 |
This article or section has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.
|
Problematization (or problematisation) of a term, writing, opinion, ideology, identity, or person is to consider the concrete or existential elements of those involved as challenges (problems) that invite the people involved to transform those situations. [1] It is a way of defamiliarisation of common sense.
Problematization is a critical and pedagogical dialogue or process and may be considered demythicisation. Rather than taking the common knowledge (myth) of a situation for granted, problematization poses that knowledge as a problem, allowing new viewpoints, consciousness, reflection, hope, and action to emerge.[1]
What may make problematization different from other forms of criticism is its target, the context and details, rather than the pro or con of an argument. More importantly, this criticism does not take place within the original context or argument, but draws back from it, re-evaluates it, leading to action which changes the situation. Rather than accepting the situation, one emerges from it, abandoning a focalised viewpoint.[1]
To problematize a statement, for example, one asks simple questions:
- Who is making this statement?
- Who is he or she making it for?
- Why is this statement being made here, now?
- Whom does this statement benefit?
- Whom does it harm?
Source
- ^ a b c Crotty, Michael J. (1998). Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. SAGE Publications. ISBN 0-7619-6106-2. Describing Freire (1976). p. 155-156.
External links
 |
Look up problematize in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
 |
This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
