answersLogoWhite

0

AllQ&AStudy Guides
Best answer

wikipedia is more reliable in terms of reliability but wikianswers is easier and faster to use plus it cuts straight to the point

This answer is:
Related answers

wikipedia is more reliable in terms of reliability but wikianswers is easier and faster to use plus it cuts straight to the point

View page

Answers.com is already better than Wikipedia. Part of the reason is because Wikipedia is part of Answers.com's reference sources. In addition, Answers.com carries reliable sources. The verdict is still out on the reliability of Wikipedia. At Answers.com, there are over 180 encyclopedias and dictionaries where you can get your information from. Wikipedia is only one source.

View page

From Wikipedia: "In retail business, a warranty (or "extended warranty") commonly refers to a guarantee of the reliability of a product under conditions of ordinary use."

View page

Wikipedia has a good article on the origin of tea bags. If you don't feel comfortable with the reliability of Wikipedia, the article lists its sources so you can be confident that the research you have found is factual.

View page
Impact of Low Quality InformationIf Wikipedia had low quality information, people would stop using the site and go to another site to get reliable information. The fact that so many people use Wikipedia is a testament to the reliability of the information the site provides.
View page
Featured study guide

Cold War

17 cards

What is Wikipedia

How does JIT delivery help stores make a profit

What shipping practice made international trade easier

How does supporting fair trade help consumers

➡️
See all cards
4.5
2 Reviews
More study guides
No Reviews

5.0
1 Review
Search results