Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Religious toleration

 
British History: religious toleration

Religious toleration, a principle accepted without question by most people in the 21st cent., came about more by a process of exhaustion than by the triumph of reasoned argument. Few people in the 16th cent. doubted that state and church had not only the right but the duty to put down religious dissent. They assumed that religious truth was God-given and absolute; that a country divided in religion would be fatally weakened; that nonconformists were potential traitors; that the exercise of private judgement would, in the end, undermine all authority and produce a shattered and anarchic society, in which everything was permissible.

The Reformation brought about toleration neither by design nor directly, but as a by-product. None of the great reformers—Luther, Calvin, Zwingli—were tolerant of their opponents. In defence of his own position, Luther was first obliged to challenge papal authority, then to expound the right of the secular ruler to declare the religious policy of his state. That formula was accepted in the Augsburg peace of 1555—cuius regio, eius religio (the ruler shall decide religion). Only catholicism or Lutheranism were permitted choices and there was no provision for toleration. But in practice political considerations sometimes made rulers embrace toleration. Countries like Prussia, which were chronically short of labour, might find it imprudent to drive out subjects and might welcome refugees from less tolerant states.

In England there had been little need for a hunt after heretics until the late 14th cent., when Wyclif's teaching combined with social unrest to produce lollardy. The authorities responded with the act of 1401 De heretico comburendo—on the burning of heretics. The seed-time for toleration in England was after the Civil War, when sects multiplied and the victorious parliamentary army demanded from the presbyterians toleration for baptists, congregationalists, and independents.

The Restoration in 1660 saw a lurch backwards, with Parliament passing severe legislation against catholics and dissenters. But, again, the exigencies of politics called for tactical behaviour and Charles II and James II both issued Declarations of Indulgence. In the crisis of 1688, when the dissenters held the balance between the Anglicans and the king, they supported the revolution, and reaped the reward from William III in 1689 in the Toleration Act, which at least permitted freedom of worship. It was far from complete. Toleration did not apply to catholics, who faced a battery of penal laws, nor to anti-trinitarians. In Scotland, episcopalians were persecuted as crypto-Jacobites. Even protestant dissenters did not have full civil rights and could neither sit in Parliament nor on corporations unless their consciences were flexible. But the narrow basis was gradually broadened, with concessions to the quakers over oath-taking and to the Scottish episcopalians over lay patronage. Underpinning the shift in policy was the start of a change in attitude. In his Letter on Toleration, published in 1689, Locke caught a new mood of calm reason: persecution created, not converts, but hypocrites, ‘for no man can, if he would, conform his faith to the dictates of another’.

There remained the problem of civil equality. No catholic and few dissenters could be MPs. Though full emancipation for catholics was held up in 1801 by the refusal of George III to sanction it, it was granted in 1829. Dissenters were allowed into Parliament in 1828 and more concessions on tithes and on marriages followed. In 1858 Jews were allowed into Parliament. At length, in 1886, after the Bradlaugh case, even atheists were admitted to Westminster. From the beginning of the Reformation, it had taken a mere 350 years.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia: Religious toleration
Top
The cross of the war memorial and a menorah for Hanukkah coexist in Oxford.
Minerva as a symbol of enlightened wisdom protects the believers of all religions (Daniel Chodowiecki, 1791)

Religious toleration is the condition of accepting or permitting others' religious beliefs and practices which disagree with one's own.

In a country with a state religion, toleration means that the government permits religious practices of other sects besides the state religion, and does not persecute believers in other faiths. It is a partial status, and might still be accompanied by forms of religious discrimination. Religious toleration as a Government policy merely means the absence of religious persecution; unlike religious liberty it does not mean that religions are equal before the law. Toleration is a privilege granted by Government (which it may do by law or charter), not a right against it; governments have often tolerated some religions and not others.

Religious toleration "as a government-sanctioned practice — the sense on which most discussion of the phenomenon relies — is not attested before the sixteenth century", which makes it rather difficult to apply the concept to topics like Persecution of religion in ancient Rome.[1]

Historically, toleration has been a contentious issue within many religions as well as between one religion and another. At issue is not merely whether other faiths should be permitted, but also whether a ruler who is a believer may be tolerant, or permit his subordinates to be.

In the Middle Ages, toleration of Judaism was a contentious issue throughout Christendom. Today, there are concerns about toleration of Christianity in Islamic states (see also dhimmi and Islam and other religions).

Proselytism can be a contentious issue; it can be regarded as an offence against the validity of others' religions, or as an expression of one's own faith.

Contents

The development of religious toleration

The concept of toleration has evolved in modern Europe, and changed during its development. For a contemporary reader there is a danger of confusing the modern connotation of words like "toleration", "religious freedom " and "liberty of conscience" with the historic meanings of these word.[2] The use of these terms in John Stuart Mill's On Liberty or by 20th century philosophers like John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin is different from the concept of religious toleration in the 17th century.[2]

To complicate matters further, the Latin tolerantia was a "highly-developed political and judicial concept in mediaeval scholastic theology and canon law."[3] Tolerantia was used to "denote the self-restraint of a civil power in the face of" outsiders, like infidels, Muslims or Jews, but also in the face of social groups like prostitutes and lepers.[3]

For individuals, religious toleration generally means an attitude of acceptance towards other people's religions. It does not mean that one views other religions as equally true; merely that others have the right to hold and practice their beliefs. This element of objection is important. People, who take these matters seriously, often experience distress when they are confronted with religious beliefs that they regard as idolatrous, superstitious, heretical or schismatic.

