Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Precision-guided munition

 
Military History Companion: precision-guided munitions

The development of precision-guided munitions (PGMs) is perhaps the most significant factor in air warfare since aircraft first began to carry bombs. While bombing has proved of considerable military value, it has always been gravely hampered by one key factor, namely a lack of accuracy. Precision-guided weapons, while not providing the ‘one target, one bomb’ equation supposed by popular opinion, greatly enhance the tactical effectiveness of attack aircraft, and have become particularly important in modern warfare with the increased concern over the avoidance of civilian casualties. With the increase in the number of weapons with guidance systems, it is important to define what PGMs are. They may be regarded as weapons which are air launched and guided to their target through the use of laser, electro-optical sensors, global positioning systems, or inertial navigation systems. Some anti-armour missiles, such as the American TOW system, are highly accurate and guided, but they do not quite fall into the category of PGMs. The term does not normally encompass weapons which are fired from the ground or sea, and generally, but not exclusively, applies to unpowered bombs with guidance systems attached.

The first precision weapons were employed in WW II. Most of the development occurred in Germany and the USA. The two key German weapon types were the Ruhrstahl/Kramer X1, or Fritz X, and the Henschel Hs 293, both used for anti-shipping purposes. The Fritz X was a guided glide bomb, while the Hs 293 was powered by a small rocket motor for the initial stage of its journey, gliding the rest of the way. Both were guided to their targets by radio signals. The Hs 293 was the first into action, sinking the sloop HMS Egret on 27 August 1943. The Fritz X was first employed the following month. Both systems had the disadvantage that the launch aircraft were required to fly at slow speed, loitering in the target area, which made them vulnerable to attack by enemy fighters or anti-aircraft fire.

The development of guided weapons on the Allied side has been curiously ignored by historians. The first guided bomb, the GB-1, was perversely not guided, simply being a bomb with wings to enable it to glide to the target. The GB-series of bombs were little used, but began the principle of precision guidance being made available to aircrews. The GB-4 was guided through the use of a television camera system; GB-6A possessed an infra-red seeker; GB-8 was a visual-controlled glide bomb and GB-12 was an over-water light-contrast weapon. Derivations of these methods of control are to be found in modern PGMs. As well as the winged GB-series, the US employed the VB (Vertical Bomb) system, which did not possess flying surfaces, only tail assemblies with guidance systems to adjust the tail fins. The only one to be used in WW II was the VB-1, also known as the Azon, a contraction of Azimuth Only. This meant that while the bomb aimer had control of the bomb through wireless, he could not adjust its trajectory to prevent it from falling short of the target or overshooting it; he could only control its horizontal position over the target. Although trials demonstrated that the Azon was 29 times more accurate than unguided ordnance, under combat conditions, results were patchy. A development of Azon, the enormous 12, 000 lb (5, 443 kg) Tarzon, proved equally disappointing in Korea, even though it did destroy a number of bridges. Precision-guided weapons were not to be seen in large numbers until the Vietnam war.

The first types of PGM employed in Vietnam were the laser-guided Paveway system and the electro-optically guided bomb. These types have been greatly refined, and the laser-guided bomb is the most well-known and currently the most important type. The Paveway system, on which all western laser-guided bombs are based, was a simple kit to be fitted to ordinary bombs. The kit involved a guidance system to be mounted on the nose of the bomb, and control surfaces. A target is designated by laser, either from a ground observer or from a podded laser system carried by the aircraft or a companion (‘buddy lasing’ in the latter instance). The laser-guided bomb is then tossed or dropped into the inverted cone of laser light reflected from the target. The seeker system detects the laser light and its guidance computer corrects the angle of the control surfaces to ensure that the bomb arrives on or near to the point of the cone of laser radiation. The system has been highly effective, and has been used to equip several thousand bombs weighing between 500 lb and 2, 000 lb (between 226.8 and 907 kg) in weight. Although much more accurate than unguided weapons, the laser-guided bomb does not guarantee complete accuracy. The figures are greatly disputed, particularly since the qualifications for accuracy change from assessment to assessment, but it is estimated that a laser-guided system, if used under adequate conditions, can achieve in the region of 80 per cent of bombs dropped hitting within 10 to 30 feet (3 to 9 metres) of the designated spot.

