(fluid mechanics) Flow in which the velocity of flow is the gradient of a scalar function, known as the velocity potential.
| Sci-Tech Dictionary: potential flow |
(fluid mechanics) Flow in which the velocity of flow is the gradient of a scalar function, known as the velocity potential.
| 5min Related Video: Potential flow |
| Sci-Tech Encyclopedia: Potential flow |
A fluid flow that is isentropic and that, if incompressible, can be mathematically described by Laplace's equation. For an ideal fluid, or a flow in which viscous effects are ignored, vorticity (defined as the curl of the velocity) cannot be produced, and any initial vorticity existing in the flow simply moves unchanged with the fluid. Ideal fluids, of course, do not exist since any actual fluid has some viscosity, and the effects of this viscosity will be important near a solid wall, in the region known as the boundary layer. Nevertheless, the study of potential flow is important in hydrodynamics, where the fluid is considered incompressible, and even in aerodynamics, where the fluid is considered compressible, as long as shock waves are not present. See also Boundary-layer flow; Compressible flow; Isentropic flow.
In the absence of viscous effects, a flow starting from rest will be irrotational for all subsequent time. For an irrotational flow, the curl of the velocity is zero (∇ × V = 0). The curl of the gradient of any scalar function is zero (∇ × ∇φ = 0). It then follows mathematically that the condition of irrotationality can be satisfied identically by choosing the scalar function, φ, such that the velocity is the gradient of φ (V = ∇φ). For this reason, this scalar function φ has been traditionally referred to as the velocity potential, and the flow as a potential flow. See also
By applying the continuity equation to the definition of the potential function, it becomes possible to represent the flow by the well-known Laplace equation (∇2φ = 0), instead of the coupled system of the continuity and nonlinear Euler equations. The linearity of the Laplace equation, which also governs other important physical phenomena such as electricity and magnetism, makes it possible to use the principle of superposition to combine elementary solutions in solving more complex problems. See also Fluid flow; Laplace's differential equation; Laplace's irrotational motion.
| Wikipedia: Potential flow |
In fluid dynamics, potential flow describes the velocity field as the gradient of a scalar function: the velocity potential. As a result, a potential flow is characterized by an irrotational velocity field, which is a valid approximation for several applications. The irrotationality of a potential flow is due to the curl of a gradient always being equal to zero.
In the case of an incompressible flow the velocity potential satisfies Laplace's equation. However, potential flows also have been used to describe compressible flows. The potential flow approach occurs in the modeling of both stationary as well as nonstationary flows.
Applications of potential flow are for instance: the outer flow field for aerofoils, water waves, and groundwater flow. For flows (or parts thereof) with strong vorticity effects, the potential flow approximation is not applicable.
Contents |
In fluid dynamics, a potential flow is described by means of a velocity potential φ, being a function of space and time. The flow velocity v is a vector field equal to the gradient, ∇, of the velocity potential φ:[1]

Sometimes, also the definition v = −∇φ, with a minus sign, is used. But here we will use the definition above, without the minus sign. From vector calculus it is known, that the curl of a gradient is equal to zero:[1]

and consequently the vorticity, the curl of the velocity field v, is zero:[1]

This implies that a potential flow is an irrotational flow. This has direct consequences for the applicability of potential flow. In flow regions where vorticity is known to be important, such as wakes and boundary layers, potential flow theory is not able to provide reasonable predictions of the flow.[2] Fortunately, there are often large regions of a flow where the assumption of irrotationality is valid, which is why potential flow is used for various applications. For instance in: flow around aircraft, groundwater flow, acoustics and water waves.
In case of an incompressible flow — for instance of a liquid, or a gas at low Mach numbers; but not for sound waves — the velocity v has zero divergence:[1]

with the dot denoting the inner product. As a result, the velocity potential φ has to satisfy Laplace's equation[1]

where
is the Laplace operator (sometimes also written Δ). In this case the flow can be determined completely from its kinematics: the assumptions of irrotationality and zero divergence of the flow. Dynamics only have to be applied afterwards, if one is interested in computing pressures: for instance for flow around airfoils through the use of Bernoulli's principle.
In two dimensions, potential flow reduces to a very simple system that is analyzed using complex analysis (see below).
Potential flow theory can also be used to model irrotational compressible flow. The full potential equation, describing a steady flow, is given by:[3]

