The description and classification of rocks.
petrographer pe·trog'ra·pher n.petrographic pet'ro·graph'ic (pĕt'rə-grăf'ĭk) or pet'ro·graph'i·cal (-ĭ-kəl) adj.
petrographically pet'ro·graph'i·cal·ly adv.
Dictionary:
pe·trog·ra·phy (pə-trŏg'rə-fē) ![]() |
The description and classification of rocks.
petrographer pe·trog'ra·pher n.| 5min Related Video: petrography |
| Sci-Tech Encyclopedia: Petrography |
The description of rocks with goals of classification and interpretation of origin. Most schemes for the classification of rocks are based on the size of grains and the proportions of various minerals. Interpretations of origin rely on field relations, structure, texture, and chemical composition as well as sizes and proportions of different kinds of grains. The names of rocks are based on the sizes and relative proportions of different minerals; boundaries between the names are arbitrary. The conditions of formation of a rock can be estimated from the types and textures of its constituent minerals.
The description of rocks begins in the field with observation of the shape and structure of bodies of rock at the scale of centimeters to kilometers. The geometrical relations between and structures within mappable rock units are generally the domain of field geology, but are simply rock descriptions at a reduced scale.
A petrographer can correctly name most rocks in which most crystals are larger than about 0.04 in. (1 mm) simply by examining the rock with a 10-power magnifying lens. Rocks with smaller grains require either microscopical examination or chemical analysis for proper classification.
Sizes, shapes, and orientations of grains and voids are the most important features of a rock relevant to its origin. The same features also affect density, porosity, permeability, strength, and magnetic behavior. It is also essential to know the identity, abundance, and compositions of minerals constituting the grains in order to name a rock and infer its conditions of formation.
Petrographers study organic as well as inorganic objects, and petrographic analyses are useful to both paleontologists and petroleum geologists. The quality of coal is revealed with polarizing and reflecting light microscopes. Inclusions of petroleum and brine in crystals of silicates and salt in rocks help scientists infer how petroleum formation is connected with cementation and other modifications of buried sediments. See also Paleontology; Petroleum geology.
Petrographers also study synthetic objects. The textures of metals and alloys are scrutinized by petrographers in order to understand what makes these materials strong and resistant to corrosion. Flaws in glasses and ceramics are revealed by microscopical and polarizing techniques. Fragments of minerals and rocks in some pottery can help point to its source and help trace prehistoric routes of trade. The industrial, agricultural, and natural sources of particles in the air and water may be established from petrographic study. See also Mineralogy; Petrology.
| US History Encyclopedia: Petrography |
Petrography deals with the systematic description of rocks. The term is sometimes loosely used as synonymous with "petrology, " which, being the broad science of rocks, is concerned not only with precise description but also with understanding the origin (petrogenesis), modification (metamorphism), and ultimate decay of rocks. Petrography as a science began with a technique invented in 1828 by the Scottish physicist William Nicol for producing polarized light by cutting a crystal of Iceland spar (calcite) into a special prism, which is still known as the Nicol prism. The addition of two such prisms to the ordinary microscope converted the instrument into a polarizing, or petrographic, microscope. By means of transmitted light and Nicol prisms, it became possible to deduce the internal crystallographic character of even very tiny mineral grains, thereby greatly advancing the specific knowledge of a rock's constituents.
But it was a later development that truly laid the foundations of petrography. This was a technique, perfected in the late 1840s by Henry C. Sorby in England and others, whereby a slice of rock was affixed to a microscope slide and then ground so thin that light could be transmitted through mineral grains that otherwise appeared opaque. The position of adjoining grains was not disturbed, thus permitting analysis of rock texture. Thin-section petrography became the standard method of rock study—and since textural details contribute greatly to a knowledge of the sequence of crystallization of the various mineral constituents in a rock, petrography ranges into petrogenesis and thus into petrology.