The electro-optically guided bomb has been less successful. The first to see widespread use were the US navy's Walleye and the USAF's GBU-8 HOBOS in Vietnam, followed into US service by the GBU-15 glide bomb and the AGM-130 rocket-assisted weapon. Soviet forces employed a number of similar weapons, and development of the type continues in Russia. The principle behind such weapons is simple: the pilot or weapons system operator acquires the target through the weapon's electro-optical seeker, locks the seeker onto the target, and then launches the weapon. The newer weapons can have corrections sent to them through a data-link pod to ensure accuracy, but many of the older types broke lock through the failure of the seeker to maintain the contrast between the target and the background. This has led to the use of imaging infra-red seekers as alternatives to the optical systems on the GBU-15 and the AGM-130. The major difficulty with acquiring electro-optical PGMs is their cost; the sophisticated seeker equipment is considerably more expensive than laser-guided types.

Laser-guided and electro-optical weapons have a major obstacle to their effective utilization, and this is the weather. Both rely upon visual acquisition of the target so that it can be designated. Increasingly sophisticated designation pods such as the British TIALD are not proof against this problem, and when conditions of visibility are poor, it is not unknown for missions to be aborted. This leaves dependency upon intertially guided systems which are highly expensive, and are to be found only in cruise missiles. These did not originate as conventional weapons, but were designed to deliver nuclear warheads to a target over long ranges. The two key types in use are the American Tomahawk Land Attack Missile and Conventional Air Launched Cruise Missile. Both rely upon terrain profile matching, so that they navigate by matching the contours of the ground beneath the missile with pre-installed navigational instructions. This gives the weapons their famed ability to turn at key road junctions as if navigating along the highway beneath; they do not rely upon the presence of the road, but on the contours along which it runs. The addition of Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment makes the weapons even more accurate. Essentially, GPS enables the missile to communicate with satellites so that it can work out exactly where over the earth's surface it is. When the satellite systems tell the weapon that it is approaching or over the target's co-ordinates, the weapon adjusts its control surfaces so that the PGM hits the target. The order of accuracy may be measured in a few feet.

The use of GPS would appear to be the way forward for PGMs. It means that they can be employed in any weather, and conventional bombs can be modified relatively inexpensively with the fitting of a fixed aerodynamic jacket around the bomb body to keep it falling at a constant angle, and a tail unit with GPS equipment and movable fins. The GPS-guided munitions currently in service are the USA's GAM-84 and GAM-113, deployed on the B-2 bomber.

PGMs are essential tools for modern war. The political implications which now attach to civilian casualties mean that their use will increase. The search for the PGM which hits its target every time will be eternal; however, the purpose of the PGM is not to ensure 100 per cent accuracy, but to ensure that targets are much more likely to be destroyed or damaged, increasing the effectiveness of the aircraft employing them and reducing the risk of civilian casualties on the ground. In spite of their expense when compared to unguided weapons, they are a worthwhile investment, and desirable acquisitions for all military services. They will not replace unguided ordnance entirely, but PGMs will be the air weapon of choice in the future.

Bibliography

  • Cordesman, Anthony H., and Wagner, Abraham R., The Lessons of Modern War, vol. iv. The Gulf War (Boulder, Colo., 1996).
  • Gunston, Bill, The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft Armament (Salamander, 1987)

— David Jordan

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
US Military History Companion: Precision‐Guided Munitions
Top

(PGMs) are generally characterized as weapons with terminal guidance systems. In addition to “smart” bombs, the term is applied to a wide variety of weapons, from air‐to‐air and air‐to‐ground missiles to wire‐guided torpedoes.

