Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

reproduce

 
('prə-dūs', -dyūs') pronunciation

v., -duced, -duc·ing, -duc·es.

v.tr.
  1. To produce a counterpart, image, or copy of.
  2. Biology. To generate (offspring) by sexual or asexual means.
  3. To produce again or anew; re-create.
  4. To bring (a memory, for example) to mind again; recall.
v.intr.
  1. To generate offspring.
  2. To undergo copying: graphics that reproduce well.
reproducer re'pro·duc'er n.
reproducibility re'pro·duc'i·bil'i·ty n.
reproducible re'pro·duc'i·ble adj.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics

is spelt -ible, not -able. See -able, -ible.

Previous:reprieve, reprehensible, reported speech
Next:reputable, request, require
Oxford Dictionary of Statistics:

reproducibility

Top

The extent to which measurements made under one set of conditions (or by one observer) can be repeated under different conditions (or by another observer).



Roget's Thesaurus:

reproduce

Top

verb

  1. To make a copy of: copy, duplicate, imitate, replicate, simulate. See same/different/compare.
  2. To produce sexually or asexually others of one's kind: breed, increase, multiply, procreate, proliferate, propagate, spawn. See reproduction/barrenness.

Antonyms by Answers.com:

reproduce

Top

v

Definition: make more of
Antonyms: destroy, stop

v

Definition: make something new; give birth
Antonyms: abort, kill


the ability to carry out a series of identical experiments to yield results that fall within a small range of error derived by statistical analysis (see standard deviation, standard error of the mean). The limits of error that are acceptable depend on the limitations of experimental technique and the inherent variability of the system under investigation.

Previous:repressor, repression, repressible
Next:reproduction, reptation, reseal
  See crossword solutions for the clue Reproduce.
Wikipedia on Answers.com:

Reproducibility

Top

Reproducibility is the degree of agreement between measurements or observations conducted on replicate specimens in different locations by different people. Reproducibility is part of the precision of a test method.[1]

Reproducibility also refers to the ability of an entire experiment or study to be reproduced, or by someone else working independently. It is one of the main principles of the scientific method. The result values are said to be commensurate if they are obtained (in distinct experimental trials) according to the same reproducible experimental description and procedure. The basic idea can be seen in Aristotle's dictum that there is no scientific knowledge of the individual, where the word used for individual in Greek had the connotation of the idiosyncratic, or wholly isolated occurrence. Thus all knowledge, all science, necessarily involves the formation of general concepts and the invocation of their corresponding symbols in language (cf. Turner).

Contents

Reproducible data

Reproducibility is one component of the precision of a test method. The other component is repeatability which is the degree of agreement of tests or measurements on replicate specimens by the same observer in the same laboratory. Both repeatability and reproducibility are usually reported as a standard deviation. A reproducibility limit is the value below which the difference between two test results obtained under reproducibility conditions may be expected to occur with a probability of approximately 0.95 (95 %). [2]

Reproducibility is determined from controlled interlaboratory test programs.[3][4]

Reproducible research

The term reproducible research was first proposed by Jon Claerbout at Stanford University and refers to the idea that the ultimate product of research is the paper along with the full computational environment used to produce the results in the paper such as the code, data, etc. necessary for reproduction of the results and building upon the research.[5][6][7]

John P. A. Ioannidis wrote:

  • While currently there is unilateral emphasis on "first" discoveries, there should be as much emphasis on replication of discoveries."[8]

While repeatability of scientific experiments is desirable, it is not considered necessary to establish the scientific validity of a theory. For example, the cloning of animals is difficult to repeat, but has been reproduced by various teams working independently, and is a well established research domain. One failed cloning does not mean that the theory is wrong or unscientific. Repeatability is often low in protosciences.

Examples of irreproducible results

In March 1989, University of Utah chemists Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann reported the production of excess heat that could only be explained by a nuclear process ("cold fusion"). The report was astounding given the simplicity of the equipment: it was essentially an electrolysis cell containing heavy water and a palladium cathode which rapidly absorbed the deuterium produced during electrolysis. The news media reported on the experiments widely, and it was a front-page item on many newspapers around the world (see science by press conference). Over the next several months others tried to replicate the experiment, but were unsuccessful.