It was in Europe, principally in Germany, that petrography burgeoned in the last half of the nineteenth century, and American geologists went to Germany for their introduction to this new science. For example, Florence Bascom, the first woman to be hired by the U.S. Geological Survey, studied with Victor Goldschmidt in Heidelberg, Germany, and returned to make major contributions to the nascent study of petrography in America. Her dissertation at Johns Hopkins, completed in 1893, showed that rocks previously thought of as sediments were actually metamorphosed lava flows. This period also coincided with the exploration of the western United States. Notable among the early surveys was the U.S. Geological Exploration of the fortieth parallel under the direction of Clarence King, who became the first director of the U.S. Geological Survey in 1878. The sixth volume of the report of the exploration, Microscopical Petrography (1876), was at King's invitation prepared by Ferdinand Zirkel of Leipzig, at the time acknowledged as one of the two leading petrographers in the world. This publication, in a sense, introduced petrography to the United States.
Subsequent monographs and other publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, as well as some of the state surveys, were replete with beautifully lithographed plates of distinctive rock types as seen in thin sections. Many of these became collector's items, for they are models of scientific accuracy and artistic merit. Many new and interesting rock types were discovered using petrographic methods, and because names of rocks commonly reflect the geography of a type of locality, some exotic names have resulted: for example, shonkinite, from the Shonkin Sag, Montana; ouachitite, from the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas; and uncompahgrite, from Uncompahgre Peak, Colorado.
Descriptions of rocks are not confined to thin-section studies. One of the earliest members of the U.S. Geological Survey, George F. Becker, recognized that to understand rock minerals properly, it would be necessary to synthesize them from chemically pure components. This awareness led to the establishment of the Geophysical Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution in 1907, of which Arthur L. Day was first director. Chemical principles were applied in investigating sequences and stability ranges of rock minerals, and in parallel studies improved methods of accurate chemical analyses of rocks were developed. Working with colleagues at the Geological Survey, Henry S. Washington, a chemist at the Geophysical
Laboratory, brought out The Quantitative Classification of Igneous Rocks in 1903, a work that had worldwide impact on petrography and petrology. This was followed in 1917 by Chemical Analyses of Igneous Rocks, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 99, perhaps still the largest compendium of chemical analyses of rocks ever brought together. Each analysis, of which there are several thousand, was converted to the author's special classification—a classification still in use, along with the more conventional mineralogical and textural classifications.
Meantime, the physicochemical studies of rock-forming minerals at the laboratory were leading to new interpretations of the origin of rocks, culminating with The Evolution of the Igneous Rocks in 1928 by Norman L. Bowen—a publication that has perhaps had wider influence in petrology than any other emanating from America.
Until the 1920s, when the National Research Council first established a committee on sedimentation, petrographers were concerned chiefly with igneous and metamorphic rocks, for it was these two categories (sometimes grouped as the crystalline rocks) that contained the widest variety of minerals, presented the best-formed crystals, and occurred in the most interesting combinations. Sedimentary rocks, by contrast, appeared relatively uniform and monotonous. Recognition of the economic importance of sediments (especially for their hydrocarbon content) led to an upsurge in sedimentary petrography. Many new authoritative works were published dealing with the special types of petrographic investigations that are appropriate for sediments.
Some of the most exciting developments in petrography involve the sample of moon rocks collected by U.S. astronauts during the first moon mission in 1969. Never before had so many and such highly sophisticated methods of petrographic study been so thoroughly applied: X-ray studies of many kinds, electron microprobes, spectrographic and isotopic analyses, and a host of other advanced techniques, together with the classic petrographic studies. The studies are aided by the fact that since the moon is without atmosphere and apparently without water, moon rocks are not subject to the types of decay that affect most rocks on the earth's surface and tend to obscure thin-section observations and to contaminate (or at least render difficult) chemical studies. Petrographers may well look to the rock formations of the moon and other celestial bodies for new revelations in the field of microscopic petrography.
Bibliography
Drake, Ellen T., and William M. Jordan, eds. Geologists and Ideas: A History of North American Geology. Boulder, Colo.: Geological Society of America, 1985.
Horowitz, Alan S. Introductory Petrography of Fossils. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1971.
Milner, Henry B. Sedimentary Petrography. New York: MacMillan, 1962.
Stanton, R. L. Ore Petrology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
Turner, Francis J. Metamorphic Petrology. New York: McGrawHill, 1981.
