
[Middle English pol, head, from Middle Low German or Middle Dutch.]
poller poll'er n.
1. [techspeak] The action of checking the status of an input line, sensor, or memory location to see if a particular external event has been registered.
2. To repeatedly call or check with someone: “I keep polling him, but he's not answering his phone; he must be swapped out.”
3. To ask. “Lunch? I poll for a takeout order daily.”
The broad end or striking face of a hammer.
Polling is a form of surveying conducted by the canvassing or questioning of a universe. A universe can consist of a particular group, such as steel workers, or can rely on a more general population, such as a political survey of public opinion in an election year. Polling dates back to 1824 in the United States, when two newspapers, the Harrisburg Pennsylvanian and the Raleigh Star, attempted to predict the presidential election by use of "show votes." By the twentieth century, polls would be taken by magazines, such as Farm Journal (1912) and Literary Digest (1916). However, these polls were mostly local in scope. The first major national poll was conducted during World War I, and asked participants whether or not the United States should become involved in the war.
In 1936, the process of polling would change forever. George H. Gallup, founder of the American Institute of Public Opinion (1935), had issued a challenge to Literary Digest, claiming that he could more accurately predict the outcome of that year's presidential election. At the time, this seemed foolhardy, for the Literary Digest had correctly predicted every presidential election correctly since 1916. Confident in his methods, Gallup had developed a system of interviewing based on quota samples, which employed a relatively small number of people to mathematically determine the views of the public at large. He came up with fifty-four different questions, and considered each question demographically, with such key determinants as age, sex, income, and region. The Literary Digest, meanwhile, had conducted an old-fashioned straw poll, based on telephone and car buyer lists. In the past, such lists had been serviceable, but in 1936, during the depression, they proved to be heavily biased in favor of the Republican candidate, Alfred M. Landon. For this reason, the Literary Digest, having predicted a landslide victory for Landon, was upstaged by the audacious Gallup, who correctly predicted another victory for Franklin D. Roosevelt. Other, lesser-known forecasters, such as Elmo Roper and Archibald Crossley, had also predicted Franklin's victory using similar sampling methods.
However, even Gallup would be proven wrong in the presidential election of 1948. In that year, all major pollsters predicted the Republican candidate, Thomas E. Dewey of New York, would defeat Harry S. Truman, the current president. Gallup had used the same sampling techniques as before, but had made a terrible mistake by concluding his poll weeks before Election Day. Furthermore, Gallup had made the incorrect assumption that the "undecided" votes would split in much the same way as the "decided" ones. This would prove untrue, as most of the "undecideds" either voted for Truman or did not vote at all.
Gallup would learn from his mistakes and recover ever stronger after the election. He improved his sampling techniques, taking into account a greater number of influences, and reanalyzing the effects of the inner city and other regions, which, to his undoing, his interviewers had neglected in 1948. Gallup also made certain that polling was done consistently, a process known as tracking, and that the likelihood of a person actually voting was now also taken into consideration.
With these improvements, Gallup's organization was able to accurately predict future elections. Between 1952 and 2000, the Gallup poll, as it came to be known, achieved an average accuracy of just over 2 percent deviation in presidential elections. In the controversial 2000 election between Al Gore and George W. Bush, Gallup's final preelection prediction had the race as a "statistical dead heat," meaning that the candidates were locked within a range of error of plus or minus 3 percent.
Gallup also introduced polling to social issues. He conducted polls on such complicated topics as the Vietnam War and education. He felt that polls gave the people a voice, and that they were therefore an important aspect of democracy.
Many, however, criticize polling, claiming that it has a "bandwagon effect" on voters, and too much control over politicians. Yet polling continues to play an important role in the political process.
Polling techniques are also extensively used in industry to conduct market research. Companies use sampling in order to determine what products consumers are willing to buy. Such techniques may include random sampling, in which everyone is a potential candidate for an interview; stratified sampling, in which sampling candidates are divided into nonoverlapping groups; quota sampling, random sampling subject to demographic controls; and cluster sampling, in which "clusters," or groups, are selected from various sectors of the population, such as the middle class or working class.
Bibliography
Chaffee, S. H. "George Gallup and Ralph Nafziger: Pioneers of Audience Research." Mass Communication and Society 3 (2000): 317–327.
Marchand, Roland. Advertising the American Dream. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1985.
Evolution
The history of polling in the United States goes back to 1824, when two newspapers, the Harrisburg Pennsylvanian and the Raleigh Star, organized "show votes" to determine the political preferences of voters prior to the presidential election of that year. In 1883 the Boston Globe attempted to speed up its reporting of election returns by sending reporters to poll various precincts. By the turn of the century many newspapers were conducting polls to determine political preferences. Later polls were conducted by magazines; the first among them were the Farm Journal (1912) and the Literary Digest (1916). Those early polls were generally local or regional rather than national and were confined to obtaining election preferences rather than opinions on political issues. During World War I, however, a poll as to whether or not the United States should enter the war was conducted.
The methods used in the early polls made no claim to being scientific; polling was usually done by canvassers hired to go out and question people or by "straw ballots" in the newspapers, which readers were asked to fill out and mail in. A more scientific method of polling called sampling was developed in the mid-1930s. This method enables the polltaker to question a small percentage of the group whose opinions he wishes to ascertain and to analyze from their responses the opinions of the whole group. The superiority of this method over the old straw-ballot system was demonstrated in the 1936 presidential election when the Literary Digest poll, which based its predictions on the older technique, produced a staggeringly inaccurate forecast, while the poll of a newer group organized by George Gallup predicted the result of the election correctly. By the 1940s the polls were concerned with social and economic questions as well as with political issues. An unusual failure of polling took place in 1948 when the polling organizations predicted the defeat of Harry S. Truman, who won.