One of the most enduring images of the Persian Gulf War of 1991 are the videotapes played on CNN and other news networks of “smart” bombs in action. These tapes showed, from bomb‐mounted TV cameras, the munitions rapidly and accurately approaching their targets, followed by the picture turning black and then into static when it hit. This popular memory persists despite the fact that a mere 9 percent of the bombs dropped by the Americans during the conflict were of the “smart” type. Weapons such as these fall into the category of precision‐guided munitions.

Despite the publicity surrounding the “smart” bomb, antitank weapons are the type most associated with precision‐guided munitions. The Soviets had the best early success in the 1960s with their AT‐1, AT‐2, and most of all the AT‐3 “Sagger” antitank missiles. The United States had its start with anti‐armor PGMS in the 1970s with the first generation of TOW (tube‐launched, optically sighted, wire‐guided missile), ushering in a period of emphasis on PGMs. These two weapons systems saw their first widespread use in combat during the 1973 Yom Kippur War. Egyptian units equipped with Soviet AT‐3s destroyed 180 of 290 Israeli tanks in just one day of combat on the Sinai front. By the conclusion of the seven days of fighting, Israel had lost 420 tanks—25 percent of its inventory. This devastating result would not go unnoticed by military theorists.

The paramount driving force behind the development of PGMs is efficiency. The massive bombing campaigns and artillery barrages of World War II caused a great deal of collateral damage, but very often failed to destroy the intended target. The actual objectives of many of these attacks could have been neutralized using only a fraction of the explosive tonnage delivered, but the lack of an accurate delivery method required the use of “area bombing” with a large tonnage of munitions. This technique, along with specific targeting of civilians in “terror bombing” campaigns, was at best morally questionable. Furthermore, the belief that bombing would break the enemy's spirit to fight seems to have been unfounded.

The measurement used to determine bombing efficiency is known as circular error probable or CEP. The CEP is the radial distance from a target inscribing an imaginary circle with an area large enough so that 50 percent of the bombs dropped fall within it. The CEP during World War II was 3,300 feet; in the Vietnam War and the Persian Gulf War, it was 6 feet.

The drawback with PGM is cost. A iron “dumb” bomb or an unguided rocket is much less expensive than a precision‐guided bomb or missile. Concerns about the costs and reliability and the expenditure in training with these munitions were the subject of congressional hearings in 1984.

Although the Persian Gulf War of 1991 brought headlines to “smart” bomb PGMs, such weapons had been used by the United States five years before in a 1986 raid on Libya and nearly twenty years earlier in Vietnam. Primitive PGMs had even seen some use by Germany in World War II. It was in the Vietnam War, however, that PGMs saw their first success. One of the early PGMs was the navy's “Walleye” electro‐optic guided bomb (EGOB). The Walleye is little more than a TV camera mounted on the weapon's nose. As the munition descends, the television relays the bomb's view to a monitor viewed by a weapons officer who remotely steers the bomb electronically by controlling its tail fins. A U.S. Air Force approach, developed by Col. Joseph Short and Weldon Wood of Texas Instruments, involved laser energy. Known as “Paveway,” this laser‐guided bomb (LGB) involves an attacking aircraft that finds a target via a TV camera and then fires a “Pave Knife” laser designator to “paint” the object to hit. The bomb then follows the beam through a laser seeker unit. This technique required only a single aircraft, but when used against targets in North Vietnam, it was found to be more effective for two aircraft to conduct attacks. One would locate and designate the target while the other dropped the bomb. The first successful PGM attacks in North Vietnam using both Walleye and Paveway‐type munitions were against the Paul Dormier Bridge and Than Hoa Bridge in April and May of 1972.

The social and political ramifications of PGM—especially bombs and missiles—has been significant. Post–Gulf War punitive raids on Iraq, strikes on Serbian positions in Bosnia, and the 1998 U.S. retaliatory raids on terrorist facilities in Afghanistan and the Sudan have all been carried out with PGMs in order to minimize damage to civilians and risk to U.S. service people. “Standoff” weapons fitting into the PGM category provide the United States with the means to strike adversaries from a distance with little or no risk to U.S. forces.