Williams, Howel, Francis J. Turner, and Charles M. Gilbert. Petrography: An Introduction to the Study of Rocks in Thin Sections. San Francisco: Freeman, 1982.
| Geological Glossary: Petrography |
The study of the mineral makeup of rocks. It is usually carried on with the assistance of the “petrographic microscope” and thin, transparent slices of rock, known as “thin sections,” ground to 3/1000 in. (0.07 mm) thickness.
| Wikipedia: Petrography |
| This article is largely based on an article in the out-of-copyright 11th edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica, which was produced in 1911. It should be brought up to date to reflect subsequent history or scholarship (including the references, if any). When you have completed the review, replace this notice with a simple note on this article's talk page. Thanks! |
Petrography is that branch of petrology which focuses on detailed descriptions of rocks. Someone who studies petrography is called a petrographer. The mineral content and the textural relationships within the rock are described in detail. Petrographic descriptions start with the field notes at the outcrop and include megascopic description of hand specimens. However, the most important tool for the petrographer is the petrographic microscope. The detailed analysis of minerals by optical mineralogy in thin section and the micro-texture and structure are critical to understanding the origin of the rock. Electron microprobe analysis of individual grains as well as whole rock chemical analyses by atomic absorption or X-ray fluorescence are used in a modern petrographic lab. Individual mineral grains from a rock sample may also be analyzed by X-ray diffraction when optical means are insufficient. Analysis of microscopic fluid inclusions within mineral grains with a heating stage on a petrographic microscope provides clues to the temperature and pressure conditions existent during the mineral formation.
Contents |
The macroscopic characters of rocks, those visible in hand-specimens without the aid of the microscope, are very varied and difficult to describe accurately and fully. The geologist in the field depends principally on them and on a few rough chemical and physical tests; and to the practical engineer, architect and quarry-master they are all-important. Although frequently insufficient in themselves to determine the true nature of a rock, they usually serve for a preliminary classification and often give all the information which is really needed.
With a small bottle of acid to test for carbonate of lime, a knife to ascertain the hardness of rocks and minerals, and a pocket lens to magnify their structure, the field geologist is rarely at a loss to what group a rock belongs. The fine grained species are often indeterminable in this way, and the minute mineral components of all rocks can usually be ascertained only by microscopic examination. But it is easy to see that a sandstone or grit consists of more or less rounded, waterworn sand-grains and if it contains dull, weathered particles of felspar, shining scales of mica or small crystals of calcite these also rarely escape observation. Shales and clay rocks generally are soft, fine grained, often laminated and not infrequently contain minute organisms or fragments of plants. Limestones are easily marked with a knife-blade, effervesce readily with weak cold acid and often contain entire or broken shells or other fossils. The crystalline nature of a granite or basalt is obvious at a glance, and while the former contains white or pink felspar, clear vitreous quartz and glancing flakes of mica, the other will show yellow-green olivine, black augite and grey stratiated plagioclase.
Other simple tools include the blowpipe (to test the fusibility of detached crystals), the goniometer, the magnet, the magnifying glass and the specific gravity balance.[1]
When dealing with unfamiliar types or with rocks so fine grained that their component minerals cannot be determined with the aid of a hand lens, a microscope is used. Characteristics observed under the microscope include colour, colour variation under plane polarised light (pleochroism, produced by the lower Nicol prism, or more recently polarising films), fracture characteristics of the grains, refractive index (in comparison to the mounting adhesive, typically Canada Balsam), and optical symmetry (birefringent or isotropic). In toto, these characteristics are sufficient to identify the mineral, and often to quite tightly estimate its major element composition. The process of identifying minerals under the microscope is fairly subtle, but also mechanistic - it would be possible to develop an identification key that would allow a computer to do it. The more difficult and skilful part of optical petrography is identifying the interrelationships between grains and relating them to features seen in hand specimen, at outcrop, or in mapping.
The separation of the ingredients of a crushed rock powder from one to another in order to obtain pure samples suitable for analysis is also extensively practised. It may be effected by means of a powerful electro-magnet the strength of which can be regulated as desired. A weak magnetic field will attract magnetite, then haematite and other ores of iron. Silicates containing iron will follow in definite order and biotite, enstatite, augite, hornblende, garnet and similar ferro-magnesian minerals may be successively abstracted, at last only the colorless, non-magnetic compounds, such as muscovite, calcite, quartz and felspar, will remain. Chemical methods also are useful. A weak acid will dissolve calcite from a crushed limestone, leaving only dolomite, silicates or quartz. Hydrofluoric acid will attack felspar before quartz, and if employed with great caution will dissolve these and any glassy material in a rock powder before dissolving augite or hypersthene. Methods of separation by specific gravity have a still wider application. The simplest of these is levigation or treatment by a current of water, it is extensively employed in the mechanical analysis of soils and in the treatment of ores, but is not so successful with rocks, as their components do not as a rule differ very greatly in specific gravity.