with Mach number components
and
where a is the local speed of sound. The flow velocity v is again equal to ∇Φ, with Φ the velocity potential. The full potential equation is valid for sub-, trans- and supersonic flow at arbitrary angle of attack, as long as the assumption of irrotationality is applicable.[3]
In case of either subsonic or supersonic (but not transsonic or hypersonic) flow, at small angles of attack and thin bodies, an additional assumption can be made: the velocity potential is split into an undisturbed onflow velocity V∞ in the x-direction, and small a perturbation velocity ∇φ thereof. So:[3]

In that case, the linearized small-perturbation potential equation — an approximation to the full potential equation — can be used:[3]

with M∞ = V∞ / a∞ the Mach number of the incoming free stream. This linear equation is much easier to solve than the full potential equation: it may be recast into Laplace's equation by a simple coordinate stretching in the x-direction.
| Derivation of the full potential equation |
|---|
| For a steady inviscid flow, the Euler equations — for the mass and momentum density — are, in subscript notation and in non-conservation form:[4]
while using the summation convention: since j occurs more than once in the term on the left hand side of the momentum equation, j is summed over all its components (which is from j=1 to 2 in two-dimensional flow, and from j=1 to 3 in three dimensions). Further:
The speed of sound squared a2 is equal to the derivative of the pressure p with respect to the density ρ, at constant entropy S:[5] As a result, the flow equations can be written as:
Multiplying (and summing) the momentum equation with vi, and using the mass equation to eliminate the density gradient gives: When divided by ρ, and with all terms on one side of the equation, the compressible flow equation is: Note that until this stage, no assumptions have been made regarding the flow (besides that it is a steady flow). Now, for irrotational flow the velocity v is the gradient of the velocity potential Φ, and the local Mach number components Mi are defined as:
When used in the flow equation, the full potential equation results: Written out in components, the form given at the beginning of this section is obtained. When a specific equation of state is provided, relating pressure p and density ρ, the speed of sound can be determined. Subsequently, together with adequate boundary conditions, the full potential equation can be solved (most often through the use of a computational fluid dynamics code). |
Small-amplitude sound waves can be approximated with the following potential-flow model:[6]

which is a linear wave equation for the velocity potential φ. Again the oscillatory part of the velocity vector v is related to the velocity potential by v = ∇φ, while as before Δ is the Laplace operator, and ā is the average speed of sound in the homogeneous medium. Note that also the oscillatory parts of the pressure p and density ρ each individually satisfy the wave equation, in this approximation.
Potential flow does not include all the characteristics of flows that are encountered in the real world. For example, potential flow excludes turbulence, which is commonly encountered in nature. Also, potential flow theory cannot be applied for viscous internal flows.[2] Richard Feynman considered potential flow to be so unphysical that the only fluid to obey the assumptions was "dry water".[7]
Incompressible potential flow also makes a number of invalid predictions, such as d'Alembert's paradox, which states that the drag on any object moving through an infinite fluid otherwise at rest is zero.[8]
More precisely, potential flow cannot account for the behaviour of flows that include a boundary layer.[2]
Nevertheless, understanding potential flow is important in many branches of fluid mechanics. In particular, simple potential flows (called elementary flows) such as the free vortex and the point source possess ready analytical solutions. These solutions can be superposed to create more complex flows satisfying a variety of boundary conditions. These flows correspond closely to real-life flows over the whole of fluid mechanics; in addition, many valuable insights arise when considering the deviation (often slight) between an observed flow and the corresponding potential flow.
Potential flow finds many applications in fields such as aircraft design. For instance, in computational fluid dynamics, one technique is to couple a potential flow solution outside the boundary layer to a solution of the boundary layer equations inside the boundary layer.
The absence of boundary layer effects means that any streamline can be replaced by a solid boundary with no change in the flow field, a technique used in many aerodynamic design approaches. Another technique would be the use of Riabouchinsky solids.[dubious ]
Potential flow in two dimensions is simple to analyze using conformal mapping, by the use of transformations of the complex plane. However, use of complex numbers is not required, as for example in the classical analysis of fluid flow past a cylinder. It is not possible to solve a potential flow using complex numbers in three dimensions.[9]
The basic idea is to use a holomorphic (also called analytic) or meromorphic function f, which maps the physical domain (x,y) to the transformed domain (φ,ψ). While x, y, φ and ψ are all real valued, it is convenient to define the complex quantities
and 
Now, if we write the mapping f as[9]
or 
Then, because f is a holomorphic or meromorphic function, it has to satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations[9]