Contexts of religious tolerance

At least five contexts of religious tolerance can be distinguished. Religious tolerance as a state sanctioned practice can more precisely termed civil tolerance. Civil tolerance is concerned with "the policy of the state towards religious dissent".[4] In contrast to this, ecclesiastical tolerance is concerned with the degree of diversity tolerated within a particular church.[5] Without this distinction, the Christian debate on persecution and toleration in England could not be adequately understood. Furthermore, there is also a social and a polemical context of religious tolerance. The grand theme of divine tolerance is the emphasis on "the patience and longsuffering of God" as it is frequently portrayed in the Christian Bible; This image of God has been invoked by early Christian advocates of toleration.

Hinduism has earned a reputation of being highly tolerant of other religions. Rigveda says Ekam Sath Viprah Bahudha Vadanti which translates to "The truth is One, but sages call it by different Names"[6]. This tradition is evident from the fact that India chose to be a secular country even though it was created after partitioning on religious lines.

The polemical context

Contemporary authors such as Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Daniel Dennett have all challenged the tolerance of religion. In The End of Faith, Sam Harris asserts that we should be unwilling to tolerate unjustified beliefs about morality, spirituality, politics, and the origin of humanity. In his preface to The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins says, "If this book works as I intend, religious readers who open it will be atheists when they put it down."[7]

Timeline

See also

References

  1. ^ H.A.Drake, Lambs into Lions: explaining early Christian intolerance, Past and Present 153 (1996), p.8, Oxford Journals
  2. ^ a b Walsham 2006: 233.
  3. ^ a b Walsham 2006: 234.
  4. ^ Coffey 2000: 11
  5. ^ Coffey 2000: 12
  6. ^ [1] "Hinduism - a general introduction"
  7. ^ Dawkins, Richard. Preface The God Delusion.
  8. ^ "Valerius Maximianus Galerius", Karl Hoeber, Catholic Encyclopedia 1909 Ed, retrieved 1 June 2007.[2]
  9. ^ "Constantine I", Encyclopedia Britannica 1911 Ed. retrieved 1 June 2007. [3]
  10. ^ "Johann Brenz" Encyclopedia Britannica 1911 Ed. retrieved 1 June 2007.[4]
  11. ^ "Toleration—Exercitium Religionis Privatum", Walter Grossman, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Jan - Mar., 1979), pp. 129-134, retrieved 1 June 2007.[5]
  12. ^ "The Confederation of Warsaw of 28 January 1573, UNESCO, retrieved 1 June 2007. [6]
  13. ^ "Edict of Nantes", Encyclopedia Britannica 15th Edition, retrieved 1 June 2007. [7]
  14. ^ "Rudolph II", Encyclopedia Britannica 15 Edition, retrieved 1 June 2007.[8]
  15. ^ Hasia R. Diner, The Jews of the United States, 1654 to 2000, 2004, University of California Press, ISBN 0520248481, pp. 13-15
  16. ^ "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights", United Nations 1948, retrieved 1 June 2007.[9]
  17. ^ "Dignitatis Humanae", Decree on Religious Freedom, 1965, retrieved 1 June 2007.[10]
  18. ^ "ADDRESS OF JOHN PAUL II TO THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCHES AND ECCLESIAL COMMUNITIES AND OF THE WORLD RELIGIONS" 1986, retrieved 1 June 2007.[11]
  19. ^ "Russia", Encyclopedia Britannica 15th edition, retrieved 1 June 2007.[12]

Referred literature

  • Coffey, John (2000). Persecution and Toleration in Protestant England, 1558-1689. Longman Publishing Group. ISBN 0-582-30465-2. 
  • Walsham, Alexandra (September 2006). Charitable Hatred: Tolerance and Intolerance in England, 1500-1700. Manchester University Press. ISBN 0719052394. 

Further reading

  • Barzilai, Gad (2007). Law and Religion. Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-2494-3. 
  • Beneke, Chris (September 2006). Beyond Toleration: The Religious Origins of American Pluralism. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 0-19-530555-8. 
  • Curry, Thomas J. (1989-12-19). Church and State in America to the Passage of the First Amendment. Oxford University Press; Reprint edition (December 19, 1989). ISBN 0-19-505181-5. 
  • Grell, Ole Peter, and Roy Porter, ed (2000). Toleration in Enlightenment Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521651967. 
  • Hamilton, Marci A. (2005-06-17). God vs. the Gavel: Religion and the Rule of Law. Edward R. Becker (Foreword. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-85304-4. 
  • Hanson, Charles P. (1998). Necessary Virtue: The Pragmatic Origins of Religious Liberty in New England. University Press of Virginia. ISBN 0813917948. 
  • Kaplan, Benjamin J. (2007). Divided by Faith: Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration in Early Modern Europe. Belknap Press. ISBN 0674024303. 
  • Laursen, John Christian and Nederman, Cary, ed (December 1997). Beyond the Persecuting Society: Religious Toleration Before the Enlightenment. University of Pennsylvania Press (December 1997). ISBN 0-8122-3331-X. 
  • Murphy, Andrew R. (July 2001). Conscience and Community: Revisiting Toleration and Religious Dissent in Early Modern England and America. Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0-271-02105-5. 
  • Zagorin, Perez (2003). How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-12142-7. 

External links


 
 

 

Copyrights:

British History. A Dictionary of British History. Copyright © 2001, 2004 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Religious toleration" Read more