Proof that e is irrational: Information from Answers.com

Part of a series of articles on
The mathematical constant e

Natural logarithm · Exponential function

Applications in: compound interest · Euler's identity & Euler's formula · half-lives & exponential growth/decay

Defining e: proof that e is irrational · representations of e · Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem

People John Napier · Leonhard Euler

Schanuel's conjecture

In mathematics, the series representation of Euler's number e

$e = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!}\!$

can be used to prove that e is irrational. Of the many representations of e, this is the Taylor series for the exponential function e^y evaluated at y = 1.

1 Summary of the proof
2 Proof
3 e^q is irrational
4 References
5 See also

Summary of the proof

This is a proof by contradiction. Initially e is assumed to be a rational number of the form a/b. We then analyze a blown-up difference x of the series representing e and its strictly smaller bth partial sum, which approximates the limiting value e. By choosing the magnifying factor to be b!, the fraction a/b and the bth partial sum are turned into integers, hence x must be a positive integer. However, the fast convergence of the series representation implies that the magnified approximation error x is still strictly smaller than 1. From this contradiction we deduce that e is irrational.

Proof

Towards a contradiction, suppose that e is a rational number. Then there exist positive integers a and b such that e = a/b.

Define the number

$x = b!\,\biggl(e - \sum_{n = 0}^{b} \frac{1}{n!}\biggr)\!$

To see that if e is rational, then x is an integer, substitute e = a/b into this definition to obtain

$x = b!\,\biggl(\frac{a}{b} - \sum_{n = 0}^{b} \frac{1}{n!}\biggr) = a(b - 1)! - \sum_{n = 0}^{b} \frac{b!}{n!}\,.$

The first term is an integer, and every fraction in the sum is an integer since n ≤ b for each term. Therefore x is an integer.

We now prove that 0 < x < 1. First, insert the above series representation of e into the definition of x to obtain

$x = \sum_{n = b+1}^{\infty} \frac{b!}{n!}>0\,.\!$

For all terms with n ≥ b + 1 we have the upper estimate

$\frac{b!}{n!} =\frac1{(b+1)(b+2)\cdots(b+(n-b))} \le\frac1{(b+1)^{n-b}}\,,\!$

which is even strict for every n ≥ b + 2. Changing the index of summation to k = n – b and using the formula for the infinite geometric series, we obtain

$x =\sum_{n = b+1}^{\infty} \frac{b!}{n!} < \sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac1{(b+1)^k} =\frac{1}{b+1}\biggl(\frac1{1-\frac1{b+1}}\biggr) = \frac{1}{b} \le 1.$

Since there is no integer strictly between 0 and 1, we have reached a contradiction, and so e must be irrational. Q.E.D.

e^q is irrational

The above proof can be found in Proofs from THE BOOK. It is used as a stepping stone in Ivan Niven's 1947 proof that π² is irrational and also for the stronger result that e^q is irrational for any non-zero rational q.^[1]

References

^ Aigner, Martin; Ziegler, Günter M. (1998), Proofs from THE BOOK, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 27–36 .

	What is the proof that square root of 6 plus square root of 30 is irrational? Read answer...
	Rounded to three decimal places the value of the irrational number e is? Read answer...
	Can you sue over e coli without proof of the strain? Read answer...

	Term needed to proof a number is irrational?
	French mathematician one of his highlights is the proof of the irrationality of pi?
	If e is an irrational number and so is i and so is pi then how come e to the ipi -1?

Proof that e is irrational

Contents

Summary of the proof

Proof

eq is irrational

References

See also

e^q is irrational