For more information on quantity theory of money, visit Britannica.com.
| Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: quantity theory of money |
For more information on quantity theory of money, visit Britannica.com.
| 5min Related Video: Quantity theory of money |
| Investment Dictionary: Velocity (of Money) |
A term used to describe the rate at which money is exchanged from one transaction to another.
Investopedia Says:
Velocity is important for measuring the rate at which money in circulation is used for purchasing goods and services. This helps investors gauge how robust the economy is. It is usually measured as a ratio of GNP to a country's total supply of money.
Related Links:
Learn how to build a price rate of change indicator and incorporate it in your strategy. Measure Momentum Change With ROC
Learn about measurement of the speed or velocity of price changes. Getting to Know Oscillators - Part 4: Momentum
| Banking Dictionary: Velocity of Money |
Number of times that money balances turn over in the economy. According to the Monetarist theory of economics, the velocity of money should be the principal objective of Federal Reserve Monetary Policy. The velocity of money is computed by dividing the nation's output of goods and services (Gross Domestic Product) by the total Money Supply (or circulating currency plus checking account deposits). Velocity of money is also influenced by interest rates. When rates are low, people hold more money in cash; when rates are rising, they put more money in interest paying investments. See also Monetary Policy; Liquidity Preference Theory.
| Wikipedia: Quantity theory of money |
In monetary economics, the quantity theory of money is the theory that money supply has a direct, positive relationship with the price level.
The theory was challenged by Keynesian economics,[1] but updated and reinvigorated by the monetarist school of economics. While mainstream economists agree that the quantity theory holds true in the long-run, there is still disagreement about its applicability in the short-run. Critics of the theory argue that money velocity is not stable and, in the short-run, prices are sticky, so the direct relationship between money supply and price level does not hold.
Alternative theories include the real bills doctrine and the more recent fiscal theory of the price level.
Contents |
The quantity theory descends from Copernicus,[2] followers of the School of Salamanca, Jean Bodin,[3], and various others who noted the increase in prices following the import of gold and silver, used in the coinage of money, from the New World. The “equation of exchange” relating the supply of money to the value of money transactions was stated by John Stuart Mill[4] who expanded on the ideas of David Hume.[5] The quantity theory was developed by Simon Newcomb,[6] Alfred de Foville,[7] Irving Fisher[8], and Ludwig von Mises[9] in the latter 19th and early 20th century. It was influentially restated by Milton Friedman in the post-Keynesian era.[10]
Academic discussion remains over the degree to which different figures developed the theory.[11] For instance, Bieda argues that Copernicus's observation
Money can lose its value through excessive abundance, if so much silver is coined as to heighten people's demand for silver bullion. For in this way, the coinage's estimation vanishes when it cannot buy as much silver as the money itself contains […]. The solution is to mint no more coinage until it recovers its par value.[11]
amounts to a statement of the theory,[12] while other economic historians date the discovery later, to figures such as Jean Bodin, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill.[13][11]
Historically, the main rival of the quantity theory was the real bills doctrine, which says that the issue of money does not raise prices, as long as the new money is issued in exchange for assets of sufficient value.[14]
In its modern form, the quantity theory builds upon the following definitional relationship.

where
is the total amount of money in circulation on average in an economy during the period, say a year.
is the transactions' velocity of money, that is the average frequency across all transactions with which a unit of money is spent. This reflects availability of financial institutions, economic variables, and choices made as to how fast people turn over their money.
and
are the price and quantity of the i-th transaction.
is a vector of the
.
is a vector of the
.Mainstream economics accepts a simplification, the equation of exchange:

where
The previous equation presents the difficulty that the associated data are not available for all transactions. With the development of national income and product accounts, emphasis shifted to national-income or final-product transactions, rather than gross transactions. Economists may therefore work with the form

where
As an example, M might represent currency plus deposits in checking and savings accounts held by the public, Q real output with P the corresponding price level, and
the nominal (money) value of output. In one empirical formulation, velocity was taken to be “the ratio of net national product in current prices to the money stock”.[15]
Thus far, the theory is not particularly controversial. But there are questions of the extent to which each of these variables is dependent upon the others. Without further restrictions, it does not require that change in the money supply would change the value of any or all of P, Q, or
. For example, a 10% increase in M could be accompanied by a 10% decrease in V, leaving
unchanged.
The equation of exchange can be used to form a rudimentary theory of inflation.

If V and Q were constant, then:

and thus

where
That is to say that, if V and Q were constant, then the inflation rate would exactly equal the growth rate of the money supply.
Economists Alfred Marshall, A.C. Pigou, and John Maynard Keynes (before he developed his own, eponymous school of thought) associated with Cambridge University, took a slightly different approach to the quantity theory, focusing on money demand instead of money supply. They argued that a certain portion of the money supply will not be used for transactions; instead, it will be held for the convenience and security of having cash on hand. This portion of cash is commonly represented as k, a portion of nominal income (
). The Cambridge economists also thought wealth would play a role, but wealth is often omitted for simplicity. The Cambridge equation is thus:

Assuming that the economy is at equilibrium (Md = M), Y is exogenous, and k is fixed in the short run, the Cambridge equation is equivalent to the equation of exchange with velocity equal to the inverse of k:

The Cambridge version of the quantity theory led to both Keynes's attack on the quantity theory and the Monetarist revival of the theory.[16]
As restated by Milton Friedman, the quantity theory emphasizes the following relationship of the nominal value of expenditures PQ and the price level P to the quantity of money M:


The plus signs indicate that a change in the money supply is hypothesized to change nominal expenditures and the price level in the same direction (for other variables held constant).
Friedman described the empirical regularity of substantial changes in the quantity of money and in the level of prices as perhaps the most-evidenced economic phenomenon on record.[17] Empirical studies have found relations consistent with the models above and with causation running from money to prices. The short-run relation of a change in the money supply in the past has been relatively more associated with a change in real output Q than the price level P in (1) but with much variation in the precision, timing, and size of the relation. For the long-run, there has been stronger support for (1) and (2) and no systematic association of Q and M.[18]
The theory above is based on the following hypotheses:
An application of the quantity-theory approach aimed at removing monetary policy as a source of macroeconomic instability was to target a constant, low growth rate of the money supply.[19] Still, practical identification of the relevant money supply, including measurement, was always somewhat controversial and difficult. As financial intermediation grew in complexity and sophistication in the 1980s and 1990s, it became more so. As a result, some central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, which had targeted the money supply, reverted to targeting interest rates. But monetary aggregates remain a leading economic indicator.[20] with "some evidence that the linkages between money and economic activity are robust even at relatively short-run frequencies."[21]
The theory attracted criticism from John Maynard Keynes, particularly in his work General Theory.[1][clarification needed]
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Quantity Theory of Money (in banking) | |
| monetarism | |
| Irving Fisher |
| According to quantity theory of money what is the effect of an increase in the quantity of money? | |
| What is the quantity theory of money? | |
| Importance of quantity theory of money? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Investment Dictionary. Copyright ©2000, Investopedia.com - Owned and Operated by Investopedia Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Banking Dictionary. Dictionary of Banking Terms. Copyright © 2006 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Quantity theory of money". Read more |
Mentioned in