Modern Methods and Trends
Sampling techniques have become increasingly sophisticated and include various types, which may be random, stratified, or purposive, or a combination of any of these. The information may be elicited by personal interview, telephone interview, or mail questionnaire, and the polling is completed only after the data have been tabulated and evaluated. Polling has been much used by politicians to determine the opinions of voters on significant issues. It has also been used to forecast patterns of voting.
Besides playing an increasingly important role in national and local political campaigns, the technique of modern polling has developed into one of the more important tools in the methodology of contemporary social science, particularly in sociology. Commercial polltakers claim that they not only provide valuable information in such fields as market research and advertising but that they also aid the process of democratic government by making known the views of the people. Critics of polling question the validity of the claim that it provides a true picture of public opinion, and it has been suggested that the polls themselves may influence public opinion by creating a "bandwagon effect."
Some of the pioneer commercial polling organizations were the Fortune survey (1936) conducted by Elmo Roper; the Crossley Poll (1936); and the Gallup Poll (1935). The Harris Survey, begun in 1956, together with the Gallup Poll, are the best-known polling organizations. Nonprofit polling organizations include the Princeton Office of Public Opinion Research (1940), the National Opinion Research Center (1941), and the National Council of Public Polls (1968). Many other countries have polling organizations, and a number of international societies (e.g., The European Society for Public Opinion and Market Research) facilitate exchanges of information.
Bibliography
See G. H. Gallup and S. F. Rae, The Pulse of Democracy (1940, repr. 1968); L. Bogart, Silent Politics (1972); C. W. Roll, Jr., and A. H. Cantril, Polls (1972); I. Crespi, Public Opinion Poll and Democracy (1989).
A public-opinion poll is no substitute for thought.
— Warren Buffett
LearnThatWord.com is a free vocabulary and spelling program where you only pay for results!
Top of the head; the occiput.
![]() |

| Look up poll or polling in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
|
Poll, polled or polling may refer to:
| This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title. If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
Dansk (Danish)
n. - valgliste, afstemning, stemmetal, valgsted
v. tr. - foretage afstemning i, opnå stemmer, optælle
v. intr. - stemme
idioms:
Nederlands (Dutch)
stem uitbrengen, opinie peilen, één voor één ondervragen, schaap scheren, verkiezing, opinie onderzoek, enquête, behaarde bovenkant van het hoofd, platte kant van een hamer
Français (French)
n. - scrutin, vote, élections, suffrages, dépouillement, résultats, voix, liste électorale, liste de contribuables, sondage
v. tr. - obtenir (des votes), interroger (un groupe), (Comput) interroger
v. intr. - recueillir (des voix), voter
idioms:
Deutsch (German)
n. - Abstimmung, Wahl, Umfrage, Kopf
v. - (Stimmen) erhalten, erforschen, kappen
idioms:
Ελληνική (Greek)
n. - εκλογές/-ή, ψηφοφορία, καταμέτρηση ψήφων, αριθμός ψήφων, κάλπη, εκλογικός κατάλογος, ήμερος παπαγάλος, σφυγμομέτρηση της κοινής γνώμης, δημοσκόπηση
v. - ψηφίζω, συγκεντρώνω ψήφους, παίρνω/συγκεντρώνω ψήφους, σφυγμομετρώ την κοινή γνώμη
idioms:
Italiano (Italian)
votare, inchiesta
idioms:
Português (Portuguese)
n. - votação (f), pesquisa de opinião (f), cabeça (f)
v. - votar
idioms:
Русский (Russian)
голосовать, проводить опрос, голосование, опрос
idioms:
Español (Spanish)
n. - votación, encuesta, escrutinio, elecciones
v. tr. - votar, empadronar, registrar, esquilar, desmochar
v. intr. - votar
idioms:
Svenska (Swedish)
n. - valförrättning, röstlängd, röstetal, valresultat, röstsammanräkning, undersökning, skult (skämts.), nacke, hornlös boskap, (hatt)kulle
v. - samla röster, registrera väljare (röster), förrätta val, avge röst, undersöka, hamla (träd)
中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
民意测验, 投票, 选举, 民意测验记录, 投票数, 对...进行民意测验, 使投票, 获得, 要求每一成员明确表态
idioms:
中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
n. - 民意測驗, 投票, 選舉, 民意測驗記錄, 投票數
v. tr. - 對...進行民意測驗, 使投票, 獲得, 要求每一成員明確表態
v. intr. - 投票
idioms:
한국어 (Korean)
n. - 투표, 득표집계, 선거인 명부
v. tr. - 명부에 등록하다, 여론 조사를 하다
v. intr. - 투표하다
idioms:
日本語 (Japanese)
n. - 投票, 投票数, 選挙人名簿, 投票所, 世論調査
v. - 得る, 投票する, 世論調査をする, 投票させる, 角を切る, 枝先を刈る
idioms:
العربيه (Arabic)
(الاسم) رأس, , القذال : جماع مؤخر الرأس, , مؤخر العنق, اقتراع, تصويت, تسجيل أصوات النقترعين (فعل) يسجل, ينال عددا معينا من الأصوات, يجز الشعر
עברית (Hebrew)
n. - מישאל, הצבעה, תא, רשימת הבוחרים, מספר המצביעים, ראש, תוכי, בקר ללא קרניים
v. tr. - גזם צמרת-עץ, גדע קרניים, ערך מישאל, קיבל (קולות), מנה קולות
v. intr. - הצביע
If you are unable to view some languages clearly, click here.
Halted. Market Data powered by QuoteMedia, fundamentals by Morningstar. Terms of use.
Read more