[See also Bombing of Civilians; Bombs; Heat‐Seeking Technology; Lasers.]

US Military Dictionary: precision-guided munitions
Top

”smart” bombs, artillery projectiles, and missiles which are terminally guided to their targets with a high degree of accuracy by laser or electro-optical guidance systems.

See the Introduction, Abbreviations and Pronunciation for further details.

Military Dictionary: precision-guided munitions
Top

(DOD) A weapon that uses a seeker to detect electromagnetic energy reflected from a target or reference point and, through processing, provides guidance commands to a control system that guides the weapon to the target. Also called PGM. See also munitions.

Wikipedia: Precision-guided munition
Top
BOLT-117, the world's first laser-guided bomb

Precision-guided munitions (PGMs, smart munitions, smart bombs, guided bomb units or GBUs) are guided weapons intended to precisely hit a specific target, and to minimize damage to things other than the target.[1] A guided bomb differs from a guided missile in that a bomb relies on the speed and height of the launch aircraft for propulsion, whilst a missile has an onboard engine.

Because the damage effects of explosive weapons fall off with distance according to a power law, even modest improvements in accuracy (and hence reduction in miss distance) enable a target to be effectively attacked with fewer or smaller bombs. Thus, even if some bombs miss, fewer air crews are put at risk and the harm to civilians and the amount of collateral damage may be somewhat reduced.

The creation of precision-guided munitions resulted in the renaming of older bombs as "gravity bombs", "dumb bombs" or "iron bombs".

Contents

Types of precision-guided ammunition

A laser-guided GBU-24 (BLU-109 warhead variant) strikes its target.

Recognizing the difficulty of hitting moving ships during the Spanish Civil War,[2] the Germans were first to develop steerable munitions, using radio control or wire guidance. The U.S. tested TV-guided (GB-4),[3] semi-active radar-guided (Bat), and infrared-guided (Felix) weapons.

Radio-controlled weapons

The Germans were first to introduce PGMs in combat, using the 1,400-kg (3,100 lb) Fritz X to successfully attack the Italian battleship Roma in 1943 and the Henschel Hs 293 missile (also in use since 1943, but only against lightly armored or unarmored ship targets). The closest Allied equivalents were the 1000-lb (454 kg) AZON (AZimuth ONly), used in both Europe and the Pacific, and the US Navy's Bat, primarily used in the Pacific Theater of World War II. In addition, the U.S. tested the rocket-propelled Gargoyle; it never entered service.[4] Japanese PGMs did not see combat in World War II.

The United States Army Air Forces experimented with radio-controlled remotely guided planes in Operation Aphrodite, but had few successes; the German Mistel (Mistletoe) "parasite aircraft" was no more effective.

The U.S. programs restarted in the Korean War. In the 1960s, the electro-optical bomb (or camera bomb) was reintroduced. They were equipped with television cameras and flare sights, by which the bomb would be steered until the flare superimposed the target. The camera bombs transmitted a "bomb's eye view" of the target back to a controlling aircraft. An operator in this aircraft then transmitted control signals to steerable fins fitted to the bomb. Such weapons were used increasingly by the USAF in the last few years of the Vietnam War because the political climate was increasingly intolerant of civilian casualties, and because it was possible to strike difficult targets (such as bridges) effectively with a single mission; the Thanh Hoa Bridge, for instance, was attacked repeatedly with iron bombs, to no effect, only to be dropped in one mission with PGMs.

Although not as popular as the newer JDAM and JSOW weapons, or even the older Laser-guided bomb systems, weapons like the AGM-62 Walleye TV-guided bomb are still being used, in conjunction with the AAW-144 Data Link Pod, on US Navy F/A-18 Hornets.

