 |
| Prefix notation |
| Infix notation |
| Postfix notation |
Polish notation, also known as prefix notation, is a form of notation for logic, arithmetic, and algebra. Its distinguishing feature is that it places operators to the left of their operands. If the arity of the operators is fixed, the result is a syntax lacking parentheses or other brackets, that can still be parsed without ambiguity. The Polish logician Jan Łukasiewicz invented this notation around 1920 in order to simplify sentential logic. When Polish notation is used as a syntax for mathematical expressions by interpreters of programming languages, it is readily parsed into abstract syntax trees and can, in fact, define a one-to-one representation for the same. Because of this, Lisp (see below) and related programming languages define their entire syntax in terms of prefix or postfix expressions.
Here is a quotation from Nicod's Axiom and Generalizing Deduction, page 180.
I came upon the idea of a parenthesis-free notation in 1924. I used that notation for the first time in my article Łukasiewicz(1), p. 610, footnote.
The reference cited by Jan Łukasiewicz above is apparently a lithographed report in Polish.
Alonzo Church mentions this notation in his classic book on Mathematical logic as worthy of remark in notational systems even contrasted to Whitehead and Russell's logical notational exposition and work in Principia Mathematica.[1]
While no longer used much in logic, Polish notation has since found a place in computer science.
Contents |
Arithmetic
The expression for adding the numbers one and two is, in prefix notation, written "+ 1 2" rather than "1 + 2". In more complex expressions, the operators still precede their operands, but the operands may themselves be nontrivial expressions including operators of their own. For instance, the expression that would be written in conventional infix notation as
- (5 − 6) * 7
can be written in prefix as
- *(− 5 6) 7
or simply
- * − 5 6 7
Since the simple arithmetic operators are all binary (at least, in arithmetic contexts), any prefix representation thereof is unambiguous, and bracketing the prefix expression is unnecessary. In the previous example, the parentheses in the infix version were required, since moving them
- 5 − (6 * 7)
or simply removing them
- 5 − 6 * 7
would change the meaning and result of the overall expression. However, the corresponding prefix version of this second calculation would be written
- − 5 * 6 7
The processing of the subtraction is deferred until both operands of the subtraction have been read in (i.e., 5 and the product of 6 and 7). As with any notation, the innermost expressions are evaluated first, but in prefix notation this "innermost-ness" can be conveyed by order rather than bracketing.
Prefix notation of simple arithmetic is largely of academic interest. Like the similar postfix reverse Polish notation, prefix notation has been used in a few (HP-11C) commercially-made calculators.[citation needed] However, prefix-notated arithmetic is frequently used as a first, conceptual step in the teaching of compiler construction.
Computer programming
Prefix notation has seen wide application in Lisp s-expressions, where the brackets are required due to the arithmetic operators having variable arity. The Ambi programming language uses Polish Notation for arithmetic operations and program construction. The postfix reverse Polish notation is used in many stack-based programming languages like PostScript, and is the operating principle of certain calculators, notably from Hewlett-Packard.
Although obvious, it is important to note that the number of operands in an expression must equal the number of operators plus one, otherwise the statement makes no sense (assuming only binary operators are used in the expression). This can be easy to overlook when dealing with longer, more complicated expressions with several operators, so care must be taken to double check that an expression makes sense when using prefix notation.
Order of operations
Order of operations is defined within the structure of prefix notation and can be easily determined. One thing to keep in mind is that when executing an operation, the operation is applied TO the first operand BY the second operand. This is not an issue with operations that commute, but for non-commutative operations like division or subtraction, this fact is crucial to the analysis of a statement. For example, the following statement:
/ 10 5 = 2 (Prefix)
is read as "Divide 10 BY 5". Thus the solution is 2, not ½ as would be the result of an incorrect analysis.
Prefix notation is especially popular with stack-based operations due to its innate ability to easily distinguish order of operations without the need for parentheses. To evaluate order of operations under prefix notation, one does not even need to memorize an operational hierarchy, as with infix notation. Instead, one looks directly to the notation to discover which operator to evaluate first. Reading an expression from left to right, one first looks for an operator and proceeds to look for two operands. If another operator is found before two operands are found, then the old operator is placed aside until this new operator is resolved. This process iterates until an operator is resolved, which must happen eventually, as there must be one more operand than there are operators in a complete statement. Once resolved, the operator and the two operands are replaced with a new operand. Because one operator and two operands are removed and one operand is added, there is a net loss of one operator and one operand, which still leaves an expression with N operators and N+1 operands, thus allowing the iterative process to continue. This is the general theory behind using stacks in programming languages to evaluate a statement in prefix notation, although there are various algorithms that manipulate the process. Once analyzed, a statement in prefix notation becomes less intimidating to the human mind as it allows some separation from convention with added convenience. An example shows the ease with which a complex statement in prefix notation can be deciphered through order of operations:
- * / 15 - 7 + 1 1 3 + 2 + 1 1 =
- * / 15 - 7 2 3 + 2 + 1 1 =
- * / 15 5 3 + 2 + 1 1 =
- * 3 3 + 2 + 1 1 =
- 9 + 2 + 1 1 =
- 9 + 2 2 =
- 9 4 =
5
Polish notation for logic
The table below shows the core of Jan Łukasiewicz's notation for sentential logic. The "conventional" notation did not become so until the 1970s and 80s. Some letters in the Polish notation table means a certain word in Polish, as shown:
| Concept | Conventional notation |
Polish notation |
Polish word |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negation |  φ |
Nφ | negacja |
| Conjunction | φ ψ |
Kφψ | koniunkcja |
| Disjunction | φ ψ |
Aφψ | alternatywa |
| Material conditional | φ ψ |
Cφψ | implikacja |
| Biconditional | φ ψ |
Eφψ | ekwiwalencja |
| Sheffer stroke | φ | ψ | Dφψ | dysjunkcja |
| Possibility |  φ |
Mφ | możliwość |
| Necessity |  φ |
Lφ | |
| Universal Quantifier |  φ |
Πφ | 'kwantyfikator ogólny' |
| Existential Quantifier |  φ |
Σφ | 'kwantyfikator szczegółowy' |
Note that the quantifiers ranged over propositional values in Łukasiewicz's work on many-valued logics.
Notes
- ^ Church, Alonzo (1944). Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. - p.38: "Worthy of remark is the parenthesis-free notation of Jan Łukasiewicz. In this the letters N, A, C, E, K are used in the roles of negation, disjunction, implication, equivalence, conjunction respectively. ..."
See also
Further reading
- Łukasiewicz, Jan (1957). Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. Oxford University Press.
- Łukasiewicz, Jan, "Philosophische Bemerkungen zu mehrwertigen Systemen des Aussagenkalküls", Comptes rendus des séances de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, 23:51-77 (1930). Translated by H. Weber as "Philosophical Remarks on Many-Valued Systems of Propositional Logics", in Storrs McCall, Polish Logic 1920-1939, Clarendon Press: Oxford (1967).
External links
- Ambi browser-based extensible RPN calculator - By David Pratten
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