Fluids are used which do not attack the majority of the rock-making minerals and at the same time have a high specific gravity. Solutions of potassium mercuric iodide (sp. gr. 3.196), cadmium borotungstate (sp. gr. 3.30), methylene iodide (sp. gr. 3.32), bromoform (sp. gr. 2.86), or acetylene bromide (sp. gr. 3.00) are the principal media employed. They may be diluted (with water, benzene, etc.) to any desired extent and again concentrated by evaporation. If the rock be a granite consisting of biotite (sp. gr. 3.1), muscovite (sp. gr. 2.85), quartz (sp. gr. 2.65), oligoclase (sp. gr. 2.64) and orthoclase (sp. gr. 2.56) the crushed minerals will all float in methylene iodide; on gradual dilution with benzene they will be precipitated in the order given above. Although simple in theory these methods are tedious in practice, especially as it is common for one rock-making mineral to enclose another. But expert handling of fresh and suitable rocks yields excellent results. [1]
In addition to naked-eye and microscopic investigations chemical methods of research are of the greatest practical importance to the geographer. The crushed and separated powders, obtained by the processes described above, may be analyzed and thus the chemical composition of the minerals in the rock determined qualitatively or quantitatively. The chemical testing of microscopic sections and minute grains by the help of the microscope is a very elegant and valuable means of discriminating between the mineral components of fine-grained rocks. Thus the presence of apatite in rock-sections is established by covering a bare rock-section with solution of ammonium molybdate; a turbid yellow precipitate forms over the crystals of the mineral in question (indicating the presence of phosphates). Many silicates are insoluble in acids and cannot be tested in this way, but others are partly dissolved, leaving a film of gelatinous silica which can be stained with coloring matters such as the aniline dyes (nepheline, analcite, zeolites, etc.).
Complete chemical analyses of rocks are also widely made use of and are of the first importance, especially when new species are under description. Rock analysis has of late years (largely under the influence of the chemical laboratory of the United States Geological Survey) reached a high pitch of refinement and complexity. As many as twenty or twenty-five components may be determined, but for practical purposes a knowledge of the relative proportions of silica, alumina, ferrous and ferric oxides, magnesia, lime, potash, soda and water will carry us a long way in determining the position to which a rock is to be assigned in any of the conventional classifications. A chemical analysis is in itself usually sufficient to indicate whether a rock is igneous or sedimentary and in either case to show with considerable accuracy to what subdivision of these classes it belongs. In the case of metamorphic rocks it often establishes whether the original mass was a sediment or of volcanic origin.[1]
The specific gravity of rocks is determined in the usual way by means of the balance and the pycnometer. It is greatest in those rocks which contain most magnesia, iron and heavy metals, least in rocks rich in alkalis, silica and water. It diminishes with weathering, and generally those rocks which are highly crystalline have higher specific gravity than those which are wholly or partly vitreous when both have the same chemical composition. The specific gravity of the commoner rocks ranges from about 2.5 to 3.2.[1]
Petrography is used by archaeologists to identify the mineral components in pottery. This information is then usually used to tie the artifacts to geological source areas for both the clay used and the rock fragments (usually called "temper" or "aplastics") often added by potters to modify the properties of the clay. This information provides insight into how potters were selecting and using local and nonlocal resources, as well as allowing archaeologists to determine whether pottery found in a particular location was locally produced or traded from elsewhere. In turn, this kind of information (in combination with other evidence) can be used to build inferences about settlement patterns, group and individual mobility, and social contacts or trade networks. In addition, an understanding of how certain minerals are altered at specific temperatures can allow archaeological petrographers to infer aspects of the ceramic production process itself, such as minimum and maximum temperatures reached in the original firing of the pot.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Geology | |
| Moon Landing | |
| petrographic |
| What is the difference between petrography and petrology? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Sci-Tech Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | US History Encyclopedia. © 2006 through a partnership of Answers Corporation. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Geological Glossary. Peterson Field Guide to Rocks and Minerals, by Frederick H. Pough. Copyright © 1998 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Petrography". Read more |
Mentioned in