Infrared-guided weapons

In World War II, the U.S. National Defense Research Committee developed the VB-6 Felix, which used infrared to home on ships. While it entered production in 1945, it was never employed operationally.[5]

Laser-guided weapons

In 1962, the US Army began research into laser guidance systems and by 1967 the USAF had conducted a competitive evaluation leading to full development of the world's first laser-guided bomb, the BOLT-117, in 1968. All such bombs work in much the same way, relying on the target being illuminated, or "painted," by a laser target designator on the ground or on an aircraft. They have the significant disadvantage of not being usable in poor weather where the target illumination cannot be seen, or where it is not possible to get a target designator near the target. The laser designator sends its beam in a series of encrypted pulses so the bomb cannot be confused by an ordinary laser, and also so multiple designators can operate in reasonable proximity.

Laser-guided weapons did not become commonplace until the advent of the microchip. They made their practical debut in Vietnam, where on 13 May 1972 when they were used in the second successful attack on the Thanh Hoa Bridge ("Dragon's Jaw"). This structure had previously been the target of 800 American sorties[6] (using unguided weapons) and was partially destroyed in each of two successful attacks, the other being on 27 April 1972 using Walleyes. That first mission also had laser-guided weapons, but bad weather prevented their use. They were used, though not on a large scale, by the British forces during the 1982 Falklands War.[7] The first large-scale use of smart weapons came in 1991 during Operation Desert Storm when they were used by coalition forces against Iraq. Even so, most of the air-dropped ordnance used in that war was "dumb," although the percentages are biased by the large use of various (unguided) cluster bombs. Laser-guided weapons were used in large numbers during the 1999 Kosovo War, but their effectiveness was often reduced by the poor weather conditions prevalent in the southern Balkans.

There are two basic families of laser-guided bombs in American (and American-sphere) service: the Paveway II and the Paveway III. The Paveway III guidance system is more aerodynamically efficient and so has a longer range, however it is more expensive. Paveway II 500-pound LGBs (such as GBU-12) are a cheaper lightweight PGM suitable for use against vehicles and other small targets, while a Paveway III 2000-pound penetrator (such as GBU-24) is a more expensive weapon suitable for use against high-value targets. GBU-12s were used to great effect in the first Gulf War, dropped from F-111F aircraft to destroy Iraqi armored vehicles in a process referred to as "tank plinking."

Radar/Infrared/IR Imaging/Electro-Optical Guided Weapons

Precision guidance has been applied to weapons other than conventional bomb warheads. The Raytheon Maverick heavy anti-tank missile has among its various marks guidance systems such as electro-optical (AGM-65A), imaging infra-red (AGM-65D), and laser homing (AGM-65E).[8] The first two, by guiding themselves based on the visual or IR scene of the target, are fire-and-forget in that the pilot can release the weapon and it will guide itself to the target without further input, which allows the delivery aircraft to manoeuvre to escape return fire.

Millimeter-wave radar

The Lockheed-Martin Hellfire II light-weight anti-tank weapon in one mark uses the radar on the Boeing AH-64D Apache Longbow to provide fire-and-forget guidance for that weapon.

Satellite-guided weapons

HOPE/HOSBO of the Luftwaffe with a combination of GPS/INS and electro-optical guidance

Lessons learned during the first Gulf War showed the value of precision munitions, yet they also highlighted the difficulties in employing them — specifically when visibility of the ground or target from the air was degraded.[9] The problem of poor visibility does not affect satellite-guided weapons such as Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) and Joint Stand-Off Weapon (JSOW), which make use of the United States' GPS system for guidance. This weapon can be employed in all weather conditions, without any need for ground support. Because it is possible to jam GPS, the guidance package reverts to inertial navigation in the event of GPS signal loss. Inertial navigation is significantly less accurate; the JDAM achieves a published Circular Error Probable (CEP) of 13 m under GPS guidance, but typically only 30m under inertial guidance (with free fall times of 100 seconds or less).[10][11]

The precision of these weapons is dependent both on the precision of the measurement system used for location determination and the precision in setting the coordinates of the target. The latter critically depends on intelligence information, not all of which is accurate. According to a CIA report, the accidental bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade during Operation Allied Force by NATO aircraft was attributed to faulty target information.[12] However, if the targeting information is accurate, satellite-guided weapons are significantly more likely to achieve a successful strike in any given weather conditions than any other type of precision-guided munition.