Nikola Tesla claimed as early as 1899 to have used a high frequency current to light gas-filled lamps from over 25 miles (40 km) away without using wires. In 1904 he built Wardenclyffe Tower on Long Island to demonstrate means to send and receive power without connecting wires. The facility was never fully operational and was not completed due to economic problems.[9]

See also

References

  1. ^ ASTM E177
  2. ^ ASTM E177
  3. ^ ASTM E691 Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method
  4. ^ ASTM F1469 Standard Guide for Conducting a Repeatability and Reproducibility Study on Test Equipment for Nondestructive Testing
  5. ^ Sergey Fomel and Jon Claerbout, "Guest Editors' Introduction: Reproducible Research," Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–7, Jan./Feb. 2009, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2009.14
  6. ^ J. B. Buckheit and D. L. Donoho, "WaveLab and Reproducible Research," Dept. of Statistics, Stanford University, Tech. Rep. 474, 1995.
  7. ^ The Yale Law School Round Table on Data and Core Sharing: "Reproducible Research", Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 8–12, Sept/Oct 2010, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2010.113
  8. ^ Is the spirit of Piltdown man alive and well?
  9. ^ Cheney, Margaret(1999), Tesla Master of Lightning, New York: Barnes & Noble Books, ISBN 0-7607-1005-8, pp. 107.; “Unable to overcome his financial burdens, he was forced to close the laboratory in 1905.”

External links


Translations:

Reproduce

Top

Dansk (Danish)
v. tr. - gengive, reproducere, genskabe
v. intr. - reproducere, forplante

Nederlands (Dutch)
zich voortplanten, Kopiëren, weergeven

Français (French)
v. tr. - reproduire (tous contextes)
v. intr. - (Biol) se reproduire

Deutsch (German)
v. - wiedergeben, reproduzieren, sich vermehren

Ελληνική (Greek)
v. - αναπαράγω/-ομαι, αποδίδω, γεννώ, πολλαπλασιάζομαι, ανατυπώνω

Italiano (Italian)
riprodurre, riprodursi

Português (Portuguese)
v. - reproduzir

Русский (Russian)
воспроизводить, размножаться

Español (Spanish)
v. tr. - reproducir, representar, reproducirse, procrear
v. intr. - reproducirse, propagarse

Svenska (Swedish)
v. - reproducera, avbilda, fortplanta, återuppföra

中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
繁殖, 生殖, 翻拍, 复制, 复写, 被复制

中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
v. tr. - 繁殖, 生殖, 翻拍, 複製, 複寫
v. intr. - 繁殖, 生殖, 被複製

한국어 (Korean)
v. tr. - 재생하다, 복사하다, 전재하다
v. intr. - 생식하다, 번식하다, 복제되다

日本語 (Japanese)
v. - 再生する, 複製する, 繁殖する, 増やす

العربيه (Arabic)
‏(فعل) يعيد انتاج‏

עברית (Hebrew)
v. tr. - ‮שעתק, יצר שוב, שחזר, הוליד, העתיק, הצמיח מחדש, ראה בשנית, השמיע שוב‬
v. intr. - ‮התרבה, הצמיח מחדש‬


 
 

 

Copyrights:

American Heritage Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
 Fowler's Modern English Usage. Oxford University Press. © 1999, 2004 All rights reserved.  Read more
Oxford Dictionary of Statistics. A Dictionary of Statistics. Second edition revised. Copyright © Oxford University Press, 2008. All rights reserved.  Read more
Roget's Thesaurus. Roget's II: The New Thesaurus, Third Edition by the Editors of the American Heritage® Dictionary Copyright © 1995 byHoughton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Answers Corporation Antonyms by Answers.com. © 1999-present by Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
 Oxford Dictionary of Biochemistry. Oxford University Press. Oxford Dictionary of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology © 1997, 2000, 2006 All rights reserved.  Read more
Bradford's Crossword Solver's Dictionary. Collins Bradford's Crossword Solver's Dictionary © Anne Bradford, 1986, 1993, 1997, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2008 HarperCollins Publishers All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia on Answers.com. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article Reproducibility Read more
Translations. Copyright © 2007, WizCom Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved.  Read more

Follow us
Facebook Twitter
YouTube