The velocity components (u,v), in the (x,y) directions respectively, can be obtained directly from f by differentiating with respect to z. That is[9]

So the velocity field v = (u,v) is specified by[9]

Both φ and ψ then satisfy Laplace's equation:[9]
and 
So φ can be identified as the velocity potential and ψ is called the stream function.[9] Lines of constant ψ are known as streamlines and lines of constant φ are known as equipotential lines (see equipotential surface).
Streamlines and equipotential lines are orthogonal to each other, since[9]

Thus the flow occurs along the lines of constant ψ and at right angles to the lines of constant φ.[9]
It is interesting to note that Δψ = 0 is also satisfied, this relation being equivalent to ∇×v = 0. So the flow is irrotational. The automatic condition ∂2Ψ /( ∂x ∂y) = ∂2Ψ /( ∂y ∂x) then gives the incompressibility constraint ∇·v = 0.
Any differentiable function may be used for f. The examples that follow use a variety of elementary functions; special functions may also be used.
Note that multi-valued functions such as the natural logarithm may be used, but attention must be confined to a single Riemann surface.
|
In case the following power-law conformal map is applied, from z = x+iy to w = φ+iψ:[10]

then, writing z in polar coordinates as z = x + iy = reiθ, we have[10]
and 
In the figures to the right examples are given for several values of n. The black line is the boundary of the flow, while the darker blue lines are streamlines, and the lighter blue lines are equi-potential lines. Some interesting powers n are:[10]
The constant A is a scaling parameter: its absolute value |A| determines the scale, while its argument arg{A} introduces a rotation (if non-zero).
If w = Az1, that is, a power law with n = 1, the streamlines (ie lines of constant ψ) are a system of straight lines parallel to the x-axis. This is easiest to see by writing in terms of real and imaginary components:

thus giving
and ψ = Ay. This flow may be interpreted as uniform flow parallel to the x-axis.
If n = 2, then w = Az2 and the streamline corresponding to a particular value of ψ are those points satisfying
which is a system of rectangular hyperbolae. This may be seen by again rewriting in terms of real and imaginary components. Noting that
and rewriting sinθ = y / r and cosθ = x / r it is seen (on simplifying) that the streamlines are given by
The velocity field is given by
, or

In fluid dynamics, the flowfield near the origin corresponds to a stagnation point. Note that the fluid at the origin is at rest (this follows on differentiation of f(z) = z2 at z = 0).
The ψ = 0 streamline is particularly interesting: it has two (or four) branches, following the coordinate axes, ie x = 0 and y = 0.
As no fluid flows across the x-axis, it (the x-axis) may be treated as a solid boundary. It is thus possible to ignore the flow in the lower half-plane where y < 0 and to focus on the flow in the upper half-plane.
With this interpretation, the flow is that of a vertically directed jet impinging on a horizontal flat plate.
The flow may also be interpreted as flow into a 90 degree corner if the regions specified by (say) x < 0 and y < 0 are ignored.
If n = 3, the resulting flow is a sort of hexagonal version of the n = 2 case considered above. Streamlines are given by, ψ = 3x2y − y3 and the flow in this case may be interpreted as flow into a 60 degree corner.
If
, the streamlines are given by

This is more easily interpreted in terms of real and imaginary components:



Thus the streamlines are circles that are tangent to the x-axis at the origin. The velocity field is given by

The circles in the upper half-plane thus flow clockwise, those in the lower half-plane flow anticlockwise. Note that the velocity components are proportional to r − 2; and their values at the origin is infinite. This flow pattern is usually referred to as a doublet and can be interpreted as the combination of source-sink pair of infinite strength kept at an infinitesimally small distance apart.
If
, the streamlines are given by

This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| electromotive force | |
| electrolytic tank (engineering) | |
| panel methods (fluid mechanics) |
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Sci-Tech Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Potential flow". Read more |
Mentioned in