Advanced guidance concepts

Responding to after-action reports from pilots who employed laser and/or satellite guided weapons, Boeing has developed a Laser JDAM (LJDAM) to provide both types of guidance in a single kit. Based on the existing JDAM configurations, a laser guidance package is added to a GPS/INS guided weapon to increase the overall accuracy of the weapons.[13] Raytheon has developed the Enhanced Paveway family, which adds GPS/INS guidance to their Paveway family of laser-guidance packages.[14] These "hybrid" laser and GPS guided weapons permit the carriage of fewer weapons types, while retaining mission flexibility, because these weapons can be employed equally against moving and fixed targets, or targets of opportunity. For instance, a typical weapons load on an F-16 flying in the Iraq War included a single 2,000-lb JDAM and two 1000-lb LGBs. With LJDAM, and the new Small Diameter Bomb, these same aircraft can carry more bombs if necessary, and have the option of satellite or laser guidance for each weapon release.

Cannon Launched Guided Projectiles

A Cannon Launched Guided Projectile (CLGP), a precursor to modern PGMs, is fired from artillery, ship's cannon, or armored vehicle. Several agencies and organizations sponsored CLGP programs. The United States Navy sponsored the "Deadeye" program, a laser-guided shell for its 5" guns[15] and a program to mate a Paveway guidance system to an 8" shell[16] for the 8"/55 caliber Mark 71 gun in the 1970s (Photo). Other Navy efforts include the BTERM, ERGM, and LRLAP shells.

The U.S. Army's MGM-51 Shillelagh missile can be considered a type of CLGP. Intended for use on the M551 Sheridan light tank, the Shillelagh missile was fired out of the Sheridan's cannon to provide robust anti-tank capability. The Army's M712 Copperhead laser guided artillery round was used in Desert Storm. Army CLGPs include the M982 Excalibur 155mm artillery shell, the XM395 Precision Guided Mortar Munition, and the XM1156 Precision Guidance Kit to refit existing 155mm shells with precision guidance, as the Air Force's JDAM program converts dumb bombs into precision munitions.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Hamilton, Richard (1995). "Precision guided munitions and the new era of warefare". Air Power Studies Centre, Royal Australian Air Force. http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/docs/paper53.htm. Retrieved 2009-02-02. 
  2. ^ Fitzsimons, Bernard, editor. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of 20th Century Weapons and Warfare (London: Phoebus, 1978), Volume 10, p.1037, "Fritz-X".
  3. ^ Fitzsimons, op. cit., Volume 10, p.1101, "GB-4".
  4. ^ Fitzsimons, op. cit., Volume 10, p.1090, "Gargoyle".
  5. ^ Fitzsimons, op. cit., Volume 9, p.926, "Felix".
  6. ^ Thanh Hoa Bridge
  7. ^ Britain's Small Wars
  8. ^ Raytheon AGM-65 Maverick
  9. ^ JDAM continues to be warfighter's weapon of choice
  10. ^ U.S. Air Force Factsheets: Joint Direct Attack Munition
  11. ^ JDAM Specifications
  12. ^ DCI Statement on the Belgrade Chinese Embassy
  13. ^ Boeing Laser JDAM
  14. ^ Raytheon Enhanced Paveway
  15. ^ [1]
  16. ^ 8" shell

External links


 
 

 

Copyrights:

Military History Companion. The Oxford Companion to Military History. Copyright © 2001, 2004 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
US Military History Companion. The Oxford Companion to American Military History. Copyright © 2000 by Oxford University Press, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
US Military Dictionary. The Oxford Essential Dictionary of the U.S. Military. Copyright © 2001, 2002 by Oxford University Press, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Military Dictionary. US Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Words, 2003.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Precision-guided munition" Read more