investigation and a number of the persons responsible for the report was fired or forced to resign. Arnett was
reprimanded by his employer and even though he didn't stand by the story in order to save his job he was still fired[5].
April Oliver, who produced the CNN investigative report "Valley of Death" about Operation
Tailwind was quoted as saying that:
| “ |
His firing was a direct result of Pentagon pressure. Perry Smith [a retired major
general and former CNN consultant who resigned in protest over the Tailwind report] told the Wall Street Journal last July that
CNN would not get cooperation from the Pentagon unless Peter Arnett was fired. |
” |
| |
|
High definition TV pioneer
In December 2001 and January 2002, Arnett broadcast exclusive high definition
television reports from Afghanistan of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan for the then new HDNet
network.
Interview in Iraq
On assignment for NBC and National
Geographic, Arnett went to Iraq in 2003 to cover the
U.S. invasion. After a press meeting there he granted an interview to state-run
Iraq TV on March 31, 2003, in which he stated:
| “ |
Now America is reappraising the battlefield, delaying the war against Iraq, maybe a week and rewriting the war plan. The first plan has failed because of
Iraqi resistance. Now they are trying to write another plan… So our reports about civilian casualties here, about the resistance
of the Iraqi forces, are going back to the United States. It helps those who oppose the war when you challenge the policy to
develop their arguments. |
” |
| |
|
When Arnett's remarks sparked a "firestorm of protest", NBC initially defended him, saying he had given the interview as a
professional courtesy and that his remarks were "analytical in nature". A day later, though, NBC, MSNBC and National Geographic all severed their relationships
with Arnett[7].
In response to Arnett's statement on Iraqi TV, the corporation stated:
| “ |
It was wrong for Mr. Arnett to grant an interview with state-controlled Iraqi
TV, especially at a time of war and it was wrong for him to discuss his personal observations
and opinions. |
” |
Arnett responded:
| “ |
My stupid misjudgment was to spend fifteen minutes in an impromptu interview with
Iraqi television. I said in that interview essentially what we all know about the war, that there have been delays in
implementing policy, there have been surprises. |
” |
| |
— Peter Arnett
|
Later that day, Arnett was hired by the British tabloid newspaper the Daily Mirror,
which opposed the war. A couple of days later he was also assigned to Greek television channel
NET television, and Belgian VTM.
Quotes
| “ |
I don't care of the consequences, Allah is beside me in this struggle. |
” |
| |
— Saddam Hussein in response to a question from
Peter Arnett, if he realized he had made a mistake by not withdrawing from Kuwait at the insistence of the coalition
|
| “ |
There's a small island, inhabited in the South
Pacific, that I will try to swim to. |
” |
| |
— Peter Arnett when asked what he intended to do
after being fired from NBC in 2003
|
| “ |
I am still in shock and awe at being fired. |
” |
| |
— Peter Arnett after being fired lampooning the
Bush Administration's Iraq strategy
|
Family
In 1964 Arnett married a Vietnamese woman, Nina Nguyen. They had two children, Elsa and
Andrew. In 1983 Nina and Peter separated after twenty years of marriage.
Elsa
Born in Saigon to Peter's Vietnamese Nina Nguyen. Elsa went to Stuyvesant High School in New York, as an accomplished student,
went on to Harvard University. After grading she went into journalism, became a reporter, worked for several months on The
Washington Post as an intern and then joined The Boston Globe[8]. Elsa married conservative law professor John Yoo.
References
- ^ Peter Arnett (December 5, 2001 Posted: 2:50 PM EST (1950 GMT)).
Peter Arnett: Osama
bin Laden and returning to Afghanistan (HTML). CNN News. Retrieved on 2007-09-12.
- ^ a b David Halberstam (2006 Issue 6: November/December). The Death of Supply Column 21
(HTML). Columbia Journalism Review at Columbia University. Retrieved on 2007-09-12.
- ^ "Peter Arnett: Whose Man in Baghdad?", Mona Charen, Jewish World Review, April 1,
2003
- ^ Peter Arnett (January 16, 2001 11 a.m. EST). Peter Arnett: A look back at
Operation Desert Storm (HTML). CNN News. Retrieved on 2007-09-12.
- ^ a b Barry Grey (22 April 1999). Fired CNN journalist on dismissal
of Arnett: "They will do anything to stem the flow of information" (HTML). pub. Retrieved on 2007-09-12.
- ^ Transcript of
Peter Arnett interview on Iraqi TV (HTML). CNN News (Monday, March 31, 2003 Posted: 0306 GMT).
Retrieved on 2007-09-12.
- ^ National
Geographic Fires Peter Arnett (HTML). National Geographic News (March 31, 2003). Retrieved on 2007-09-12.
- ^ Peter Arnett (February 20, 1994). Live from the Battlefield: From
Vietnam to Baghdad, 35 years in the World's War Zones (HTML). booknotes. Retrieved on 2007-09-12. “Elsa Arnett is my daughter. She's 25
years of age, born in Saigon. My wife was a Vietnamese woman. We separated a few years ago, but we're still in touch. Elsa, a
bright young lady, and she went to Stuyvesant High School in New York, as an accomplished student, went on to Harvard University.
I never had a university education. Well, Elsa compensated for that by going to Harvard University and graduating with high
honors and, lo and behold, went into journalism, became a reporter, worked for several months on The Washington Post as an intern
and then joined The Boston Globe; spent a couple of years there and, thank goodness, agreed to help me get this book done.”
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)