Answered
What is prior restraint?
judicial suppression of material that would be published or broadcast on the grounds that are libcious or harmful
Results for: Restraint
Answered
What is uncharacteristic restraint?
Uncharacteristic restraint is restraint that is shown, at some point when it usually is not. This would be a friend who usually makes fun of you holding back for one reaso…n or another. (MORE)
Answered
What is a civil restraint?
More commonly referred to as a "restraining order" or a "no-cointact order." It is an order issued by the civil court at the request of the petitioner, if they can show suffic…ient legal grounds to be protected, from the unwanted advances of the respondant, against whom the order is issued. It is a valid court order and a violater of it can either be arrested and/or cited for contempt of court. (MORE)
Answered
What is substantive restraints?
Substantive restraints are procedural restraints used when consulting the US Bill of Rights. Substantive restraints are not usually physical restraints.
Answered
What are restraints?
Restraints are anything used to bound of hold someone or something. examples of restraints would be handcuffs, zip ties, tape.
Answered
In Uncategorized
What is fiscal restraint?
For the record, it isn't a show of "fiscal restraint" to cut funding for poor kids, especially when that funding goes toward one of the few programs that devotes itsel…f to the children of the least well-off. Head Start is not without its problems, yes, but of the policy interventions we can make into the lives of children, early-childhood education is one of the most worthwhile. Budget cuts might save a few dollars in the short term, but they would come at significant long-term cost for the country at large. Relatedly, this entire discussion over Head Start demonstrates the lopsidedness of the conversation over spending and taxes: The fight over federal spending intensified on Capitol Hill this week when two bills - the House Republican version with large cuts to Head Start and scores of other programs, and a Democratic rejoinder with far fewer trims - both failed in the Senate. As the two sides begin to bargain in earnest, it is increasingly clear that Democrats will be forced to justify the effectiveness and importance of a host of social programs singled out for cuts, while Republicans will have to grapple with the popularity of many of those programs among their constituents, and, as the case with Ms. Murkowski, in their own hearts. In a rational world -- where we acknowledged our historically low tax rates and massive tax expenditures -- The New York Times would present the opposite formulation, "It is increasingly clear that Republicans will be forced to justify the effectiveness and importance of tax cuts and low rates on investment income." Tax cuts on the rich are far more expensive and far less justifiable than spending on the least well-off, even when that spending goes toward programs of varying effectiveness. It's a testament to the influence of money on the political process that liberals must justify programs to help poor children, while Republicans can recklessly oppose any efforts to raise revenue, with little in the way of media scrutiny. (MORE)
Answered
In Definitions
What does restraint mean?
A restraint is something holding you back, like handcuffs are restraints. They are restraining you.
Answered
In Criminal Law
What is felonious restraint?
There is no such legal term. It sounds more like phraseology describing an action in which an individual attempted to restrain or stop something, but who used felonious method…s to do so. (Perhaps deadly or injurious force?) Could this be a phrase to describe unlawful confinement? (MORE)
Answered
In Technology
What is a sleep restraint?
A sleep restraint is a set of straps, probably velcro, designed to keep austronauts from floating away from their beds. Strengthened versions may also be used for people who h…ave violent sleeping disorders (MORE)
Answered
In Uncategorized
What is Judicail Restraints?
Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that says that judges should hesitate to strike down a law unless it is obviously unconstitutional. This encourages judges to …limit their own powers. (MORE)